SDXL1.0 Juggernaut XL & RealVisXL
TLDRIn this video, the host compares two photorealistic SDXL models, Realviz XL and Juggernaut XL, using various prompts and settings. The comparison includes different scenarios such as skin texture, hair color, cinematic shots, car photos, and sci-fi settings. While both models perform well, the host slightly favors Juggernaut XL for its more dramatic and darker tones, better adherence to prompts, and the inclusion of a Laura feature. However, Realviz XL also impresses with richer colors and believable motion, making it a strong contender. The host invites viewers to share their preferences and suggests future model comparisons, focusing on fantasy themes.
Takeaways
- 🎨 **Photorealistic Models Compared**: The video compares two SDXL models, RealVis XL and Juggernaut XL, known for their photorealistic quality.
- 🔍 **Recent Update**: Juggernaut XL was updated to version three in September, which is a point of interest for the comparison.
- 📐 **Image Resolution and Settings**: The comparison used a resolution of 1024 by 1024 with 30 steps and a CFG of 6 DPM plus plus sde, Keras, with random seeds.
- 📝 **Prompts for Imagery**: The prompts included terms like 'cinematic', 'film still', and 'analog' to enhance the desired look, with simple negative prompts.
- 🆚 **Initial Comparison Lean**: At first glance, the reviewer leans towards Juggernaut XL for its slightly smoother skin texture, but acknowledges both models' comparability.
- 👥 **Hair Color Mention**: The presence of purple hair, as prompted, indicates RealVis XL adheres to the prompt slightly better in that instance.
- 🌅 **Lighting Preferences**: Juggernaut XL is favored for its softer sunset lighting, aligning more closely with the prompt's request for soft lighting.
- 🚗 **Car Photo Edge**: RealVis XL is preferred for richer color and a better sense of motion in car photos, despite Juggernaut's dramatic tone.
- 🤖 **Sci-Fi and Cinematic Styles**: Both models perform well with sci-fi prompts, but Juggernaut XL slightly edges out with better rusted texture details as requested.
- 🍺 **Realism in Simple Shots**: When comparing two glasses of beer, RealVis XL provided a bit more foam detail, but Juggernaut XL offered deeper contrast, appealing to the reviewer.
- 📈 **Maturity of Models**: Juggernaut XL, being on version three, is seen as slightly more mature, whereas RealVis XL, on version one, shows great potential.
- ✍️ **Community Feedback Invited**: The reviewer encourages comments on preferences and suggestions for future model comparisons.
Q & A
What are the two SDXL models that were compared in the transcript?
-The two SDXL models compared are RealVis XL version one and Juggernaut XL version three.
What aspect ratio was used for the comparisons?
-The aspect ratio used for the comparisons was 1024 by 1024.
How many steps were used with a CFG of 6 DPM plus plus sde, Keras?
-30 steps were used with a CFG of 6 DPM plus plus sde, Keras.
What was added to all the prompts to enhance a certain look?
-The word 'cinematic, film still analog' was added to all the prompts to enhance the desired look.
Which model did the speaker lean towards at first glance and why?
-The speaker leaned towards Juggernaut at first glance due to its slightly smoother skin texture and hyper-realistic look.
What was the speaker's observation about the hair in the first set of images?
-The speaker noticed a bit of purple in the hair, which was included in the prompt, and found that RealViz adhered to the prompt slightly better in this aspect.
Which model had a more cinematic look with dramatic lighting?
-Juggernaut had more of a darker dramatic tone, which the speaker associated with a cinematic look.
In the car photos, which model did the speaker lean towards and why?
-The speaker leaned towards RealViz because of its richer color, better sense of motion, and interesting reflections on the wet streets.
What was the advantage Juggernaut had over RealViz in the sci-fi, cinematic prompt?
-Juggernaut better incorporated the 'rusted texture' that was included in the prompt, showing more rust spots and dirt.
What was the speaker's final verdict on the models when comparing a simple but realistic image of two glasses of beer?
-The speaker felt that neither model was a clear loser, but Juggernaut seemed slightly more mature, possibly due to being on version three.
What additional feature does Juggernaut have that was mentioned in the transcript?
-Juggernaut has a 'Laura' feature that can further enhance its output.
What does the speaker intend to do in the next video?
-The speaker is considering doing more model comparisons, potentially focusing on fantasy models, and is open to suggestions from the audience.
Outlines
📊 Photorealistic SDXL Model Comparison: Realviz XL vs. Juggernaut XL
The video script begins with an introduction to a comparison between two photorealistic SDXL models, Realviz XL version one and the recently updated Juggernaut XL version three. The comparison is conducted using a 1024 by 1024 aspect ratio with 30 steps and a CFG of 6 DPM plus plus sde, Keras. The seeds are left random to observe the variability in the images produced. The prompts used in the comparison aim to enhance a cinematic film still analog look, with additional modifiers to describe the image. The video presents a series of images comparing the two models, noting that while both are highly comparable, there are slight preferences for Juggernaut in some instances due to its slightly smoother skin texture and better adherence to the prompt regarding hair color. The video concludes with the narrator expressing satisfaction with both models and indicating a slight edge to Juggernaut for certain aspects, while acknowledging the potential of Realviz XL.
🔍 Further Insights and Future Model Comparisons
In the second paragraph, the narrator reflects on the maturity of Juggernaut's model, attributing its slight advantage to being on version three, compared to Realviz's version one. The narrator also mentions the additional Laura tool that comes with Juggernaut, which can further enhance its capabilities. Despite this, the narrator recognizes the potential in Realviz and expresses an intention to continue experimenting with it. The video ends with an invitation for viewers to share their preferences in the comments and to suggest models for future comparisons, with a teaser for a potential upcoming video focusing on fantasy models.
Mindmap
Keywords
SDXL1.0
Photorealistic
RealVisXL
Juggernaut XL
Aspect Ratio
CFG
Prompts
Negative Prompts
Cinematic
Skin Texture
Seeds
Highlights
Comparing two photorealistic SDXL models: Realviz XL and Juggernaut XL.
Juggernaut XL was recently updated to version three in September.
Using aspect ratios of 1024 by 1024 for the image comparisons.
30 steps with a CFG of 6 DPM plus plus sde, Keras were used for the tests.
Seeds were left random to observe how the prompts reacted to the models.
Cinematic, film still analog was added to all prompts to enhance the look.
Juggernaut has a slightly smoother skin texture with a hyper-realistic look.
Realviz adheres to the prompt slightly better, especially with hair color.
Juggernaut has a more dramatic, darker tone suitable for cinematic shots.
Realviz provides richer colors and a better sense of motion in car photos.
In the car comparison, Realviz gets a slight edge for believability.
Both models excel in rendering detailed sci-fi and cinematic scenes.
Juggernaut better captures rusted textures as per the prompt.
Realviz offers a cleaner look, which some might prefer for certain details.
Juggernaut's version three maturity and accompanying Laura set it apart.
Realviz, despite being version one, shows great potential for future development.
Both models are considered winners, with preference being a matter of personal taste.
The video invites viewers to share their preferences and suggest models for future comparisons.