How Feedback Affects Performance - Andrew Huberman - Growth Mindset
Summary
TLDRIn this episode of 'After Skool,' Dr. Andrew Huberman explores the concept of a growth mindset, emphasizing the malleability of abilities. He discusses the impact of feedback on performance, citing a study by Dr. Carol Dweck that shows praising intelligence can hinder motivation, while praising effort enhances it. Huberman advises shifting narratives from performance to effort, fostering improvement and persistence.
Takeaways
- 🧠 The concept of a growth mindset is the belief that our abilities are not fixed but can be developed through effort and learning.
- 🤔 The importance of self-reflection on personal strengths and weaknesses, and questioning the origins of these beliefs, is emphasized.
- 🏅 Dr. Carol Dweck's research is foundational in the field of growth mindset, showing that how we receive feedback significantly affects our motivation and performance.
- 🔍 The study by Dweck and Mueller found that praising children for their intelligence could undermine their motivation and performance, contrary to common belief.
- 🏆 Receiving praise for effort, rather than innate ability, encourages children to take on more challenges and persist in the face of difficulty.
- 📉 Intelligence-based praise can lead to a decrease in performance, while effort-based praise can enhance it, highlighting the power of the right type of feedback.
- 🛠️ The type of feedback we receive, especially early in learning, becomes integrated into our core beliefs about our capabilities.
- 🔄 The potential negative effects of intelligence praise include a tendency to avoid challenges and a likelihood of misrepresenting one's performance.
- 💪 Shifting narratives from performance to effort can help foster a growth mindset and continuous improvement.
- 👨🏫 As educators and parents, being mindful of the type of feedback given is crucial for nurturing a growth mindset in children.
- 🌐 The Huberman Lab podcast and social media platforms provide additional science-based tools for mental, physical health, and performance.
Q & A
What is the concept of a growth mindset according to Andrew Huberman?
-A growth mindset is the idea that our abilities are not fixed but are malleable, and we can improve at things through effort and learning.
What are some questions that Andrew Huberman recommends we ask ourselves to understand our abilities better?
-He suggests asking ourselves what we've been told we're good or poor at, what we tell ourselves we're good or bad at, and considering the origins of these messages.
What is the main difference between intelligence feedback and effort feedback as discussed by Andrew Huberman?
-Intelligence feedback is tied to identity labels like 'smart' or 'talented', while effort feedback is tied to verbs and actions, focusing on the effort and persistence applied.
What did Dr. Carol Dweck's research show about the effects of intelligence praise on children's motivation and performance?
-Her research showed that intelligence praise can undermine children's motivation and performance, making them less likely to choose challenging tasks and potentially leading to misrepresented performance.
How did the children in Dr. Dweck's study respond to intelligence praise when later presented with easy or hard problems?
-Children who received intelligence praise tended to select problems they knew they could perform well on, avoiding challenges that could jeopardize the praise they received.
What was the impact of effort praise on children's choice of problems in Dr. Dweck's study?
-Children who received effort praise were more likely to choose harder problems, indicating a desire to learn and grow from the challenges.
How did the performance of children who received intelligence praise compare to those who received effort praise in subsequent problem sets?
-The performance of children who received intelligence praise declined, while the performance of those who received effort praise improved significantly.
What is the potential negative consequence of intelligence praise that was revealed in Dr. Dweck's study?
-The study revealed that children who received intelligence praise were more likely to misrepresent their performance in the future, tending to lie about their scores to appear better than they actually did.
What advice does Andrew Huberman give regarding the type of feedback we should give ourselves or receive from others?
-He advises that we should focus on effort-related narratives rather than performance narratives, rewarding ourselves for effort, which can lead to improved performance and growth.
How can the findings from Dr. Dweck's study be applied to self-improvement and personal development?
-By shifting our focus from fixed identity labels to effort and persistence, we can foster a growth mindset that encourages continuous learning and improvement, regardless of initial ability.
What is the significance of understanding neuroplasticity in relation to the growth mindset?
-Neuroplasticity is the brain's ability to change and adapt, which supports the idea of a growth mindset by showing that intelligence and abilities can be developed and improved through effort and experience.
Outlines
🧠 Growth Mindset and Identity Labels
Andrew Huberman introduces the concept of a growth mindset, emphasizing that abilities are not fixed but can be developed. He encourages self-reflection on personal strengths and weaknesses, questioning where these perceptions come from and how they influence behavior. The paragraph sets the stage for discussing the impact of feedback on performance and identity, particularly highlighting Dr. Carol Dweck's research on how praise can affect motivation and performance.
🏅 The Impact of Praise Type on Performance
This section delves into a study by Dr. Carol Dweck and Claudia Mueller, contrasting the effects of 'intelligence feedback' and 'effort feedback' on children's motivation and performance. Intelligence feedback, which labels children as smart or talented, tends to lead to a preference for easy tasks and a decline in performance when challenged. Conversely, effort feedback, focusing on the process and persistence, encourages the selection of harder tasks and results in improved performance. The study underscores the importance of the type of praise given and its profound influence on behavior and self-perception.
📉 Decline vs. Improvement in Performance
The summary of the study's findings reveals a significant performance decline in children who received intelligence praise, while those praised for their effort showed a marked improvement. This dichotomy highlights the negative long-term effects of praising innate abilities versus the positive reinforcement of effort. Additionally, the study observed that children praised for intelligence were more likely to misrepresent their performance, suggesting a potential negative psychological consequence of such praise.
🛠 Shifting Narratives for Personal Growth
In the concluding paragraph, Huberman discusses the broader implications of the study and its relevance to personal development. He advises shifting from performance narratives to effort-related narratives as a tool for improvement. By focusing on effort rather than innate ability, individuals can foster a growth mindset, which is essential for enhancing skills and abilities. The paragraph also directs listeners to the Huberman Lab podcast and social media for further exploration of science-based tools for mental and physical health.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Growth Mindset
💡Neuroplasticity
💡Feedback
💡Identity Labels
💡Effort Praise
💡Performance Goals
💡Persistence
💡Cognitive Problems
💡Misrepresentation
💡Self-Affirmation
💡Narrative
Highlights
Growth mindset is the concept that abilities are not fixed but can be improved through effort and learning.
Asking oneself about areas of strength and weakness and the origins of these perceptions is crucial for personal development.
Feedback attached to identity labels like 'smart' or 'talented' can lead to different behavioral paths compared to feedback based on effort.
Dr. Carol Dweck's research is foundational in the field of growth mindset, emphasizing the impact of the type of feedback received.
Praising intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance, contrary to common belief.
Children praised for intelligence tend to select easier problems to maintain the praise they receive, while those praised for effort seek out more challenging tasks.
Effort praise leads to better performance and persistence in the face of challenges compared to intelligence praise.
The type of praise received early in life or when learning a new skill can integrate into core beliefs about one's capabilities.
Parents and teachers should be cautious about the kind of feedback they provide, especially when it's tied to identity labels.
Rewarding effort over identity traits is a more effective approach to improving performance and motivation.
Children who receive intelligence praise are more likely to misrepresent their performance compared to those who receive effort praise.
The study's findings challenge the common practice of praising intelligence and highlight the benefits of effort-based praise.
Understanding neuroplasticity and the brain's ability to learn is key to embracing the growth mindset.
Shifting from performance narratives to effort-related narratives can foster improvement and a positive mindset.
The Huberman Lab podcast and social media provide additional tools and insights on mental, physical health, and performance.
Transcripts
[Music]
welcome to another episode of after skool I'm Andrew huberman professor of neurobiology and
Ophthalmology at Stanford school of medicine and the host of The huberman Lab podcast growth
mindset is the idea that we can get better at things that is that our abilities are not fixed
but rather that our abilities are malleable and the beauty of growth mindset is that it forces
es us to step back and ask ourselves some simple questions these are questions that you could ask
yourself right now and in fact I highly recommend you do you could ask yourself for instance what
have I been told I'm really good at you should also ask yourself what have I been told I'm really
poor at that I'm just not good at what have I told myself I'm really good at and what have I told
myself I'm really bad at and then a second set of questions is what am I good at and why did it come
naturally to me did I apply myself for many years meaning did I apply a lot of effort to learning
that thing or perhaps both right and then it's also important to ask yourself why am I not good
at other things is it simply because you've never applied yourself at those things or is it because
you tried and had an early failure or perhaps you tried and tried and tried for many years and you
continued to fail at that thing or you just didn't reach a level of proficiency that made you want
to pursue it further in asking yourselves those questions you are asking yourself not just what
you're good at and bad at and why you should also be thinking about where the messages of being good
at something or being bad at something arrived from did they arrive from outside you meaning
from your parents from your coaches from your teachers or was it the case that despite a lot
of positive feedback you just sort of decided you weren't good at something or conversely was it
the case that despite a lot of negative feedback that you would never be good at something or that
you weren't good at something that you continue to persist because there's certainly people like that
the more negative feedback they get the more they dig their heels in to prove themselves as capable
of becoming good at something so I do recommend as we March forward in this conversation you think
about those questions what am I good at what am I bad at why am I good at those things why am I bad
at those things and ask yourself to what extent your labels that is your identity is attached to
the things that you are good at or bad at and the reason I'd like you to ask yourself those
questions is that next we're going to talk about research from Dr Carol D's laboratory
that was really the seed of the entire field of growth mindset it relates to a specific set of
experiments that really show that the specific feedback we get meaning whether or not we get
feedback that is attached to our identity like a label like smart or great athlete or talented
sends us down a very different path of performance in the short and long run as compared to whether
or not we receive feedback that's based on effort meaning you tried really hard or you really seem
to apply yourself under conditions where you're getting the right answer over time because you
simply refuse to quit those are two very Divergent sets of feedback and as you'll learn in a moment
the sorts of feedback that we get especially early in life or early in an Endeavor so this
doesn't just apply to young kids this applies to adults too who are taking on a new skill or are
trying to expand on an existing skill those two Divergent forms of feedback get integrated into
our core beliefs about what we think is possible for us in a given Endeavor and the great news is
we can also modify those core beliefs simply by changing the feedback that we give ourselves the
research paper I'd like to discuss briefly that beautifully embodies the runway that led to the
discovery of growth mindset is a paper from Dr Carol dck as well as her colleague Claudia Mueller
and the title of the paper essentially says it all the title is praise for intelligence can undermine
children's motivation and performance right that should be surprising that praise for intelligence
can undermine motivation and performance I would have thought and I think many people
probably believe that if you tell a child or an adult that they're really good at something and
you're genuine about that feedback meaning they're performing well and you say great
you're doing really well you're so smart you're so talented that their performance would continue to
improve that it would bolster their motivation to engage in that activity which hopefully they enjoy
that it would serve to encourage them right the kid thinks not only am I engaging this activity
but I'm getting positive feedback presumably from people that I care about or whose opinion I care
about wouldn't that serve to elevate performance it does not in fact the exact opposite happened so
I'll just give you a few of the key takeaways from this study the way it was done is very interesting
they essentially gave feedback about performance that was linked up with a child's intelligence
telling a kid they're smart they're talented that they can learn things really easily or
that they're very good at learning this sort of thing and they called that intelligence feedback
or they gave them what was called effort feedback the simple way to think about effort feedback is
that it's more attached to verbs as opposed to labels so effort feedback consists of things like
you tried really hard on that problem it was great the way that you applied effort it was great the
way that you persisted it was great the way that even when you got the wrong answer you spent 10
minutes thinking about it and then you tried again and again or in some cases even if they didn't get
the right answer telling them well even though you didn't get the right answer it's really terrific
that you continue to try Okay so intelligence feedback was the sort of feedback that was tied
to labels of identity things like smart talented Etc whereas effort feedback was tied to verbs
choices behavioral and cognitive choices that children made in an effort to learn or get better
at something so in this study which included over a 100 children they either got the intelligence
type feedback or the effort type feedback or there was a control group that didn't get either
the intelligence or the effort type feedback and then they looked at a number of different
outcomes so I'll just highlight a few examples of what they found first of all the kids that
got the intelligence-based feedback when they were then later offered problem sets that were either
challenging or were of the sort that they knew they could perform well on they tended to select
problems that they knew they could perform well on these where what were referred to as performance
goals in other words they picked problems that allowed them to continue to get the praise that
they had received previously about being smart or talented whereas the kids that got feedback about
their strong effort when later presented with problems that were either easy or hard more often
than not they pick the harder problems that stood to teach them more so that strike it says that
if you tell a kid that they're smart or talented and that's the reason why they perform well when
they encounter challenges they are likely to go with the least amount of challenge so that they
can continue to receive that praise or feedback whereas if you receive praise and feedback for
your strong effort then later you tend to pick environments problem sets Etc that allow you to
exert the very effort that got you the praise in the first place so in both cases these children
are essentially attached to to the praise right in some sense I mean we like to think that they enjoy
these activities and they're benefiting from them as well but in both cases the praise really serves
to reinforce a certain pattern of behavior but in the case of giving intelligence feedback the
kids are really just trying to reinforce being told that they're smart or talented as opposed
to reinforcing the engagement in the activity that got them the praise in the first place and
the converse is also true when kids are told hey you really tried hard and that's great or I like
how you persisted or you're so persistent I can really see how persistent you are in trying to get
the right answer even if you don't get the right answer well then when you present those kids with
additional challenges they work very hard to stay in Challenge and guess what no surprise the kids
that are rewarded for effort and that continue to pick harder problems outperform the kids that are
given the intelligence praise and feedback by a large margin so what does this tell us this
tells us that the narratives that we hear from others of course reinforce certain patterns of
behavior what else does this tell us this tells us that if you're a parent or teacher you have to be
very careful about giving feedback to a child that is attached to their identity around an Endeavor
especially if they're performing well at that endeavor right now of course if a child is not
performing well at something you also don't want to tell them that they're stupid right you don't
want to tell them that they're deficient right but that's a rare occurrence in the classroom
one would hope that's a rare occurrence par on the field one would hope but what's very common very
very common is that when we see children or adults performing well we tend to give them identity
labels as a way to try and reinforce whatever Behavior we observe and we like now the other
thing they looked at in this study were the actual raw performance on cognitive problems and these
data I must say are just so interesting they took the kids and they gave them all the same problem
sets and all the kids AC Ross the board whether or not they were getting intelligence praise or
effort praise or they were in the control group were performing more or less the same way they
were getting some of these questions right some of these questions wrong then they gave them praise
after they completed those problems they either got intelligence praise you're so smart you're so
talented or they got effort praise you tried so hard you really persisted that's fantastic then
later they gave them another set of problems and they looked at performance now remember the first
time around all the kids got some of the questions right and some of the questions wrong so there's
room for improvement for everybody what they found was absolutely striking the kids that were in the
control group so they didn't get any specific form of Praise they perform more or less the same way
as they did before so if they were getting 75% of the answers right the first time they got
75% of the answers right the second time the kids that were in the intelligence praise group their
performance went down significantly whereas the kids that were in the effort praise group
their performance increased significantly okay so this is a biral effect where giving intelligence
praise reduces performance and giving effort praise improves performance which is absolutely
striking and tells you everything you need to know which is if you're a parent you're a teacher and
of course as we all give ourselves feedback rewarding yourself for effort is the best way
to improve performance rewarding yourself based on identity labels so smart so talented you're a
great athlete Etc all that stare in the mirror and do self-affirmation stuff can actually undermine
performance and in fact it does undermine performance it may not do it right away but
eventually it does and in a moment I'll explain why the other thing this study looked at that I
just have to mention is this notion of persistence so remember earlier I said that the kids that got
intelligence praise tended to pick easier problems down the line whereas the kids that got effort
praise tended to pick harder problems it turns out that the kids that got intelligence praise also
tended to take on fewer problems overall they tended to limit the total number of challenges
that they engaged in whereas the kids that got the effort praise that you work so hard you're
so determined that was so impressive how you just kept going even when you got some answers wrong
those kids not only opted for harder challenges they not only performed better but they also took
on many more challenges so these data really make clear that the effort praise is the way to go now
I know many people have heard this whole thing about don't reward the person reward the effort
reward the verbs as I'm referring to it but it's actually pretty rare that we hear effort rewarded
in everyday settings and it is very common for us to overhear intelligence praise or Talent praise
you know a kid comes home with a trophy and we tell them you're a great athlete right kid
comes home with a great report card you you're so smart congratulations a kid comes home with some
sort of win in their world and we tend to give them a label because we like to think that that
label will get internalized and they'll start to view themselves as a winner we tell them you can
do anything you're a winner you're a winner and of course you don't want to tell children or yourself
or any other adult you're a loser right we do not want to do that you don't want to undermine
performance that way but it's very clear based on This research and a lot of other papers similar to
it that we all have a giant blind spot sitting in our psychological field when we are getting
and receiving praise that really it is the sort of Praise that attached to the very efforts that led
to the results that will lead to even improved results over time okay so this paper is really
truly important it's a landmark paper in the field of psychology motivation learning and performance
and that's why I'm discussing it in such detail here but it actually includes one additional piece
of information that I also think everyone should know about and that is the tendency for children
who get intelligence praise to misrepresent their performance on subsequent efforts what do I mean
by that in this paper they had the children perform on a given task and then they either
got intelligence praise you're so smart you're so talented or effort praise you work so hard you're
so diligent and then they had them do a series of other tasks and then report their results to other
kids and what they found is that children who get intelligence praise when they need to report their
scores either by walking up to the board and putting a little Mark where their particular
score is or telling a another student what their score was or even writing it down on a piece of
paper covertly so that's it's not visibly being compared to all the other scores the kids that
got intelligence praise tend to lie about their score and as you could imagine they tend to lie
in the direction of making themselves appear as having performed better than they actually did so
this is a pretty Sinister aspect of intelligence praise that we don't often hear about even if
you've heard telling a person that they are smart or talented can ultimately undermine performance
rarely if ever do we hear that telling someone that they're smart or talented can increase
the probability that that person is going to misrepresent their performance in the future
whereas the kids that receive the effort praise do no such thing they Faithfully represent their
performance so just to illustrate how important the findings in the study really are the paper
was published in 1998 but just two years prior in 1996 there was a survey of parents asking to
what extent do you believe that intelligence is fixed and 85% answered that they thought
that intelligence was fixed that means they believe that the brain was sort of a vessel
of fixed size that of course when we're born into the world it's kind of empty we don't have
any knowledge but that the job of schooling was to teach kids things and reveal an intelligence
capacity that was innate and that couldn't be increased upon whereas nowadays we really
understand mainly through our deeper understanding of neuroplasticity and how the brain learns that
indeed the brain can learn and that intelligence is not fixed however in 1998 when these studies
were done most people were of the core belief that intelligence is fixed that it cannot be improved
upon and these results really drive home the fact that the type of feedback we get about our
performance even when our performance is good can undermine our future performance or if we
receive feedback of the effort praise type the you tried so hard you're so persistent type that our
abilities can indeed improve and when you look at any intelligence test if you look at a standard IQ
test or you you know go way out onto the other end of the Continuum in terms of intelligence
testing you look at emotional intelligence it is very clear that anyone and everyone can improve
their scores on those exams and in fact can improve the various aspects of intelligence
because in fact there are many different forms of intelligence through dedicated effort I know many
of you are listening to this with an eye toward the tool tools meaning you want to know what the
tools are that you can Implement well earlier I had you ask some questions what are you good at
what have you been told you're good at and how did you arrive at being good at those things
I also encourage you to think about what you've been told you're bad at or less good at and what
you tell yourself you're bad at and less good at and how you arrived at that conclusion right now
I'd like you to ask yourself what is your typical narrative when you are engaging in things that you
believe you are good at and what is your typical narrative meaning your internal dialogue in your
head when you're engaging in things that you are not good at or if you're not engaging in those
things when you think about engaging in those things and the tool that's very effective to apply
even just in your own mind is to start shifting your narrative from those performance narratives
towards effort related narratives if you attach effort verbs to why you got good at something
as well as why you are not good at something well then there's only room for improvement
thank you for joining for this special episode of after skool if you'd like to learn more tools for
mental health physical health and performance check out the huberman Lab podcast which is
available on all platforms YouTube Apple Spotify anywhere podcasts are found also
check out huberman lab on both Instagram and Twitter there I cover science and science-based
tools some of which overlaps with the content of the huberman Lab podcast but much of which
is distinct from the content of the huberman Lab podcast we are also huberman lab.com that's our
website and there you can find links to all of our social media and all of our podcast episodes
Weitere ähnliche Videos ansehen
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)