IT'S OVER! Freedom Convoy Just KILLED Trudeau's Bullsh*t Emergency Act
Summary
TLDRThe video discusses a recent court ruling in Canada that found Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government acted illegally by invoking emergency powers to quell the 'Freedom Convoy' trucker protests. It analyzes how the legacy media and Trudeau administration unjustly labeled protesters as racist and far-right extremists to justify authoritarian crackdowns on dissent. The host argues this reveals a dangerous appetite within supposedly liberal governments to censor speech and bypass civil liberties through states of emergency and unchecked executive power. However, the court victory for protesters highlights the importance of independent media and civil society upholding free expression against encroaching political overreach.
Takeaways
- 😡 Justin Trudeau invoked emergency powers to deal with trucker protests in Canada, which was later ruled illegal by a federal court
- 😮💨 The court found freezing protestors' bank accounts was unreasonable search and seizure, violating rights to free expression
- 🤔 The ruling raises concerns about government overreach under the guise of liberalism and progressivism
- 😠 Media portrayed the truckers as racist and far right, without basis
- 😤 Trudeau still defends his decision to invoke emergency powers, despite the court ruling it wasn't justified
- 😡 Governments seem increasingly willing to restrict rights and protest in the name of safety and security
- 🤨 Protestors with legitimate grievances are being mischaracterized to justify authoritarian measures
- 😒 Social media and independent media are crucial for exposing government overreach
- 😌 The ruling was a victory for free speech and civil liberties
- 😕 But real accountability and consequences for Trudeau are still uncertain
Q & A
What was the major event that happened in Canada that prompted Trudeau to invoke the Emergencies Act?
-Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act in response to the trucker protests against COVID-19 restrictions and mandates that blocked streets and border crossings across Canada in early 2022.
What actions did Trudeau's government take after invoking the Emergencies Act?
-After invoking the Emergencies Act, Trudeau's government froze bank accounts of protestors, imposed fines and jail time for protestors, and enacted measures to disperse protests.
Why was Trudeau's use of the Emergencies Act controversial?
-Use of the Emergencies Act was controversial because it had never been used before in Canada's history. Critics saw it as an overreach of power to quash legal protests.
What did the court ultimately rule about Trudeau's use of the Emergencies Act?
-A federal court ruled that Trudeau's use of the Emergencies Act was not justified and violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
How did Trudeau justify use of the Emergencies Act initially?
-Trudeau claimed the protests represented a threat to public safety and national security that warranted emergency measures.
How did Trudeau respond to the court ruling that his actions were illegal?
-Despite the ruling, Trudeau continued to insist that invoking the Emergencies Act was the right decision at the time.
What critique does the video make about media coverage of the protests?
-The video argues mainstream media wrongly portrayed the trucker protestors as racists and far-right extremists to discredit them.
What is the video's perspective on Trudeau and his government?
-The video portrays Trudeau as an authoritarian figure who violated civil liberties under the guise of liberalism and progressivism.
How does the video relate the Emergencies Act issue to broader trends?
-The video connects Trudeau's actions to a pattern of increased government authoritarianism and erosion of free speech around the world.
What warning does the video offer about using emergencies to justify restrictions on rights?
-The video cautions that government's may manufacture or exaggerate states of emergency to impose authoritarian policies that curb civil liberties.
Outlines
😤 Paragraph 1 discusses Trudeau's illegal use of emergency powers during the trucker protest and the implications on civil liberties.
Paragraph 1 discusses how Trudeau illegally invoked emergency powers to deal with the trucker protest in Canada, as legally determined. It suggests this could be a victory for free speech, or lead to more authoritarianism by liberal governments. It argues governments are using the specter of far-right extremism to introduce more authoritarian measures in the name of protection. It cautions against the appetite for state control of resources, democracies and information flows, evident in censorship and control of social media.
😡 Paragraph 2 argues the truckers were right to protest unreasonable government overreach, unlike media depictions.
Paragraph 2 states the truckers seem to have been right to protest, contrary to media and government portrayals. It argues there is disdain for ordinary working people by media and appetite to legitimize condemnation of them. It sees the emergency law as bypassing rights when the truckers were protesting unreasonable government activity regarding vaccines, lockdowns etc. It credits independent media and social media for the ability to organize the trucker protest and raise awareness.
🤨 Paragraph 3 questions whether there will be real accountability for Trudeau's illegal actions.
Paragraph 3 questions whether there will be real consequences for Trudeau, Freeland and others responsible for the illegal use of emergency powers, beyond an apology. It also asks about compensation for those negatively impacted, like having bank accounts frozen or jailed. It argues the progressive rhetoric of leaders like Trudeau masks actual authoritarian actions.
😠 Paragraph 4 continues Trudeau's unapologetic defense of his illegal actions.
Paragraph 4 examines Trudeau's continued defense of his decision as necessary, with no apologies, despite the court ruling it illegal. It compares his rhetoric to that of a dictator, saying it would be widely condemned if by a Trump-like figure. It argues Trudeau shows no compunction about misusing power and acting illegally.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Emergency Act
💡Authoritarianism
💡Dissent
💡Free Speech
💡Far Right
💡Nazis
💡Working People
💡Legacy Media
💡Independent Media
💡Tyranny
Highlights
Trudeau acted illegally in evoking the emergency act during the trucker protest in Canada
Ruling found the government violated two sections of the charter - freezing bank accounts was unreasonable search and seizure
Media and government were wrong, truckers were right about vaccine efficacy and lockdowns
Without independent media these stories would fizzle out
Governments want to create emergencies to evoke authoritarian laws
Judge recognizes benefit of hindsight, may have even been persuaded it was necessary in the moment
Freeland claims they respect the judiciary but disagree with the ruling
Trudeau claims it was a tough decision but necessary to keep Canadians safe
Trudeau still argues it worked to end the protests with no violence
Judge ruled the act does not bear hallmarks of reasonableness or justification
Legacy media would have condemned this if it was Trump or their enemies
Media and governments don't like working and ordinary people
Trudeau uses patriotic language about safety after calling protesters Nazis
Protesters were always acting legally, Trudeau acted illegally
Trudeau remains confident he made the right, but illegal, choice
Transcripts
Justin Trudeau acted illegally in
evoking the emergency act during the
trucker protest in Canada that's now
been legally determined so will this be
a victory for free speech or will it
lead to the doubling down of
authoritarianism by apparently liberal
governments hello there you Awakening
wonders thanks for joining us in our
Voyage to truth and freedom remember if
you become a supporter of our work we
make additional videos every week like
one on the farming protest that's very
like the Canadian trucker story as a
matter of fact you'll see how it all
connected to January 6th and you'll see
how liberalism is using the idea of the
far right to introduce more
authoritarianism apparently to protect
people we also did an exclusive video on
an 8% increase in child deaths we give
you the kind of content that's difficult
to bring you publicly and it's so vital
that you support our work if you can
because as you know we are facing a
tyrannical and authoritarian force that
wants to censor and shut down in fact
when I'm reading about some of this
stuff I think about the demonetization
on YouTube and I think about the
government getting involved in our work
and I think about how the Legacy Media
have operated recently regarding me
personally and it's very important that
if you can you support our work because
there's no doubt we are sliding towards
authoritarianism under the guise of
liberalism and the emergency Act and the
attempt to evoke it by Justin Trudeau
was one of those moments that revealed
that neoliberalism and it sort of mask
of cultural progressiveness is an
interesting force in contemporary
politics remember people had their bank
accounts Frozen people went to jail we
were told that it was a national
emergency Canada has never evoked this
act in its history so it was an
unprecedented act with unprecedented
consequences all the while we were told
that the truckers were racist that they
were Nazis remember this kind of
rhetoric is becoming extremely common
January 6th was an Insurrection the
farmers protest are somehow far right
and racist it's almost as if if you
attempt to resist globalism which
amounts to the advance of the agenda of
a global Elite attempting to control the
world's resources and the world's
democracies if you oppose that you will
be called far right fortunately in
Canada a ruling is found that Trudeau's
government acted illegally let's have a
look at this story and see what it means
for all of us ottawa's weeks long
gridlock warranted the government's
attention according to the federal
court but using the emergencies act to
deal with it was not justified Justice
Richard Mosley ruled that the federal
government violated two sections of the
charter freezing bank accounts was in
unreasonable search and seizure and the
nation wide order to stop protesting
violated the right to free expression
one key factor Ontario and Alberta had
already shut down border protests
demonstrating it could be done these are
things that you might have felt at the
time when you heard bank accounts being
frozen surely these protest of Freedom
expression thankfully Canada has a form
of constitution in which those values
and ideas are enshrined the bigger
question is would people ever attempt to
exert this level of control again and
are the Legacy Media going to be made
accountable for support in the claim
that these truckers were racist and far
right and that their protests were not
legitimate this ruling had a different
conclusion than the head of the public
commission found last year unlike his
findings the federal court ruling is
legally binding remember since this
Canada has passed a new Online safety
bill that gives them incredible control
over the media and of course they said
this was to amplify Canadian voices and
to support diversity all valuable and
important ideas but one can't help but
wonder if all of these Online safety
bills we have one in our country you've
got them coming to your country they're
discussing for the whole EU are
ultimately about controlling information
so that trucker movements can't ever
happen again so that events where people
protest against government activity
State corporatism globalist corruption
can't ever be discussed or organized you
have to ask yourself in your own heart
do you think that these regulatory
bodies the state and the way that they
are sponsored and their globalist
affiliations care about you and your
freedom or do they have other goals
seeing I have concluded that the
decision to issue the proclamation that
would be the invoking of the emergencies
act does not bear the Hallmarks of
reasonableness justification
transparency and intelligibility that
means it was stupid unreasonable and not
transparent which is how it seemed at
the time I me what are they going to do
next applaud a Nazi in
Parliament and was not justified in
relation to the relevant factual and
legal constraints that were required to
be taken into consideration uh and he
talks as well about some of the
financial penalties they brought in in
terms of seizing and and freezing bank
accounts uh because that affected people
Beyond just the people they were trying
to affect that itself uh was an overstep
one theme whether it's in the United
States of America and the anti-a
rhetoric continually in the media the
condemnation of agricultural movement or
indeed the story we're discussing now
the trucker movement what becomes clear
is there is a disdain at the level of
media for ordinary working people and
there is an ongoing effort and appetite
to leverage ideas that legitimize the
condemnation of ordinary working people
they're racist they're disgusting
they're stupid they shouldn't have
rights that emergency Act was literally
we don't care about their rights we
should be able to bypass their rights
when in fact what they were doing was
protesting quite unreasonable government
activity that looks more and more
unreasonable the more we learn about
vaccine efficacy the more we learn about
the efficacy of lockdown the more we
learn about the financial relationships
between the state and pharmaceutical
organizations the more we learn about
the laws and indemnity that was granted
to these organizations the truckers it
seems were right the media were wrong
the government were wrong without the
scrutiny of independ media these kind of
stories would just sort of fizzle out
without the ability to use social media
to organize the truckers would not been
able to mount that protest without
Independent Media and social media
knowledge of the Frozen bank accounts
would not have risen to the point where
enough people were disgusted and aware
that even if they sort of like
politicians like Justin Trudeau and
their cute socks and their lovely hair
and their love of dressing up should we
call it I deeply deeply regret it seems
that there are questions to be asked of
governments that have the aesthetic of
liberalism kindness compassion
progressivism but the actions of
authoritarianism this is a defining
story of our time what's interesting as
well in part of his judgment is he talks
about how if he had been at the table
you know making the decisions that he
does recognize that hindsight is 2020 uh
and that in the moment uh he may have
even been persuaded uh that this was
necessary seems like that judge is
trying to offer as much mitigation as
possible anyone could make the mistake
of freezing bank accounts and throwing
pastors into jail and all of that I
might have even done it myself but the
fact is when you look at what's written
down in our Charter it was illegal
presumably so as not to have masses of
people over Canada right now going wait
a minute we were protesting we were
within our rights to protest and they
froze our bank accounts through people
in jail evoking emergency act and we're
not getting sufficient recompense what
now what should happen as a result of
this did the people get their bank
accounts unfrozen are they compensated
in some way what about the people that
have done jail time as a result of those
measures and what about Trudeau himself
is he allowed to continue to govern
given he's a person who reaches for an
emergency act with the enthusiasm
reaches for the shoe polish on party
night but that in the light of day when
you when you actually get to hear all
the evidence and see uh what the
applicants in this case the civil
liberties uh Association but others as
well is it me or does the future feel
more insecure and uncertain Wars
pandemics lies trickery my cats keep
having kittens the last one's personal
for those who are in the United States
there is a way to secure Your
hard-earned Nest deeg American Heart for
gold make it easy to protect your
savings and retirement accounts with
physical gold and silver with one phone
call they can have physical gold and
silver delivered right to your door or
inside a qualifying retirement account
like your IRA or
401K American Hartford gold is the
highest rated firm in the US with an A+
rating from the BBB and thousands of
satisfied clients right now they will
give you up to $5,000 of free silver on
your first qualifying order this offer
is only for us customers call 866 505
831 5 that's 866 50583 one5 or simply
text brand to
98899 get up to $5,000 of silver and
protect your future in this crazy crazy
world with some solid precious metals
literally made in Stars uh that then you
get to see well actually maybe it wasn't
it's not helpful that in this footage
you continually see militarized police
force which is another one of the
ongoing stories of our age the
militarization of police forces the
introduction of anti-protest laws the
evocation of emergency acts the
introduction of surveillance and
censorship laws across the world that
image there that's Canada that's not the
United States that's not Chia like
that's Canada with all of its sweet
freedom and sweet sweet syrup acting
like a tyrannical State while all the
world telling you look at my hair I'm
called Christia Freeland that's the
Finance Minister who has literal Nazis
in her family background and actual
Nazis in the parliament being applauded
and a willingness to freeze people's
bank accounts and intervene in people's
private and financial lives in
unprecedented ways why because it's an
emergency don't you think that there
seems to be an appetite within these
type of governments to create a state of
emergency in order to evoke these laws
to say there's a terrorist threat in
order to evoke these laws not the other
way around and so he does say there is a
recognition of this benefit of hindsight
and time to actually go through it but
in the moment uh you might be seized
with the sense of urgency a mad giddy
gluttonous appetite for power oh all of
us can get sort of priapic and Giddy and
start evoking emergency laws and
freezing bank accounts any one of us is
felt the sweet seductive Aroma of power
in our nostrils that's not how a
government's supposed to behave look at
all the rational rhetoric look at the
way that Justin Trudeau was in the
television we have to shame people that
don't take vaccines these truckers are
Nazis turns out the person that was
getting a little bit emotional and a
little bit fascistic was Trudeau himself
no that you know calmer heads prevail as
time goes on and in terms of looking
back on what was really going on bit
late if you had your bank account Frozen
and if you were thrown in jail seems
like what they're asking for is the kind
of compassion that we would give one
another on a in person personal level
like oh sorry I shouldn't have said that
actually I made a mistake oh don't worry
about it that's not afforded in today's
culture errors errors of judgment errors
of speech those things the kind of
progressivism that Justin Trudeau
upfront advocates for while round the
back introducing emergency laws that's
the kind of compassion that oh sorry
about that we got bit heart under the
color during those protests we knew we
were exaggerating the threat of covid we
knew we're amplifying the efficacy of
the vaccines we panicked and called
everyone nzis hey it could happen to
anyone some people involved in the
protests are calling this a win this is
resonates as Pleasant news but I would
love to know what the outcome of this
ruling is will there be consequence for
Trudeau Freeland and mesino that's yet
to play out it was officially wrong and
we're sorry and let that be an end to it
thank you good night and God bless
Canada that's the way these things play
out like 2008 financial crash that
should not have happened we're very very
sorry indeed are you going to do
anything about it as I said very sorry
indeed and then there's the matter of
the protesters who had their bank
accounts Frozen and whether this ruling
could give wait to any potential legal
action by them against the government
although that is still unclear Christia
Freeland now the sarcastically named
Finance Minister who froze people's bank
accounts so we are aware of the Court
decision we have discussed it with the
prime minister with cabinet
colleagues with senior federal
government officials and
experts we respect very much Canada's
independent
Judiciary
however we do not agree with this
decision hey you should do a protest oh
I forgot it's illegal I would just like
to take a moment to remind
Canadians of how serious the situation
was in our country when we took that
decision the public safety of
Canadians was under threat safety that's
what we care about remember we're here
to protect you to take care of you lotgh
of threats out there it's very scary out
there no what's scary is you our
national security which includes our
National Economic Security was under
threat the people whose Economic
Security was most threat was the people
who had their Banks pres I'll just get
myself some food I said food hello hello
Frozen it was a hard decision to
take we took it very seriously after a
lot of hard work oh well that's okay
took it seriously like when you try out
those Nazis in Parliament is this
serious or do mistakes happen what what
is it what's the rules we were convinced
at the time I was convinced at the time
it was the right thing to do it was the
necessary thing to do that's what
fascism looks like and sounds like now
it was necessary we had no choice
remember it might not look like the
handmade's tale with a Christian
theocracy it might not look like Bonito
musolini it might look like people with
LLY haircuts and pretty names coming
along telling you that they were scared
and it's for your safety and we had to
do what's right then you investigate
these people and their relationships and
the way that the company is financially
under GED and you start to recognize
that their biggest threat their biggest
fear their biggest concern is your
freedom it's not something that had ever
been done in Canada
before it was certainly not something
that we undertook to do lightly we all
this like whether it was serious or
whether you believed it or whether you
undertook it lightly that's sort of
weird framing isn't it yes we did
illegally use the emergency act but we
didn't do it lightly that ain't what
we're discussing mate we're discussing
whether or not it legal yeah but just to
let you know I actually pushed a pig
into my hand while doing none of that
matters it was illegal the
responsibility of a prime minister
is to make the tough calls and keep
people
safe and this was a
moment
where the collective advice
of cabinet of the public
service and my own inclination was that
this was a moment to do something
that we needed to do to keep Canadians
safe people that were doing the protest
were Canadian they didn't come from
somewhere else so there's not used
patriotic insula language about Canada
now because at the time those Canadians
were Nazis at the time those Canadians
had their bank accounts Frozen at that
time those Canadians had their rights
illegally violated so talking about the
way oh it's so hard to be a prime
minister what was your dad again he was
a prime minister as well oh God how did
you do it you can't use all of that the
burden of power stuff when power has
been plainly misused and knowing full
well that this was an inevitable
consequence of me signing I agree and it
wasn't even my idea that's like a kid is
it it wasn't my idea it was their idea I
just signed it I just prime ministered
it I was very comfortable that we were
at a moment where this was the right
thing to
do
and we did it oh well thanks good night
we were able to solve the situation with
it that there was no loss of life there
was no uh you know serious violence
there's no loss of life there's no
serious violence oh right that's down to
you isn't it that's people are go yeah
but imagine how the pandemic would have
been if we hadn't done all those
lockdowns and all those mandates or near
mandates just see what I mean it's we're
not able to envisage what happened if
they hadn't done what they did which has
now been deemed to be illegal he's still
kind of trying to offer it up as a sort
of solution there's no compunction there
haven't been a recurrence of these kinds
of illegal occupations uh since then
there people protesting legal
occupations I'm not going to pretend
that it's the only thing that could have
done
it but it did do it what the protesters
was doing was legal in evoking the
emergency act what Justine Trudeau did
was illegal and he's still saying it
work though it worked that's amounts to
by any means necessary if you envisage
for a moment justtin Trudeau not with
his lovely hair and handsome face and
delightful suit but wearing like a
series of medals and a military hat
saying we did what we had to do we got
the neighborhoods back under control
this is just a series of procedures that
we have to endure now you'd go well that
is a junter that is a dictatorship that
is corruption and you'd be right I am
absolutely absolutely Serene and
confident um that I made the right
choice in agreeing with the invocation
brilliant I've concluded cluded that the
decision to issue the proclamation of
the emergencies act does not bear the
Hallmarks of reasonableness
justification transparency and
intelligibility and was not justified
Mosley Rome imagine for a moment there
was Donald Trump or one of the enemies
of the Legacy Media that had behaved in
this manner can you imagine the Deluge
they would say they wouldn't they on
MSNBC and CNN this is exactly what
dictatorships do they won't report on
that in this way cuz generally speaking
I'll tell you what I thinks behind it
they don't like working people they
don't like Ordinary People so things
that are against them they just think
trudo that the protests were not violent
but still insisted that he's confident
with his decision to use a law that has
never been used before to stop the
protest there's no loss of life there
was no serious violence there hasn't
been a recurrence of these kind of
illegal occupations since then I'm
absolutely Serene and confident that I
made the right choice in agreeing with
the invocation Trudeau told the
commission that is investigating whether
the government's decision to use the
emergency Act was justifiable very much
like I imagine a mentor of his Tony
Blair when reflecting on the decision to
evade Iraq I did the right thing I'm
have got no sleepless nights about it
well that's just your personal
conscience and they recognize that
that's important to any sovereign
individual but when you're talking about
matters of invoking emergency acts and
freezing bank accounts and jailing
protesters it's not enough before the
emergencies Act was invoked Trudeau said
that those opposing covid measures and
restrictions were of a small Fringe
minority who had unacceptable views in a
sense the more you look at this story
The more you see that it's layer after
lay of authoritarianism masked as
concern for public welfare we're doing
this for your own good seems to be the
Clarion call of this new form of
authoritarianism and when it's found
legally that what they did was
unwarranted and therefore in fact
illegal they say yeah but would have
been much worse if we hadn't done it I
mean if that was coming from pole pot or
someone that we recognize and accept was
a military dictator we go oh God that's
the Twisted warped rhetoric of a tyrant
but because we're just so duped by
Aesthetics and by the language of
liberalism and concern and care and mad
indigenous ceremonies and talk about
inconsequential to them and to power and
to finance measures around sort of Civic
rights issues we're unable to see that
what is actually in front of us is the
very tyranny that they purport to be
protecting us from in absolute plain
sight as they say these days but that's
just why I think why don't you let me
know what you think in the comments and
chat remember we make an exclusive video
for our supporters every week and we
give you early access to content and you
get to participate in interviews as well
as comment in the chat during live
streams which we do every day join us if
you can support our movement God knows
we need you more important than that if
you can please stay free hey thanks for
watching if you want to see more
uncensored content where Free Speech can
flourish join our live stream click the
link right here to watch the next video
if you want to or become a member of a
growing movement download the rumble app
and you'll be informed every time we
make a new piece of content Stay Free
تصفح المزيد من مقاطع الفيديو ذات الصلة
Civil Liberties
¿Quién tiene el dinero de los activos rusos congelados por Europa? Lorenzo Ramírez
what is liberty, it's meaning definitions, characteristics,kinds,aspects and safeguards of liberty
Civil Rights & Liberties: Crash Course Government & Politics #23
Massive BOMBSHELL Dropped On Justin Trudeau
TRUCKER VICTORY: Trudeau's Emergency Act Use 'UNJUSTIFIED', Rules Canadian Judge
Krystal and Saagar HEATED Debate On Campus Gaza Protests
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)