Absurdism Explained | The Myth Of Sisyphus (Full Analysis)
Summary
TLDRThis video script explores Albert Camus' essay 'The Myth of Sisyphus,' delving into the concept of the Absurd and its implications for human existence. Camus argues that life's inherent meaninglessness confronts us with an Absurd that cannot be rationalized. He introduces the idea of embracing the Absurd through revolt, freedom, and passion, using archetypes like Don Juan and the Conqueror to illustrate living authentically in an absurd world. The script also discusses Camus' philosophical stance on happiness, suggesting that true contentment comes from accepting life's struggle without illusions, much like the myth of Sisyphus who finds joy in his eternal defiance.
Takeaways
- 📚 Albert Camus explores the fundamental question of whether life is worth living in his essay 'The Myth of Sisyphus', considering the absence of inherent meaning in life.
- 🤔 Camus introduces the concept of the 'Absurd', which arises from the confrontation between the human desire for meaning and the world's indifferent silence.
- 🚫 He rejects the idea that traditional philosophical inquiries, such as ethics, epistemology, and metaphysics, can provide a satisfactory answer to the question of life's worth.
- 💡 Camus suggests that acknowledging the Absurd is the first step towards dealing with it, rather than seeking false comfort in philosophical suicide or irrational beliefs.
- 🏆 The essay outlines three transformative outcomes of embracing the Absurd: revolt, freedom, and passion, which allow one to live authentically in a meaningless universe.
- 🎭 Camus discusses the role of art as a means of expressing the Absurd but clarifies that it cannot inherently add value to life, only shape one's existence.
- 🎭 The character Kirilov from Dostoevsky's 'The Possessed' is presented as an example of someone who rebels against a Godless universe by asserting ultimate freedom.
- 🏹 The Absurd man is characterized by internal innocence and integrity, living without the constraints of imposed morality or fear of divine judgment.
- 🧗♂️ The myth of Sisyphus is used as an allegory for humanity's perpetual struggle against life's inherent absurdity, with Sisyphus representing the Absurd hero.
- 🏔️ Camus concludes that happiness can be found in the acceptance of our experiences and fate without illusions, as illustrated by Sisyphus finding joy in his eternal task.
- 📖 The video encourages viewers to read 'The Myth of Sisyphus' in its original form to experience Camus's ideas firsthand, beyond interpretations and summaries.
Q & A
What is the fundamental question of philosophy that Albert Camus explores in 'The Myth of Sisyphus'?
-The fundamental question of philosophy that Albert Camus explores in 'The Myth of Sisyphus' is whether life is worth living, given the inherent lack of meaning in life.
What does Camus mean by the 'Absurd' in his essay?
-By the 'Absurd,' Camus refers to the conflict between the human need for meaning and the universe's indifference and silence, which cannot provide the clarity or understanding that humans seek.
How does Camus describe the confrontation between the human quest for meaning and the universe's silence?
-Camus describes this confrontation as a silent dialogue between humanity's longing for purpose and the enigmatic silence of the universe, which is a paradoxical dance that leaves us grappling with the profound mystery of our existence.
What are the three transformative outcomes of embracing the Absurd according to Camus?
-The three transformative outcomes of embracing the Absurd, as posited by Camus, are revolt, freedom, and passion.
What are the three archetypes that Camus presents to illustrate how one should live when confronted with the Absurd?
-The three archetypes presented by Camus are Don Juan, the actor, and the conqueror, each representing different ways of embracing the Absurd and living authentically.
How does Camus view the role of art in expressing the absurdity of life?
-Camus views art as a means to express the absurdity of life, but he also points out that art cannot add inherent value to our life; it can only be a means to an end and a way to shape our existence.
What is the significance of the myth of Sisyphus in Camus' philosophy?
-The myth of Sisyphus is significant in Camus' philosophy as it serves as an allegory for humanity's perpetual struggle against life's inherent absurdity, with Sisyphus representing the Absurd hero who finds meaning in his defiance and acceptance of his eternal task.
How does Camus differentiate the Absurd man from the rest of humanity?
-Camus differentiates the Absurd man from the rest of humanity not by his actions but by his internal perspective towards them. The Absurd man operates outside the bounds of morality, free from notions of guilt or wrongdoing, and is led solely by his own sense of integrity.
What does Camus suggest about the relationship between happiness and the awareness of the Absurd?
-Camus suggests that true happiness arises when we accept our life and fate as entirely our own. He implies that happiness and absurd awareness are closely linked, and genuine happiness can be found in accepting our experiences without relying on illusions.
How does the character Kirilov in Dostoevsky's work 'The Possessed' relate to the concept of the Absurd?
-Kirilov in 'The Possessed' embodies the struggle with the idea of a Godless universe and ultimately ends his own life as a bold rebellion against this notion, attempting to assert ultimate freedom by becoming his own God, which Camus interprets as an understanding of the Absurd.
Outlines
📖 The Absurd and the Quest for Meaning
Albert Camus' essay 'The Myth of Sisyphus' is explored, focusing on the fundamental question of whether life is worth living. Camus introduces the concept of the Absurd, arising from the confrontation between human desire for meaning and the world's indifference. He argues that traditional philosophical inquiries are distractions from this central issue. The essay is known for laying the groundwork for absurdism, the belief that life is inherently meaningless. Camus suggests that acknowledging the Absurd is the first step in coping with it, and he uses the myth of Sisyphus to illustrate the human struggle against life's absurdity, advocating for rebellion and finding fulfillment in the act of living itself.
🤔 Philosophical Suicide and Embracing the Absurd
The second paragraph delves into how other philosophers have attempted to address the Absurd, leading to what Camus calls 'philosophical suicide'—an irrational embrace of objective meaning despite life's inherent absurdity. Camus rejects these approaches as inadequate. Instead, he proposes embracing the Absurd, which involves a courageous confrontation with life's chaos and meaninglessness, leading to revolt, freedom, and passion. The Absurd man is introduced as one who lives authentically in a world devoid of inherent meaning, starting with indifference to societal norms and moral systems, and gaining freedom by shedding the constraints of imposed meaning.
🎭 Archetypes of the Absurd Man and Artistic Expression
Camus presents three archetypes of how one might live in the face of the Absurd: the Don Juan, the actor, and the conqueror. These figures represent different ways of engaging with life's meaninglessness, from seeking pleasure and passion to embracing the pursuit of goals for their own sake. The paragraph also discusses the role of art as a means of expressing the Absurd, noting that while art can help shape our existence, it cannot add inherent value to life. Camus uses the work of Dostoevsky to illustrate how literature can grapple with metaphysical concerns and the impact of these on individual lives.
🏋️♂️ Sisyphus as the Absurd Hero and the Struggle for Meaning
The fourth paragraph continues the discussion on the Absurd, drawing a parallel between the repetitive nature of daily life and the myth of Sisyphus, who was condemned to eternally roll a boulder up a hill only for it to roll back down. Camus sees Sisyphus as a symbol of the Absurd hero, embracing life in its entirety and defying death despite the task's futility. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of living with full awareness of one's absurd situation, suggesting that happiness can be found in the acceptance of our experiences without illusions, and that the struggle itself is enough to fill one's heart.
🏔️ Acceptance of the Absurd and the Pursuit of Happiness
In the final paragraph, Camus concludes that happiness and an awareness of the Absurd are closely linked. He argues that true happiness arises when we accept our life and fate as our own, without relying on hope or illusions. The myth of Sisyphus serves to illustrate that happiness can be found in accepting the struggle of life, even when it is devoid of hope. Camus suggests that by embracing our absurd existence, we can transcend our fate and find genuine happiness in the struggle itself.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Absurd
💡Albert Camus
💡Sisyphus
💡Absurdism
💡Freedom
💡Don Juan
💡Indifference
💡Absurd Man
💡Tragedy
💡Happiness
Highlights
Albert Camus explores the fundamental question of whether life is worth living in his essay 'The Myth of Sisyphus'.
Camus introduces the concept of the Absurd as the confrontation between the human quest for meaning and the universe's indifference.
The Absurd arises from the inability to explain life or the world with rationality or science, leading to meaningless abstractions.
Camus argues that recognizing the Absurd is the first step towards dealing with it, rather than seeking answers from religion or philosophy.
Embracing the Absurd leads to transformative outcomes such as revolt, freedom, and passion.
Camus rejects the idea of 'philosophical suicide', where one embraces an irrational belief in objective meaning despite the Absurd.
The Absurd man is indifferent to moral systems and the opinions of others, seeking authenticity in a world devoid of inherent meaning.
Camus presents three archetypes of how one can live in the face of the Absurd: the Don Juan, the actor, and the conqueror.
The Absurd man is characterized by innocence, as he operates outside the bounds of morality and is free from notions of guilt or wrongdoing.
Art can help express the absurdity of life but cannot add inherent value to it; it is a means to an end.
Camus uses the myth of Sisyphus to illustrate the human struggle against life's inherent absurdity and the pursuit of meaning in a futile task.
Sisyphus, despite his eternal struggle, finds happiness in his defiance and acceptance of his fate.
Camus suggests that happiness and absurd awareness are closely linked, with true happiness arising from accepting life and fate as our own.
The essay concludes that by embracing our absurd situation and living without illusions, we can find genuine happiness and meaning.
Camus's work encourages readers to confront the Absurd and live life authentically, despite its inherent meaninglessness.
Transcripts
to judge if this life is worth living is
giving answer to the most fundamental
question of philosophy this is the
question Alber kamu asks in the opening
sentence of his essay the mid of Copus
written in 1942 the French writer artist
and by some proclaimed philosopher asamu
himself did not consider himself one
wrote this now Infamous classic kamu is
trying to find an answer to the question
if life is worth living when in
inherently we know there is no true
meaning in life kamu coins this the most
important and quintessential
philosophical question the only question
that truly matters actually he even goes
a step further claiming that all other
questions in the history of philosophy
are Irrelevant in comparison to this one
ethics epistemology metaphysics they are
but mere distractions if they do not
seek an answer to this question the
essay is mostly known as an introdu
ction to what kamu coin the Absurd and
give rise to the philosophy of
absurdism but what does kamu mean with
the Absurd well in short every attempt
to look at the meaning of life in an
objective way always ends in absurdity
it is impossible to explain our life or
the world around us with rationality or
science as they only create meaningless
abstractions and as kamu writes himself
a man that has become conscious of the
Absurd is forever forever bound to it
the Absurd arises from the confrontation
between the human who asks and the world
that remains silent in an unreasonable
manner we long for clarity about our
existence but that Clarity is not given
to us questions that are unanswerable
such as what is the meaning of life is
there a divine plan or is there an
afterlife are in essence unknowable with
our limited comprehension and although
kamu did not coin himself an atheist
religion or God failed to provide him
with a satisfactory answer which brought
him to the following how should and can
we live life if we cannot rely on
anything if we cannot know the true
meaning of life and it appears that
there is none how can we relate to the
absurdity of our own existence that is
the question Albert kamu presents to us
in the mid of Copus influenced by the
philosophical ideas of thinkers like
Surin Kart Arthur shopau and fried n
kamu contends that life inherent meaning
despite Humanity's persistent efforts to
impose order and seek answers to
unanswerable questions drawing
inspiration from the ancient Greek myth
of Copus who is eternally tasked by the
gods to roll a boulder up a hill only
for it to roll back down kamu employs
this allegory to illustrate Humanity's
Perpetual struggle against life's
inherent absurdity according to kamu the
initial step towards dealing with this
absurdity is to acknowledge its
existence if again to Copus death is not
a viable option the only recourse is to
rebel by finding fulfillment in the very
Act of pushing the boulder upwards for
eternity in this video we will explain
and outline the main ideas of the essay
note that we will offer our own
subjective interpretation of this essay
and of course there are other
interpretations that are also possible
so be sure to let us know what you think
in the comment section below the my of
Copus consists of the following four
parts the first part part which is
titled an absurd reasoning a second part
titled the Absurd man a third part
titled absurd creation and last but not
least the fourth and final part which is
titled the myth of
Copus part one an absurd
reasoning in the opening of the essay
kamu delves into the fundamental
question of human existence which he
calls the Absurd as explained earlier
the Absurd is born out of our
confrontation with the meaninglessness
of life as humans we are creatures
driven by an innate longing for
happiness and irrational understanding
of the world around us yet when we
confront the vastness of the cosmos we
are met with an unsettling silence an
irrational void that defies our attempts
to find meaning imagine a traveler
wandering through a dense forest Guided
by the flickering light of his
flashlight and the hope of Discovery but
as the traveler Journeys deeper he finds
himself ins snared in a Labyrinth of
chaos and uncertainty where the very
fabric of reality seems to mock his
quest for understanding the clash
between our innate desire for meaning
and the indifferent chaotic nature of
the universe gives rise to the Absurd
it's not merely a matter of human
irrationality or Cosmic Randomness but
rather the inherent contradiction
between our quest for meaning and the
Stark reality of existence the ABS
emerges as the silent dialogue between
Humanity's longing for purpose and the
enigmatic Silence of the universe it's a
paradoxical dance that leaves us
teetering on the Edge of Reason
grappling with the profound mystery of
our own
existence so what should we do or put
differently what can we do to cope with
the
Absurd kamu observes that other
philosophers tried to Grapple with the
Absurd only to find their paths leading
to what he terms philosophic iCal
suicide this curious phenomenon entails
embracing an irrational belief in
objective meaning despite the inherent
absurdity of existence one example kamu
mentions is kar's proposition when faced
with the Absurd he advocates for a leap
of Fate referring to God urging us to
abandon reason and morality in favor of
a predetermined moral framework
essentially asking us to ignore the
absurds hence coming coining it a form
of philosophical suicide kamu dismisses
such Notions as inadequate responses to
the Absurd so what remains well K posits
another option embracing the Absurd this
entails a courageous confrontation with
the inherent chaos and meaninglessness
of existence leading to three
transformative outcomes Revolt freedom
and passion embracing the Absurd grants
us the realization of true Freedom unted
by the constraints of imposed meaning an
invitation to seize the richness of
life's experiences without the burden of
preconceived notions or unnecessary
moral Frameworks as in the example of
Gart but how does one go about this
daunting task this question serves as
the gateway to the second part of the
essay the Absurd man where kamu delves
deeper into the Practical implications
of embracing the Absurd and living
authentically in a world devoid of
inherent meaning here kamu notes that
for the Absurd man it's not about
explaining or solving anything but about
experiencing everything starts with
indifference this indifference
encompasses everything from an
indifference against or moral systems
such as religion or a type of Ethics to
the opinion of others when we detach
from these abstractions we break free
from the chains of suffering comeu here
verges on a form of stoicism in a sense
where remove moving significance brings
relief from most forms of Anguish by
shedding significance we not only
lighten our load of suffering from the
absurd but also gain greater freedom in
our choices this opens up the
possibility to a form of unrestrained
agency kamu gives us three archetypes
that describe how man should live once
being confronted with the reality of the
Absurd the three archetypes are the
Donan the actor and the Conqueror the
first archetype the Don Kuan or as I
like to call him myself the Playboy is a
Seducer he does not care about a greater
meaning in Life or in afterlife he is
simply a chaser of the daily enjoyments
he finds in life virtually living his
life without a worry on his Horizon
would you recognize in this individual a
constant state of misery or unhappiness
Donan chooses a life of passion and
excitement with a Perpetual smile
gracing his lips Don Juan acknowledges
there exists no Noble love except that
which acknowledges its own brevity and
uniqueness next we have the second
archetype the actor which is an
interesting archetype because the actor
for kamu symbolizes someone that lives
through the character he is portraying
on stage he is playing a role and loses
his own sense of self well knowing that
the character he is portraying is
temporary and will metaphorically
speaking die once the role is finished
the ACT gives it his all during his
performance which can be linked to the
transformative outcome of passion the
third and last archetype is the
Conqueror for the Conqueror overcoming
the Absurd is not merely about achieving
wealth status or even recognition
instead it is about embracing the
Relentless pursuit of goals the trill of
overcoming obstacles and the
satisfaction of continuous growth much
like cus endlessly pushing the boulder
of the Hill the Conqueror finds
fulfillment in the journey itself rather
than in any ultimate destination an
important side note here is that for
kamu these archetypes are just
hypothetical examples they are not
necessarily meant to be applied in life
literally he does not want them to be
granted the status of an ideal but wants
to use them to clarify his point another
important note is that the Absurd man in
whatever form he comes is aoral either
morality comes from something
Transcendent like God or it is invented
as a system by humans in order to
justify certain kinds of behavior the
Absurd man does not believe in God and
he has no need for moral justification
he is Led solely by his own sense of
Integrity which stands independent of
any moral framework since the Absurd man
operates outside the bounds of morality
free from Notions of guilt or wrongdoing
kamu characterizes him as innocent the
distinction between the Absurd man and
the rest of humanity lies not in his
actions but in his internal perspective
towards them for instance the difference
between Don Juan and an average Seducer
is not primarily in their behavior but
in their attitude towards that behavior
an ordinary Seducer might be accused of
the same false that kamu defends Don
Juan against the difference being that
for Don Juan there is nothing beyond the
act of Seduction itself he does not
seduce to find love or to alleviate
Melancholy he seduces purely for the
pleasure of Seduction Dan Juan embodies
the Absurd Man by recognizing that his
life lacks inherent meaning and that his
actions hold no significance beyond
their immediate consequences kamu labels
the Absurd man innocent to contrast it
against the Christian idea of sin in
Catholic belief everyone is born a
sinner marked by the original sin of
Adam and Eve a Christian lives with a
continual consciousness of sin and guilt
striving to earn forgiveness and gain
entry into heaven or the afterlife the
Christian Life is centered between our
innate evil and our potential for good
in contrast the innocence of the absurd
man eliminates any sense of sin or guilt
his actions and decisions are not
overshadowed by a fear of divine
judgment or the idea of a struggle
between good and evil he experiences no
internal restraints preventing him from
pursuing his Desires in this way the
Absurd man's innocence also reflects a
certain Integrity he lives a life
aligned with his interests and desires
without needing any moral code Beyond
part three absurd creation
in the third part of the essay kamu
points out that expressive forms such as
art help us to express the absurdity of
life however he also points out that
these Expressions cannot add inherent
value to our life they can only be a
means to an end so art in a sense helps
us shape our existence the notion that
art imitates life has been prevalent
since Aristotle's time the Greeks called
this concept mimesis a term from which
the English word MIME is derived kamu
likely references this Greek idea when
he describes the Absurd man as
performing a mime of Life viewing the
Act of Creation as the ultimate form of
dis imitation this embodies the essence
and the ideal of the Absurd man as we
should not hope to find a logical
explanation for life that is something
neither philosophy religion or science
can ever provide us let alone art
however art symbolizes the Revolt the
creative aspect of one's own perspective
on the world
asamu writes himself the only way to
deal with an unfree world is to become
so absolutely free that your own
existence is an act of
rebellion as a case study kamu explores
the work of Doki and more specifically
his novel de possessed in this novel
dooi wrestles with the notion that life
is either filled with meaning because of
God's existence or utterly pointless
without him unlike philosophers who deal
with abstractions of this question dooi
as a novelist delves into how these
metaphysical concerns impact our
individual
lives in this novel The Character kilof
embodies this struggle he wants to
revolt against the idea that God doesn't
exist kof embodies this struggle he
argues that for life to have purpose God
must exist but he cannot reconcile this
belief with the conviction that God does
not exist kof ends his own life not as
an act of Despair but as a bold
Rebellion against the idea of a Godless
Universe an attempt to assert ultimate
Freedom by becoming his own God he wants
himself in a certain sense to become God
it's precisely this absurd reasoning
that makes doeski an author that
understands the Absurd kamu interprets
this to mean that in a world without God
individuals assume the role of
determining their own fate without
Divine oversight human actions are
guided purely by personal will however
ever many people cling to Hope and fail
to embrace this absolute freedom kof
serves as a radical demonstration of the
complete Freedom available to
humans despite presenting an absurd
perspective through kirilov and other
characters dooi ultimately rejects the
full implications of absurdism and turns
to fate in his final novel The Brothers
karamazov doeski concludes with alosha
affirming belief in an afterlife
revealing his ultimate faith in God kamu
notes that while doeski engages deeply
with teams of absurdity he ultimately
aligns more with existentialism choosing
Faith over the acceptance of a
meaningless Universe we saw the same
reasoning in chapter one with
philosophers like Kart this chapter
extends that idea showing that doeski as
a writer mirrors this pattern
recognizing the Absurd doesn't
necessarily lead to creating literature
that reflects it
entirely part four the myth of Copus
the biggest part of the Absurd is our
everyday existence the Absurd person is
someone who has seen through the
ridiculous repetitions of daily life
Rising street car 4 hours in the office
or factory meal street car 4 hours of
work meal sleep and Monday Tuesday
Wednesday Thursday Friday and Saturday
according to the same Rhythm this spth
is easily followed most of the time but
one day the why arises and everything
begins in that weariness tinged with
amazement kamu Associates this
repetition of daily life to the Greek
MTH of Copus Copus was the king of epura
today known as Corinth he was also a
horrible Tyrant that killed others for
his own pleasure he was condemned by the
gods to the worst punishment imaginable
to men a punishment that other
philosophers such as Hyer would coin
worse than death itself to roll a
boulder up a hill only for it to roll
back down once he reached the top of the
hill over and over again for
eternity bound to a life of Perpetual
struggle his task rendered futile his
existence devoid of significance yet he
finds solace in his Defiance for kamu
Copus emerges as the emblem of the
Absurd hero one who embrac his life in
its entirety defying death despite being
forever chained to a task devoid of
meaning we are all Copus engaged in the
repetitive grind of our existence we all
laboriously push our individual burdens
only to witness their inevitable descent
back into insignificance the true
absurdity of our existence lies in our
conscious recognition of this copian
condemnation nevertheless kamu does not
advise us to succumb to despair he
envisions Copus confronting his Destiny
with Defiance as he descends the hill to
recommends his arduous task in these
fleeting moments of Liberation when he
transcends his fate and asserts
dominance over his burden Copus becomes
not only a prisoner of Eternity but a
rebel despite the seeming futility of
our daily struggles we grant them with
significance and meaning thus granting
our life's meaning amidst the absurdity
through the mid of Copus kamu undertakes
the Monumental task of analyzing the
essence and meaning of life yet rather
than delving into metaphysical or overly
abstract explanations he observes the
occasional onset of absurdity urging us
to heed his analysis of a shared State
of Mind his Focus remains fixed on the
question of how to live and attain
happiness kamu concludes I leave Copus
at the foot of the mountain one always
finds one's burden again but Copus
teaches the higher Fidelity that negates
the gods and raises rocks he too con
udes that all is well this universe
henceforth without a master seems to him
neither sterile nor futile each atom of
that stone each mineral flake of that
night fi mountain in itself forms a
world the struggle itself toward the
height is enough to fill a man's heart
one must imagine cus
happy kamu contends that the Absurd hero
perceives Life as a Relentless struggle
devoid of Hope denying or avoiding the
strugg strle and its inherent
hopelessness is a way to escape from the
Absurd contradiction of existence for
kamu the essential requirement for the
Absurd man is to live with a full
awareness of his absurd situation as
Copus pushes his Rock uphill he
experiences only toil and struggle but
during his descent he is aware of his
endless and futile struggle this
awareness mirrors the mindset of the
Absurd man who knows his efforts are
ultimately pointless as long as s
remains conscious of this his fate is no
worse than our own we only react with
Dread to Copus fate due to its evident
futility and despair Kimu argues that
life itself mirrors this point to
struggle without any promise of hope yet
he also implies that his fate is
Dreadful only as long as we continue to
hope for something more worthwhile our
predicament appears terrible when
contrasted with an imagined better
alternative if we abandon the notion of
a preferable existence we can accept Our
Fate without fear in doing so Kimu
suggests we can truly Embrace Life
without any Illusions Copus transcends
his fate precisely because he has embrac
it his ordeal becomes Dreadful only if
he continues to hope for or dream of a
better condition without hope the gods
have no means to torment him while kamu
differs from n in many ways his
inspiration to nin philosophy is very
evident here exploring tragedy Kimu
notes that cif's awareness of his fate
renders it tragic he references idus who
becomes a tragic figure upon realizing
his actions both characters ultimately
find happiness by concluding that all is
well kamu implies that tragedy is not
pessimistic but represents a human
Triumph recognition and acceptance of
her fate and limitations lead to True
heroism tragic fate seems terrible only
when contrasted with hope for something
more by abandoning hope Copus does not
perceive his fate as Dreadful but but
finds genuine happiness Kimu concludes
that happiness and absurd awareness are
closely linked true happiness arises
when we accept our life and fate as
entirely our own if happiness required
escaping reality through hope or fate it
would be a false happiness born out of
denial the myth of Copus aims to show
that happiness can be found in accepting
our experiences without relying on
Illusions therefore if genuine happiness
is possible Copus must be happy
while we've covered the key aspects of
the myth of Copus watching a video about
kamu cannot replace the experience of
reading his work firsthand as the
Italian saying goes tradutor trador to
translate or interpret is to betray our
interpretations can introduce
imprecisions due to personal biases and
perspectives I strongly recommend
reading the mid of Copus yourself you
can find a link to the book in the
description below along with links to
some of K's other words
did you enjoy this video if so please
give it a thumbs up and don't forget to
subscribe for more content also let us
know in the comments which philosopher
thinker or author you'd like us to
explore next your feedback helps us
bring you the content you want to see we
are here to serve you philosophy thank
you for watching and we will see you in
the next video take care
تصفح المزيد من مقاطع الفيديو ذات الصلة
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)