Anarchy
Summary
TLDRIn this video, Alan Sense introduces the concept of anarchy in global politics, particularly from the perspective of political realism. He explains that anarchy refers to the lack of a central authority in the international system, which leads to insecurity among states. States rely on self-help, increasing military power or forming alliances to ensure their security. This can result in the 'security dilemma,' where states' attempts to protect themselves lead to arms races and heightened tensions. The video highlights how anarchy shapes state behavior in global politics, with examples from history.
Takeaways
- 🌍 Anarchy is a key concept in the theory of political realism, which asserts that the international system lacks a central authority.
- 🏛️ Realists argue that global politics operate under international anarchy due to the absence of a world government and no global police force.
- ⚔️ The anarchic nature of the international system makes states insecure, with their main concern being survival.
- 🛡️ In an anarchic system, states rely on themselves for security, leading to a 'self-help' system where military power or alliances are the primary methods of protection.
- 🤝 Trust is difficult in this system, making long-term cooperation between states hard to achieve, as states are driven by self-interest.
- 🔁 The 'security dilemma' exemplifies how states' attempts to defend themselves can lead to increased military buildup by others, fostering an arms race.
- 💣 Arms races, resulting from the security dilemma, often make the international environment more hostile and insecure.
- ⚠️ Realists argue that despite efforts to secure themselves, states may end up less secure due to the increased tensions and distrust in the system.
- 📜 Realists use historical examples to demonstrate how the anarchic structure of the international system influences state behavior.
- 🧠 While realism emphasizes anarchy in global politics, other theories offer different interpretations of the international system's nature.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is the concept of anarchy in international relations and global politics, particularly how it shapes state behavior in an anarchic international system.
Why is anarchy important in the study of international relations according to the video?
-Anarchy is important because it is a core concept in the theory of political realism, which argues that the absence of a central authority or world government in the international system determines the nature and behavior of states.
How do realists define an anarchic international system?
-Realists define an anarchic international system as one where there is no central authority or world government to establish laws, enforce rules, or provide protection. This lack of authority creates a self-help system where states rely on themselves for security.
What are the two primary reasons realists argue that the international system is anarchic?
-First, there is no central authority or world government to enforce laws. Second, there is no world police force to maintain order and ensure security, making states responsible for their own safety.
What is the 'self-help' system in realist theory?
-In realist theory, the 'self-help' system refers to the idea that in an anarchic international system, states must rely on their own resources for security, either by increasing their military power or forming alliances.
How does anarchy affect trust and cooperation between states?
-Anarchy makes trust difficult between states, as they cannot rely on a central authority to enforce agreements. This distrust makes long-term cooperation challenging, leading to conflicts and a focus on self-interest.
What is the 'security dilemma' as described in the video?
-The security dilemma refers to a situation where states, in an effort to increase their security by building up their military power, unintentionally provoke fear and suspicion in other states, leading to an arms race and increased insecurity.
How does the security dilemma create an arms race between states?
-In the security dilemma, when one state builds up its military for self-defense, other states perceive this as a threat and respond by increasing their own military power. This cycle of mutual fear leads to an arms race, where states continually increase their defenses in response to each other.
What are the potential consequences of an arms race according to realists?
-An arms race can lead to a more hostile and insecure environment, where states are less secure than before. The suspicion and distrust generated by military buildups can even lead to conflict or war.
Do all theories in international relations agree with the realist view of anarchy?
-No, not all theories agree with the realist view of anarchy. Other theories in international relations have different perspectives on the international system and its fundamental characteristics, offering alternative explanations for state behavior.
Outlines
🎓 Introduction to Global Politics and Anarchy
Alan Sense introduces the video series on global politics, focusing on key concepts in international relations, specifically anarchy. Anarchy is a core concept in political realism, which argues that global politics operates within an anarchic international system. The absence of a world government or central authority results in an anarchic system that shapes the behavior of states, determining global politics historically, today, and in the future.
🌍 The Anarchic International System
Anarchy in global politics is explained through the absence of both a central authority and a world police force. This creates a system where states must prioritize their own survival and security. The system is labeled 'self-help' because states cannot rely on others for security, and must build military power or form alliances. Trust is scarce, cooperation is difficult, and states act in self-interest, creating a conflict-prone environment.
🔄 The Security Dilemma and Arms Race
The concept of the 'security dilemma' is introduced, where one state’s efforts to increase its military for self-defense lead other states to do the same. This lack of trust causes an arms race as each state builds more military power, assuming the worst of others. This spiral increases suspicion and tension, ultimately making the international system more insecure and potentially leading to war, despite each state’s intention to secure itself.
💥 Anarchy’s Impact on State Behavior
The security dilemma is a prime example of how anarchy affects the behavior of states in the international system. Realists argue that the anarchic structure shapes how states interact and compete. This theory has historical examples to support it, but not all international relations theories agree. Realism’s emphasis on anarchy offers significant insights into global politics, though other perspectives provide different views on the nature of the international system.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Anarchy
💡Political Realism
💡International System
💡Self-Help System
💡Security Dilemma
💡Arms Race
💡Survival
💡Trust
💡Central Authority
💡Cooperation
Highlights
Anarchy is a core concept in the theory of political realism, influencing global politics.
Realists argue that global politics is shaped by the lack of a central authority, leading to an anarchic system.
The absence of a world government means no established rules, laws, or protections exist in the international system.
Realists emphasize that there is no global police force to enforce rules or laws in the international system.
An anarchic system creates insecurity among states, making survival their ultimate priority.
States in an anarchic environment must rely on themselves for security, leading to the concept of a 'self-help system.'
States have two main options for security: increasing their military power or forming alliances.
Trust is difficult in an anarchic system, making cooperation between states extremely challenging.
The security dilemma illustrates how states build up military power out of fear, leading to arms races.
In a security dilemma, states’ efforts to defend themselves can result in increased insecurity and potential conflict.
The arms race between states A and B demonstrates how mistrust and fear can escalate tensions in an anarchic system.
The security dilemma can extend throughout the international system, involving multiple states in an arms race.
Anarchy leads to a hostile and suspicious environment among states, which can potentially lead to war.
Realists believe that the anarchic structure of the international system dictates the behavior of states.
Not all theories agree with realism; other perspectives challenge the idea of an anarchic international system.
Transcripts
hi I'm Alan sense and I'm sitting
outside the International House at the
University of British Columbia welcome
to the global politics instructional
video series in this series we're
looking at a number of key concepts in
the study of international relations and
global politics today we're looking at
anarchy
now anarchy is important because anarchy
is one of the core concepts in the
theory of political realism realists
argue that the way global politics are
and the way global politics happens is
all because it's an international
anarchy that is to say the international
system is anarchic and realists argue
that this fundamentally determines the
character of global politics
historically today and in the future so
let's see what they mean anarchy
now when we think of anarchy often comes
up first is the idea of anarchism and
anarchists of course are irrelevant in
some contexts but we're not really
interested in them right now we're
actually focused on global politics so
I'm going to draw an international
system and I'm going to populate it with
some states and I'll draw some very
powerful states and some less powerful
states and some even less powerful
states now realists argue that this
system is anarchic that is to say it is
characterized by anarchy and they make
that claim for two reasons first there
is no central authority in this system
and what that really means is there's no
world government there's no world
government to establish rules establish
laws or provide protection for anyone in
the system
the second reason this system is
anarchic is that there is no world
police force and as a result there's no
force to actually enforce rules or laws
in the system
now realists argue there's another of
consequences to this the first
consequence is that states are very
insecure in an anarchic environment and
as a result they are very concerned
observe ival and that is their first and
ultimate priority second realists argue
that in this anarchic system states can
really only rely on themselves for their
own security and realists call this a
self-help system and there's really only
two ways States can't
help themselves to secure themselves
against any threats and that's to
increase their own military power or to
form alliances third realists argue that
in an anarchic system is extremely
difficult to trust anyone so Trust is
difficult and as a result it's very
difficult to promote cooperation
everyone in the system is worried about
their own self-interests there's a lot
of conflict in the system because it's
so difficult to establish long-term
patterns of cooperation with others in
an anarchic environment so realists
argue that this anarchic structure makes
States act the way they do this system
this anarchic system determines the
behavior of states and one of the
examples that realists use to illustrate
this and we'll talk about here because
it's a very good example is something
called the security dilemma and the
whole idea here is when states look out
into the international system and I'll
just label these three or powerful
states in the system a B and C when
states look out into the system they
feel insecure so let's take state a
looks into this system and feels it's
insecure there's no central authority
there's no police force it needs to
depend on itself for its own security
Trust is difficult it wants to survive
and so as a result it will build up its
military power and I'll just draw a
little symbol there to to express that
and what state a is really doing is it's
looking out of the system is saying you
know we don't have any aggressive intent
we don't want to attack anybody but we
can't trust anyone either and we need to
ensure our own security so we're going
to build up our military to defend
ourselves
now state B looks at that and asked the
question why did state a do that why did
they increase their military
and certainly they realized it we have
no aggressive intent towards them so
perhaps they're building up their
military in order to attack us we can't
take that chance it's a self-help system
so we better build up our own military
in response state a then looks to that
effort by state B to build up its
military and ask the question now why
did they do that surely they knew we
have no aggressive intent towards them
we were building up our military to
defend ourselves but then they go up and
build their military up why did they do
that maybe they're planning to attack us
it's a self-help system so we better
build up or military a little bit more
in order to defend ourselves against
state b state b then looks at that and
goes hah why did they do that we
increased our military just to defend
ourselves and now they've gone and
increase their military some more we
better do the same and then state a
responds state B responds and before you
know it you've got an arms race between
state a and state B now meanwhile state
C is looking at this and going what's
going on these two countries are vastly
increasing the military power we better
do the same in case they're planning to
attack us and before you know it you've
got an arms race that's extended
throughout the system an arms race is a
particularly extreme form or virulent
example of the security dilemma and of
course the dilemma here is that in their
efforts to ensure their own security
these states have now created an
environment which is much more insecure
than it was before I mean there's
certainly no more secure than they were
before and arguably they're even less
secure because this system is now much
more hostile much more filled with
suspicion and distrust and could even
lead to war so realists make the
argument through the security dilemma as
one example
of how Anarchy affects global politics
the nature of the system the character
of the system actually affects the
behavior of states it does so in a way
that realists argue has examples
throughout history so that was the
concept of anarchy now not everyone
believes that realists are right when
they describe the world as anarchic most
other theories have very different takes
on how you would describe the
international system and its fundamental
characteristics but clearly if we do
want to try to understand global
politics realists do have a lot to tell
us and anarchy is one of the main
contributions they make to this
discussion I hope you enjoyed this video
join me next time
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)