SC-CJI, NEET Leak a Business, Hegde Rips NTA #Lawchakra #supremecourtofindia

Summary

The speaker expresses deep concerns over the integrity of competitive exams, citing the occurrence of 61 toppers and the potential for unfair practices. They argue that the examination agency, NTA, has been lax in its response to paper leaks and has failed to ensure a fair ranking system. The speaker calls for a re-examination for affected students, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in the examination process to maintain trust and fairness.

Takeaways

• 😔 The speaker expresses distrust in competitive exams, citing issues with integrity and fairness.
• 📚 There is a mention of a history of paper leaks, suggesting an organized gang is involved in these activities.
• 💼 The speaker criticizes the NTA (National Testing Agency) for not being serious about maintaining the integrity of the examination process.
• 🔍 The speaker points out that the NTA did not cooperate initially with the police or the EOU (Economic Offences Wing) in addressing the leaks.
• 🏥 The government is spending about a crore (ten million) per year per medical student, highlighting the financial implications of these exams.
• 🏆 Students with high scores (690, 640) are not assured of a fair rank, which is a major concern from a student perspective.
• 🔑 The speaker suggests that the NTA continued to deny the existence of a leak and did not take immediate action when informed.
• 🔄 Changes in personnel and the involvement of the CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) in the investigation were only made later, indicating a delayed response.
• 📈 The speaker mentions that the NTA has not been transparent with data, and the data provided was only after being served with numerous PDF files.
• 🚫 The speaker concludes that the exams cannot be considered fair and that it is not safe to trust the results, advocating for a retest for those affected.

Q & A

What is the main concern raised about competitive exams in the transcript?

The main concern is the lack of trust in competitive exams due to the possibility of paper leaks and the integrity of the examination process.

What is the term 'mots' referring to in the context of the transcript?

The term 'mots' seems to be a typographical error; it should likely be 'most', referring to the majority of toppers in exams.

What is the implication of 'CR' in the context of government spending per medical student?

CR likely stands for 'Crore', which is a unit of Indian currency, indicating the amount spent by the government annually per medical student.

What is the issue with the NTA's handling of the examination process as mentioned in the transcript?

The issue is that the NTA did not show concern for the integrity of the process, continued to deny the paper leak, and did not cooperate with the investigation promptly.

What is the significance of the number '61' mentioned in the transcript?

The number '61' is not clearly explained in the transcript, but it could be related to the number of toppers or a specific data point in the context of the examination results.

What is the term 'Grace Mark' referred to in the transcript?

Grace Mark refers to additional marks given to students to compensate for potential errors in the examination process or to ensure a minimum passing score.

What is the role of the organized gang mentioned in the transcript?

The organized gang is implicated in leaking examination papers as part of their business model, aiming to maximize profit from the time-limited commodity of leaked papers.

What is the situation with the students who scored 690 and 640 as mentioned in the transcript?

These students are concerned that despite their high scores, they are not assured of a fair rank due to the potential manipulation and integrity issues in the examination process.

What is the significance of the 'retest' mentioned for 1563 students?

The retest is a measure taken by the authorities to ensure fairness and accuracy in measuring the students' abilities, in response to the integrity issues with the original examination.

What is the suggestion made for students who scored above 164 in the transcript?

The suggestion is to provide a re-examination for these students to ensure that they are accurately measured and ranked, in light of the concerns about the integrity of the original examination.

What is the final request made by the speaker in the transcript?

The speaker requests that the examination results not be accepted as fair and that the NTA's actions not be approved, suggesting that those involved in the paper leak should not be allowed to get away with it.

Outlines

00:00

🚨 Integrity Concerns in Competitive Exams

The speaker expresses deep concerns about the integrity of competitive exams, particularly in the context of medical student admissions. They argue that the exam system is unreliable due to the possibility of paper leaks and the presence of an organized gang with a history of such activities. The speaker highlights the high cost of medical education, funded by the government, and the unfair advantage gained by those who manage to crack the exam through illicit means. They emphasize the need for a serious examination agency like the NTA to prioritize the integrity of the process and question the agency's response to known leaks, suggesting a lack of cooperation with law enforcement and a denial of the issue. The speaker also mentions the potential for a retest for affected students and the need for transparency in the examination process.

05:01

🔍 Addressing Exam Leaks and Grace Marks

This paragraph delves into the administrative response to exam leaks and the granting of grace marks. The speaker suggests that the NTA and other administrative bodies have been in denial about the leaks and have not been transparent with their data. They point out that the NTA only acknowledged the issue and granted grace marks after being questioned by higher authorities. The speaker also criticizes the NTA for not cooperating with the Bihar police and for not taking immediate action when informed of the leaks. The paragraph concludes with a call for a retest for affected students and a re-examination of those who scored exceptionally high, to ensure fairness and accuracy in the examination process. The speaker ends with a poetic note, urging guidance and responsibility from the authorities.

Keywords

💡Competitive Exam

A competitive exam is a standardized test that is used to select candidates for educational programs or jobs based on merit. In the video's context, the speaker expresses distrust in such exams due to the occurrence of topper anomalies and potential for cheating, as evidenced by the mention of 61 toppers and the concern for exam integrity.

💡Data Cohort

A data cohort refers to a group of individuals who share a common characteristic for the purpose of research or analysis. The script discusses the possibility of anomalies within a data cohort, such as multiple individuals sharing the same high marks, which raises questions about the fairness and integrity of the exam results.

💡Integrity

Integrity in this context refers to the honesty and reliability of the examination process. The speaker emphasizes the importance of maintaining the integrity of competitive exams and criticizes the examination agency for not being sufficiently concerned about it, as shown by their alleged lack of action in response to paper leaks.

💡Gang

The term 'gang' in the script refers to an organized group involved in illicit activities, specifically the leaking of exam papers. The speaker alleges that such a gang operates with a business model to profit from the timely distribution of leaked exam materials.

💡Grace Marks

Grace marks are additional points given to students to compensate for minor errors or to adjust for perceived unfairness in grading. The script mentions that grace marks were given, but the speaker questions the transparency and fairness of this practice, suggesting it may have been used to cover up for exam leaks.

💡Investigation

An investigation in this context is a formal inquiry into the alleged leaking of exam papers. The speaker mentions that the examination agency was slow to initiate an investigation and only did so after being questioned by higher authorities, indicating a lack of proactiveness in addressing the issue.

💡Retest

A retest is an additional examination offered to students to ensure fairness and accuracy in the evaluation process. The speaker suggests a retest for affected students as a solution to the problem of potential unfairness caused by exam leaks, as mentioned in the context of 1563 students being given a retest.

💡Fair Rank

A fair rank refers to a position in a ranking system that accurately reflects a student's abilities and performance. The script discusses the uncertainty of students having received a fair rank due to the possibility of exam leaks and the subsequent impact on their educational opportunities.

💡Administrative Agency

The administrative agency in this context is the examination authority responsible for conducting the competitive exams. The speaker criticizes the agency for its alleged failure to act promptly and effectively in response to the exam leak, suggesting a lack of proper guidance and oversight.

💡Election

The script mentions elections as a special circumstance that may have distracted the administrative agency from effectively handling the exam leak situation. It implies that the preoccupation with elections could have contributed to the agency's delayed response.

💡Hot Spots

In the context of the script, 'hot spots' refer to areas or instances where there is a significant concentration of anomalies in the exam results, such as a high number of students scoring the same high marks. These are used as indicators of potential cheating or unfairness in the exam process.

Highlights

Concerns about the trustworthiness of competitive exams due to the possibility of topper manipulation.

Government spending about a CR per year per medical student raises the stakes of exam integrity.

The presence of an organized gang with a history of leaking exam papers as a business model.

The rare occurrence of perfect scores in exams like GMAT, raising questions about the validity of high scores.

The dilemma of how to handle exam results when there is suspicion of cheating but no concrete evidence.

The potential impact of exam results on government seats and the cost implications.

The lack of assurance for students with high scores about the fairness of their ranks.

NTA's denial of exam paper leaks and lack of cooperation with law enforcement.

The suggestion that the administrative agency may have been unprepared to handle the situation due to elections.

The revelation that NTA only admitted to giving grace marks under pressure.

The lack of transparency from the NTA regarding the full data on exam results.

The identification of 'hot spots' or red flags in the data that require explanation.

The organized gang's strategy to maximize profit from leaked exam papers within a time limit.

The argument that the current exam results cannot be considered fair and the implications for students.

The call for a retest for those affected by the exam integrity issues.

The recommendation for all students above a certain score to have a re-examination for accurate measurement.

A poetic summary of the case, emphasizing the need for guidance and the obligation to ensure fairness.

Transcripts

you cannot trust a competitive exam

which turns out 61

Toppers inevitably mots in any data

cohort is a case of the government

spending about a CR per year per medical

student if the NTA had been a serious

examination agency it would have been

most concerned about the Integrity of

the process

is that there is an organized gang which

has a prior

history of leaking papers it is their

business

model you cannot trust a competitive

exam which turns out 61

Toppers inevitably mots in any data

cohort you may have two or three people

who may share marks or who may crack

it when GMAT and all all those exams

were it is rare that somebody cracked

everything got that seven perfect SC1 44

are those actually who uh got the uh

Mark not Grace Mark but got full mark

because of question 19 because because

of because of one question but that also

means that also means

that those

44 got marks for 117 uh 179 questions

right that itself is a very high

figure those 44 people today my lords at

a stage of incomplete

investigation if your Lordships were to

say that look so far you you have shown

us only hazar p now we do not know

exactly where it is

going do

we ask a whole host of people maybe 24

lakh maybe 13 lakh maybe two lakhs to

rewrite the

exam what if your Lordships were to turn

us all down and say that no they have

given s adequate uh uh

justification what Lordships at to at

today's date will not be aware as to how

many Sals or how many persons got into

the system and each government

seat is a case of the government

spending about a CR per year per medical

student so at about

25,000 government seats in the general

category I also represent students who

have got 690 640 and and all

that they will get a seat

somewhere but what they are not assured

of is that they have got a fair rank

your lord through the student

perspective my lords please look at the

institutional

perspective please look at NTS

constant responses to your

Lordships if the NTA had been a serious

examination agency it would have been

most concerned about the Integrity of

the

process but what did it

do on the fifth itself when it was

told that the paper had leaked and on

the fifth it if it had taken a decision

that look once there is a breage of a

paper we find it unsafe and supposing

they had taken that decision and we had

we were challenging it saying look look

look it leaked only in one place how can

you scrap an entire exam would your

Lordships have found an outrageous

Defiance of logic in that decision I'm

turning the question around

yes the

NTA continued to deny the fact that

there was a

leak it did not cooperate with the Bihar

police the apparently the eou even wrote

them letters they did not immediately

cooperate my there was special

circumstances this year in uh May and

June everybody was pre occupied with the

elections nobody was possibly there to

guide

them it is quite possible that uh the

administrative agency thought you know

let just let the thing blow over or let

whoever comes in guide

us continually they kept denying and it

was only when your

Lordships asked

questions that then came that little uh

uh thing that yes yes yes we did give

Grace marks but we can redo it by a

retest for 15 in for some 1533 1563

students at that stage also if they if

they had looked at their own

data if today they have not been

transparent they haven't given the full

data in fact all the data that Mr Huda

has so painstakingly given your

Lordships has been after we were served

with about 4,500 PDF

files that had to be run through data

had to be

extracted and we we can see some hot

spots whether they are hot spots whether

they are red

flags they that is for them to

explain then my lords the NTA continues

to be in denial it's only as late as the

22nd of

June that changes are made in personnel

and that the CBI is put in charge of the

investigation I do not know what has

been there in that report I do not know

whether there is a theory of

Investigation but what comes out is that

there is an organized gang

which has a prior

history of leaking papers it is their

business

model the leaked paper is a Time limited

commodity you have it for two hour two

days or or less you have to maximize

profit and everybody into whose hands it

goes whether it is the paper solver or

anybody else will try to maximiz

anything else

now just give me two more minutes mys

the fact

is that we cannot tell the

students that this is a fair exam we

cannot send a signal to the NTA that we

approve of what you have done nor can we

tell those who indulge in these

practices

that look you may very well get away

with it because if these results stand

those postd checks may still be

cashed they still have a value so

therefore my lords the safer thing the

safer thing to

do is your Lordships has already done it

your Lordships has set retest for those

1563 if your Lordships were to treat

what has happened so far as step one of

the

exams some everybody above

164 had a chance at a medical seat those

people give them a re re-examination

because your Lordships will see from

their own affidavit which Mr Huda also

pointed out somebody who's got

720 ends up with

640 let everybody be accurately measured

that's the least

that can be done my Lord I'm

Grateful just just one thing just one

thing before I go since the solic

general is here and he likes U poetry

the case can be summarized by one

verse it is your guidance your not re

it's

re obliged

yes