Ricuh Sidang Razman & Hotman Paris, Humas PN Jakut Sesalkan Keributan Terjadi | Kabar Petang tvOne

Summary

The court session of a defamation case involving Rasman Nasution became chaotic at the North Jakarta District Court. The session, held on Thursday morning, witnessed tensions after the panel of judges declared the hearing closed due to sensitive content containing elements of obscenity. Hotman Paris was among the witnesses called by the defense. The drama escalated when the judge restricted public access to specific testimony, citing it as inappropriate for public viewing. This led to disruptions from the defense counsel, adding to the disorder in the courtroom.

Takeaways

• 😀 The court session for the defamation case against Rasman Nasution, featuring witness Hotman Paris, became chaotic at the North Jakarta District Court.
• 😀 The spokesperson for the North Jakarta District Court, Mariono, expressed regret over the disturbance that occurred during the trial.
• 😀 The commotion happened after the judge declared the trial to be closed to the public due to the presence of material containing immoral elements.
• 😀 The closed session was necessary for the safety of sensitive content related to the trial, which was deemed inappropriate for public consumption.
• 😀 The court examined three witnesses, including Hotman Paris, who was one of the reporters, during the trial.
• 😀 Witnesses were checked individually, their identities verified, and they were sworn in before giving their testimonies.
• 😀 The judge specifically ruled the session to be closed for the protection of confidential and taboo content in the case.
• 😀 The defendant's legal team, led by Kas Hukumnya, caused further disruption during the closed session by acting inappropriately.
• 😀 The commotion was a result of the defendant's lawyer not respecting the court's order for a private trial.
• 😀 The disturbance highlighted the tensions within the courtroom, especially when dealing with sensitive legal matters involving moral implications.

Q & A

What was the primary issue being discussed in the court session?

The court session was focused on a defamation case involving defendant Rasman Nasution.

Who was a key witness in the case?

One of the key witnesses in the case was Hotman Paris.

Where did the court session take place?

The session took place at the North Jakarta District Court.

What caused the disruption during the session?

The disruption occurred after the panel of judges decided to make the session closed to the public due to the presence of material containing obscene content.

Who expressed disappointment about the disruption in the court?

Mariono, the spokesperson for the North Jakarta District Court, expressed disappointment about the disruption.

What was the reason for declaring the session closed to the public?

The session was declared closed to the public because the trial contained material that included content considered taboo to be heard or seen publicly.

Who was the first to be examined in the trial?

The complainant (pelapor) was the first to be examined in the trial.

How was the complainant sworn in during the trial?

The complainant was sworn in after their identity was verified.

What was the role of the defense lawyer during the trial?

The defense lawyer for the defendant, Rasman Nasution, caused some disruptions during the session, which led to the trial being closed to the public.

What was the main content that led to the session being closed?

The content of the trial involved sensitive material, specifically related to issues of obscenity, which led to the decision to hold the session behind closed doors.