Do We Have Free Will or Are We Predetermined?

The School of Life
17 Oct 201705:48

Summary

TLDRThe video explores the long-standing philosophical debate between Free Will and Determinism, discussing how both ideas impact our lives. It argues that instead of seeking a universal answer, we should determine which perspective is more relevant to our individual situations. People may struggle with defeatism, attributing their failures to external forces, or reckless aspiration, overestimating their control over life. The Stoics provide a balanced view, likening humans to dogs tethered to a cart, with limited freedom. True wisdom lies in using reason to accept what we cannot change, finding serenity in that acceptance.

Takeaways

  • 🧠 The debate between Free Will and Determinism has been central to philosophy, starting from Ancient Greece and continuing to modern times.
  • ⚖ Free Will suggests that humans have the ability to shape their actions and lives, while Determinism implies that external forces like fate, biology, or politics control them.
  • 📜 The Stoics provided a balanced view, stating that we are neither fully free nor fully determined, but exist somewhere between the two states.
  • 🌀 The ancient Stoic analogy compares humans to dogs tied to a cart, symbolizing that we have some freedom but are also bound by external constraints.
  • 😟 High levels of Defeatism lead people to blame outside forces for their failures, resulting in underachievement and avoidance of personal responsibility.
  • 🚀 Excessive Aspiration, driven by an exaggerated belief in Free Will, can lead to disappointment and frustration when inevitable setbacks occur.
  • 🎯 The debate becomes more meaningful when individuals personalize it, considering whether Free Will or Determinism is more relevant to their lives.
  • 🔄 According to the Stoics, we cannot always change events, but we can change our attitude toward them, finding serenity in accepting what we cannot control.
  • đŸ—ïž Reason helps humans understand their limitations and adjust expectations, preventing unnecessary conflict with reality.
  • đŸŒ± The School of Life encourages developing emotional intelligence, offering tools to help people understand and navigate these philosophical ideas.

Q & A

  • What is the central debate in the history of philosophy discussed in the script?

    -The central debate discussed is the philosophical conflict between Free Will and Determinism, which explores whether human actions are shaped by personal choice or determined by forces beyond control.

  • Why is it difficult to find a conclusive answer to the Free Will vs. Determinism debate?

    -The debate is difficult to resolve because it is often framed in objective terms, seeking a universal truth for all humans, instead of considering individual differences in psychological needs such as levels of Defeatism or Aspiration.

  • What are the two contrasting psychological qualities mentioned in the script?

    -The two contrasting psychological qualities are Defeatism, where individuals attribute their life outcomes to external forces, and Aspiration, where individuals believe they can control every aspect of their lives through willpower.

  • How does excessive Defeatism affect an individual's life?

    -Excessive Defeatism leads individuals to blame external factors, such as parents, government, or society, for their life circumstances, resulting in underachievement and self-deception.

  • What is the danger of having an exaggerated notion of Free Will?

    -An exaggerated belief in Free Will can lead individuals to think they can change all aspects of their lives, which may result in frustration and bitterness when things don’t go as expected.

  • How should individuals decide whether to believe more in Free Will or Determinism?

    -Individuals should reflect on their personal lives and determine whether their suffering stems more from a defeatist attitude or from reckless aspirations, adjusting their beliefs accordingly to find balance.

  • What is the Stoic view on Free Will and Determinism?

    -The Stoics proposed a balance between Free Will and Determinism, using the metaphor of a dog tied to a cart. Humans have some freedom but are always limited by external forces, and serenity comes from accepting what cannot be changed.

  • How does the Stoic metaphor of the dog and the cart help explain our relationship with destiny?

    -The Stoic metaphor illustrates that while we have some leeway in life (like the dog on a leash), we are also bound by uncontrollable external factors (the cart). Understanding and accepting these limitations reduces frustration.

  • How can reason help us navigate between Free Will and Determinism?

    -Reason allows us to predict and understand the relationship between our desires and external events, helping us decide when to accept necessity and when to assert our will, ultimately leading to more freedom and peace.

  • What is the ultimate message about balancing Free Will and Determinism for a fulfilled life?

    -The script suggests that to live a calmer and more fulfilled life, individuals should personally assess how much faith to place in Free Will or Determinism, recognizing when to accept the unchangeable and when to pursue change.

Outlines

00:00

đŸ€” The Debate Between Free Will and Determinism

The ongoing debate between Free Will and Determinism has shaped philosophy for centuries, from Ancient Greece to modern times. At its core, it questions whether humans are free to make choices or are controlled by external forces like fate or biology. The problem is often addressed objectively, but it becomes more insightful when viewed subjectively—whether Free Will or Determinism is more relevant to an individual’s psychological makeup. People differ in their levels of Defeatism and Aspiration, which impacts how much responsibility they assign to external forces or themselves. Excessive Defeatism can lead to underachievement, while extreme Aspiration based on Free Will can cause frustration when goals aren’t met. Striking the right balance between the two is crucial for personal fulfillment.

05:01

đŸ¶ The Stoic Philosophy on Free Will and Determinism

Stoic philosophers proposed a middle ground between Free Will and Determinism, suggesting that humans, like dogs tied to a cart, have limited freedom. The leash allows some movement, but ultimately external forces pull us in directions we can’t fully control. The wise course is not to resist when it’s impossible to change outcomes but to accept the limits of freedom with reason. Unlike a dog, humans can use reason to understand and predict when resistance is futile, helping to reduce frustration. Stoics argue that understanding our limits and adjusting our desires accordingly brings us serenity and a deeper sense of freedom.

🧠 Emotional Intelligence and Acceptance

At The School of Life, developing emotional intelligence is key to handling the philosophical tension between Free Will and Determinism. The ability to accept the things we cannot change, while maintaining the freedom to choose our attitude towards them, leads to a unique form of serenity. By embracing what is necessary and letting go of unrealistic desires, we can find freedom and peace. The School of Life provides resources to help individuals cultivate this emotional awareness.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Free Will

Free Will refers to the concept that individuals have the power to make choices and control their own actions. In the video, it contrasts with Determinism, highlighting the idea that some people believe they can shape their lives through their decisions. Those with high levels of Aspiration tend to emphasize Free Will, but the script warns that this can lead to frustration and disappointment when things do not go as planned.

💡Determinism

Determinism is the idea that events, including human actions, are governed by external forces beyond one's control, such as fate, biology, or social conditions. In the video, it is presented as the opposite of Free Will. Some people with high levels of Defeatism adopt Determinism to explain their lack of control over life outcomes, leading to underachievement and self-deception.

💡Defeatism

Defeatism is a psychological state where individuals believe they have no control over their circumstances, attributing failure to external forces. In the video, those who lean too much toward Determinism exhibit Defeatism, resulting in radical underachievement. This outlook limits personal growth by removing responsibility for one’s life.

💡Aspiration

Aspiration refers to the drive or ambition to improve and achieve personal goals. In the context of the video, people with high Aspiration may overemphasize Free Will, leading them to believe they can control all aspects of their life. This mindset can result in bitterness when they encounter inevitable setbacks beyond their control.

💡Stoicism

Stoicism is a school of philosophy from Ancient Rome that teaches the importance of accepting what is beyond our control and focusing on what we can influence. The video uses Stoicism to suggest that individuals should balance Free Will and Determinism, accepting limitations while still taking responsibility for their actions. The Stoics offer a middle path, advocating for reasoned judgment in navigating life's challenges.

💡Dog and Cart Metaphor

The Dog and Cart metaphor, from Stoic philosophy, illustrates the balance between freedom and external limitations. In the video, humans are likened to dogs tied to a cart, with limited freedom to move but not complete control over their direction. The metaphor helps convey the Stoic idea of adjusting one’s mindset to realities one cannot change, finding peace in that acceptance.

💡Philosophy

Philosophy, in this context, refers to the long-standing intellectual debate over Free Will versus Determinism. The script notes that this debate has spanned centuries, from Ancient Greece to modern times, involving philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists. It highlights how this philosophical discussion has been central to understanding human nature and behavior.

💡Christian Philosophy

Christian Philosophy, mentioned briefly in the script, is the period when theological ideas about Free Will and Determinism played a dominant role in shaping the debate. The discussion around predestination and human responsibility was integral to Christian theological views, which influenced Western philosophical thought.

💡Emotional Intelligence

Emotional Intelligence refers to the ability to understand and manage one's emotions. In the context of the video, emotional intelligence is about finding a balance between Free Will and Determinism, making peace with life’s uncontrollable elements while focusing on areas one can change. The video emphasizes that emotional intelligence helps individuals achieve a calmer and more fulfilled life.

💡Reason

Reason is the human capacity to think logically and make judgments. In the video, reason is portrayed as the key tool that allows individuals to discern what they can and cannot control, offering freedom through understanding. Unlike a dog tied to a cart, humans can use reason to predict outcomes and adjust their desires, reducing frustration with the inevitable.

Highlights

The debate between Free Will and Determinism has dominated philosophy, starting in Ancient Greece and continuing to this day.

The core issue is whether human beings are fundamentally free to choose their actions or are determined by forces beyond their control, such as fate, biology, politics, or class.

The question of Free Will versus Determinism becomes more interesting when framed personally, rather than objectively, focusing on what is more relevant to the individual.

Each person’s perspective on Free Will or Determinism depends on their levels of Defeatism and Aspiration.

People with high levels of Defeatism often believe their lives are controlled by external forces, leading to under-achievement and self-deceit.

On the other hand, those with exaggerated notions of Free Will may believe they can change everything in their lives, leading to frustration and bitterness when things don't work out.

The debate between Free Will and Determinism isn’t beyond resolution but should be answered personally, considering how much of one’s suffering stems from defeatism or reckless aspiration.

Ancient Roman Stoic philosophers offered a middle ground between Free Will and Determinism.

The Stoics used the metaphor of a dog tied to a cart to illustrate how humans have a degree of freedom but are still subject to external forces beyond their control.

The Stoics advised that it’s better to trot along with the cart (fate) than to resist and suffer.

Stoicism encourages accepting what is necessary without passivity, as it’s equally unreasonable to resist what is inevitable or to accept what isn’t.

Reason allows humans to understand when their desires are in conflict with reality, providing a unique sense of freedom.

The ability to calculate the path of the ‘cart’ or destiny allows individuals to adjust their desires, creating more slack and reducing suffering.

Though we cannot change certain events, we remain free to choose our attitude toward them, leading to serenity and freedom.

At The School of Life, the focus is on developing emotional intelligence and offering products to support personal growth.

Transcripts

play00:00

The history of philosophy has been dominated by competing arguments around the ideas of

play00:06

Free Will and Determinism. Simply stated, the issue hangs on whether human beings should

play00:12

be thought of as fundamentally free to choose their actions and mould their lives – or

play00:17

whether they should be deemed as being at heart determined by forces beyond their control,

play00:23

be they fate, biology, politics or class. The debate has been long-running and hugely

play00:30

vicious. It began in Ancient Greece, was picked up by the Romans, dominated Christian philosophy

play00:35

and rumbles on to this day among philosophers, psychologists and neuroscientists. Part of

play00:42

the reason why the question seems so hard to find a conclusive answer to is that it

play00:46

is almost always framed in objective terms, as if we might discover whether either Free

play00:51

Will or Determinism could be an advisable interpretation for human beings in general.

play00:57

But, in truth, the debate becomes more interesting and more relevant if we change the parameters

play01:02

of the question – and ask simply: is an idea of Free Will or of Determinism more or

play01:08

less relevant to me? All of us will have different needs in this area depending on our contrasting

play01:15

levels of two psychological qualities: Defeatism on the one hand, Aspiration on the other.

play01:22

There are people whose levels of Defeatism have grown so high, they too readily declare

play01:28

that responsibility for things always lies outside of themselves: the course of their

play01:33

life is, they tell us, entirely determined by parents, school, the government, the bosses,

play01:39

the media
 anyone but themselves. The result is radical under-achievement and self-deceit.

play01:46

But there is another kind of difficulty created in people whose levels of Aspiration have

play01:50

grown so high on the basis of overly exaggerated notions of Free Will. They will deem that

play01:56

everything about their lives is capable of change. They will declare that they can achieve

play02:00

all things simply through an exercise of the will. Their career and income, their relationships

play02:06

and prospects are all, apparently, subject to dramatic change. It’s an inspiring philosophy,

play02:12

but one that reliably also leads – when things don’t work out, as they never do

play02:16

in all areas – to bitterness and rage. Each of us needs to decide for ourselves whether

play02:23

we should have a greater faith in Determinism or in Free Will. We should ask how much of

play02:29

the suffering in our lives can be traced back to a defeatist attitude and how much might

play02:33

be traced back to reckless aspiration. Some of us need to dial up a faith in Free Will,

play02:39

others need more of a mellow acceptance of Determinism. The oldest debate in philosophy

play02:44

isn’t beyond answering. We just have to answer it more personally, with more of a

play02:48

sense of what we need to believe in to be calmer and more fulfilled. Perhaps the wisest

play02:58

way to navigate the debate between Free Will and Determinism was worked out by the Ancient

play03:03

Roman philosophers of the Stoic school. These Stoics proposed that we should see ourselves

play03:08

as always hovering between a Free and a Determined state – and they invented a powerful image

play03:14

to evoke our condition as creatures able at times to effect great change – and yet never

play03:20

far from being subject to immensely powerful external necessities. We are, they said, like

play03:27

dogs who have been tied to an unpredictable cart. Our leash is long enough to give us

play03:33

a degree of leeway, but is not long enough ever just to allow us to wander wherever we

play03:38

please. A dog will naturally hope to go wherever it pleases, said the Stoics. But if it cannot,

play03:44

then it is better for the animal to be trotting behind the cart rather than dragged and strangled

play03:51

by it. To reflect that we too are never without a leash around our neck may help to reduce

play03:58

the violence of our protest against events which veer away from our intentions. It may

play04:04

sound like a recipe for passivity, but as the Stoics insisted, it is no less unreasonable

play04:09

to accept something as necessary when it isn’t as to rebel against something when it is.

play04:15

It’s our reason that must judge the difference and this is where we have a big advantage

play04:21

over a dog. A dog will probably not at first grasp that he is even tied to a cart, nor

play04:27

understand the connection between the swerves of the cart and the pain in his neck. So he

play04:32

won’t be able to predict where the cart is going and adjust his position accordingly.

play04:36

But reason enables us to theorise with considerable accuracy about the path of the cart or destiny,

play04:43

which offers us a chance, unique among living beings, to increase our sense of freedom by

play04:48

ensuring a good slack between our desires and what we cannot change. Reason allows us

play04:55

to calculate when our wishes are in irrevocable conflict with reality, and then bids us to

play05:00

submit ourselves willingly, rather than angrily or bitterly, to necessities. We may be powerless

play05:07

to alter certain events, but we remain free to choose our attitude towards them, and it

play05:14

is in an unprotesting acceptance of what is truly necessary that we can find a distinctive serenity and freedom.

play05:26

At The School of Life we believe in developing emotional intelligence.

play05:31

To that end we've also created a whole range of products to support that growth. Find out

play05:36

more at the link on the screen now.

Rate This
★
★
★
★
★

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Ähnliche Tags
Free WillDeterminismPhilosophyStoicismEmotional IntelligencePersonal GrowthPsychologyAspirationDefeatismLife Balance
Benötigen Sie eine Zusammenfassung auf Englisch?