Originality.AI Review - 5 Tests to Check if it Works!

The video review explores the effectiveness of Originality.AI, an AI content detection tool. The reviewer tests the software by submitting various pieces of content, including AI-generated paragraphs from OpenAI and Jasper, original content written by the reviewer, and content written by a hired researcher. The software accurately identifies the AI content with high percentages and the original content with 100% originality. The reviewer also demonstrates the impact of using a paraphrasing tool like Quill Bot, which significantly increases the AI percentage detected. The video emphasizes the importance of human touch in content creation, suggesting that AI tools should be used carefully and in conjunction with human oversight. It concludes that Originality.AI is a valuable tool for those concerned about the detectability of AI-generated content and potential penalties from search engines like Google.

Takeaways

• 📝 There are many AI writing tools available, but using them can violate Google's webmaster guidelines and lead to penalties.
• 🤖 Originality.AI was tested with different types of content to see if it can accurately detect AI-generated content.
• 🍣 A paragraph about sushi, created by OpenAI, was tested and Originality.AI detected it as 99% AI, which is accurate.
• ✍️ Jasper AI was used to write a paragraph on the same topic, and Originality.AI detected it as 100% AI, slightly worse than OpenAI.
• 📖 Content written by the reviewer personally was correctly identified as 100% original and 0% AI by Originality.AI.
• 📚 A piece of content written by a hired researcher was identified as 77% original and 23% AI, indicating mixed results.
• 📝 After using Quill Bot, a paraphraser, on the same content, Originality.AI detected it as 99% AI and 1% original.
• 🔍 Originality.AI proved to be very accurate in distinguishing between AI and original content in the tests conducted.
• 🚫 The reviewer suggests that while AI tools can be helpful, they should be used carefully to avoid penalties and inaccuracies.
• 👥 AI tools require a human touch for proofreading, fact-checking, and adding manual content to ensure quality.
• ❓ It's unclear what specific benchmark Originality.AI or Google uses to determine if content is acceptable or penalized.
• 💡 Running content through Originality.AI can be helpful to ensure it passes scrutiny and to maintain a balance between AI assistance and human input.

Q & A

What is the main concern regarding the use of AI writing tools mentioned in the transcript?

The main concern is that Google has stated that AI-generated content violates its webmaster guidelines and could lead to a manual penalty.

What is the purpose of the Originality.AI tool as discussed in the video?

Originality.AI is designed to detect whether a piece of content is AI-generated or original, which can be useful for those concerned about potential penalties from search engines.

How many credits were given to the reviewer to test out the Originality.AI platform?

The reviewer was given two thousand credits to test the platform.

What was the result when the reviewer tested a paragraph created by openai.com through Originality.AI?

The result was 99% AI and 1% original, which aligns with the fact that the content was 100% AI-generated.

How did the content created by Jasper fare when scanned with Originality.AI?

The content created by Jasper was detected as 100% AI and 0% original.

What was the outcome when the reviewer's own original content was tested on Originality.AI?

The software correctly identified the content as 100% original and 0% AI.

How did the content written by a researcher hired by the reviewer score on Originality.AI?

The content was scored as 77% original and 23% AI.

What was the impact of using Quill Bot, a paraphraser, on the original content's AI score?

After paraphrasing with Quill Bot, the content's AI score increased to 99% AI and 1% original.

Why is it still necessary to have a human touch when using AI writing tools?

A human touch is necessary for fact-checking, proofreading, and adding manual content to ensure accuracy and relevance, as AI tools may have limited knowledge and can sometimes provide incorrect information.

What is the reviewer's opinion on the use of AI tools for creating content?

The reviewer believes that AI tools can be very helpful in saving time and assisting with writer's block, but they should be used correctly and in conjunction with human input to ensure quality and accuracy.

What is the reviewer's suggestion for those who use AI tools to create content?

The reviewer suggests using Originality.AI to check the AI content percentage and ensure it doesn't exceed acceptable levels to avoid potential penalties.

How does the reviewer describe the credit-based system of Originality.AI?

The reviewer mentions that the credit-based system is efficient as it allows for extensive use of the platform without quickly depleting the credits.

Outlines

00:00

🤖 AI Writing Tools and Their Impact on SEO

The video discusses the prevalence of AI writing tools in the market and their potential risks. It mentions that while these tools are often praised and recommended through affiliate links, Google's webmaster guidelines consider AI-generated content as a violation, which can result in penalties. The speaker shares personal experience with AI content ranking well in search engines but cautions that this might not always be the case. The video introduces a tool called originality.ai, which the speaker has tested. The tool is designed to detect AI-generated content, and the speaker shares the results of various tests, including content created by openai.com, Jasper, and personally written content. The results indicate that the tool is highly accurate in distinguishing between AI and original content. The video concludes with a suggestion that while AI tools can be useful, they should be used wisely and with a human touch, including fact-checking and manual editing.

05:01

📝 The Importance of Human Input in AI-Generated Content

The second paragraph emphasizes the necessity of human involvement when using AI writing tools. It points out that these tools may sometimes produce factually incorrect information, especially since their knowledge is often limited to events before 2021. The speaker advises that for industries where up-to-date information is crucial, relying on AI tools may not be beneficial. However, for other niches, AI tools can be time-saving and helpful in overcoming writer's block or expanding content. The importance of proofreading, fact-checking, and adding manual content is highlighted. The video also discusses the potential use of originality.ai as a tool to check for AI content, suggesting that if it can detect AI usage, then Google likely has the technology to do so as well. The speaker concludes by mentioning the credit-based system of originality.ai and the number of credits used during testing, encouraging viewers to try the tool if they are concerned about the authenticity of their content.

Keywords

💡AI writing tools

AI writing tools refer to software applications that utilize artificial intelligence to assist in the writing process. They can generate content, rewrite existing texts, and help with various writing tasks. In the video, the host discusses the use of these tools, their potential benefits, and the concerns related to their use, particularly regarding search engine optimization and penalties.

💡Affiliate link

An affiliate link is a unique URL that contains an identifier for an affiliate marketer. When a user makes a purchase through this link, the affiliate earns a commission. In the context of the video, the host mentions that many people promote AI writing tools through affiliate links, suggesting a commercial incentive behind their endorsements.

💡Google's webmaster guidelines

Google's webmaster guidelines are a set of rules and best practices provided by Google to help website owners optimize their sites for the search engine. The video mentions that according to these guidelines, AI-generated content is not allowed, which can lead to penalties for websites using such content.

💡Originality.ai

Originality.ai is a software platform mentioned in the video that is designed to detect AI-generated content. The host of the video was given credits to test the platform and shares the results of his tests, which indicate that it can accurately identify content created by AI.

💡Content scan

A content scan is the process of analyzing a piece of text to check for certain attributes, such as plagiarism or in this case, AI generation. The video demonstrates the use of Originality.ai's content scan feature to determine the percentage of AI content in various texts.

💡Penalty

In the context of the video, a penalty refers to the negative consequences imposed by search engines like Google on websites that violate their guidelines. Using AI-generated content can result in a manual penalty, which may include a decrease in search rankings.

💡Human touch

The human touch refers to the personal, creative, or editorial input that a human being adds to a process or product. The host emphasizes that even when using AI writing tools, it is essential to have a human review and edit the content to ensure accuracy, relevance, and to add a personal touch.

💡Fact checking

Fact checking is the act of verifying the accuracy of statements or information. The video suggests that AI tools may sometimes provide content that is not factually accurate, so it is crucial for humans to perform fact-checking to ensure the reliability of the information presented.

💡Writer's block

Writer's block is a term used to describe a condition, often experienced by writers, where they have difficulty writing or coming up with ideas. The video mentions that AI writing tools can help overcome writer's block by generating content or expanding on existing ideas.

💡Quill bot

Quill bot is a paraphrasing tool that rewrites content to make it unique while maintaining its original meaning. In the video, the host uses Quill bot to paraphrase a piece of content and then tests it with Originality.ai to see how the tool detects the AI-generated aspect of the rewritten text.

💡Credit-based system

A credit-based system is a method of payment or usage where a user is given a certain number of credits to use a service or product. The video explains that Originality.ai operates on such a system, where the host was provided with 2,000 credits to test the platform.

Highlights

AI writing tools are prevalent on the market, with many claiming to be the best and promoting through affiliate links.

OpenAI's free tool is effective, but Google's webmaster guidelines consider AI-generated content a violation which can lead to penalties.

Despite potential penalties, AI content can still rank highly in search engines.

Originality.AI was tested with various content types to determine its ability to detect AI-generated content.

The Originality.AI dashboard is sleek and user-friendly.

AI content from OpenAI was detected with 99% accuracy as AI-generated.

Jasper AI content was also identified with 100% accuracy as AI-generated.

Content written by the reviewer was correctly identified as 100% original and 0% AI.

A piece of content written by a hired individual was identified as 77% original and 23% AI.

Quill Bot, a paraphraser, was used to rewrite the content, which was then identified as 99% AI and 1% original.

Originality.AI's accuracy in detecting AI content suggests that Google may already have similar technology.

AI tools should be used carefully and with a human touch to avoid penalties and inaccuracies.

Factual checking is essential as AI tools may provide inaccurate information.

AI tools are less useful for industries that require up-to-date information post-2021.

AI tools are beneficial for saving time, overcoming writer's block, and expanding content, but require human intervention for quality.

Running content through Originality.AI can be helpful for ensuring originality and avoiding penalties.

The reviewer was given 2,000 credits to test Originality.AI, using only five, leaving plenty for further use.