What Darwin Never Knew (NOVA) Part 6/8 HD
Summary
TLDRThe script explores the genetic basis of evolution, focusing on Hox genes that dictate body plans across species. It reveals how minor genetic mutations in ancient fish like Tiktaalik could have led to the development of limbs, setting the stage for diverse land creatures. The narrative also delves into human uniqueness, comparing human and chimp DNA, and suggests that specific genetic differences may be responsible for the human hand's remarkable dexterity, hinting at the complex interplay of genes in shaping life's diversity.
Takeaways
- 🐟 The paddlefish is considered more primitive than the extinct Tiktaalik, with fins that are less related to limbs.
- 🧬 Shubin's research focused on Hox genes, which are crucial in determining the body plan of developing organisms and have remained unchanged for over 600 million years.
- 🔍 Hox genes play a key role in the formation of both paddlefish fins and the limbs of four-limbed animals, suggesting a genetic basis for the transition from fins to limbs.
- 🌟 The revelation that the same Hox genes are involved in the development of fins and limbs indicates that the evolution of limbs from fins might not have required entirely new genetic material.
- 🔄 Evolution often involves the reconfiguration of old genes and pathways rather than the creation of new ones, leading to the emergence of new structures and functions.
- 🦴 The origin of four-legged creatures can be traced back to a creature like Tiktaalik, which likely experienced mutations in Hox gene activity that led to limb-like structures.
- 🏞 Tiktaalik's ability to move onto land opened up new ecological niches, setting the stage for the diversification of limbed animals.
- 🧬 Modern genetics has provided insights into the genetic underpinnings of human uniqueness, challenging the traditional belief in human exceptionalism.
- 🤚 The human hand, with its unique combination of precision and power, is a key attribute that sets us apart from other species, largely due to the opposable thumb.
- 🔬 Research by Jim Noonan at Yale University suggests that a specific DNA sequence, differing in humans from chimps, may be linked to the development of the human thumb.
- 🧬 The human-chimp DNA comparison reveals a 99% similarity, with the remaining 1% containing the genetic differences that contribute to our distinct characteristics.
Q & A
What is the significance of paddlefish in the study of evolutionary biology?
-Paddlefish is significant because it is a more primitive form compared to Tiktaalik, and its fins bear less relation to limbs. Studying paddlefish embryos helps in understanding the genes that build its fins, which are related to those in more complex animals, including humans.
What role do Hox genes play in the development of an organism?
-Hox genes are critical in determining the body plan of an organism. They dictate the placement of various body parts such as the front and back, top and bottom, left and right, inside and outside, as well as the positions of eyes, legs, and other features.
How did the discovery of Hox genes in paddlefish relate to the evolution of limbs in creatures?
-The discovery showed that the same Hox genes that control the development of paddlefish fins also control the growth of our limbs. This suggests that the transition from fins to limbs in evolutionary history might not have required entirely new genes but rather changes in the expression and order of existing genes.
What is the evolutionary significance of the changes in the activity of Hox genes?
-Changes in the activity of Hox genes could lead to the development of new structures, such as the evolution of limbs from fins. This indicates that evolution can involve the reconfiguration of old genetic pathways rather than the creation of entirely new genes.
How did the discovery of the role of Hox genes in limb development impact our understanding of evolution?
-The discovery showed that the origin of creatures with arms and legs might not have been a huge leap, as many of the genes necessary for limb development were already present in prehistoric fish. It highlights the importance of genetic mutations and changes in gene regulation in the evolution of new traits.
What is the role of Hox genes in the formation of the human hand?
-Hox genes are involved in the development of the human hand, particularly in the formation of the thumb, which provides a unique combination of precision and power. They are crucial for the ability to touch all four fingers with the thumb, allowing for various grips.
What challenges did Charles Darwin face when suggesting humans descended from apes?
-Darwin faced significant backlash and accusations of attacking the belief that humans were created in the image of God. His ideas were controversial and challenged the prevailing religious and social views of his time.
What is the current understanding of the genetic relationship between humans and apes?
-Modern science has established that humans and apes share a common ancestor, with the human and chimpanzee genomes being approximately 99% identical. The focus now is on understanding how such closely related species can exhibit such significant differences.
What is the significance of the 1% genetic difference between humans and chimps?
-The 1% genetic difference, despite being a small percentage, represents about 30 million DNA letters. This small difference is crucial for understanding the distinct characteristics and abilities that define humans, such as our advanced cognitive abilities and physical traits like the human hand.
What insights have been gained from studying the genetic differences in the human hand?
-Research has identified specific sequences in human DNA that differ from chimp DNA, which may act as switches to form key attributes of the human hand, such as the opposable thumb, contributing to our precision and power grip capabilities.
How does the study of genetic differences contribute to our understanding of what makes us human?
-Studying genetic differences helps scientists pinpoint the specific genes and sequences that contribute to uniquely human traits. This can provide insights into the evolutionary changes that have led to the development of human-specific abilities and behaviors.
Outlines
🐟 Evolution of Limbs from Fish to Land Creatures
This paragraph discusses the evolutionary journey of how fish like paddlefish, which are primitive and share a common ancestor with the extinct Tiktaalik, developed limbs. It highlights the role of Hox genes, which are crucial in determining the body plan of complex animals and have remained unchanged for over 600 million years. The paragraph explains how the same Hox genes that form paddlefish fins also create the bones in human limbs, suggesting that the transition from fins to limbs in evolutionary history might not have been a significant leap. The discovery implies that the origin of new structures in evolution often involves the reconfiguration of old genes rather than the creation of new ones.
🌏 The Colonization of Land by Early Limbed Creatures
The second paragraph delves into the implications of the evolutionary adaptation of limbs in early creatures like Tiktaalik. It suggests that random mutations in the activity of Hox genes allowed these creatures to develop limb-like structures, enabling them to move onto land. This migration led to the colonization of terrestrial environments rich with resources, setting the stage for the diversification of limbs for various functions such as running, flying, digging, and swinging. The paragraph emphasizes the significance of genetic changes in the evolution of life on Earth and ponders the broader question of what makes humans unique in the context of nature's wonders.
🧬 Unraveling the Genetic Basis of Human Uniqueness
The final paragraph presented focuses on the genetic basis that differentiates humans from other species, particularly our close relatives, the apes. It discusses the surprising genetic similarity between humans and chimpanzees, with nearly 99% identical DNA, raising questions about how such closely related species can exhibit significant differences. The paragraph introduces the work of scientists like Jim Noonan, who investigates the 1% genetic difference and its impact on human-specific traits, such as the versatility of our hands and thumbs. The research hints at the discovery of genetic sequences that may act as a 'switch' for the development of the human thumb, contributing to our unique precision and power grip capabilities.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Caviar
💡Paddlefish
💡Hox Genes
💡Tiktaalik
💡Embryo
💡Evolution
💡Genetics
💡Human Hand
💡Chimpanzee
💡Genome
💡DNA
Highlights
Paddlefish, a primitive fish, shares genes with the extinct Tiktaalik, indicating a common genetic heritage.
Hox genes, crucial for body plan development, have remained unchanged for over 600 million years across complex animals.
The same Hox genes are involved in the development of both paddlefish fins and human limbs, suggesting a genetic basis for limb evolution.
Evolution of new structures often involves reconfiguration of old genes rather than the creation of new ones.
A few mutations in Hox gene activity could have transformed fins into limbs, facilitating the transition of creatures from water to land.
The diversity of life on Earth is a result of complex interactions between genes, switches, and regulatory pathways.
Darwin's theory of evolution has been expanded by modern genetics, providing insights into the origins of human uniqueness.
Human activities and achievements, such as art, science, and technology, demonstrate our unique cognitive abilities.
Darwin faced controversy for suggesting human descent from apes, a view now supported by genetic evidence.
Modern science reveals a 99% DNA similarity between humans and chimps, posing the question of what makes us so different.
The human hand's unique combination of precision and power is attributed to the versatility of our thumb.
Jim Noonan's research at Yale University focuses on the genetic differences that contribute to the human hand's unique attributes.
A specific DNA sequence, differing in 13 places from chimp DNA, was identified as potentially influencing thumb development.
Experiments with mouse embryos showed human DNA activity in the development of the thumb and big toe, hinting at a genetic switch for human-specific traits.
The discovery of a genetic switch related to thumb development could explain the evolution of human hand dexterity.
The ongoing exploration of genetic differences between humans and chimps is crucial for understanding human evolution and uniqueness.
Transcripts
for caviar so we'd get our paddlefish
from caviar farms intriguingly even
though Tiktaalik is extinct the
paddlefish is actually the more
primitive form its fins bear far less
relation to an arm or leg than ticked
Alex and because they are related the
two kinds of fish should share the same
genes so Shubin began looking at
paddlefish embryos hunting for the genes
that built its fins
and soon he zeroed in on one particular
group of body plan genes called Hox
genes Hox genes have been found in all
complex animals from the velvet worm
that dates back some 600 million years
to the modern human and in all that time
the letters of their DNA have remained
virtually unchanged their aristocrats of
the gene community near the very top of
the chain of command
they give orders that cascade through a
developing embryo activating entire
networks of switches and genes that make
the parts of the body
they are absolutely critical to the
shape and form of a developing creature
these genes determine where the front
and the back of the animals going to be
the top the bottom the left the right
the inside the outside where the eyes
are going to be where the legs are gonna
be where the guts going to be how many
fingers are gonna have Subin found that
Hox genes had a key role in the
formation of paddlefish fins one set of
Hox genes orders the first stage of fin
development a sturdy piece of cartilage
that grows out from the torso
amazingly in all four-limbed animals
even us exactly the same genes create
the long upper arm bone in the
paddlefish another set of Hox genes
command the next stage of fin
development again exactly the same genes
control the growth of our two forearm
bones
finally the same genes working in a
different order make the array of bones
at the end of the fin the same sequence
of the same genes makes our fingers and
toes
this was a massive revelation suddenly
the origin of creatures with arms and
legs didn't seem such a huge leap after
all if the same genes were at work in
Tiktaalik then many of the genes needed
to make legs and arms were already being
carried around by prehistoric fish all
it needed was a few mutations
a few changes to the timing and order of
what was turned off and on and a fin
could become a limb oftentimes the
origin of whole new structures in
evolution doesn't involve the origin of
new genes or whole new genetic recipes
old genes
old genetic pathways can be reconfigured
to make marvelously wonderful new things
so it is now possible to answer what
Darwin didn't know and explain how all
four-legged creatures could be descended
from fish
around 375 million years ago a creature
like tick talent was under attack
harried by predators
but some random changes to the activity
of the Hox genes led to its fins
developing a structure like a limb
Tiktaalik could now halt itself out of
danger onto dry land on land it would
have found a world of plants and insects
a world ripe for colonization a world
perfect for animals with arms and legs
and so over millions of years these new
limbs evolved changed and diversified
some became adapted for running others
for flying some for digging others for
swinging and so for limbed creatures
took over the world in a multitude of
different ways
and all because of some changes to an
ancient set of genes
and this is the true wonder of where our
new understanding of DNA has led us to
there are genes that make the stuff of
our bodies switches that turn them off
and on and still other genes that give
those switches orders together in a
complex cascade of timing and intensity
they combine to produce the amazing
diversity of life on this planet
that truly is something that Darwin
never knew
but can this new science also explain
perhaps the most fundamental question of
all what makes us human the scope of
human activity is simply astounding what
fascinated me were all the crazy things
that humans did you look around the
world and if there's something bizarre
and interesting that you could be doing
humans are up to it somewhere in the
world and when you look at all of this
you just have to ask yourself what makes
us special what is the basis for this
human is for all nature's wonders the
achievements of the human mind are truly
unique we are the only species to think
about what others think about us to
punish those who have harmed others to
create art music
architecture
to engage in science medicine the
microchip only we can destroy millions
at the push of a button hardly
surprising then that for centuries we
thought that humans were different from
all other species better created in the
image of God
but then Darwin began to draw
conclusions from evidence like gill
slits in human embryos that showed that
we were descended from fish but it was
when he drew parallels with other close
relatives that he got into real trouble
shortly after Darwin returned from his
voyage in London an orangutan named
Jenny went on exhibit and this was a
huge sensation this was the first great
ape to be exhibited in captivity and
Darwin was absolutely taken with how she
was sort of childlike in her ways and he
saw a lot of human behavior in the way
this orangutan behaved when Darwin
suggested that human beings must
actually be descended from apes
he was savaged he was accused of
attacking that core belief that
humankind had been created in the image
of God above all other creatures but
today the idea that we share a common
ancestor with apes is completely
accepted in biology
instead as a result of having sequenced
the genomes of both humans and apes we
face a very different puzzle Katy
Pollard is an expert on chimp DNA given
all the obvious differences between
humans and chimps you might expect our
DNA to be really different but in fact
it's more like 99% identical just a 1%
difference in the DNA of humans and
chimps the mystery facing modern science
is not how can such different animals be
related but how can such closely related
species be so different
that really is something that Darwin
never knew but slowly scientists are
starting to find the answers and one
answer begins with insights into the
genetics of a key human organ our hands
the human hand is a marvel nimble and
dexterous nothing quite like it exists
anywhere else in nature it offers us a
unique combination of precision and
power and much of that is down to one
particular digit our thumb one of the
features of the human hand is our
ability to touch all four fingers with a
thumb and that allows us to make grips
like this gives us a lot of precision
the power grip is the ability to put a
lot of strength into this sort of
contact so if you're holding a ball you
basically pinching it and we can put a
lot of strength into that
the better to throw a fastball with
finding out why we have such versatile
hands compared to our nearest relatives
is the task of Jim Noonan at Yale
University
he began sifting through that vital 1%
of DNA that is different in humans from
chimps it's kind of the fundamental
questions in science is what makes us
who we are that's really what we try to
get to what makes humans human it was
slow work 1% may not sound like much but
it's still some 30 million of DNA's
chemical letters a's t's c's and g's but
Jana was a big place
and just by looking at sequence you
really can't tell for the most part what
is important and what isn't but
eventually in human DNA he spotted
something a sequence that was different
in 13 places compared to chimp DNA the
trouble was he had no idea what this
piece of DNA actually did to find out he
inserted it into the embryo of a mouse
to make the effects of the DNA easier to
follow he attached it to another gene
that gives off a blue color that way he
could see where the gene became active
in the embryo as the embryo developed
the piece of DNA seemed to be active all
over the place but most intriguingly it
was doing something in the growing paw
well I thought wow this is really cool
I think it was it was a really really
striking image
what Noonan saw was that the human DNA
became active in the mouse embryos thumb
and big toe it seems that Noonan may
have found a switch that helps form that
key human attribute our thumb the part
of our hand that gives us so much power
and precision
it's that power and
تصفح المزيد من مقاطع الفيديو ذات الصلة
What Darwin Never Knew (NOVA) Part 3/8 HD
Grade 10 SCIENCE | Quarter 3 Module 5 | Evidences of Evolution
TELMO PIEVANI - Quando Nacque la MENTE UMANA: come siamo diventati Sapiens
Biology Basics: Gene Flow (Simplified)
What Darwin Never Knew (NOVA) Part 5/8 HD
Temperament, heredity, and genes | Behavior | MCAT | Khan Academy
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)