Justin Trudeau's new bill SHUTS ME DOWN and makes your opinion ILLEGAL.

Summary

In this video, the host discusses censorship issues surrounding Bill C63 and the Canadian government's restrictions on free speech, particularly regarding online content and political commentary. The host shares a personal experience of having a YouTube livestream demonetized for showing a parody clip, emphasizing the growing limitations on free expression. The video also highlights concerns about proposed legislation, such as criminalizing dissent on certain historical events like residential schools. The host calls for open discussion, urging viewers to reflect on the implications of such censorship in Canada’s democracy.

Takeaways

• 😀 The video introduces the 'Friday Night Fringe' live stream, where the host and his wife discuss politics, share memes, and engage with the community.
• 😄 A clip from a previous stream was demonetized by YouTube, which the host claims is a result of internet censorship, particularly involving a parody of Justin Trudeau.
• 😅 The host discusses Bill C63 and Justin Trudeau's efforts to limit free speech under the guise of protecting families and children from online harm.
• 😇 The host claims that censorship is becoming more prominent, citing his demonetized content as an example of how YouTube suppresses voices critical of the government.
• 🤔 The host criticizes how independent media, like Rebel News, is being marginalized and even denied journalistic accreditation and funding in Canada.
• 🙄 A portion of the video touches on a new Canadian law proposed by an NDP MP, which would criminalize denial or downplaying of the residential school system's harm, framing it as hate speech.
• 😲 The host expresses skepticism about some claims surrounding the unmarked graves of indigenous children, stating there is insufficient evidence, and warns against the potential consequences of silencing opposing views.
• 😡 The video raises concerns that censorship could be expanded beyond Indigenous issues, with broader implications for free speech in Canada.
• 😳 The host criticizes the government’s control over online content, linking this to the broader issue of Bill C63, which he claims is designed to stifle free expression on the internet.
• 😎 The video concludes with a call for the audience to engage in the conversation, participate in the weekly Friday live stream, and resist government overreach by supporting the channel.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the video discussed in the transcript?

The main topic of the video revolves around censorship, specifically related to Bill C63 in Canada, internet censorship, and how it affects free speech. The creator also touches on demonetization issues on YouTube and the government's actions in controlling narratives.

What is Bill C63, according to the speaker?

Bill C63 is described as a Canadian law proposed to limit free speech under the guise of protecting families and children from online harms. The speaker argues that it’s more about censorship and silencing voices critical of the government, specifically those critical of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

How does the speaker describe YouTube's censorship of their content?

The speaker explains that YouTube demonetized their stream for showing a parody clip of Justin Trudeau, claiming it infringed on copyright due to featuring footage from Stephen Colbert's show. Despite the parody being protected under fair use, YouTube refused to lift the demonetization.

What example does the speaker give of parody content that was demonetized by YouTube?

The speaker shares an example of a dubbed video featuring an altered interview of Justin Trudeau, in which Trudeau humorously claims Fidel Castro is his father and admits to liking blackface. This parody was flagged and demonetized by YouTube.

What concerns does the speaker raise about Bill C63 and freedom of speech?

The speaker is concerned that Bill C63 will criminalize individuals for expressing opinions that disagree with the government. They fear that speaking against the official narrative on sensitive issues could lead to jail time, essentially eroding freedom of speech in Canada.

How does the speaker connect YouTube's actions to the broader topic of government censorship?

The speaker suggests that YouTube’s demonetization of their content is part of a broader trend where the government, particularly Justin Trudeau’s administration, is using its influence to control narratives on platforms like YouTube by suppressing content critical of the government.

What are the speaker’s views on residential school denialism and the proposed amendment to criminalize it?

The speaker questions the lack of proof regarding some claims about unmarked graves at residential schools, particularly referencing the Kamloops case. They believe that while residential schools were tragic, criminalizing dissenting opinions without concrete evidence sets a dangerous precedent for free speech.

What does the speaker say about the future impact of Bill C63 on content creators?

The speaker warns that Bill C63 could lead to further suppression of content creators, especially those who express views contrary to the government. They mention that creators could face legal consequences simply for sharing opinions or discussing controversial topics.

What additional example does the speaker provide to show government control over media narratives?

The speaker points to Rebel News being denied government subsidies and journalistic recognition, stating that this is another example of the government controlling media by limiting the reach of outlets critical of the government.

What does the speaker encourage the audience to do in response to the censorship they describe?

The speaker encourages viewers to subscribe, like, and comment on their videos to help push back against YouTube’s algorithm, which they believe suppresses content that challenges government narratives. They also urge viewers to join their live streams for open discussions on political issues.

Outlines

00:00

🎥 Introduction and Friday Night Stream Recap

The speaker welcomes viewers to their channel, referencing a recent Friday night live stream with their wife. The stream involved community interaction, funny clips, and discussions about politics. They encourage viewers to subscribe and join future live streams. The speaker briefly mentions Bill C63 and internet censorship, criticizing Justin Trudeau's efforts to limit free speech under the guise of protecting families from online harms.

05:01

📺 Parody Video and YouTube Censorship

The speaker recalls showing a parody video during the live stream, in which Justin Trudeau humorously admits to controversial claims, like Fidel Castro being his father and his fondness for blackface. The video, although a parody, was flagged by YouTube for copyright infringement. Despite filing an appeal, the video remained demonetized, which the speaker views as an example of growing censorship on the platform. They argue that the video was fair use and that YouTube’s actions reflect a broader suppression of content that criticizes Trudeau.

10:01

⚖️ The Impact of Bill C63 on Free Speech

The speaker transitions to discussing Bill C63 and its potential to suppress free speech. They express concern about how the Canadian government, led by Trudeau, is censoring independent media and stifling opinions that challenge the official narrative. They point out the demonetization and suppression of certain creators, alleging that YouTube, influenced by the government, is preventing content critical of Trudeau from reaching audiences.

📢 Residential School Denialism and the Criminalization of Dissent

The speaker critiques a new bill proposed by the NDP that would criminalize denialism regarding the residential school system in Canada. They highlight a tweet from Harrison Fauler, expressing opposition to the bill, which could classify opinions that deny or downplay the system's atrocities as hate speech. The speaker acknowledges the harm caused by residential schools but stresses the importance of proof when making serious claims. They suggest that criminalizing differing views on historical events sets a dangerous precedent for free speech.

🧑‍⚖️ Concerns About Expanding Censorship

The speaker emphasizes the broader implications of the proposed legislation, questioning where such censorship could lead beyond the issue of indigenous rights. They argue that allowing the government to criminalize differing opinions could extend to other areas, like criticism of Trudeau's policies, and recall past instances where the government used questionable science to justify its actions. The speaker highlights the potential dangers of limiting public discourse.

🛑 Slippery Slope of Limiting Free Speech

The speaker reflects on the slippery slope of government censorship, noting how virtue signaling and overprotective laws could expand to stifle dissent across multiple topics, not just indigenous issues. They reiterate the need for open debate, evidence, and the preservation of free speech, warning that such laws could target not only public opinions but also independent media and content creators.

📢 Final Thoughts and Call to Action

The speaker closes by encouraging viewers to leave comments and share their opinions on Bill C63 and the criminalization of dissent. They note that a conservative MP, Michelle Rempel Garner, is proposing an amendment to the bill to protect children without infringing on free speech. The speaker invites the audience to join future discussions in their live streams and to engage with their content by liking and subscribing, especially to counteract YouTube’s algorithm, which they believe suppresses their videos.

Keywords

💡Bill C63

Bill C63 refers to legislation in Canada discussed in the video, which is associated with internet censorship and limitations on free speech. The speaker argues that this bill, while framed as protecting families and children from online harms, is actually a means for the government, particularly Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, to control dissent and suppress criticism of the government.

💡Censorship

Censorship is a central theme in the video, with the speaker discussing how platforms like YouTube and the Canadian government allegedly censor content that goes against their views. The speaker mentions how their live stream was demonetized for parody content, framing this as an example of censorship infringing on freedom of speech under Bill C63.

💡Fair use

Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the rights holders, typically for purposes like criticism, comment, parody, or news reporting. In the video, the speaker argues that their use of a parody video should be protected under fair use, but claims YouTube unjustly demonetized their content despite this protection.

💡Parody

Parody refers to content that imitates another work or person in a humorous way. In the video, the speaker discusses using a parody of Justin Trudeau's interview, where his voice is dubbed to say humorous and controversial things. The speaker believes the parody is harmless and falls under fair use, but claims that YouTube’s decision to demonetize their stream shows how censorship can target even comedic expressions.

💡Justin Trudeau

Justin Trudeau, the Prime Minister of Canada, is a focal point in the video. The speaker portrays him as a leader attempting to suppress free speech and criticism, especially online. The speaker references Trudeau in discussions about Bill C63, framing him as the architect of restrictive policies that limit dissenting voices on the internet.

💡Hate speech

Hate speech refers to abusive or threatening speech that expresses prejudice against a particular group. The video mentions that under new Canadian laws, particularly in relation to indigenous peoples and residential school history, certain forms of speech could be classified as hate speech, criminalizing opinions that contradict official government narratives.

💡Residential schools

Residential schools were institutions in Canada where Indigenous children were forcibly enrolled, leading to widespread abuse and cultural erasure. The video discusses a new bill that criminalizes denial of the harms caused by these schools, framing it as another example of censorship. The speaker emphasizes that while some injustices were real, they question whether all claims are substantiated.

💡Rebel News

Rebel News is a right-leaning Canadian media outlet that the speaker mentions as a victim of censorship by the government. The video claims that Rebel News has been excluded from search results and denied journalistic recognition and subsidies, portraying this as evidence of political suppression of independent media.

💡Demonetization

Demonetization refers to the removal of a content creator’s ability to earn money from their videos. In the video, the speaker mentions how their live stream was demonetized by YouTube due to the inclusion of a parody video. They argue that this is an unfair application of censorship, as their content falls under fair use, yet they still faced economic penalties.

💡Freedom of speech

Freedom of speech is the right to express one's opinions without government interference or censorship. The speaker repeatedly emphasizes this right in the video, arguing that Canadian government policies like Bill C63 threaten this freedom by criminalizing dissent and limiting what can be said about political leaders, sensitive topics like residential schools, and other contentious issues.

Highlights

Introduction to The Fringe's Friday night live stream with Mrs. Fringe

Call to action for viewers to subscribe and enable notifications for live streams

Discussion on Bill C63 and internet censorship

Criticism of Justin Trudeau's attempt to limit speech on the internet

Humorous video involving Justin Trudeau was demonetized by YouTube

Explanation of parody as fair use and YouTube's response

Concerns about the implications of Bill C63 on free speech

Mentions of other outlets like True North and Rebel News facing censorship

The potential for jail time for expressing opinions the government disagrees with

NDP's bill on a National Day of Reconciliation and its implications for free speech

Critique of the lack of physical evidence to support certain claims about residential schools

Discussion on the potential slippery slope of government-enforced opinions

Concerns about the impact of government control on media and information

The importance of freedom of speech in a democratic society

Invitation for viewer engagement in the comments section

Reminder about the live streaming show 'Friday Night Fringe' and its schedule

Transcripts

oh

yeah what's going on ladies and

gentlemen welcome back to The Fringe if

you joined me here on the Channel with

my beautiful wife Mrs Fringe on Friday

for Friday night Fringe this past week

which if you haven't already you really

should be hitting that subscribe button

and your bell for notifications to join

us for every week on our Friday Night

live streams we showed some funny clips

in that stream we always use that time

to sit down and chat with the community

not just about things that have happened

in the past week with politics but we

have some laughs we talk about some

quirky fun things sometimes we show

memes sometimes we share different

materials that are kind of fun to give

everybody a light-hearted jab at what's

happening in our society now I won't be

playing the clip today but uh it ties

into what's happening with Bill

C63 and internet sensorship now we all

know that Justin Trudeau is trying to

limit everyone's speech when it comes to

the internet that he says it's to

protect families and children from

online harms when really it's about

Justin Trudeau not really enjoying

anybody making fun of him they don't

like when people talk against their

rhetoric I do have a video coming up to

prove that later on in this video but I

wanted to talk specifically about the

live stream because in that video I

showed a clip of an altered version of

the interview from when Justin trau

embarrassingly sat on Steven colar this

past week uh to which it was a a a

dubbed video of Trudeau saying that

Fidel Castro was his father that his

mother was with MC Jagger that you know

all the that he likes blackface like

that Canada hates him it was a really

funny video now again I won't be showing

that clip in here uh you can always go

back and watch it from Friday night's

live stream uh but but the reason I'm

bringing that up is because censorship

is Alive and Well YouTube actually

demonetized the stream and said that

this was a clip from Steven kar's actual

Show Now what's funny about that

is that parody is part of fair use there

is no ruling against using uh dubbed

audio to make fun of a political figure

now evidently I figured at this time hey

maybe this is a problem uh maybe their

algorithm automatically detected that

you know because there were images of Co

bear because the voice sounds like Co

bear because Justin Trudeau's there in

the voice sounds like Justin tau's voice

that perhaps they just mistakenly

thought that this was part of interview

with Steven coar and I was in fact

ripping off the show as the strike

against the

channel titled Steven kar's episode so

of course like any normal YouTuber I did

my due diligence I filed a uh request to

have that removed I stated my case that

hey this is a dubbed parody of the

interview there is no copyright

infringing material that we took from

this it was all in good fun it was part

of it was part of parody which is

covered by fair use um and where I say

censorship is alive and well is that

even after proving that YouTube still

shot down the video still demonetized it

and said nope uh we're not going to

allow that to fly you're you're still

taking copyright material from Steven

colar uh and dispersing it on the

internet

now what's funny about that is that

censorship has already began now I

really don't care if they demonetize a

live stream that's part of the nature of

the business and I put that video out

because I thought it was bloody

hilarious and I still think it's

hilarious but what's funny about C63 as

we get closer to the Amendments that are

being made on C63 is that Justin Trudeau

is always saying well we're not trying

to censor online creators we've already

seen them censoring outfits like True

North like Rebel news from being found

in common Google search results we've

seen recently that Rebel news was denied

uh their credits for filing as a

journalist outfit uh they've been told

that they will not be getting any

government subsidies for uh journalistic

business practices they weren't being

recognized as a journalistic

institution uh and now we're starting to

see that people's free speech is being

taken away and it's going to be taken

away in fact if you say certain things

now that the government doesn't like

well you can be jailed you're going to

be jailed for having an opinion or

expressing your opinions now we've seen

already and the reason I brought up the

YouTube stream uh is because Justin

Trudeau has obviously we've already seen

millions of dollars being funneled out

to companies like Google who own YouTube

to be told hey if you're talking

negatively about Captain tampon uh we're

not going to boost those videos we're

not going to put them in our algorithm

and now we're getting to the point where

even if you haven't done anything wrong

if you haven't tripped over any lines

which again I've checked thoroughly with

other creators I've checked with other

uh people who work on the platform and

they've all said the same thing this is

fair use um that Google Now is starting

to say n we're just not going to allow

it because we just don't want too no

reasoning behind it they're just going

to demonetize they're going to shut it

down um and now the NDP who are in bed

with the Liberals tbling a bill about a

National Day of Reconciliation which is

coming up saying that if you don't agree

with

their statements their

rhetoric you can be charged with ha

speech you can go to jail in fact making

this video could essentially have me

landed with hate speech so it's far

beyond having a

demonetized we've got here Harrison

fauler tweeting out radical leftist NDP

MP just tabled a bill that would

criminalize so-called residential school

denialism if passed it would be illegal

in Canada to say that the residential

school system was not a genocide which

it was not this is totally insane now

again this is Harrison fauler opinion

now I will say that when you look at

what happened in residential schools

from children being taken from their

families being forced to speak English

languages the treatment that they got of

course I don't agree with a lot of that

um I'm I'm grateful for what's happened

with residential schools but essentially

what we're talking about here when it

comes to uh the Day of Reconciliation is

in fact it's often used to

highlight uh the supposed alleged and

I'm going to say alleged YouTube because

we haven't found any proof yet um

unmarked Graves of hundreds of

indigenous children

now the reason I bring that up we've

covered it to a great extent here on the

channel if somebody or some outfit wants

to provide me with some kind of physical

proof that they have found the remains

of abused children I will happily report

on that I will happily

agree that that portion of what is

discussed is a travesty but essentially

what you're seeing

here um and I'm referring to the

residential school in cam loops where

again they've done uh thermal scans of

the area they've found tree roots so far

there hasn't

been to my

knowledge Again YouTube to my knowledge

a single body found as of yet to share

the evidence of what the government is

virtue signaling um but essentially this

bill saying that if you don't agree with

that you can be charged with hate speech

you can um if you're going to deny it

that's a hate crime this all ties into

C63 coming to def fruition and

essentially being told here that even if

you share a different view or opinion

than the

government you're a criminal let's take

a listen to the absurdity of what's

being proposed in the House of Commons M

gazan seconded by Mout moves for leave

to introduce a bill entitled an act to

amend the criminal code promotion of

hatred against indigenous peoples this

motion is deemed adopted The Honorable

member from Winnipeg Mr Speaker speaker

today I Rise to table an act to amend

the criminal code promotion of hatred

against indigenous peoples if pass this

bill would add to the criminal code the

offense of willfully promoting hatred

against indigenous peoples by condoning

denying justifying or downplaying the

harm caused by the residential school

system in Canada calling irrefutable

historical facts into question a

genocidal project that was recognized as

as such unanimously in the house so I

just want to pause on that because again

it's saying that if you have a different

opinion if you feel that their statement

of events is in any way misconstrued or

that again like me you just want some

form of proof of what they're

saying it's a hate speech now she's

saying that the house unanimously stood

behind that um that the house identified

that what happened was a travesty and

again there were certain things that

went on in residential schools that

again I I um I don't support that I

condemn however when talking about

certain aspects of residential

schools I think that if you're going to

State those claims if you're going to

make those claims you should have proof

behind it and this has nothing to do

with indigenous people the reason this

is a slippery slope is because you have

an indigenous

MP who

coming out and saying you're going to

agree with what we say or else it's a

hate crime where does it end outside of

indigenous where does it end for if you

don't agree with Justin Trudeau it's a

hate crime uh you think back to the

pandemic when they talked about science

when they talked about we have experts

who um are are Towing the line for us

that are saying that everything is

irrefutable and all these years later we

find that certain things in fact were

not irrefutable at all they were just

merely people lining their pockets being

told again to tow a line and convey a

message so if this is adopted out of

virtue signaling out of saying well you

know we want to look after the

indigenous we want to make sure we don't

offend anybody we don't want to be

racist where does this kind of ability

to push for these kinds of

criminal attributes will say and in

terms of Canadian citizens being allowed

to have an opinion to voice their

opinions to again require a discussion

and proof of what's being stated before

they approve of or deny what took place

somewhere survivors and their families

deserve to heal from this

intergenerational tragedy and be free

from violent hate and we cannot allow

their safety and well-being to be put

further at risk all parliamentarians

must stand firm against all forms of

damaging hate speech including the not

the the denial of the tragedy of the

residential schools in Canada and at a

time of increasing residential school

denialism including from some

parliamentarians survivors their

families and communities need protection

and a platform to share our history in

honor of orange shirt day I extend this

gift to you on behalf of me and all of

my colleagues may you find Justice and

healing in the protection

of your stories thank you very

much so again I don't want to downplay

anybody's personal experiences or say

that uh anybody is wrong for the things

that have happened in their families um

for those who do suffer any kind of

Injustice of course you want them to

feel uh as though justice has been

served however the government coming out

and saying that anyone who has a

difference in opinion is a criminal is a

very slippery slope again this has

nothing to do with indigenous this has

to do with where this can be extended

into day-to-day life and of course with

the government we've always seen that if

you give an inch they take a mile when

we talk about the online harms act when

we talk about censoring videos when we

talk about shutting down content

creators when we talk about shutting

down Independent Media that isn't funded

by the government and shield paid

prostitutes what does this mean for how

you absorb your information what does

this mean for how you get your news what

does this mean for stating your opinion

in a country that's supposed to have the

protection of freedom of speech let me

know what you guys think Down Below in

the comments do you agree with this do

you agree uh with the criminality that's

going on do you agree with uh Bill

C63 um do you think that again things

are going to get better now it is worth

noting before we quit the video that

Michelle rmle Garnier of the

conservatives has said that she's going

to propose an amendment to Bill C63 and

that she does agree with certain aspects

of it in terms of protecting children

that again without the requirement of a

digital ID that uh people can

essentially protect their kids online if

that in fact is the worry but what we're

talking about here the the barbaric

nature of how Bill C63 has been

constructed is essentially to silence

people on the internet when the

government doesn't like what you're

saying let me know what you guys think

Down Below in the the comments if it's

your first time here I hope this video

has earned your subscription make sure

to leave a thumbs up or a comment down

below if you enjoyed this video again

when we talk about these things on the

channel they always get pushed down

YouTube again once doesn't like pushing

it out because that's their job uh but

it does help us get a little bit above

that algorithm so if you enjoyed the

content leave a thumbs up and a Content

comment down below if you're hitting

that subscribe button also make sure to

click on your bell for notifications and

join me once again live here on the

channel each and every Friday night for

Friday night Fringe our live streaming

show where we're going to go over

everything that happened in the previous

week in politics everything coming up in

the week ahead as well as some back and

forth with our community especially ones

that get us banned and shut down on

YouTube those are always the fun ones uh

it all goes down here on the channel

every Friday at 6 P p.m. Pacific 800

p.m. Central and I look forward to

seeing each and every one of you there

this upcoming Friday I hope you guys

enjoy this video and have a great rest

of your day I'll catch you on the next

one