Globalization and Ideology in the Contemporary World: A Response to M. Steger

Summary

The video script explores the concept of ideology, particularly focusing on globalization as discussed by Manfred Steger in 'Ideologies of Globalization.' It delves into the debate over whether globalization qualifies as an ideology, examining its core claims such as market liberalization, inevitability, and the spread of democracy. The script challenges the notion of globalization as a singular, cohesive ideology, highlighting its complexity and the diverse impacts it has on political and economic landscapes.

Takeaways

• 📜 The script discusses the concept of ideology and its relation to politics, focusing on the article 'Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach' by Michael Freeden.
• 🌐 It explores the debate on whether globalism can be considered a mature ideology, as opposed to just a set of economic practices or beliefs.
• 🤔 The traditional definition of ideology is presented as a set of interconnected ideas and ideals that form a coherent belief system, such as liberalism, conservatism, capitalism, Marxism, and communism.
• 🔗 The script outlines three criteria for an ideology: uniqueness, morphological sophistication, and the ability to produce anticipation chains within a political framework.
• 🌟 Globalism is argued to meet these criteria by representing a set of holistic ideas and beliefs, suggesting it could be classified as a new ideology.
• 💡 The six core claims of globalization are detailed, emphasizing the liberalization and integration of markets, the inevitability and irreversibility of globalization, and its impact on democracy and political issues.
• 🚀 Globalization is described as a driving force behind economic growth and prosperity, with the potential to lift people out of poverty and foster development.
• 🌍 The script highlights the interconnectedness of modern civilization with global supply chains and economies, suggesting a dependency on globalization for progress.
• 💬 There is a discussion on the influence of powerful nations like the United States and China on the shaping and direction of globalization.
• 🕊️ The benefits of globalization for democracy are examined, with a critique of the assumption that economic development automatically leads to successful democratic systems.
• 🌳 The script raises concerns about the environmental impact of globalization, questioning the sustainability of its practices and the long-term consequences.
• 🔄 The concept of a 'global war on terror' is tied to globalization, showing its political responsiveness and flexibility, but also its potential to be influenced by militaristic and nationalistic ideas.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the discussion in the video script?

The main topic is the exploration of the concept of ideology, specifically focusing on globalization as a potential ideology, based on the article 'Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach' by Manfred Steger.

What does the script suggest about the relationship between globalization and ideology?

The script suggests that globalization could be considered a mature ideology due to its set of coherent ideas and beliefs, despite arguments that it is not an exclusive ideology but rather a broad and diverse political landscape.

What are the six core claims of globalization as defined by Steger?

The six core claims are: 1) Globalization is about the liberalization and global integration of markets. 2) Globalization is inevitable and irreversible. 3) No one is in charge of globalization. 4) Globalization benefits everyone in the long run. 5) Globalization further spreads democracy in the world. 6) Globalization requires a global war on terror.

How does the script describe the concept of 'ideational family' in relation to globalization?

The script describes the 'ideational family' as a set of interconnected ideas that form a coherent framework. It suggests that globalization, despite no one being in charge, has the marks of an ideational family due to its interconnected and responsive nature.

What is the script's stance on the inevitability of globalization?

The script posits that globalization is seen as inevitable and irreversible, reflecting the historical progression towards a world based on market values and the continuous technological advancement that has interconnected the globe.

How does the script address the role of the United States in globalization?

The script acknowledges the United States as a leader in the world economy, having imposed its globalization agenda worldwide while also enforcing its own interests.

What is the script's view on the benefits of globalization for all countries?

The script suggests that globalization is believed to benefit everyone by promoting economic growth and prosperity, but it also points out that there are always nations that profit more than others, and it fails to address potential environmental consequences.

How does the script discuss the link between globalization and democracy?

The script discusses the link by suggesting that globalization is often associated with the spread of democracy, treating free markets, free trade, and democracy as synonymous terms. However, it also points out that this view may be based on a narrow understanding of democracy.

What is the script's perspective on the role of China in the context of globalization?

The script highlights China as a country that has profited from and manipulated globalization to the point where it can challenge the US or global hegemony, indicating a shift in global power dynamics.

How does the script evaluate the concept of a 'global war on terror' in relation to globalization?

The script evaluates it as a claim that showcases globalization's political responsiveness and conceptual flexibility, combining economic globalization with militaristic and nationalistic ideas. However, it questions the necessity of this war for globalization's progress.

What conclusion does the script draw about globalization as an ideology?

The script concludes that while globalization exhibits evidence of being a new ideology, it may be for the wrong reasons, as it does not fit the traditional description of an ideology due to its broadness and diversity.

Outlines

00:00

🌐 Introduction to Ideology and Globalization

The video script begins with an exploration of ideologies, questioning the audience's beliefs in concepts like freedom, equality, and justice. It introduces the topic of the day, the article 'Ideologies and Mobilization' by Manfred Steger, and discusses the response to it by Michael Freeden. The conversation revolves around defining ideology as a set of ideas and ideals that shape political thought and action, with examples such as liberalism and conservatism. The script then delves into the debate on whether globalization qualifies as an ideology, with Steger arguing that it does, while Freeden disagrees, seeing globalization as a broad and flexible concept rather than a cohesive ideology.

05:02

🌟 Core Claims of Globalization

This paragraph expands on the six core claims of globalization as defined by Steger. It discusses how globalization is perceived as inevitable and irreversible, with a focus on the liberalization and integration of markets. The script highlights the idea that globalization is not controlled by any single entity but is influenced by various actors, such as the United States and China. It also touches on the benefits of globalization, such as economic growth and the spread of democracy, but critiques the notion that it universally benefits all, pointing out potential environmental and social costs. The paragraph concludes by examining the connection between globalization and the war on terror, suggesting that globalization's flexibility allows it to adapt to and incorporate various political narratives.

10:03

🔄 The Fluid Nature of Globalization

The final paragraph of the script reflects on the nature of globalization as a force that permeates various ideologies and becomes an unstoppable force in the modern world. It challenges the notion of globalization as a singular, exclusive ideology, suggesting that it is more accurately described as a broad and diverse phenomenon that interacts with and influences multiple political landscapes. The paragraph emphasizes that globalization's openness and adaptability make it difficult to categorize as a traditional ideology, and it may already have outgrown such a definition.

Keywords

💡Ideology

An ideology is a set of political beliefs or principles that form the basis of a political system or organization. In the video, ideology is discussed as a framework for understanding political concepts, with the video exploring the question of whether globalization qualifies as an ideology. The script mentions ideologies such as liberalism, conservatism, capitalism, Marxism, and communism as examples.

💡Globalization

Globalization refers to the process of increased interconnectedness and interdependence among countries, which has been driven by advances in communication, transportation, and trade. The video discusses globalization as a potential new ideology, with the script exploring the six core claims of globalization as defined by Manfred Steger, and whether these claims make globalization a coherent belief system.

💡Liberalization

Liberalization in the context of the video script pertains to the freeing up of markets and the reduction of government intervention in economic affairs. It is a key aspect of globalization, as the script mentions the emphasis on free markets and how this concept is central to the driving idea behind globalization.

💡Market Integration

Market integration refers to the process where different markets become more interconnected, often as a result of globalization. The script highlights the liberalization and global integration of markets as one of the core claims of globalization, noting the importance of free markets and big businesses in this process.

💡Inevitability

In the script, the term 'inevitability' is used to describe the perceived unstoppable nature of globalization. It suggests that globalization is not only happening but is also irreversible, reflecting the idea that resistance to globalization would be futile and potentially dangerous.

💡Irreversibility

Irreversibility is closely related to inevitability and is used in the script to emphasize that globalization is a one-way process that cannot be reversed. This concept is tied to the idea that civilization's progress requires the integration of more resources and the continuous expansion of global networks.

💡Self-Regulating Market

A self-regulating market is an economic system where market forces, such as supply and demand, operate without direct government intervention. The script mentions this concept in the context of globalization, suggesting that no single party is in charge of globalization, reflecting the idea of a market that regulates itself.

💡Democracy

Democracy is a form of government where power is vested in the people, who can elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. In the video, democracy is linked to globalization, with the script suggesting that globalization can further the spread of democracy, although this claim is also subject to debate.

💡Economic Growth

Economic growth refers to an increase in the production of goods and services in an economy over time. The script discusses how globalization is often associated with economic growth and prosperity, suggesting that it provides opportunities for all countries to advance materially.

💡War on Terror

The 'War on Terror' is a term used to describe military, political, legal, and ideological efforts to combat terrorism. In the script, it is mentioned in the context of globalization's political responsiveness and conceptual flexibility, with the claim that globalization incorporates ideas related to the war on terror.

💡Mobilization

Mobilization in the script refers to the process by which ideas and concepts are brought together under an ideology to influence political thought and action. It is used to discuss how globalization, through its core claims, attempts to mobilize support and create a unified framework for understanding global processes.

Highlights

Ideology is traditionally defined as a family of systems composed of ideas and ideals.

Examples of ideologies include liberalism, conservatism, capitalism, Marxism, and communism.

An ideology must have uniqueness, morphological sophistication, and the ability to produce back anticipation chains.

Globalization is not considered an ideology by some due to its broad and inclusive nature.

Globalization's first core claim is the liberalization and global integration of markets.

Globalization is seen as inevitable and irreversible, reflecting the dictates of history.

Globalization's adaptability to new realities, such as post 9/11 world, demonstrates its responsiveness.

Claim three suggests that no one is in charge of globalization, reflecting a self-regulating market concept.

Globalization is influenced by powerful economies like the United States and China.

Claim four posits that globalization benefits everyone in the long run through economic growth and prosperity.

Globalization's fifth claim links it to the spread of democracy, treating economic freedom and democracy as synonymous.

Claim six shows globalization's political responsiveness by combining economic globalization with the war on terror.

Globalization is flexible and can adapt to various political landscapes, making it an unstoppable force.

Globalization may not fit the narrow description of an ideology due to its broad and diverse nature.

The discussion challenges the notion that globalization is a mature ideology, suggesting it's more complex.

Transcripts

[Music]

what is it that you believe in it's not

a trick question do you believe in

freedom a lot of pressure

what about equality or disparity how

about justice maybe even exploitation

all of these are tie into politics in

what we call ideology

I'm your host shall and welcome to CMW

and today we will be discussing the

article ideologies mobilization written

by Manfredi's eater in 2005 I respond to

my confidence article ideologies and

political theory a conceptual approach

Michael Frieden someone technologist

globalism as a possible holistic

contender but argues against its status

as an ideology seeing it as purely to

proclaim it as such so Kyle what do you

think is an ideology

well it's traditionally defined as a

family of systems composed of ideas and

ideals

I took socio economic policies that

different political thought in modern

life examples are liberalism

conservatism capitalism Marxism

communism etc what is an ideology does

family an America supported people

belief system because as one well you

didn't notice that mature ideologies is

a unique features anchored indistinct

concept old morphologies where in the

criteria are firstly uniqueness and

morphological sophistication second

contacts found responsiveness and the

third is ability to produce back

anticipation chains

now let's focus on that last one pick on

the station chains different the station

is used when a political concept

peacefully the matrix of other concepts

on the framework of one ideology an

ideology attempts to end the inevitable

contention over concepts by D contesting

them by removing their meanings from

Ponder's freedom believes that

globalization denotes not an ideology

whilst he be redacted a statement and he

intends to establish in his article that

globalism is mature enough to be

pronounced as an ideology saying that

globalism represents a set of holy

people ideas and beliefs coherent enough

to warrant the status of a new ideology

feature break sport globalism into six

core claims that play crucial semantic

and political roles he confines

globalization to a set of conflicts

social processes that are changing our

current social condition a compression

of time and space as a result of

societal and global changes now we will

be breaking down six core claims of

globalization as defined by Steiger same

one globalization is about the

liberalisation and global integration of

markets this blame highly emphasizes in

the market or economic aspect of

globalization free markets betrayed big

businesses are among the main highlights

of this the realization in the context

refers to stay letting go of the market

basically the regulation teacher cites

Thomas Friedman which perfectly

summarizes claim one the driving idea

behind globalization is free-market

capitalism

blame want some what forgets but mark

let's make it a driving force today but

that does not mean government is

helpless if we reduce wrote

globalization to appear even Ami

nominal by removing their use the free

flow of goods services and applicants

and we forget that globalization is not

nearly on the phenomena phenomena

mobilization has multiple aspects that

have profound effects in every aspect of

modern life effort to say that

globalization is only about a

liberalisation and global integrated

market would be missing the bigger

picture

lam - globalization is inevitable and

irreversible this claim assumes that

globalization is inevitable and it is

accelerating the reality of the modern

world teacher says that since emergence

of a world based on the primacy of

market values it reflects the dictates

of history resistance would be a natural

irrational and dangerous an important

thing to note from claim to is that

global isms ability to adapt to new

realities of the post 9/11 world gives

ample proof of its responsiveness to a

broad range of political issues

mobilization is visible and irreversible

because in order to progress

civilization you need to pull in more

and more resources our continuous

technological advancement historical

example we had the Industrial Revolution

led by European imperialism sparking

global colonization efforts which fuel

even more industrialization modern

civilization has grown to become

dependent on the world that has been

connected to every corner of the globe

it has come to rely on networks of

entire global supply chains and a

globalized economy where dependency has

spread even more dependency over time

this cycle of need and one common even

in the globalization

opinion lism that is perpetually

contagious daintree nobody is in charge

of globalization of around the concept

of the self-regulating market where

globalization does not reflect any

party's agenda after 9/11 the survival

of globalization is conceived as the

liberalization and global integration of

markets that depended in the political

leadership of the United States where

instead it show is globalization

ideation of flexibility and ability to

respond to political issues seizure ends

playing three by stating the

globalization war the marks of an

ideational family although no one is in

charge of globalization it does not mean

that nobody can influence it sister

Marie aura cries of the United States in

the 20th century it has become the

leader of the world economy and imposed

its globalization from lay agenda into

every corner of the world while also

enforcing its own interests China today

is a country that owes its parent

prosperity for profiting from and

manipulating globalization to the point

where it is able to challenge the US or

global hegemony the truth about

globalization is that everyone has power

over it well everyone also has their own

interest to say that nobody is in charge

is also not necessarily wrong but it is

a step in the wrong direction the real

question is who has the most influence

claim or mobilization benefits everyone

in the long run this flames focuses on

the benefits gained in material terms

such as economic growth and prosperity

the birth dates from the d7 summit of

1997 for indentifying economic growth

and progress is tied to the process of

globalization because it provides great

opportunities for the future for all

countries

in your notes that globally seeks to

serve enter the contest nation of

mobilization has benefits for everyone

by using science as a basis for hard

evidence

it is true that industrialization of a

country increases the chances of its

citizens to live prosperously but it

fails to see that there are always

nations who profit and nations who are

enslaved paying for assumes that there

will always be resources in time and

that it's only a matter of how much

profit is a domain but that in itself is

a paradox

even though globalization is helping

economies matured and bring more people

out of poverty

it does not foresee a world of

environmental devastation and ecological

collapse unsustainable practices are not

long-term solutions and globalization

fails in that on many accounts you blame

five mobilization further spread of

democracy in the world

this claim links globalization in market

to the adjacent concepts of democracy

teacher says the globalist treats

freedom free market and free trade and

democracy as synonymous terms key curves

Francis Fukuyama in saying that there is

a clear correlation between a country's

level of economic development and

successful democracy

additionally teacher notes that acclaim

with globalization furthers the spread

of democracy in the world is thus

largely based on a narrow form of

procedural understanding of democracy

most of the world considers democracy as

a key player to globalization but in

2020 that can easily be considered a

Miss Wentz eg published ideologies of

globalization nobody saw China becoming

a global superpower in just a little

more than attacking and the idea that

more freedom because more globalization

was a prevailing thought most people

thought that China will just be a

manufacturing hub and people recognize

the profound effect localization would

have democracy does not always work and

you don't need the mock receipt to

experience economic growth

Game six globalization requires a global

war on terror dream six attest the

global isms political responsiveness and

conceptual flexibility / combines the

idea of economic globalization with

openly militaristic and nationalistic

ideas revolving around the war on terror

Steiger states that if global terror

ended quickly in cream six would be

contingent on in thus less important in

the poor reclaims Steiger prices

globalization to be quite flexible and

cites it as evidence for it to be an

ideology however in this claim is based

that it needs a war on terror this is

quite perplexing because globalization

was doing just fine before the u.s.

started its average crusade against

terror in hindsight the war on terror

did not affect globalization's progress

in a significant way to conclude TJ

gives evidence of globalization as a new

ideology and concludes it as such but

maybe for the wrong reasons

globalization is not really exclusive as

an ideology in fact it drives in a

diverse political landscape and

especially in the diverse world

it seeps into the cracks of different

ideologies and then suddenly become an

unstoppable force that can become

irreversible ideology is used somewhat

narrowly in the past decades to describe

families of a pod and globalization for

all its openness and broadness simply

does not fit the description of ideology

and may even have already intended