TAK INGIN IKUT DI SANGSI ! WASIT VAR AHIRNYA JUJUR WASIT HIROKI KASAHARA SENGAJA CURANGI INDONESIA

Summary

The 2024 AFF Cup match between Indonesia and Laos ended in a controversial 3-3 draw, sparking outrage over a disputed third goal by Laos. The Japanese referee, Hiroki Kasahara, allowed the goal despite VAR evidence showing the ball had gone out of play before the assist. This decision, following a red card for Indonesia's Marcelino Ferdinan, led to heated protests from Indonesian players and officials. With this controversial result, Indonesia’s path to the semifinals became more difficult, and public outcry called for action against the referee’s decisions, highlighting the need for better officiating and more reliable VAR use in international tournaments.

Takeaways

• 😀 The match between Indonesia and Laos in the AFF Cup 2024 ended in a controversial 3-3 draw, with a disputed third goal by Laos.
• 😀 Indonesia's team faced significant challenges, especially after midfielder Marcelino Ferdinan received a red card in the 58th minute, reducing them to 10 men.
• 😀 Laos' third goal came in injury time, but video evidence indicated that the ball had gone out of bounds before the goal, sparking controversy.
• 😀 Despite VAR's warning, the referee, Hiroki Kashiwara, upheld the goal, leading to protests from Indonesia's players and officials.
• 😀 Indonesia's coach Shin Tae-yong expressed frustration over the referee's decision, stating that they had informed the referee of the mistake, but it was ignored.
• 😀 The controversial decision left Indonesia with just 4 points from 3 matches in Group B, making their route to the semifinals much harder.
• 😀 Laos, considered an underdog, earned a valuable point from the match, while Indonesia must win their final two group-stage games to advance.
• 😀 The controversial call led to a public outcry in Indonesia, with social media hashtags like #Karahati and #AffJusticia trending.
• 😀 PSSI, Indonesia's football federation, announced plans to file an official protest to the AFF regarding the referee's decision, demanding a review.
• 😀 The incident highlighted concerns about the quality of refereeing in international tournaments and the effectiveness of VAR in ensuring fair play.
• 😀 The match's outcome and the referee's decision serve as a reminder of the importance of technological assistance and fair officiating in high-stakes competitions.

Q & A

What was the main controversy in the Indonesia vs. Laos match at the 2024 AFF Cup?

The main controversy was the third goal scored by Laos in injury time. Despite VAR showing that the ball had crossed the line before the assist was made, the referee, Hiroki Kashara, allowed the goal to stand, which led to protests from the Indonesian team.

How did the red card for Marcelino Ferdinan impact the match?

Marcelino Ferdinan received a red card in the 58th minute for a dangerous foul, forcing Indonesia to play with 10 men for the rest of the match. This reduced their ability to compete with Laos, who took advantage of their numerical superiority.

What was the outcome of the match between Indonesia and Laos?

The match ended in a 3-3 draw, which left Indonesia with 4 points from three matches in Group B of the AFF Cup, making it more challenging for them to advance to the semifinals.

What was the Indonesian Football Association's (PSSI) response to the controversial decision?

PSSI formally protested the referee's decision and demanded that the AFF review the incident. PSSI chairman Erik Thohir stated that they could not accept the injustice and insisted that VAR had clearly shown the goal should not have counted.

Why was VAR important in this match?

VAR was crucial in indicating that the ball had gone out of bounds before Laos' third goal was scored. However, the referee ignored the VAR warning and upheld the goal, leading to controversy and frustration from the Indonesian team.

How did the controversial decision affect Indonesia's semifinal prospects?

The 3-3 draw made Indonesia's path to the semifinals more difficult, as they now need to win their final group-stage matches against Vietnam and the Philippines to secure qualification.

What were the public reactions to the referee's decision?

The controversial decision sparked widespread outrage in Indonesia, with fans and media using the hashtag #KasharaOut to express their discontent. Many questioned the quality of officiating at the tournament and called for stronger action from the AFF.

What role did Hiroki Kashara play in the controversy?

Hiroki Kashara, the Japanese referee, was at the center of the controversy. Despite VAR indicating the goal should not stand, Kashara ignored the evidence and upheld the goal, which led to protests from the Indonesian players and officials.

What does the incident reveal about officiating in international tournaments?

The incident highlights the importance of consistency and transparency in officiating, as well as the need for referees to properly utilize technology like VAR to ensure fair play. The failure to adhere to VAR recommendations raised doubts about the reliability of the system in high-stakes matches.

What impact did the controversial decision have on Indonesia's morale for upcoming matches?

The controversial decision likely affected the morale of the Indonesian players and supporters, as it was seen as an injustice. However, the team is expected to bounce back and focus on winning their remaining group-stage matches to secure a semifinal spot.