U.S. Military Just Cleared To Use Lethal Force Against Americans During Upcoming Unrest!

Summary

The Biden and Harris Administration has issued a controversial directive, DoD Directive 52, 4.01, allowing military assistance in civil unrest, including the potential use of lethal force against civilians. This directive raises alarms as the nation approaches a contentious election, stipulating that military support requires approval from the Secretary of Defense. It outlines permissible actions, such as protecting law enforcement and providing specialized resources, while also allowing rapid mobilization in imminent danger situations without prior approval for up to 72 hours. The implications of this policy have sparked significant public concern and debate regarding civil liberties.

Takeaways

• 📜 The Biden and Harris Administration issued DoD directive 52 4.01, authorizing military assistance to law enforcement in cases of civil unrest.
• ⚔️ Military units may use lethal force against civilians if deemed necessary during situations of unrest, raising significant concerns.
• 📅 The directive was issued on September 27, amid growing tensions as the country approaches a controversial election.
• 🚨 The Secretary of Defense must approve military engagement, especially in situations that may require the use of lethal force.
• 👮‍♂️ The directive allows for various forms of assistance, including technical knowledge, specialized equipment, and personnel support to law enforcement agencies.
• 🛑 Humanitarian assistance activities and certain intelligence operations are exempt from this directive.
• ⏳ In urgent situations where lives are at risk, military units can operate for up to 72 hours without prior approval.
• 📊 Concerns have been raised about the potential for militarization of civilian law enforcement and the implications for civil liberties.
• 🔄 The directive includes a provision for military support to local and state law enforcement upon their request.
• 💬 Viewers are encouraged to engage with the content, share the information, and remain vigilant about the intersection of military and civilian authority.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the DOD directive 52-4.01?

The main focus of DOD directive 52-4.01 is to authorize military assistance to law enforcement agencies, including the potential use of lethal force against civilians during civil unrest situations.

What does the directive state about the use of lethal force?

The directive allows for the use of lethal force by military units if they are called in to respond to civil disturbances, with such actions requiring approval from the Secretary of Defense and potentially the President.

What are the approved units under this directive?

The directive applies to various components of the Department of Defense (DOD), including the Office of the Secretary of Defense, military departments, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

What kind of support can military units provide according to the directive?

Military units can provide assistance such as technical knowledge, specialized equipment, and personnel support to law enforcement agencies when lives are at risk.

Are there any exceptions to the directive's applicability?

Yes, the directive does not apply to activities conducted by the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency or humanitarian assistance efforts.

What are the potential implications of this directive in the context of upcoming elections?

The directive raises concerns about how military involvement could impact civil liberties and the potential for increased tension during a politically charged environment, such as the approaching elections.

What does subsection 3.5 of the directive entail?

Subsection 3.5 allows military units to operate without prior approval from the Secretary of Defense for up to 72 hours in situations where there is imminent risk of death or bodily injury.

How does the directive describe the cooperation between military and law enforcement agencies?

The directive emphasizes the need for cooperation between military units and law enforcement agencies to effectively respond to threats and ensure public safety.

What are the concerns raised by critics regarding this directive?

Critics are concerned that the authorization for lethal force could lead to excessive military responses to civil unrest and may infringe upon the rights of civilians.

What is the general sentiment expressed in the video regarding this directive?

The video expresses significant concern about the potential misuse of the directive and the broader implications it could have on civil rights and public safety.