Polemik TWK KPK Berlanjut, Komnas HAM Temukan 11 Dugaan Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia

Summary

In this interview, Amiruddin Al Rahab, the commissioner of the National Human Rights Commission, addresses concerns regarding the transparency, professionalism, and accountability of a recent assessment process. He explains the Commission’s findings, which include complaints about a lack of openness and fairness. Key issues discussed include the use of BKN letterhead and delays in announcing TWK test results for KPK employees. Amiruddin outlines recommendations to the President, KPK, and other agencies, urging improvements in human rights practices. He emphasizes the importance of respecting citizens' dignity and the legal framework in human rights work.

Takeaways

• 😀 The National Human Rights Commission (Komnas HAM) emphasized that the assessment process lacked professionalism, transparency, and accountability.
• 😀 Amiruddin, the commissioner, stated that complaints were made by a representative who had poor signal connectivity during the process.
• 😀 There were concerns that the process was not open to all participants, which led to feelings of discomfort among those involved and some were declared ineligible.
• 😀 Komnas HAM advocates for transparent and accountable processes that respect human dignity, especially in sensitive areas like the Hajj committee.
• 😀 A key issue raised was the illegal use of BKN (National Civil Service Agency) letterheads, which Amiruddin confirmed will be further explained later.
• 😀 The delay in announcing the results of the TWK (State Civil Apparatus) test is seen as a human rights violation by Komnas HAM.
• 😀 Komnas HAM has confirmed that there were 11 human rights issues related to the TWK process, which were highlighted in their findings.
• 😀 Komnas HAM has sent a letter to the President with a request for a direct meeting to discuss their findings and recommendations in detail.
• 😀 Despite the Ombudsman’s findings regarding the TWK process, if the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commission) rejects Komnas HAM’s recommendations, it would not change their stance, as their authority is based on the law.
• 😀 Komnas HAM continues to maintain a positive outlook on human rights efforts and hopes that all government institutions, including the KPK, will address the issues raised in their recommendations.

Q & A

What was the main concern raised by the National Human Rights Commission (Komnas HAM) regarding the assessment process?

Komnas HAM raised concerns that the assessment process did not meet the principles of professionalism, transparency, and accountability. They emphasized that the process lacked openness and respect for the dignity of individuals, which made participants uncomfortable.

How did Amiruddin Al Rahab respond to the concerns about the transparency of the assessment process?

Amiruddin Al Rahab explained that there were complaints from representatives about the lack of transparency, especially in the process where certain individuals felt uncomfortable and were subsequently declared ineligible. He mentioned that the process should be transparent, accountable, and respectful of human dignity.

What were the findings regarding the use of BKN letterhead, and why was it considered problematic?

The National Human Rights Commission highlighted concerns regarding the use of BKN letterhead, which was considered to be illegal. The details of this issue were yet to be fully explained, but it raised questions about the legality and ethics of the assessment process.

What were the 11 human rights violations mentioned by Komnas HAM, and how did they impact the process?

Komnas HAM confirmed the existence of 11 human rights issues, which included improper labeling and other problematic practices. These issues were said to have negatively affected the assessment process, which ultimately led to the Commission’s recommendation for reform.

Did Komnas HAM receive any response from the President or the KPK regarding their recommendations?

As of the interview, Komnas HAM had not yet received a response from the President or the KPK. They had sent a letter to the President requesting a meeting to discuss their findings and recommendations but were still awaiting a reply.

What did Amiruddin say about the potential rejection of Komnas HAM's recommendations by the KPK?

Amiruddin stated that if the KPK were to reject Komnas HAM's recommendations, it would not be the Commission's fault, as their authority is limited to providing recommendations. He emphasized that Komnas HAM's work is based on the law, and the Commission cannot speculate on how the KPK will respond.

How does Komnas HAM view the commitment of state institutions towards respecting human rights?

Komnas HAM believes that all state institutions, including the KPK, are bound by the law and should respect human rights. Amiruddin mentioned that they have a positive view of the commitment of institutions to uphold human rights, but he refrained from speculating on the KPK's intentions regarding their recommendations.

Did Komnas HAM set a specific deadline for the KPK to respond to their recommendations?

Komnas HAM did not set a specific deadline for the KPK to respond to their recommendations. Amiruddin mentioned that they were waiting for communication with the KPK leadership and would monitor any developments.

What were the potential consequences if the KPK or other institutions fail to respect the recommendations from Komnas HAM?

If the KPK or other institutions fail to respect Komnas HAM's recommendations, it could lead to continued human rights violations, and the process could remain flawed. Komnas HAM’s role is to highlight these issues and recommend corrective actions.

How did Amiruddin respond to the possibility of delays or rejections from the KPK regarding Komnas HAM’s recommendations?

Amiruddin refrained from speculating on the reasons for potential delays or rejections. He reiterated that Komnas HAM works within the law and will continue to monitor the situation, remaining hopeful that the KPK and other institutions would respect the recommendations made.