In e.l.f we Trust | e.l.f Cosmetics Game Day Commercial 2024
Summary
TLDRIn this humorous and thought-provoking script, the speaker plays the role of a judge addressing the issue of excessive spending on beauty products. The script humorously criticizes the high costs of makeup, likening it to a scam and questioning the necessity of spending $92 on foundation. It also touches on the topic of cruelty-free products and concludes with a playful verdict, suggesting a more affordable alternative for achieving glowy skin, all while maintaining a light-hearted and engaging tone.
Takeaways
- 💰 The script criticizes overspending on beauty products, implying that it's a waste of company funds.
- 💸 It suggests that expensive makeup is overpriced and likens it to scams like certain services.
- 🙅♂️ The speaker objects to the idea of spending $92 on foundation, using a humorous analogy to express disbelief.
- ✨ The desire for a 'gooey radiant, luminous' look is mentioned, indicating the appeal of certain makeup effects.
- 💔 The script points out that the high cost of makeup does not guarantee quality or ethical production (not cruelty-free).
- 👎 The speaker finds the subject 'guilty' of reckless spending and humorously 'sentences' them to a cheaper alternative.
- 😤 There's an implication that no amount of makeup can cover up irritation, possibly referring to skin reactions.
- 👁 The phrase 'judge Beauty serves eyes, lips' could be interpreted as a play on words, emphasizing the focus on visual appeal.
- 🤔 The use of 'facts in elf' at the end is cryptic, but it might suggest a preference for evidence-based or economical choices in beauty products.
- 🌟 The script uses humor and exaggeration to make a point about the value and cost of makeup products.
- 🛑 The overall message seems to be a caution against unnecessary spending on beauty products that may not deliver on their promises.
Q & A
What is the main issue discussed in the script?
-The script discusses the issue of overspending on beauty products, specifically makeup, and the concept that expensive makeup is not necessarily better.
What is the role of 'Judge Beauty' in the script?
-Judge Beauty appears to be a character who is critical of the spending on beauty products and makes a judgment on the issue, suggesting a more cost-effective alternative.
What is the stance of the script on the cost of makeup?
-The script suggests that expensive makeup is overpriced and not necessarily of better quality, implying that it's a scam similar to other overpriced services.
What is the significance of the phrase 'Beauty, Fades dumb is forever'?
-This phrase seems to imply that physical beauty is temporary, while ignorance or foolishness is enduring, possibly criticizing the focus on beauty over wisdom.
What does the script suggest about the necessity of spending $92 on foundation?
-The script objects to the idea of spending $92 on foundation, suggesting it's an unnecessary expense and that cheaper alternatives can provide similar results.
What is the script's opinion on cruelty-free makeup?
-The script expresses disappointment in the lack of cruelty-free options among the expensive makeup products being discussed.
What is the consequence of 'reckless spending' as mentioned in the script?
-The consequence of reckless spending, as portrayed in the script, is a sentence to use a $14 product that offers a 'glow', implying that cheaper products can be just as effective.
What is the script's view on the effectiveness of makeup to cover up irritation?
-The script states that no makeup can cover up irritation, suggesting that makeup is not a solution for skin problems and may even contribute to them.
What is the final verdict given by 'Judge Beauty'?
-The final verdict is that the character is sentenced to $14 glowy skin, indicating a preference for more affordable and possibly more ethical beauty products.
What does the phrase 'We Trust in ELF' imply?
-The phrase 'We Trust in ELF' could imply that the script is endorsing ELF cosmetics as a brand that offers quality products at a more affordable price, and possibly as a cruelty-free option.
What message is the script conveying about the beauty industry?
-The script is conveying a message that the beauty industry often overcharges for products that may not be of superior quality and that consumers should be more discerning and consider cost-effective and ethical options.
Outlines
💄 The Cost of Beauty and Makeup
The first paragraph of the script discusses the high costs associated with makeup and the perceived value of expensive products. It criticizes the notion that spending a significant amount of money on makeup, such as $92 on foundation, is justified and suggests that this is a scam. The speaker also expresses concern about the ethical considerations of makeup production, questioning whether it is cruelty-free. The paragraph ends with a humorous verdict on reckless spending and a suggestion to opt for more affordable and ethical alternatives.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Beauty
💡Overspending
💡Makeup
💡Pricey
💡Cruelty-free
💡Glowy skin
💡Irritation
💡Judge Beauty
💡Radiant
💡Luminous
💡Elf
Highlights
Judge Beauty is back, emphasizing the return of a character or theme focused on beauty standards.
The critique of overspending on beauty products and the waste of company funds.
The argument that expensive makeup is overpriced and akin to scams like couples therapy or setting boundaries.
The humorous objection to the high cost of foundation, with a metaphor comparing it to being deceived by rain.
The desire for makeup that provides a gooey radiant, luminous look, despite its high price.
The revelation that the expensive makeup is not even cruelty-free, adding to the controversy.
A dramatic gasp indicating shock or surprise, likely related to the previous statement about cruelty-free status.
The verdict of 'guilty' for reckless spending, with a humorous sentence of $14 for glowy skin.
The statement that no makeup can cover up irritation, suggesting an acceptance of reality over appearance.
A judge's declaration of serving eyes and lips, possibly indicating the focus on these aspects of makeup.
The phrase 'facts in elf' which might be a play on words or a slogan related to the brand ELF.
The trust in the brand ELF, suggesting a positive endorsement or belief in their products.
The recurring theme of beauty and its costs, indicating a central topic of the discussion.
The contrast between the desire for high-quality makeup and the reality of its cost and ethics.
The humorous and critical tone used throughout the transcript, engaging the audience with wit.
The underlying message about the importance of making informed choices when it comes to beauty products.
Transcripts
All Rise judge beauty is back Beauty
Fades dumb is forever his boss was
overspending on beauty she is wasting
company funds on overpriced makeup good
makeup is expensive well pricey makeup
is a scam like couples therapy or
boundaries o i object to his whole
vibe you're telling me you need to spend
$92 on Foundation don't pee on my leg
and tell me it's raining I confess I
just want it to look gooey radiant
luminous elfing hot but this stuff cost
a fortune and it isn't even
crueltyfree I know I'm not proud of it
gasp I find you guilty of Reckless
spending and sentence you to $14 glowy
skin just wait stop so what do I get
sorry no makeup can cover up
irritating that's okay I don't mind
being irritated judge Beauty serves eyes
lips facts in elf We
Trust
تصفح المزيد من مقاطع الفيديو ذات الصلة
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)