DON'T buy a Screen Protector before watching this.

Summary

In this video, the presenter compares three iPhone 12 screen protectors priced at $1, $40, and $80. Despite their varying costs, he finds minimal visual differences and highlights that the cheapest option offers the best installation results. Scratch tests reveal that both the $1 and $40 protectors fail to deliver on their claims of hardness, while the $80 sapphire protector performs significantly better. Drop tests show the sapphire protector withstands impacts better than its cheaper counterparts. Ultimately, the video concludes that consumers need not spend excessively on screen protectors, although the sapphire option is recommended for superior durability.

Takeaways

• 😀 Screen protectors vary widely in price, but higher cost does not always mean better quality.
• 💰 The $1 screen protector performed surprisingly well compared to the more expensive options.
• 📦 Packaging and additional installation tools do not significantly enhance the protective capabilities of a screen protector.
• 🔍 All three tested protectors claimed to be high hardness (level 9), but this was misleading for the cheaper options.
• ⚒️ Scratch tests revealed that the $1 and $40 protectors showed damage at level 6, while the $80 sapphire protector resisted until level 9.
• 🧪 The installation process for all protectors had varying results, with the budget option applying the best without bubbles.
• 💥 A drop test indicated that spending more does not guarantee that your device will remain undamaged.
• 🛡️ The sapphire screen protector showed the best performance in terms of durability and damage resistance.
• 💡 Consumers should be cautious about marketing claims associated with screen protectors and focus on practical performance.
• 🤑 Ultimately, a reasonable price for a screen protector is often sufficient, and spending excessively is usually unnecessary.

Q & A

What are the three types of screen protectors tested in the video?

The video tests a $1 tempered glass protector, a $40 tempered glass protector from Spec, and an $80 sapphire screen protector from Shelrus.

What was surprising about the performance of the $1 screen protector?

Despite its low price, the $1 screen protector performed surprisingly well in installation and did not restrict brightness, applying with the best result among the three.

How did the packaging differ between the cheaper and more expensive screen protectors?

The cheaper protector had basic packaging with some spelling errors, while the more expensive ones had more reassuring packaging and included additional tools for application.

What hardness scale was used to test the scratch resistance of the screen protectors?

The hardness picks rated from 1 to 9 were used, where a higher number indicates a greater ability to scratch.

At what hardness levels did the cheaper screen protectors show noticeable scratches?

The $1 and $40 screen protectors showed noticeable scratches at level 6 and deep scratches at level 7.

What was the outcome of the drop tests conducted with the screen protectors?

Both the $1 and $40 screen protectors were severely damaged during drop tests, while the sapphire protector exhibited significantly less damage.

What unique characteristic does the sapphire screen protector have compared to the others?

The sapphire screen protector is claimed to be made from 99.99% pure sapphire, achieving a hardness level of 9 on the scale, making it more durable against scratches.

What conclusion did the reviewer reach regarding the pricing of screen protectors?

The reviewer concluded that spending more on a screen protector does not guarantee better protection, and many companies take advantage of consumers’ fears about damaging expensive devices.

Why does the reviewer recommend Surfshark VPN?

The reviewer recommends Surfshark VPN for its good value, affordability, and effectiveness in providing secure internet browsing compared to more expensive VPN options.

What was the final recommendation about purchasing screen protectors?

The final recommendation is that while glass screen protectors are advisable, consumers do not need to spend excessively; the sapphire protector is worth the investment for enhanced protection.