⚡️ШЕЙТЕЛЬМАН: одна фраза путіна спалила всю контору - пролито світло на стрілянину в Крокус Сіті

Summary

The transcript discusses a terrorist incident in Bryansk, Russia, where attackers were pursued and captured. It details a horrific act where an ear was cut off a captive and forced to eat it. The conversation then shifts to a terrorist attack at a concert hall, 'Krokus City,' in 1958, where over 100 people were killed in a meticulously planned 18-minute operation. The attackers, dressed in bulletproof vests and armed with automatic weapons, managed to escape in an old Renault car. Speculations are made about the involvement of Islamic State and the FSB, suggesting a possible setup with look-alike decoys. The speaker also criticizes the Russian government's response and the credibility of the FSB, questioning the authenticity of the incident and the role of propaganda.

Takeaways

• 🔍 The script discusses a violent incident involving terrorists being chased and captured in Bryansk Oblast, with one of them having his ear cut off as a form of punishment.
• 🎥 It references a chronology of events at a location called 'Krokus City' in 1958, where terrorists carried out a shooting and set fire to a hall, killing over 100 people within 18 minutes.
• 🚓 The terrorists were equipped with bulletproof vests and automatic weapons, and they behaved in a highly organized manner, not discarding their weapons but storing them somewhere.
• 🚗 After the attack, the terrorists allegedly escaped in an old Renault car, which was later intercepted near the Ukrainian border.
• 👥 There is speculation about the identity of the people who captured the terrorists, with suggestions that it could have been the FSB, a private military company, or other unidentified individuals.
• 📸 The script mentions that the terrorist group 'Islamic State' claimed responsibility for the attack and released photos of the alleged terrorists.
• 🤔 The speaker raises questions about the credibility of the official narrative, suggesting that there might be more to the story than what is being reported.
• 👮‍♂️ There is criticism of the FSB and the Russian government's handling of the situation, with implications that they may have been involved or complicit in some way.
• 🌐 The script touches on the broader context of the conflict, suggesting that the incident could be used as a pretext for further military mobilization.
• 🗣️ The speaker expresses skepticism about the Russian propaganda machine, questioning the authenticity of the information being disseminated to the public.
• 🚨 The script ends with a discussion about the potential for further mobilization and the challenges of equipping a large number of mobilized individuals with adequate weaponry.

Q & A

What incident is being described in the transcript?

The transcript describes a terrorist attack where individuals were chased and captured in Bryansk Oblast, and one of them had his ear cut off as a form of punishment.

What is the significance of the 'Renault' vehicle mentioned in the script?

The 'Renault' vehicle is significant as it is the car used by the terrorists to escape from the scene of the attack at the concert hall.

How quickly did the terrorists carry out the attack in the concert hall according to the script?

According to the script, the terrorists carried out the attack in the concert hall within 18 minutes, which included killing security personnel, setting the hall on fire, and causing the death of over 100 people.

What is the role of the 'Krokus City' in the script?

Krokus City is the location where the terrorists began their attack by shooting in the hall and setting it on fire.

What was the response time of the emergency services after the attack?

The emergency services, including firefighters, arrived at the scene 12 minutes after the terrorists had left, and an operational headquarters was set up at 20:45.

What is the speculation about the terrorists' escape route mentioned in the script?

The script speculates that the terrorists were possibly allowed to escape towards the Ukrainian border, suggesting that a 'window' on the border might have been prepared for them.

What is the role of the 'ear' in the narrative described in the transcript?

The 'ear' is part of a gruesome act where one of the captured terrorists had his ear cut off, and there are claims of forcing him to eat it as a form of punishment.

What does the script suggest about the authenticity of the terrorists' identities?

The script suggests that there might have been a switch, with the real terrorists being replaced by look-alikes dressed in similar clothing to mislead the public and authorities.

What is the connection mentioned between the FSB and the terrorists in the script?

The script implies a possible connection or complicity between the FSB and the terrorists, suggesting that the FSB might have facilitated the escape or prepared the border crossing.

What is the speculation about the FSB's role in the aftermath of the attack?

The script speculates that the FSB might have been involved in creating a narrative or cover-up after the attack, possibly to mislead the public about the true nature of the event.

What is the implication regarding the Russian propaganda mentioned in the script?

The script implies that Russian propaganda has been consistently spreading misinformation and cheap fakes, which raises doubts about the authenticity of the information provided by the authorities, including the FSB.