Tim Pool Tried to HUMILIATE Me. Now What?

Summary

Kim Iverson responds to defamatory claims made by Tim Pool, addressing a false story he spread about her hygiene. She distinguishes between protected free speech and harmful lies, explaining that Pool's accusation crosses into defamation. Iverson outlines the legal difference between political opinions and fabricated personal attacks, emphasizing that such lies damage reputations. While she doesn't intend to sue, she demands Pool back up his claims, highlighting the importance of truth in public discourse. The situation underscores the potential consequences of spreading false, damaging stories in the media.

Takeaways

• 😀 Kim Iverson addresses ongoing drama with Tim Pool, revealing personal and professional tensions.
• 😀 Tim Pool made defamatory claims about Kim Iverson’s hygiene, saying she smelled bad during a visit to his studio, which she denies.
• 😀 Iverson criticizes Pool for deleting the offensive tweet and claiming it was a joke, while still dealing with the damage done to her reputation.
• 😀 Iverson defends free speech, stating she can critique Tim Pool’s political affiliations, but calls out his false personal accusations as defamation.
• 😀 Kim Iverson was invited back on Tim Pool’s show multiple times, disproving the claim that her hygiene was a reason she wasn’t invited back.
• 😀 Iverson shares her history of being on Tim Pool’s show, showing that the accusations about her hygiene were false and malicious.
• 😀 Defamation per se is explained by Iverson, emphasizing that false statements about a person's body, health, or professional integrity are legally actionable.
• 😀 Iverson acknowledges the right to criticize her political views, but she draws a firm line against fabricated personal attacks meant to humiliate.
• 😀 Tim Pool's large audience and influence are discussed, with Iverson highlighting the impact of public false claims, especially when made by influential figures.
• 😀 Iverson indicates she does not intend to sue Pool but wants him to back up his false claims or stop repeating them. She warns about the consequences of spreading false information.

Q & A

What was the defamatory claim Tim Pool made about Kim Iverson?

Tim Pool tweeted that Kim Iverson 'smelled like she didn't wipe' during her visit to his studio, claiming that her hygiene was the reason she wasn’t invited back on his show.

How did Kim Iverson respond to Tim Pool's tweet?

Kim Iverson dismissed the claim, stating it was false and defamatory. She pointed out that she had been invited back on Tim's show multiple times after the alleged incident, disproving the claim.

What does 'defamation per se' mean in the context of Iverson's argument?

'Defamation per se' refers to false statements that are so harmful that they do not require proof of damages to be considered defamatory. Iverson argues that Pool’s false claim about her hygiene falls into this category.

Why does Kim Iverson believe Tim Pool's statement was defamatory?

Iverson argues that Pool's tweet about her hygiene was a fabricated story presented as a fact, which was not only false but also harmful to her reputation, especially since it was tied to a specific professional consequence (not being invited back).

What is the difference between political commentary and defamation, according to Iverson?

Political commentary is protected free speech, even if it's harsh or untrue. Defamation, however, involves knowingly making false statements about someone's character or professional integrity, like claiming they are unclean, which is not protected speech.

Did Tim Pool apologize for his defamatory tweet?

Tim Pool deleted the tweet and reportedly claimed it was a joke, but Iverson argues that the damage had already been done. He later attempted to reframe the statement as his 'opinion'.

Why does Kim Iverson believe Pool's claim about her hygiene was particularly damaging?

Iverson believes the claim was damaging because it spread a humiliating lie about her personal hygiene and was presented as a factual event. This false information led to people questioning her reputation and integrity.

What legal concept does Iverson emphasize to explain why Pool’s statement was harmful?

Iverson emphasizes the legal concept of 'defamation per se', which involves false statements about someone’s hygiene or professional competence that can ruin reputations without needing to prove actual harm.

Does Kim Iverson intend to sue Tim Pool for defamation?

Iverson clarified that while she did threaten to sue, she doesn’t intend to pursue legal action. Instead, she wants Pool to be accountable for his false claims, which she believes he will undermine himself for without her involvement.

What does Iverson think about free speech in relation to the defamation case?

Iverson stands by free speech, especially when it comes to political commentary and criticism. However, she believes that making false, humiliating claims about someone’s body or professional integrity crosses a line into defamation, which should not be protected.