Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Gaming Performance: There Are Serious Problems

Summary

The video reviews Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K CPU, highlighting its gaming performance through various benchmarks. While it shows promise in productivity tasks and performs comparably to the i9 14900K in some scenarios, it struggles to deliver consistent high frame rates in demanding games like Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 and Cyberpunk 2077, often falling behind older CPUs. Despite automation in testing providing more accurate results, the 285K does not justify its purchase for gamers at this time. Future updates could improve performance, but currently, older processors remain more competitive.

Takeaways

• 😀 Intel's Core Ultra 9 285k shows CPU limitations in demanding games like Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, even on high-end hardware.
• 😀 Despite high specifications, no CPU consistently achieves 60 frames per second in the benchmark, highlighting the need for better performance.
• 😀 Faster RAM, such as G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo at 6000 MT/s, may not significantly impact gaming performance in this context.
• 😀 The Intel Core Ultra 9 285k struggles to match its predecessor, the i9-14900k, particularly in CPU-intensive games like Cyberpunk 2077.
• 😀 Automated benchmarking setups allow for more efficient testing of CPU performance across various games.
• 😀 In CPU-heavy scenarios, such as the cherry blossom marketplace in Cyberpunk 2077, the 285k shows notable performance regression compared to older models.
• 😀 For gaming performance, the Core Ultra 9 285k does not offer compelling reasons to upgrade from previous generation CPUs like the i9-14900k.
• 😀 Performance benchmarks reveal significant inconsistencies across different games, questioning the reliability of the new CPU.
• 😀 In certain scenarios, the 285k performs well, matching or exceeding the i9-14900k, especially in less demanding titles.
• 😀 The conclusion suggests waiting for potential updates and patches before considering the Core Ultra 9 285k for gaming.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the video regarding the Intel Core Ultra 9 285k?

The video primarily evaluates the gaming performance of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285k CPU, comparing it to other high-end CPUs in various demanding games.

How does the Intel Core Ultra 9 285k perform in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020?

In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core Ultra 9 285k is CPU-limited, failing to consistently achieve 60 frames per second even at 4K ultra settings, indicating significant performance limitations.

What benchmarks were conducted to evaluate the Intel Core Ultra 9 285k?

The benchmarks included popular titles like Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, Cyberpunk 2077, and Dragon's Dogma 2, focusing on both gaming performance and productivity tasks like video encoding.

How does the Core Ultra 9 285k compare to the Core i9 14900k in Cyberpunk 2077?

The Core Ultra 9 285k significantly underperformed compared to the Core i9 14900k, showing about a 45% performance deficit in Cyberpunk 2077.

What issues were identified with the performance consistency of the Core Ultra 9 285k?

The Core Ultra 9 285k exhibited highly irregular frame times and inconsistent performance across different games, raising concerns about its reliability for high-demand gaming.

What did the reviewer suggest about the new CPU's performance in terms of gaming efficiency?

The reviewer pointed out that while Intel claims the Core Ultra 9 285k focuses on efficiency improvements, it has not translated into better gaming performance compared to older models.

What are the potential factors affecting the gaming performance of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285k?

Factors affecting performance may include CPU architecture, optimization in specific games, RAM speeds, and the limitations of current BIOS or driver support.

What does the review conclude about the purchasing decision for the Intel Core Ultra 9 285k?

The review concludes that, based on current benchmarks, there is no compelling reason for gamers to purchase the Intel Core Ultra 9 285k, especially given the performance of older processors.

How does the performance of the Core Ultra 9 285k compare to AMD's Ryzen 7 7800x3d?

The performance of the Core Ultra 9 285k is generally inferior to the Ryzen 7 7800x3d, as seen in multiple benchmarks where AMD's processor outperformed Intel's in gaming scenarios.

What future developments could influence the Core Ultra 9 285k's gaming performance?

Future BIOS updates, driver optimizations, and patches from game developers could potentially improve the gaming performance of the Core Ultra 9 285k and align it more closely with user expectations.