Xande Ribeiro Reacts to Craig Jones Invitational vs ADCC | Everyday Perspective Podcast Clips

Summary

The speaker expresses mixed feelings about a rival grappling event organizer's actions, suggesting it undermines the ADCC's 20-year legacy as the World Championships of grappling. While acknowledging the organizer's efforts to increase transparency and athlete pay, the speaker criticizes the timing and approach, arguing it could hurt the sport and athletes' careers. They also discuss the financial aspects of organizing such events and the importance of profit in business, emphasizing the need for a sustainable strategy beyond just paying fighters.

Takeaways

• 🤼‍♂️ The speaker believes that the creation of a rival grappling tournament is a good idea but is being executed at the wrong time and against the ADCC, which has been the platform for many athletes for over 20 years.
• 🏆 The ADCC is considered the World Championship of grappling, similar in status to the IBJJF, and the speaker feels that the new tournament is undermining this legacy.
• 💰 The speaker suggests that the rival tournament's organizer might be using significant financial resources to create a spectacle, similar to what the speaker would do if they had the money to put on a competing event.
• 📚 The speaker advocates for transparency in the sport, such as opening up the books to show viewership numbers and financials, which could help in negotiations and understanding the sport's value.
• 🤝 The speaker acknowledges that while pay for athletes could be better, the ADCC has always treated athletes well, which is an important aspect of the sport's culture.
• 🎟️ The speaker compares the situation to competing in the World Championships, where athletes pay to compete but ultimately gain prestige and potential financial benefits.
• 💡 The speaker speculates that the organizer of the rival tournament might be trying to make a statement or prove a point, but the timing and approach are not agreed upon.
• 🏆 The speaker expresses concern that the rival tournament could hurt the sport by drawing away top athletes and potentially affecting their chances of being invited to future ADCC events.
• 💼 From a business perspective, the speaker emphasizes the importance of profitability and the balance between paying fighters and maintaining a sustainable business model.
• 🤷‍♂️ The speaker reflects on the sport's growth and compares it favorably to other combat sports, noting that grappling has opportunities and financial support that others lack.
• 🕊️ The speaker concludes by expressing a hope for the future of the sport, despite the current controversy, and a desire for transparency and fairness in how athletes are treated and compensated.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the script regarding the ADCC and the individual's actions?

The main issue discussed is the individual's decision to go against the ADCC, which is seen as a betrayal of the organization that provided him with a platform, and the timing of his actions which could be detrimental to the sport.

What does the speaker believe about the impact of the individual's actions on the ADCC?

The speaker believes that the individual's actions are hurting the ADCC, which is the World Championships of grappling, and could potentially affect the careers of athletes who participate in the rival event.

How does the speaker view the financial aspect of the ADCC and the rival event?

The speaker acknowledges that while the ADCC could potentially offer more money to the athletes or better production, it has always treated the athletes well. The speaker also criticizes the financial approach of the rival event, suggesting it may not be sustainable.

What is the speaker's opinion on the timing of the rival event in relation to the ADCC World Championships?

The speaker thinks that the timing of the rival event is intentionally set to undermine the ADCC World Championships, and believes it would have been better to schedule it at a different time to avoid direct competition.

How does the speaker describe the potential consequences for athletes who choose to participate in the rival event?

The speaker suggests that athletes who participate in the rival event may face consequences such as being required to compete in trials to get to the next ADCC event, and potentially being seen as less desirable by the ADCC.

What does the speaker believe about the financial sustainability of the rival event?

The speaker questions the financial sustainability of the rival event, suggesting that it may be backed by a wealthy individual willing to spend money without a clear path to profit.

How does the speaker compare the grappling industry to other combat sports?

The speaker believes that the grappling industry is doing well compared to other combat sports, with more opportunities for athletes to earn money and gain sponsorships.

What is the speaker's view on the importance of the ADCC World Championships in the grappling community?

The speaker views the ADCC World Championships as the pinnacle of the grappling community, a prestigious event that should not be undermined by rival events.

What does the speaker suggest about the motivations behind the rival event organizer's actions?

The speaker suggests that the organizer's motivations may be more about making a statement or proving a point rather than genuinely improving the sport or providing a better platform for athletes.

How does the speaker feel about the impact of the rival event on the ADCC and its stakeholders?

The speaker feels hurt and disappointed by the rival event's impact on the ADCC, as it disrupts the established order and potentially harms the careers of athletes and the reputation of the ADCC.

What is the speaker's perspective on the future of the grappling community in light of these events?

The speaker is uncertain about the future, expressing hope that the community will continue to support the ADCC and that the rival event will not have a lasting negative impact.