BOMBSHELL NEW FOOTAGE OF 9/11 ATTACKS CONFIRMS CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF TOWERS | Redacted News

Summary

The script discusses a resurfaced video of the 9/11 Twin Towers attack, which some claim shows evidence of a controlled demolition rather than a structural failure due to plane impacts. Ted Walter, Executive Director for the International Center for 911 Justice, analyzes the video, highlighting flashes and structural damage that contradict the official narrative. He emphasizes the significance of eyewitness accounts of explosions and the importance of seeking truth and justice for the victims' families.

Takeaways

• 🌐 A video from the 9/11 Twin Tower attacks resurfaced on Twitter, sparking discussions as if it were new footage.
• 📺 The video was not entirely new; it had been broadcast before, but a significant portion of it was previously unseen and in higher quality.
• 🔍 Ted Walter, Executive Director for the International Center for 9/11 Justice, believes the video confirms a controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and not a collapse due to plane impacts.
• 👀 The video shows flashes of light, particularly on the lower part of the South Tower, which proponents of the controlled demolition theory argue are indicative of demolition charges.
• 🔥 There is a bright flash visible on the northeast corner of the South Tower, which Walter suggests is a demolition charge, contradicting the idea of a natural building collapse.
• 👮‍♂️ Over 200 eyewitness accounts, including those from first responders and reporters, have described explosions during the collapse of the towers.
• 🏢 World Trade Center Building 7's collapse is also considered suspicious, with no evidence of it being caused by debris from the Twin Towers, and is believed by some to have been brought down by demolition charges.
• 🕵️‍♂️ The new video provides a clearer view of structural damage to the South Tower, which supports the theory of demolition charges being used.
• 📝 The video's release is historically significant as it captures the immediate reactions of witnesses who perceived the event as an explosion, not a structural failure.
• 📉 The official narrative of the towers' collapse due to fires was introduced after the event, contrasting with the eyewitness accounts of explosions.
• 🔒 There is a concern that much of the original footage and eyewitness accounts supporting the explosion theory have been suppressed or made difficult to find in official channels.

Q & A

What video surfaced on Twitter that was claimed to be new footage of the 9/11 attacks?

A video of the attacks on the Twin Towers on 9/11 was posted on Twitter, which some users believed to be new footage never seen before, although it was later revealed to be previously broadcasted material with some additional unseen content.

How much of the video was actually new content?

About 57 minutes of the video was previously unseen footage, while a segment showing the collapse of the South Tower had aired before on Sky News and a Washington DC affiliate of CBS.

What is the position of the speaker regarding the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11?

The speaker, Ted Walter, holds the position that the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7 were brought down by controlled demolition, not by the impact of the airplanes.

What significant evidence does the new video provide to support the theory of controlled demolition?

The new video provides evidence such as visible flashes, particularly on the lower portion of the building as the top starts to go down, and a bright flash on the northeast corner of the South Tower, which the speaker suggests indicates demolition charges.

What is the significance of the flashes seen in the video?

The flashes are significant because they occur in areas of the building well above the impact zone and where the collapse is happening, suggesting the presence of demolition charges rather than a natural building collapse.

What does the speaker suggest about the bright flash seen on the northeast corner of the South Tower?

The speaker suggests that the bright flash is indicative of a demolition charge, as it cannot be explained by natural sunlight reflection and is visible in multiple videos from different angles.

What is the 'Journal of 9/11 Studies' and how does it relate to the video?

The 'Journal of 9/11 Studies' is a publication where a meticulous analysis of the video was published, confirming the presence of flashes in multiple videos, which supports the theory of controlled demolition.

What is the significance of the structural damage seen in the video near the bright flash?

The structural damage is significant as it appears in areas of the building that should not have been affected by a natural collapse, suggesting that the damage is associated with the detonation of demolition charges.

What are the implications of the video for the families and victims of 9/11?

The implications for the families and victims are that the video may provide new evidence supporting the theory of controlled demolition, which could potentially lead to further investigations and a reevaluation of the official narrative of the events.

How does the speaker describe the public's initial interpretation of the collapse of the Twin Towers?

The speaker describes the public's initial interpretation as perceiving the collapse as an explosion or demolition, rather than a structural failure caused by the airplane impacts and subsequent fires.

What is the role of the International Center for 9/11 Justice and how can people access more information?

The International Center for 9/11 Justice is an organization dedicated to seeking answers for the families and victims of 9/11. People can access more information by visiting their YouTube channel by searching 'i911' or visiting their website at IC911.org.