I Tried 31 Different AI Models. These Are the Ones That Work.

The Nerdy Novelist
18 Oct 202328:15

Summary

TLDRIn this video, the host explores various AI language models, focusing on open-source options available on the cloud platform Open Router. The host compares models like GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and others through creative writing prompts, assessing their performance in generating urban fantasy novel ideas, social media headlines, and a dark fantasy book chapter. The results reveal strengths in different models, with GPT models and Mistol showing promise, and the video concludes with a discussion on the affordability of using these AI models for creative writing.

Takeaways

  • 🤖 The video discusses comparing various AI language models, including both well-known and open-source options.
  • 🔍 The host introduces a tool called 'open router' that allows access to multiple AI models in the cloud, which is user-friendly for non-technical individuals.
  • 💰 Open router operates on a pay-as-you-go model, with the ability to use crypto for transactions, and the host demonstrates the pricing structure during the video.
  • 📝 The host tests the AI models by giving them a brainstorming prompt about an urban fantasy novel, evaluating their responses for creativity and relevance.
  • 📊 The AI models perform variedly, with GPT 4 and mistol showing promise for brainstorming tasks, and the host shares detailed feedback on each model's output.
  • 🎯 The video also tests the models on creating social media headlines using a dark fantasy book concept, with llama and Claude delivering the most engaging results.
  • 📖 A writing prompt for a dark fantasy chapter is used to assess the models' prose quality, with Claude and mistol standing out among the rest.
  • 🚫 The host mentions that while some models do not generate safe-for-work content, others like mistol and myax do not have such restrictions.
  • 💡 The importance of experimenting with different models for various tasks, such as marketing or prose writing, is emphasized.
  • 📉 The host concludes that GPT models are good for following instructions, while Claude offers creative output, and mistol shows potential for certain tasks.
  • 💸 The cost of using open router for the tests was minimal, making it an affordable option for AI model experimentation.

Q & A

  • What is the main focus of the video?

    -The main focus of the video is to compare different AI language models, including open-source models, and test their capabilities in various tasks such as brainstorming, writing headlines, and creating content for a dark fantasy novel.

  • Which tool is introduced in the video for accessing multiple AI models?

    -The tool introduced in the video is called Open Router, which allows users to access and test various AI models in the cloud.

  • How much did the user spend from their $5 server credit during the testing?

    -The user spent approximately 11 cents from their $5 server credit during the testing of the AI models.

  • What type of content did the user test the AI models with?

    -The user tested the AI models with content related to brainstorming ideas for an urban fantasy novel, writing marketing headlines for a dark fantasy book concept, and creating a 600-word chapter for a dark fantasy story.

  • Which AI model stood out for its performance in writing marketing headlines?

    -Llama, Meta's AI model, stood out for its performance in writing marketing headlines, providing creative and attention-grabbing options.

  • What was the user's overall verdict on the GPT models?

    -The user found the GPT models to be good at staying on task but not as creative or engaging as some of the other models like Claude and Llama.

  • Which AI model did the user find to be the best for brainstorming?

    -The user gave the edge to both GPT models (3.5 and 4) and Mistol for brainstorming, as they provided a mix of creative ideas and followed the user's instructions well.

  • What was the user's opinion on the performance of the Weaver model?

    -The user encountered issues with the Weaver model, as it was unable to generate responses during the testing, so they were unable to evaluate its performance.

  • Which AI models did not run not safe for work content?

    -The GPT models, Claud models, and the ones from Meta and Google did not run not safe for work content.

  • What is the user's recommendation for writing not safe for work content?

    -The user recommends using Mistol for writing not safe for work content, as it is one of the open-source models that allow such content, and suggests censoring the explicit parts in the story beats.

  • How does the user feel about the pay-as-you-go model of Open Router compared to subscriptions?

    -The user prefers subscriptions that offer unlimited words like Chat GPT and Claude, but acknowledges that the pay-as-you-go model of Open Router is inexpensive and allows for continuous use as long as one is willing to pay the small per-chat cost.

Outlines

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Mindmap

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Keywords

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Highlights

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen

Transcripts

plate

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.

Upgrade durchführen
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Ähnliche Tags
AI ComparisonLanguage ModelsChatbotsOpen-SourceCloud ComputingCreative WritingMarketing HeadlinesUrban FantasyDark FantasyNecromancy
Benötigen Sie eine Zusammenfassung auf Englisch?