Contract Law Overview: What is the Gateway Issue on ALL Contracts Essays?
Summary
TLDRThe video script emphasizes the crucial 'gateway issue' in contract law, which dictates whether the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) or common law governs a contract. It warns against prematurely jumping into complex contract analysis without first determining the applicable law. The UCC typically applies to contracts involving goods, while common law governs services and real estate. The script also addresses the distinction between the strictness of common law and the more lenient, intention-focused approach of the UCC. It stresses the importance of identifying the predominant purpose of a mixed contract to correctly apply legal principles, ensuring a proper foundation for contract analysis.
Takeaways
- 🚪 The 'Gateway Issue' in contract law is crucial and should be addressed before delving into other aspects of contract analysis.
- 📚 Students often make the mistake of skipping the gateway issue, which can lead to applying the incorrect set of rules to their analysis.
- 🤝 Contract law is divided into two primary sets of rules: the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and the common law.
- 🛒 The UCC governs contracts dealing with goods, which are defined as items that are readily movable at the time of identification.
- 🏢 Common law applies to contracts involving services, including real estate transactions where the subject matter is not readily movable.
- ⚖️ A contract cannot be governed by both the UCC and common law at the same time, except in rare cases of divisible contracts.
- 🔍 To determine which law applies, one must assess if the predominant purpose of the contract is the sale or purchase of goods (UCC) or services (common law).
- 🏠 Contracts involving real estate are typically governed by common law, as land and buildings are not considered 'goods' under the UCC.
- 🎨 In mixed contracts with elements of both goods and services, the key is to identify which aspect is predominant based on the purpose of the contract.
- 🔑 Factors such as the required knowledge, skill, quantity, and price can indicate whether a contract is more service-based or goods-based.
- 📉 The common law is stricter and more binary compared to the UCC, which is more lenient and focused on the intent of the parties involved.
- ✍️ When writing a contract law essay, it's advised to clearly state at the beginning whether the UCC or common law governs to avoid confusion and incorrect analysis.
Q & A
What is the gateway issue in contract law analysis?
-The gateway issue in contract law analysis is determining which set of rules or law governs the contract in question, either the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) or the common law.
Why is it crucial to address the gateway issue before delving into other aspects of contract law?
-Addressing the gateway issue is crucial because it determines the applicable law, which in turn dictates the analysis and interpretation of the contract. Skipping this step can lead to applying the wrong law and result in significant errors in contract analysis.
What are the two separate universes of contract law mentioned in the script?
-The two separate universes of contract law mentioned are Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and the common law.
How does one determine whether a contract is governed by the UCC or the common law?
-A contract is governed by the UCC if it deals with goods, as defined by the UCC. If it deals with services or real estate, it falls under the common law.
What is considered a 'good' according to the UCC?
-According to the UCC, a 'good' is something that is readily movable at the time of identification.
How does the UCC define a contract involving goods?
-The UCC defines a contract involving goods as one where the predominant purpose is the purchase or sale of a good, which is something readily movable at the time of identification.
What is the predominant factor in determining whether a mixed contract is governed by the UCC or the common law?
-The predominant factor is the predominant purpose of the contract. If it's more about the purchase or sale of a good, the UCC governs; if it's more about services or real estate, the common law governs.
What are some factors to consider when determining the predominant purpose of a mixed contract?
-Factors to consider include the knowledge, expertise, or skill required to perform the contract, the quantity of the output, and the price of the contract.
How does the script differentiate between the common law and the UCC in terms of their approach to contract interpretation?
-The common law is described as very strict and binary, requiring exact conditions for a valid contract. The UCC, on the other hand, is more lenient and focused on the good-faith intent of the parties, willing to fill gaps to make the contract work.
What advice does the script give for students writing a contract law essay?
-The script advises students to identify the governing law (UCC or common law) as the gateway issue before starting their analysis. It also suggests writing a heading 'UCC versus common law' at the top of their essay to keep this issue in mind throughout their writing.
Outlines
📚 The Gateway Issue in Contract Law
This paragraph emphasizes the critical 'gateway issue' in contract law, which is determining the governing law for a contract before delving into specific elements like offer, acceptance, and consideration. It cautions against the common mistake of students skipping this step and instead jumping directly into analyzing these elements. The paragraph explains that contracts are governed either by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) or by common law, and it's essential to identify which applies to avoid confusion and errors in analysis. The UCC governs contracts involving goods, while common law applies to services. The distinction is crucial as the rules and analysis under each are markedly different. The speaker also mentions the rarity of 'divisible contracts' that could involve elements of both but highlights that most contracts are indivisible, requiring a clear choice between UCC and common law. The paragraph concludes with a reminder of the importance of this initial determination in contract analysis.
🏗️ Predominant Purpose in Mixed Contracts
The second paragraph delves into the complexities of 'mixed contracts' that involve both goods and services. It explains that the key to determining which law governs in such cases is identifying the 'predominant purpose' of the contract. The UCC will apply if the primary focus is on the sale or purchase of goods, whereas common law will govern if the main purpose is service-oriented. The paragraph provides examples, such as a contract to build a house, which despite involving the purchase of materials (goods), is primarily a service contract under common law because the main purpose is the construction service provided by the builder. Another example is the purchase of paper with shipping included; here, the UCC would apply because the predominant purpose is the acquisition of the goods (paper). The paragraph also introduces three factors to consider when assessing mixed contracts: the knowledge, expertise, or skill required; the quantity of the goods; and the price. These factors can help determine whether the contract is more service-based or goods-based, guiding the choice of governing law.
🔍 The Evolution and Philosophy of Contract Law
The final paragraph discusses the historical context and philosophical differences between common law and the UCC in contract law. It explains that common law, being the older system, is more rigid and binary, often leading to harsh outcomes. In contrast, the UCC was developed to address these issues by focusing on the parties' intent and allowing for more flexibility in filling gaps within a contract. The UCC is described as more lenient and willing to consider the good-faith intent of the parties, in contrast to the strict requirements of common law. The paragraph serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding the underlying principles of each system when analyzing contracts. It concludes with advice for students to always consider the 'gateway issue' of which law governs before starting their analysis, as neglecting this can lead to significant errors and loss of points in assessments.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Gateway Issue
💡Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
💡Common Law
💡Goods
💡Services
💡Consideration
💡Offer and Acceptance
💡Divisible Contract
💡Predominant Purpose
💡Knowledge, Expertise, or Skill
💡Real Estate
Highlights
The importance of identifying the governing law before analyzing a contract.
The concept of a 'gateway issue' in contract law analysis.
Two separate legal frameworks: the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and common law.
A contract cannot be governed by both UCC and common law simultaneously.
The rare case of a divisible contract with multiple forms of consideration.
The general rule: UCC governs contracts dealing with goods, common law governs services.
The definition of 'goods' under the UCC: something readily movable at the time of identification.
Real estate contracts fall under common law due to immovability.
The process of determining whether a mixed contract is governed by UCC or common law.
Predominant purpose of a contract as the key factor in mixed cases.
Examples of contracts involving both goods and services, and how they are analyzed.
Three factors to consider in mixed contracts: knowledge, quantity, and price.
The difference between common law and UCC in terms of strictness and intent consideration.
Common law's strict and binary approach versus UCC's more lenient and intent-focused approach.
The historical context of common law preceding the UCC.
The role of the 'gateway issue' in structuring a contract law essay.
The potential catastrophic results of neglecting the gateway issue in contract law analysis.
Transcripts
what is the gateway issue on a contracts
essay question before you do any type of
analysis about whether a contract was
formed and offer acceptance
consideration all the big subjects I
know everyone wants to jump into and
immediately start discussing in their
contracts analysis there's a very
important determination you have to make
before you jump into any of that stuff
this is a mistake I see made all of the
time because students are excited to get
into the discussion of the bigger topics
like offer acceptance consideration
whatever it is they want to jump into
that stuff so they skip the Gateway
issue and it can end up being
catastrophic so it's really important
that we understand that contract law has
a very important gateway issue you have
to determine what set of rules or what
law governs the contract that you're
dealing with in your back pattern you
think if this is two separate universes
article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code
which we lovingly refer to as the UCC
and also the common law the common law
and your contract and your fact pattern
is going to be either governed by the
Uniform Commercial Code or the common
law it cannot fall into both at the same
time unless you're dealing with a very
rare fact pattern where it's a divisible
contract where you have multiple forms
of consideration being executed in one
instrument one contract that could be
divisible and broken up into separate
contracts but that's rare assuming that
you're dealing with a contract that's
indivisible which is 99 percent of the
time you're either going to be applying
the Uniform Commercial Code or the
common law you can't apply both at the
same time and I see students do this all
the time right they apply elements of
the UCC elements of the common law
because they forgot to make this their
gateway issue when they started their
analysis they forgot to run through this
very brief analysis and ends up costing
of a ton of points the one caveat here
is
if you're dealing with the contracts si
question and the call of the question
somehow asks you to apply both the
common law and UCC which I have seen
then of course do with the cob the
question tells you but assuming that the
cob the question doesn't specifically
ask you to discuss both you have to
choose one or the other
how do you make that determination if
the contract deals with goods then the
UCC governs that contract what is a good
the UCC defines a good something that is
readily movable at the time of
identification common law is going to be
services so if the contract deals with
services the common law is going to
govern that contract and remember the
rules under the UCC and Comm are going
to be very different so depending on
what you find here your analysis is
likely going to be completely different
so it's very important we make the
correct determination here so off the
top one thing I like to note about
services as under the common law is UCC
defines a good is something that is
readily movable so is land or buildings
or a house is any of that stuff readily
movable no so any contract that's
dealing with real estate so I put a big
real estate is going to fall under the
common ball so in your head just as
you're reading a fact pattern you can
think services or real estate common law
goods UCC that's how easy this analysis
should be the only time it can get a
little bit tricky a little bit dicey
would be in a situation where you have a
mixed contract that has elements of both
goods and services in the same contract
for example and most of the time most
contracts do have elements of both but
it's going to be very easy to establish
which control so
the rule here by the way if you're
dealing with a mixed contract that has
elements of services and goods in the
same contract the question is going to
be what is the predominant purpose of
the contract is the product is the
predominant purchase more about the
purchase or sale of a good or is the
predominant purpose of the contract more
about services or real estate so for
example say you have a contract you're
hiring a builder to build you a house to
construct you a house from scratch
well that builders gonna have to
purchase raw materials goods things like
lumber and whatever else that it takes
to build a house so there's gonna be
some goods involved but what's the
predominant purpose of that contract
obviously you're hiring this builder to
build you a house that's more of a
service more of a real estate contract
that's gonna fall under the common law
common law is going to govern that
contract to build a home right so the
question if you have a mixed contract so
it deals with both goods and services he
asked what's the predominant purpose of
the contract so another common example
would be something that is the purchase
or sale of a good plus shipment so say
you're buying 100 reams of paper from a
paper supply company but they're also
agreeing in that contract to ship that
paper to you well shipping something is
a service right so it does have elements
that contract you're purchasing goods
but they're also in the same contract
agreeing to ship those goods to you
which is a service so what controls will
ask what is the predominant purpose of
the contract and typically they're the
predominant purchase is the goods you're
purchasing reams of paper yeah they're
shipping it to you but the predominant
purpose you want that paper you're
entering that contract to obtain the
good of paper so UCC is going to be the
predominant purpose here the goods
aspect of it is going to be the
predominant purpose so the UCC
is going to govern that contract so one
other if you just want to have some
factors in your head there's three
factors that I kind of put under the
common law that you can think about if
you're dealing with a mixed contract you
want to think about I won't write them
just to briefly go over these under the
common log you want to think about what
is the knowledge expertise or skill
required to perform this contract what's
the quantity we're dealing with and
what's the price the lower the quantity
the higher the price and the higher the
knowledge or skill requirement that's
going to typically be factors that point
to something that's more service-based
for example say you're hiring a painter
a painter to paint a painting of you
right you're spending thousands of
dollars hiring an expert painter to make
a artist rendition painting of you well
you're actually entering a contract to
purchase a good painting under the
definition of the UCC is a good it's
readily movable at the time of
identification so a painting the
purchase of a painting could be a good
but here in this situation you're
spending thousands of dollars hiring an
expert to make something very low in
quantity one single painting those
factors are gonna point to a service
contract the predominant purpose of that
contract is more about the knowledge
skill expertise of that painter painting
that painting the actual act of the
service of creating the painting is more
of the predominant purpose under those
backs so again the predominant purpose
can be a little bit tricky sometimes if
you're dealing with a mixed contract but
those are some of the main factors you
want to think about how much knowledge
and skill is required here what quantity
output are we dealing with if you're
dealing with something where someone's
going you're hiring a painter to make
hundreds and hundreds of
and you're buying to a quantity of 200
paintings that might be a different
analysis right especially if there's
less of a skill requirement and it's
less of a you know and the price goes up
less of a still requirement and the
price goes down I mean then you could be
dealing with a Goods contract there
right so it's gonna be very
fact-specific those are going to change
a lot those factors are not conclusive
but just something to think about in
your head obviously you could be dealing
with a contract for the purchase of some
sort of specially manufactured good that
would still be a good but does require
knowledge and skill to make that good so
again it's going to be very
fact-specific but if you're dealing with
a mixed flow of contract the question is
going to be what is the predominant
purpose of this contract is this more
about the purchase or sale of a good or
is this more about the service aspect of
the contract once you determine that you
will determine whether the UCC or common
law governs and you're ready to move on
in your analysis and one more note to
make on the common law versus the UCC is
simply going to be this and this is
something I just like to note that the
common law if you're ever wondering what
the difference between common law and
UCC is something just to remember in
your head is that the common law came
first right the common law has been
around since the beginning of time since
beginning of law and formation common
law was but was around long before the
UCC was written so the common law is
what contracts were based off of this is
what the law governing contracts was for
many many decades and years right and so
what happened over time though as
contract law evolved as a subject what
you had was very harsh results the
common law tends to lean towards very
binary findings the common law is very
strict it says things like you know we
have to have in order for there to be a
valid
forcible contract XY and Z have to
happen exactly like this and if there's
anything wrong with that no contract so
in common law a lot of times you get
very harsh results so what happened the
drafters of the UCC came along and said
okay look the common law is leading some
to some very harsh results let's look at
the actual intent of the parties to the
contract the UCC is much more willing to
plug the gaps consider the parties
intending the good-faith intent of the
parties so the common law is going to be
very strict very binary very it has to
be exactly this or nothing the UCC is
going to say well let's look at the
good-faith intent of the parties and if
we need to plug in some gaps here and
there to make this work that's gonna be
okay but we really want to think about
the intent of the parties
so just remember common-law was around
first it's very harsh very strict very
formal so the drafters of the UCC came
along to try and mitigate some of this I
would say harshness so just the only
last minute to think about as we
continue and you can see the differences
between the common law and UCC it's
typically going to be con Maas very
strict very harsh you see C's a little
bit more lenient okay so basically that
is going to be everything you need to
know for your gateway issue when you sit
down to write a contract law s a very
important that you hit this gateway it
should you knock this out before you
even read the back pattern I tell
students to put this heading down on
your essay if nothing else you see you
have a contracts essay to write before
you even read the back cutter at the
very top put this heading UCC versus
common law something that you're going
to see is you begin to write your essay
so it's in your head as you're going and
that's going to help because if you
forget to cover this day way issue the
results are often catastrophic because
you're going to end up applying the
wrong law to the back pad ER and
and you're gonna get no points so all
that you have to remember is this is
your gateway issue you want to run
through this but then once you get past
this gateway issue you know what law
governs your fact pattern you're gonna
be ready to go get into the more
exciting topics of contract law which
we're gonna be covering in our next
videos until then I wish you all the
absolute best and I'll see you at our
next video
استعرض المزيد من الفيديوهات ذات الصلة
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)