3.2 Introduction to Inter State Arbitration

Leiden Learning & Innovation Centre
24 Feb 201605:53

Summary

TLDRThis video discusses the evolution, significance, and future of interstate arbitration in resolving disputes between states. It traces its historical roots from ancient Greece through the Middle Ages to its modern resurgence, particularly after the Cold War. Key points include the role of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, the flexibility and control states have in arbitration, and the process’s binding nature. The video also explores how states determine the procedural rules and laws applied, emphasizing arbitration as a politically acceptable solution for interstate disputes, with a promising future in international relations.

Takeaways

  • 🌍 Arbitration between states has a long history, dating back to ancient Greece and the Middle Ages.
  • 📜 Arbitration declined during the 18th and 19th centuries due to the rise of state sovereignty.
  • 🛡️ Modern state arbitration reemerged with the United States and the United Kingdom, leading to the creation of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 1899.
  • 📈 Since the end of the Cold War, arbitration has gained popularity, with increasing numbers of cases handled by the Permanent Court of Arbitration.
  • ⚖️ Arbitration is often used in disputes related to environmental and territorial matters, such as the 2008 conflict over the Abyei region in Sudan.
  • 🤝 Interstate arbitration provides states with control over the settlement process, including choice of arbitrators and legal frameworks.
  • 📝 Consent from both parties is necessary for arbitration, differentiating it from domestic legal systems where courts have automatic jurisdiction.
  • 🔒 States can control the level of confidentiality in arbitration proceedings, including public access to hearings and decisions.
  • 🏛️ Arbitration offers a politically acceptable solution for states to settle disputes while maintaining sovereignty and flexibility.
  • 🔮 The future of interstate arbitration looks promising due to its flexibility, which is well-suited for the decentralized nature of international society.

Q & A

  • What is the primary focus of the video?

    -The primary focus of the video is the settlement of disputes between states through arbitration, covering its history, current role, and future prospects.

  • When did interstate arbitration first emerge?

    -Interstate arbitration dates back to ancient Greece, where it was used to resolve disputes between allied states and city-states regarding independence and sovereignty.

  • How did interstate arbitration evolve in the Middle Ages?

    -In the Middle Ages, arbitration was commonly used, with figures like the Pope acting as arbitrators in disputes among states.

  • What event led to the decline of arbitration in interstate relations?

    -The 1648 Peace of Westphalia treaties, which followed the Thirty Years' War in Europe and emphasized state sovereignty, led to a decline in arbitration for interstate disputes.

  • When did modern interstate arbitration resurface, and which countries played a key role?

    -Modern interstate arbitration resurfaced in the 18th and 19th centuries, with significant contributions from the United States and the United Kingdom, leading to the establishment of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 1899.

  • What evidence suggests an increased use of interstate arbitration since the Cold War?

    -The increased number of cases handled by the Permanent Court of Arbitration since the end of the Cold War indicates a rising preference for interstate arbitration.

  • What factors make interstate arbitration appealing to states today?

    -Interstate arbitration is appealing due to its binding decisions, control states have over the process, including choosing arbitrators, applicable laws, and procedural arrangements.

  • Why is state consent critical in interstate arbitration?

    -State consent is essential because, unlike domestic legal systems, arbitration tribunals do not have automatic jurisdiction over interstate disputes; states must agree to arbitrate specific disputes.

  • What flexibility does interstate arbitration offer to states in terms of procedural arrangements?

    -States can decide on the level of confidentiality, whether hearings are public, and if the decisions are released, which makes arbitration a politically acceptable solution for resolving disputes.

  • What is the potential future of interstate arbitration?

    -Interstate arbitration has a promising future as it accommodates state sovereignty while providing a flexible means of dispute settlement, especially in the decentralized structure of international relations.

Outlines

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Mindmap

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Keywords

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Highlights

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Transcripts

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Ähnliche Tags
Interstate ArbitrationState DisputesInternational LawConflict ResolutionTerritorial DisputesEnvironmental DisputesCourt of ArbitrationSovereigntyLegal HistoryModern Diplomacy
Benötigen Sie eine Zusammenfassung auf Englisch?