REDUÇÃO DA MAIORIDADE PENAL? Será que resolve?
Summary
TLDRThe script discusses the issue of lowering the age of criminal responsibility in Brazil, highlighting the potential dangers of placing minors in adult prisons. It argues that reducing the age of penal responsibility without addressing the root causes of crime is ineffective and unethical. The speaker emphasizes the importance of education and rehabilitation over punishment, and criticizes the emotional, rather than rational, approach to public safety issues, which often leads to counterproductive policies.
Takeaways
- 🔫 Many youths in impoverished communities are quickly drawn into criminal activities such as theft, illegal possession of firearms, and even murder.
- ⚖️ The law in Brazil currently states that individuals under 18 who commit crimes are sent to Fundação Casa for a maximum of 3 years, which many people find too lenient.
- 🚨 There is a proposal to lower the age of criminal responsibility to 16, which is being debated in the Brazilian Congress.
- 👨⚖️ The argument against lowering the age of criminal responsibility is that placing minors in adult prisons could worsen their situation and lead to further criminalization.
- 📚 The education system should focus on preventing crime by addressing root causes rather than simply punishing young offenders.
- ❌ Lowering the age of criminal responsibility could lead to criminals using even younger children to commit crimes.
- 🔄 The current system is already failing to rehabilitate adult criminals, so it is unlikely to be effective for minors.
- 🤔 The idea of reducing the age of criminal responsibility is seen as ineffective and driven more by a desire for revenge than by rational or ethical considerations.
- 💔 Placing minors in the adult prison system could result in them being victimized and further entrenched in criminal behavior.
- 📝 Instead of lowering the age of criminal responsibility, the focus should be on enforcing existing laws and ensuring they function effectively.
Q & A
What is the current age of criminal responsibility in Brazil according to the script?
-The current age of criminal responsibility in Brazil is 18 years old. Individuals who commit a crime under this age are sent to a foundation house, where they can stay for a maximum of 3 years.
What is the proposed change to the age of criminal responsibility mentioned in the script?
-The script mentions a proposal for a law to be voted on in the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate to lower the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years old.
What is the concern regarding lowering the age of criminal responsibility to 16 years old?
-The concern is that it would not be effective and could lead to more severe consequences. It is argued that sending a 16-year-old to prison with hardened criminals is not a smart measure and could lead to further criminal behavior.
What is the argument against placing minors in adult prisons?
-The argument is that placing minors in adult prisons is harmful as it exposes them to victimization and violence, which can exacerbate their criminal tendencies rather than rehabilitate them.
What is the speaker's view on the effectiveness of the current resocialization system for adults?
-The speaker views the current resocialization system for adults as absolutely flawed, suggesting that it would be even more detrimental to place children in the hands of criminals within the prison system.
Why does the speaker believe that reducing the age of criminal responsibility is not a solution?
-The speaker believes that reducing the age of criminal responsibility is not a solution because it is ineffective, inutile, and does not address the root causes of crime. It is seen as a measure driven by vengeance rather than a rational or ethical approach.
What is the speaker's opinion on the emotional response to public safety issues?
-The speaker suggests that emotional responses to public safety issues, often triggered by high-profile crimes, can lead to poor decision-making and policies that may ultimately worsen public safety.
What is the current maximum sentence for minors under the age of 18 in Brazil according to the script?
-According to the script, the current legislation allows for the deprivation of liberty for minors under the age of 18 for up to 8 years.
What does the speaker suggest as an alternative to lowering the age of criminal responsibility?
-The speaker suggests that instead of lowering the age of criminal responsibility, efforts should be made to improve the current legislation and ensure that it functions effectively, without admitting the flaws that currently exist.
How does the script relate the United States' approach to minors and crime with its prison system?
-The script implies a correlation between the United States' approach to considering minors for criminal responsibility from any age and its status as having the largest prison system and one of the most violent societies.
What is the speaker's stance on the argument that minors should be treated as adults in the criminal justice system?
-The speaker is against treating minors as adults in the criminal justice system, arguing that it is not ethical and can lead to more harm than good, such as making them victims within the prison system.
Outlines
🏛️ Debate on Lowering the Age of Criminal Responsibility
The paragraph discusses the societal issue of children in impoverished communities being coerced into criminal activities such as theft and illegal firearm possession, leading to violent crimes. It touches on the legislative debate about lowering the age of criminal responsibility from 18 to 16 years old. Critics argue that the current system, which sends minors to a foundation for a maximum of three years, is too lenient and counterproductive, suggesting that it should be harsher. The speaker also points out the potential danger of placing children in adult prisons, which could lead to further victimization and radicalization. The paragraph concludes with a critique of the emotional, rather than rational, approach to public safety issues, which can often lead to counterproductive policies.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Communities
💡Cooptation
💡Illegal Arms Trade
💡Penal System
💡Fundação Casa
💡Majority Age
💡Resocialization
💡Education
💡Emotion vs. Rationality
💡Vengeance
💡Public Security
Highlights
Communities are struggling with poverty and crime, leading to the cooptation of individuals into illegal activities.
The current law allows for a maximum of 3 years in a foundation house for crimes committed under 18 years old.
There is public outrage over the idea that a 17-year-old who commits murder should only serve 3 years.
Critics argue that sending a minor to a penitentiary with hardened criminals is not a smart measure.
The importance of clear educational guidance is emphasized instead of just lowering the age of criminal responsibility.
The speaker suggests that reducing the age of criminal responsibility could lead to the exploitation of even younger children by criminals.
The speaker has experienced how people often haven't considered the implications of reducing the age of criminal responsibility.
The reduction of the age of criminal responsibility is deemed useless, ineffectual, and not based on moral or ethical grounds.
The only argument for reducing the age could be a desire for vengeance, which is not a rational or ethical stance.
The current legislation allows for up to 8 years of deprivation of liberty, which should be made to work effectively.
The United States, which does not have a specific age for considering minors, has the largest prison system and one of the most violent societies.
Public security issues are often resolved based on emotion, which can lead to counterproductive outcomes.
Measures that seem protective can actually worsen the security situation, as they may not address the root causes of crime.
Transcripts
estão inseridos em comunidades
empobrecidas onde o tráfico rapidamente
avança e portanto acabam sendo cooptadas
e praticam roubos Furtos eh porte ilegal
de arma de fogo e acabam
matando vai ser votada na câmara dos
deputados e no senado a lei da
maioridade penal a partir dos 16 anos
como é a lei hoje na lei hoje Quem
comete um crime abaixo dos 18 anos de
idade é encaminhado pra fundação casa
onde vai permanecer por no máximo 3 anos
muita gente se revolta com isso que diz
pô menino 17 anos é um homem já ele mata
alguém na rua e vai cumprir pena de 3
anos na Fundação Casa a pena tinha que
ser muito maior ele tinha que ser
castigado de outra forma
Eu também acho que 3 anos num caso de um
crime de Ono é um período muito curto
mas eu pegar esse menino e jogá-lo numa
penitenciária no meio de bandidos de
longa carreira no crime não é uma medida
inteligente a educação escolar
especialmente ela precisa ser Clara de
que não adianta você quando tem uma
questão você tentar abaixar o rio em vez
de levantar a ponte né no caso é
necessário agora que a gente entenda que
num sistema que é absolutamente falho em
relação à ressocialização de adultos que
nós vamos conseguir um efeito
absolutamente deletério maléfico ao
colocarmos crianças né até Certa idade
agora na mão da bandit de um outro modo
se a maioridade baixa né para 16 aqueles
bandidos que hoje usam crianças vão
pegar os meninos de 15 né para assumirem
E se nós baixarmos para 12 eles vão
pegar os de 11 porque a ão tá na Bandit
agem e não na questão da
maioridade eu tenho tido a experiência
de percorrer o Brasil e frequentar um
pouco sistemas midiáticos e tenho tido a
experiência de muita gente dizer que
nunca tinha pensado sobre esse ponto de
vista que aliás é o ponto mais Óbvio
possível eu me sinto dizendo por exemplo
que a redução da maioridade penal deve
ser combatida em primeiro lugar não Por
uma questão po mas matemática ela é
inútil ela é inócua ela é
ineficaz que se você votar a favor dela
você só tem uma justificativa não moral
e não ética entendendo a ética como
Aristóteles a coloca que é o bem comum
eu só posso ser a favor essa redução por
sentimento de
Vingança eu tô irritado com o mundo eu
tô irritado comigo tô irritado com o meu
casamento e com o meu emprego eu quero
que os menores vão para cadeia e morram
então Se eu disser isso não é válido
racionalmente nem eticamente mas
curiosamente este é o único argumento
que eu poderia utilizar
vendeta me assaltaram então eu quero
esses adolescentes todos na
[Música]
cadeia algo muito sério que é colocar sa
baixo de 18 anos junto com o sistema
prisional tal como ele é no Brasil hoje
com adultos é fazê-los serem vitimados e
trucidados logo no ponto de partida aí
você diz o então deixamos soltos não a
legislação atual no eca permite a
privação de Liberdade até 8 anos durante
8 anos então é uma questão de fazê-la
funcionar e não admitir alguns Deslizes
que hoje o eca vem permitindo mas
trataram a criança como se ele fora um
adulto a nação norte--americana que não
tem n essa questão da minoridade você
pode ser considerado a partir de
qualquer idade não é casual que ela
tenha o maior sistema prisional do mundo
e a sociedade mais
violento esses problemas que envolvem a
segurança pública costumam ser
resolvidos na base da emoção geralmente
motivados por um crime que provocou uma
comoção
Nacional a emoção é uma péssima
conselheira nessas situações Às vezes o
que parece que vai proteger a sociedade
Na verdade tem um efeito oposto e vai
colocar a segurança da sociedade numa
situação muito pior do que o que estava
anteriormente
Weitere ähnliche Videos ansehen
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)