Putin Humiliated as Nuclear Missile Explodes in RUSSIA!
Summary
TLDRThe video discusses a failed Russian nuclear missile test, the RS28 Sarmat, which was intended as a show of force but exploded on the ground. It highlights Russia's repeated warnings to NATO and the West about using nuclear weapons, and analyzes the credibility of these threats. The script also touches on the potential consequences if NATO were to allow Ukraine to strike inside Russia with Western weapons, and includes a response from a British official reminding Russia of Britain's nuclear capabilities.
Takeaways
- 🚀 Russia experienced a nuclear missile explosion during a test meant to demonstrate its military strength.
- 😅 The incident occurred at the intended launch site, highlighting operational issues within Russia's military.
- 📡 The test was a strategic move to assert Russia's readiness to use nuclear weapons, particularly in response to NATO's potential support for Ukraine.
- 🌍 Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned the West about Russia's nuclear capabilities in an interview, setting the stage for the failed missile test.
- 💥 The missile, an RS-28 Sarmat or 'Satan 2', failed before launch, causing significant destruction to the silo and launch site.
- 📸 Satellite imagery provided evidence of the explosion, as Russia did not admit to the failure publicly.
- 🔍 The incident raised questions about the reliability of Russia's nuclear arsenal and its military hardware in general.
- 🇺🇦 Russia's use of nuclear threats is seen as a bluff to deter Western support for Ukraine, with some experts suggesting they are unlikely to use nuclear weapons.
- 💬 The situation has led to a war of words, with Russian officials making bold statements about potential nuclear retaliation if NATO supports Ukraine.
- 📢 The video script suggests that Russia's threats are not being taken seriously by Western powers, who are aware of Russia's internal corruption and military shortcomings.
Q & A
What was the main purpose of Russia's nuclear missile test?
-The main purpose of Russia's nuclear missile test was to demonstrate their military strength and signal to the West, NATO, and Ukraine that Russia is not afraid to use its nuclear capabilities.
What happened during the missile test that was supposed to showcase Russia's strength?
-The missile test failed catastrophically as the missile exploded on the ground during the fueling process, destroying the silo and much of the launch site.
How did the failure of the missile test impact Russia's intended message?
-The failure of the missile test undermined Russia's intended message of strength and deterrence, instead becoming a source of ridicule and questioning of Russia's military capabilities.
What was the significance of Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's interview with Sky News?
-Sergey Lavrov's interview was significant as it was meant to build up anticipation for the missile test and serve as a warning to the West about Russia's readiness to use nuclear weapons.
What was the context behind Putin's fake press conference mentioned in the script?
-The context was the possibility of NATO giving Ukraine permission to strike inside Russia using Western weapons, to which Putin warned that it would mean NATO is at war with Russia.
What was the reaction of the United States to Dmitry Medvedev's statement about a potential nuclear response?
-The U.S. Department of State responded by saying they know not to take Medvedev seriously, dismissing his statement as standard Kremlin nonsense.
What does the script suggest about the reliability of Russia's military equipment?
-The script suggests that Russia's military equipment, including its nuclear arsenal, may be unreliable and outdated, as evidenced by the failure of the new missile test and the examination of recovered weapons by Ukraine.
How does the script describe the role of corruption in Russia's military and border fortifications?
-The script describes corruption as a significant issue, suggesting that funds allocated for border fortifications were embezzled, leading to inadequate defenses that contributed to Ukraine's ability to invade.
What was the response of a close adviser to Putin when discussing the potential use of missiles by Ukraine?
-The adviser threatened that if Ukraine were to use missiles from the UK, Putin would be forced to attack Britain, indicating a potential escalation in response to NATO's involvement.
How did Michael Clark respond to Russia's threats of nuclear use against Britain?
-Michael Clark reminded Russia that Britain has an independent nuclear deterrent, with submarines ready to respond to any threats, effectively neutralizing Russia's threats.
Outlines
🚀 Russian Nuclear Missile Fiasco
This paragraph discusses a failed Russian nuclear missile test that was intended to serve as a show of force. The missile, which was supposed to demonstrate Russia's military might, exploded on the test site before it could launch. The incident is particularly embarrassing for Russia as it occurred during a period when the country was already facing setbacks, such as losing territory under Putin's leadership since World War II. The failure was highlighted by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's prior warnings to the West and NATO, asserting that Russia's nuclear arsenal was ready for use. The paragraph also addresses the potential for Russian bots to suppress videos critical of Russia and calls for viewers to support the content by liking and sharing.
🔍 Analyzing Russia's Nuclear Red Lines
The second paragraph delves into Russia's nuclear strategy and the concept of 'red lines' in the context of nuclear weapons. It references statements made by Russian officials, including Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, who emphasized that Russia's nuclear weapons are on high alert and ready for use if necessary. The paragraph also discusses the failed test of the RS-28 Sarmat, a new Russian missile, which was a significant embarrassment given its intended role as a display of Russia's military capabilities. The incident raised questions about the reliability of Russia's nuclear arsenal and the country's overall military preparedness, especially considering the missile's failure during the fueling process that led to the destruction of the launch site.
🌐 Geopolitical Ramifications of Nuclear Threats
The final paragraph addresses the geopolitical implications of Russia's nuclear threats, particularly in relation to the ongoing conflict with Ukraine. It discusses the potential for NATO countries to become directly involved in the conflict if they provide Ukraine with advanced weaponry. The paragraph includes a statement from a close advisor to Putin, suggesting that if Ukraine were to receive permission to strike inside Russia using Western weapons, it would lead to a direct confrontation between Russia and NATO. The response from Michael Clark, reminding Russia of Britain's own nuclear capabilities, is also highlighted. The paragraph concludes with a call to action for viewers to sign up for a geopolitical newsletter to stay informed about current events.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Nuclear Missile
💡Show of Force
💡Red Line
💡Corruption
💡NATO
💡Ukraine
💡Geopolitical Event
💡Bluff
💡Satan 2
💡Nuclear Arsenal
💡Open Source Intelligence
Highlights
Russian nuclear missile explodes during a test meant to demonstrate Russia's military strength.
The explosion occurred at the test site from where the missile was supposed to launch.
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned the West about Russia's readiness to use nuclear weapons.
The failed test was intended as a signal to the West and NATO of Russia's resolve.
Putin held a press conference to address the possibility of NATO allowing Ukraine to strike inside Russia.
The incident highlights potential issues with Russia's military capabilities.
Experts suggest that Russia's nuclear arsenal may be in a similar state of disrepair as its conventional forces.
The missile that exploded was the RS-28 Sarmat, also known as Satan 2, a relatively new Russian weapon.
The test failure was so catastrophic that it destroyed the entire silo and launch site.
Satellite imagery confirms the extent of the destruction caused by the missile explosion.
The missile had enough fuel to travel 18,000 km, which contributed to the scale of the explosion.
Russia's corruption issues may have compromised the integrity of its military equipment.
The incident follows a pattern of Russian military failures, including outdated and unreliable weapons.
Despite the failure, Russia continues to issue nuclear threats to maintain its geopolitical stance.
Putin's advisor suggests that if Ukraine uses British missiles, Russia will retaliate against Britain.
Michael Clark, a British official, reminds Russia of Britain's independent nuclear deterrent capabilities.
The geopolitical newsletter 'Global Recap' offers a daily summary of significant world events.
Transcripts
Russian nuclear missile explodes in
Russia for everyone that loves to laugh
Russia is a gift that just keeps on
giving first Russia became the first
country in the world to have nukes and
still get invaded then Putin became the
first Russian leader to lose territory
since World War II and now Russian
nuclear missiles are exploding in Russia
in fact it exploded in the test site
where it was supposed to launch from
what makes this situation even more
laughable was the fact that this was not
just a normal test that Russia was
running to see if their missiles work or
not this was a show of force and it was
a kind of show of force that they built
up a lot of excitement for the foreign
minister Sergey lavro went on a big
interview with Sky News where he
basically gave a warning that Russia's
nukes are locked and loaded and then the
plan was to show off this test as a
signal to the world as a signal to the
west and NATO that Russia is not afraid
to use its nukes but unfortunately
the missile never took off and the
pictures and the videos that are coming
out from the area are just truly comical
so let's get into all that in today's
video and more but first I have a quick
request for you guys sometimes our
videos get downloed heavily by Russian
Bots who just want to kill the reach of
any video that criticizes Russia and
Putin so if you can just take a second
to hit the like button below and share
the video on your social media that
helps us out tremendously in the
algorithm now let's start Putin recently
did this fake press conference where he
answered just one question and the
question was what would Russia do if
NATO gives Ukraine permission to strike
inside Russia using Western weapons the
big reason he did this was there was a
lot of news at least last week that NATO
more specifically the US was leaning
heavily towards giving Ukraine
permission to strike inside Russia using
Western weapons now clearly this is
something Putin cannot afford in a war
that's already going so horribly for
Russia so he did a press conference to
send out a message to Nato saying that
if NATO gives permission that would mean
NATO is at war with Russia and just a
reminder again Russia is not afraid to
use its nukes so I guess after this
interview the world had a new red line
which would be the 100th one in this war
that Russia has given now a lot of
experts a lot of people a lot smarter
than me clearly saw this as what it was
it was a bluff that Russia was using to
stop the west from helping Ukraine even
more just hear from Ben Hodes yourself
but the thing is they're not going to
use it because there is zero benefit for
them to use it nowhere on the
battlefield nowhere on the planet where
Russia uses a nuclear weapon of any type
does it make the situation better for
them it only makes their situation worse
their only benefit with nuclear weapons
is the threat that they might use one
because they see so far the United
States and therefore many allies
continue to hesitate
to do what needs to be done to help
Ukraine actually defeat Russia clearly
people didn't take it as seriously so
Russia had to up the stakes go a step
further in their bluff if you know what
I mean first we had Dimitri meddev the
former Russian president who said this
in a telegram post Russia has been
patient it is obvious that a nuclear
response is a hugely complex decision
with irreversible consequences what
arrogant Anglo-Saxon and dewitz failed
to admit though is that you can only
test someone's patience for so long it
will turn out in the end that certain
moderate Western analysts were right
when they warned true the Russians are
not likely to use this response although
it's still a possibility besides they
may use new delivery vehicles with
conventional payloads and then it's over
a giant blot of molten gray mass in the
place where the mother of Russian cities
historical name of Kiev once stood holy
it's impossible but it happened the
problem is no one takes medev seriously
and here's the proof this is what the US
Department of State said after the medev
statement quote we know by now not to
take medev seriously this is standard
Kremlin nonsense end quote so Russia had
to pull out the big guns and by that
what I mean they were going to test a
nuclear missile and show the world that
Russia is capable of what is saying
Russia can use nukes if the West does
not take it seriously so the whole plan
was the foreign Ministry of Russia which
is Sergey La he's going to go give this
big speech where he's going to warn the
West warn NATO and then right after the
meeting Russia is going to conduct this
big test that's going to be show of
force to everyone who thinks Russia is
not
serious but it didn't exactly go as
planned so first let's go over the
statement that Sergey lavv did and then
we'll look at the test and how it went
there is a question in the context of
references to Russia's use of nuclear
weapons we know about the Russian
federation's Doctrine in this sphere
each time the red lines are crossed the
question arises as to where they really
lie in the context of nuclear weapons we
talk about the red lines in the hope
that our assessments and statements will
be heard by clever decision makers it is
silly to say that we will push the red
button if tomorrow you fail to do as I
demand I am confident that the decision
makers are aware of what we mean in
these situ uations no one wants a
nuclear war we said this time and again
let me assure you that we have weapons
whose use will involve grave
consequences for the masters of the
Ukrainian regime these weapons are
available and on full alert status all
right so after this the plan was to use
the new Russian missile in a test flight
as a show of force to the world the
missile to be used was rs28 sarmat or
it's commonly known as Satan 2 I would
like to point out that this is not a
Soviet era missile so it's not an old
one this is actually a relatively new
Russian weapon that was unveiled in
March 2018 and the first test flight
took place in April 2022 right after the
invasion started now we already know all
the old Soviet style weapons are
breaking down on the front line for
Russia but this is a brand new missile
that Russia has been boasting about as a
huge accomplishment for their defense
industry and as you'll soon see the
failure was massive as you can see from
the tweet on your screen Russians
prepared a test launch of one of their
rs28 sarmat ballistic missiles however
the test failed before it even started
apparently the missile exploded on the
ground during the fueling process
destroying the whole Silo and most of
the laun site here you can see the image
of The Silo which is pretty much
destroyed and soon I'll show you the
before and after so you can see how it
looked like before but some people may
question how a missile was able to
destroy the whole testing site before
even taking off well that's because the
missile had fuel enough to travel around
18,000 km or roughly 11,000 Mi so when
things went wrong all that fuel went
boom here you can see the before and
after of the launch site which clearly
shows there was an explosion and the
site was destroyed the big reason we
have to use satellite maps and satellite
imagery is because of course Russia is
never going to admit this went horribly
wrong and the reason we know that this
this went horribly long is because of
Open Source intelligence by the way
important note before moving on these
missile tests don't actually have a
nuclear warhead attached to them cuz
after all they are just test so they
just have a fake Warhead for data taking
purposes but anyways Peter zehan does
bring up a good point here we already
know that Russia's Soviet era weapons
are falling apart the big reason we know
this is because at the start of the war
Ukrainian forces carefully examined
Russian weapons recovered from the
Battlefield hoping to learn any insights
that could give them an edge maybe they
could tweak and improve their own gear
to turn the tables on Russians and give
them a taste of their own medicine but
after a thorough inspection the
ukrainians quickly realized that most of
Russian weapons were outdated and
unreliable in fact they were so bad that
compared to Modern Western weapons the
ukrainians outright called them and I
quote ineffective and obsolete on top of
that it's important to note that this
was not a Soviet era missile in fact
this was a relatively new missile which
took its first test flight in April 2022
unfortunately that was the one and only
successful test flight it ever had since
then the missile has failed four times
maybe it's time we consider that Russian
nuke Arsenal may be in as pure of a
shape as everything else in the Russian
military after all the nuclear weapons
do require a very high maintenance to
keep them in ready form recently we
learned that because because of
corruption the Chinese missiles were
filled with water instead of fuel
because soldiers were just taking out
the fuel and selling it for personal
profit now Russia is no better when it
comes to corruption in fact K invasion
was made possible because of corruption
in Russia I think the Russian government
spent hundreds of millions of dollars
fortifying the Border but when Ukrainian
forces came across the border Putin
realized that the person responsible for
fortifying the Border in fact just
pocketed the money and did a very lousy
job that made it possible for Ukraine to
invade Russia but anyways this doesn't
mean that the Bluffs from Russia will
stop just last week we had a close
adviser to Putin come on times radio and
say if Ukraine gets permission to use
storm Shad missiles inside Russia a
missile that's from UK then Putin will
be forced to attack Britain now I know
that might be hard to believe but listen
to it yourself if Russia gets some uh
rocket missiles which by the way Iran
deny uh but nevertheless let's imagine
that we Russia get some rocket missile
from south from North Korea and from
Iran but we're targeting to our Target
ourselves but Ukrainian Army has no
satellite group uh and that why it's you
are Americans and British going to
Target those rocket missiles to Russian
cities is directed woman to war you want
to have War go ahead finally yes uh
finally of course it will be attack
against British territory but from the
beginning but it's depend also on the
Great Britain and but from the beginning
I think the embassy British Embassy will
be closed uh then Russian Embassy will
be closed in Britain then some of the
British drones and Military Aviation
would be crashed down and also because
this uh British uh uh missiles will be
used from F16 but F16 based not in
Ukraine they based on the Romania and
Poland Air Field possibly Russian army
will have uh to give real strike to
those F16 which is on the Romania and
Poland airfields now of course they're
not just going to attack Britain they're
also going to attack Poland and Romania
cuz after all the attack in Ukraine is
going so well for Russia but anyways
Michael Clark had a perfect response to
this just reminding Russia that Britain
has nuclear weapons too before we get
into that though let's listen to the
Putin press conference that everyone is
just repeating from Russia side we are
seeing is an attempt to substitute
Notions because this is not a question
of whether the KF regime is allowed or
not allowed to strike Targets on Russian
territory it is already carrying out
strikes using unmanned aerial vehicles
and other means but using Western made
long-range Precision weapons is a
completely different story the fact is
that I have mentioned this and any
expert both in our country and in the
West will confirm this the Ukrainian
Army is not capable of using Cutting
Edge High Precision longrange systems
supplied by the West they cannot do that
these weapons are impossible to employ
without intelligence data from
satellites which Ukraine does not have
this can only be done using the European
Union satellites or us satellites in
general NATO satellites this is the
first point the second Point perhaps the
most important the key Point even is
that only NATO military personnel can
assign flight missions to these missile
systems Ukrainian servicemen cannot do
this therefore it is not a question of
allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike
Russia with these weapons or not it is
about deciding whether NATO countries
become directly involved in the military
conflict or not if this decision is made
it will mean nothing short of direct
involvement it will mean that NATO
countries the United States and European
countries are parties to the war in
Ukraine this will mean their direct
involvement in the conflict and it will
clearly change the very essence the very
nature of the conflict dramatically this
will mean that NATO countries the United
States and European countries are at war
with Russia and if this is the case then
bearing in mind the change in the
essence of the conflict we will make
appropriate decisions in response to the
threats that will be posed to us now
let's listen to Michael C's response
when people think that um you know that
that somehow we vulnerable remember that
those people in the kreman also know and
this is this may be an inconvenience
fact and I don't like it either but the
fact is you know we have an independent
nuclear deterrent we have a submarine um
always under the North Atlantic 24 hours
a day 365 days of the year if the Prime
Minister gave the order whether it in
Washington or in London or in workington
or in Doncaster or in Sterling if he
gave the order then that that submarine
would fire its missiles 55 minutes after
he gives the order and Moscow will be
destroyed full stop no question that's
the technical reality
now you can argue about whether that's a
good or a bad thing but that is where we
are that is what that is the situation
so those on TV in in Russia who make
lots of blood curling threats about
nuclear use against Britain um need to
think about the fact that we do have an
independent nuclear deterent like it or
not it's there now this Russia Ukraine
war much like any geopolitical event
it's moving very fast and it's pretty
much impossible to keep up with all the
news that's why we launched Global recap
a geopolitical newsletter that covers
the world news in a quick and simple way
every day we send out an email directly
to your inbox that covers the most
important geopolitical news that you can
read in less than 5 minutes trust me cuz
I do it every day best of all it's
completely free and you can sign up now
by using the link in the description or
scanning the QR code sign up now and
become more knowledgeable about the
world you live in
Weitere ähnliche Videos ansehen
INR 4335 News Briefing
Panic in USA and UK over Russia giving Nuclear Weapons to Iran | Biggest Geopolitical Development
How serious is Putin's threat of nuclear war? | DW News Full Broadcast Feb 29
روسيا تجري تدريبات نووية لقصف سواحل بريطانيا و فرنسا بعد هجوم أوكرانيا علي كورسك بالأراضي الروسية
IT'S HAPPENING
DRONES : PLUS EFFICACES QUE LES AVIONS ?
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)