Kasus Asusila, Eks Kapolres Ngada Dipecat dari Polri

Summary

Former Ngada Police Chief AKBP Fajar was officially dismissed from the police force following allegations of sexual harassment and drug-related offenses. The decision was made after an ethics committee hearing on March 17, 2025. Fajar, who is facing charges in a sexual assault case involving four victims, three of whom are minors, had 16 witnesses testify. The committee found his actions to be disgraceful, imposing administrative sanctions including placement in a special unit and eventual dismissal. Fajar has appealed the ruling, but the decision to terminate him was upheld.

Takeaways

• 😀 The former Ngada Police Chief, AKBP Fajar, was dismissed from the police force due to allegations of sexual harassment and drug-related offenses.
• 😀 AKBP Fajar's dismissal was based on the decision made by the Police Ethics Commission on March 17, 2025.
• 😀 The police officer was accused of sexual harassment involving four victims, three of whom were minors.
• 😀 The police investigation involved the questioning of 16 witnesses in connection with the case.
• 😀 The Police Ethics Commission determined that the officer's actions were 'disgraceful'.
• 😀 The officer received an administrative penalty, which included being placed in a special facility for a period from March 7 to March 13, 2025.
• 😀 The officer had already served the special facility punishment in the Provos Bureau under the Propam Polri.
• 😀 Following the Commission's decision, AKBP Fajar was officially dismissed from the police force without honor (PTDH).
• 😀 AKBP Fajar appealed the decision made by the Police Ethics Commission.
• 😀 The decision to dismiss AKBP Fajar underscores the Police's commitment to addressing misconduct, especially involving minors.

Q & A

Who is AKBP Fajar and what happened to him?

AKBP Fajar is a former police chief of Ngada, who was dismissed from his position as a result of allegations of sexual harassment and drug-related offenses. His dismissal followed a decision by the Police Ethics Commission on March 17, 2025.

What were the charges against AKBP Fajar?

AKBP Fajar faced charges of sexual harassment involving four victims, three of whom were minors, and also drug-related offenses.

What actions were taken against AKBP Fajar following the allegations?

He was dismissed from the police force through a process known as 'Pemberhentian Tidak Dengan Hormat' (PTDH), which means 'dismissal without honor.' This decision was made after a hearing by the Police Ethics Commission.

Did AKBP Fajar accept the decision made by the Police Ethics Commission?

No, AKBP Fajar appealed the decision made by the Police Ethics Commission, as indicated by his intention to file an appeal after the ruling.

How many witnesses were involved in the case against AKBP Fajar?

A total of 16 witnesses were examined during the investigation into the allegations against AKBP Fajar.

What specific misconduct did AKBP Fajar's actions fall under according to the Police Ethics Commission?

The Police Ethics Commission determined that AKBP Fajar's actions were 'unethical' and classified as 'disgraceful conduct' due to the severity of the crimes, particularly involving minors.

What administrative sanctions were imposed on AKBP Fajar before his dismissal?

Before his dismissal, AKBP Fajar was placed in a special detention area from March 7 to March 13, 2025, as part of the administrative sanctions.

Where was AKBP Fajar detained during the administrative sanction period?

During the administrative sanction period, AKBP Fajar was detained at the special room within the Police Propam Bureau (Biro Provos Propampolri).

When was the decision to dismiss AKBP Fajar made?

The decision to dismiss AKBP Fajar was made on March 17, 2025, by the Police Ethics Commission.

What is the significance of the Police Ethics Commission's ruling in this case?

The ruling of the Police Ethics Commission was significant because it led to AKBP Fajar's dismissal from the police force and addressed his unethical and criminal actions, setting a precedent for handling similar cases within the police.