Dugaan Kecurangan Pemilu dengan Penggelembungan Suara di Aplikasi Sirekap - Sindo Sore 20/02

Summary

The video discusses concerns over potential vote manipulation in Indonesia's election, particularly focusing on discrepancies found in the Sirap application for vote tallying. The Bawaslu (Election Supervisory Agency) conducted an investigation after discovering that vote counts in certain polling stations exceeded the registered voter numbers. The issue became viral after amateur footage revealed inconsistencies in the results. Experts argue that the application requires improvement to prevent such errors, emphasizing the need for thorough evaluation to ensure election integrity and avoid public distrust in the system.

Takeaways

• 😀 Allegations of vote manipulation in the Sir app continue to surface, drawing attention from the public.
• 😀 Bawaslu (Election Supervisory Board) discovered discrepancies, with some vote counts exceeding the number of registered voters in the TPS (Polling Station).
• 😀 Bawaslu has asked the KPU (General Elections Commission) to correct the data regarding the vote count for Prabowo.
• 😀 An amateur recording went viral, showing differences between the tallying of votes in the app and the manual count at the TPS.
• 😀 The video showed discrepancies where votes for a presidential candidate increased significantly, from dozens to hundreds, raising suspicions of vote manipulation.
• 😀 In Cengkareng, TPS 106, the vote count for a candidate was 713, even though there were only 28 voters registered in the DPT (Voter List).
• 😀 Similar discrepancies were found in TPS 54 in Cakung, Jakarta, where the vote count for a candidate was 748, though the correct number was only 74.
• 😀 Bawaslu Jakarta Timur has urged the local KPU to make corrections regarding the vote counting errors in their jurisdiction.
• 😀 The discrepancies in vote tallying on the KPU’s online rekapitulasi system were considered embarrassing and require immediate correction.
• 😀 Cybersecurity and forensics expert Alfon Tanu Jaya suggested the KPU needs to reevaluate the Sir app to prevent errors and ensure accuracy in future elections.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the transcript?

The main issue discussed is the alleged manipulation of vote counts through the Sir rekap application, which has raised concerns about potential vote inflation in the election.

What did the Bawaslu discover during their investigation?

Bawaslu discovered that the vote count in the Sir rekap application exceeded the number of voters registered in the DPT (Permanent Voter List) at certain polling stations, indicating a potential issue with the vote tally.

What action did Bawaslu take in response to their findings?

Bawaslu requested the KPU (General Elections Commission) to correct the vote data in the application, but they did not take further punitive measures.

What specific example of vote inflation was mentioned?

An example from TPS 106 in Cengkareng showed a candidate receiving 713 votes, despite there being only 28 registered voters in the DPT, which raised suspicions of vote inflation.

How did the public become aware of the issue?

The issue gained attention after an amateur recording went viral, which showed discrepancies between the vote count displayed in the Sir rekap application and the manual vote tally at the polling station.

What was the controversy regarding TPS 54 in Cakung, Jakarta?

At TPS 54, the Sir rekap application showed 748 votes for a candidate, while the actual number of registered voters in the DPT was only 74, highlighting a similar issue of vote inflation.

What does Bawaslu recommend for addressing the issue?

Bawaslu recommended that the KPU make necessary corrections to the vote data and take corrective actions to prevent similar issues in the future.

What did the cyber security expert Alfon Tanujaya suggest regarding the Sir rekap application?

Alfon Tanujaya suggested that the KPU should evaluate the Sir rekap application thoroughly to prevent issues where the vote count for one candidate appears disproportionately high compared to the total votes.

Why was the OCR functionality of the Sir rekap application mentioned?

The OCR (Optical Character Recognition) functionality of the Sir rekap application was mentioned as being imperfect, contributing to potential errors in the recording and processing of vote data.

What is the broader concern that the public has about the application?

The broader concern is that the discrepancies in the Sir rekap application could lead to public distrust in the election results, potentially causing concerns about the legitimacy of the vote count.