Anarchy

allensens
27 Feb 201208:41

Summary

TLDRIn this video, Alan Sense introduces the concept of anarchy in global politics, particularly from the perspective of political realism. He explains that anarchy refers to the lack of a central authority in the international system, which leads to insecurity among states. States rely on self-help, increasing military power or forming alliances to ensure their security. This can result in the 'security dilemma,' where states' attempts to protect themselves lead to arms races and heightened tensions. The video highlights how anarchy shapes state behavior in global politics, with examples from history.

Takeaways

  • 🌍 Anarchy is a key concept in the theory of political realism, which asserts that the international system lacks a central authority.
  • 🏛️ Realists argue that global politics operate under international anarchy due to the absence of a world government and no global police force.
  • ⚔️ The anarchic nature of the international system makes states insecure, with their main concern being survival.
  • 🛡️ In an anarchic system, states rely on themselves for security, leading to a 'self-help' system where military power or alliances are the primary methods of protection.
  • 🤝 Trust is difficult in this system, making long-term cooperation between states hard to achieve, as states are driven by self-interest.
  • 🔁 The 'security dilemma' exemplifies how states' attempts to defend themselves can lead to increased military buildup by others, fostering an arms race.
  • 💣 Arms races, resulting from the security dilemma, often make the international environment more hostile and insecure.
  • ⚠️ Realists argue that despite efforts to secure themselves, states may end up less secure due to the increased tensions and distrust in the system.
  • 📜 Realists use historical examples to demonstrate how the anarchic structure of the international system influences state behavior.
  • 🧠 While realism emphasizes anarchy in global politics, other theories offer different interpretations of the international system's nature.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of the video?

    -The main topic of the video is the concept of anarchy in international relations and global politics, particularly how it shapes state behavior in an anarchic international system.

  • Why is anarchy important in the study of international relations according to the video?

    -Anarchy is important because it is a core concept in the theory of political realism, which argues that the absence of a central authority or world government in the international system determines the nature and behavior of states.

  • How do realists define an anarchic international system?

    -Realists define an anarchic international system as one where there is no central authority or world government to establish laws, enforce rules, or provide protection. This lack of authority creates a self-help system where states rely on themselves for security.

  • What are the two primary reasons realists argue that the international system is anarchic?

    -First, there is no central authority or world government to enforce laws. Second, there is no world police force to maintain order and ensure security, making states responsible for their own safety.

  • What is the 'self-help' system in realist theory?

    -In realist theory, the 'self-help' system refers to the idea that in an anarchic international system, states must rely on their own resources for security, either by increasing their military power or forming alliances.

  • How does anarchy affect trust and cooperation between states?

    -Anarchy makes trust difficult between states, as they cannot rely on a central authority to enforce agreements. This distrust makes long-term cooperation challenging, leading to conflicts and a focus on self-interest.

  • What is the 'security dilemma' as described in the video?

    -The security dilemma refers to a situation where states, in an effort to increase their security by building up their military power, unintentionally provoke fear and suspicion in other states, leading to an arms race and increased insecurity.

  • How does the security dilemma create an arms race between states?

    -In the security dilemma, when one state builds up its military for self-defense, other states perceive this as a threat and respond by increasing their own military power. This cycle of mutual fear leads to an arms race, where states continually increase their defenses in response to each other.

  • What are the potential consequences of an arms race according to realists?

    -An arms race can lead to a more hostile and insecure environment, where states are less secure than before. The suspicion and distrust generated by military buildups can even lead to conflict or war.

  • Do all theories in international relations agree with the realist view of anarchy?

    -No, not all theories agree with the realist view of anarchy. Other theories in international relations have different perspectives on the international system and its fundamental characteristics, offering alternative explanations for state behavior.

Outlines

00:00

🎓 Introduction to Global Politics and Anarchy

Alan Sense introduces the video series on global politics, focusing on key concepts in international relations, specifically anarchy. Anarchy is a core concept in political realism, which argues that global politics operates within an anarchic international system. The absence of a world government or central authority results in an anarchic system that shapes the behavior of states, determining global politics historically, today, and in the future.

05:02

🌍 The Anarchic International System

Anarchy in global politics is explained through the absence of both a central authority and a world police force. This creates a system where states must prioritize their own survival and security. The system is labeled 'self-help' because states cannot rely on others for security, and must build military power or form alliances. Trust is scarce, cooperation is difficult, and states act in self-interest, creating a conflict-prone environment.

🔄 The Security Dilemma and Arms Race

The concept of the 'security dilemma' is introduced, where one state’s efforts to increase its military for self-defense lead other states to do the same. This lack of trust causes an arms race as each state builds more military power, assuming the worst of others. This spiral increases suspicion and tension, ultimately making the international system more insecure and potentially leading to war, despite each state’s intention to secure itself.

💥 Anarchy’s Impact on State Behavior

The security dilemma is a prime example of how anarchy affects the behavior of states in the international system. Realists argue that the anarchic structure shapes how states interact and compete. This theory has historical examples to support it, but not all international relations theories agree. Realism’s emphasis on anarchy offers significant insights into global politics, though other perspectives provide different views on the nature of the international system.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Anarchy

Anarchy in the context of international relations refers to the absence of a central authority or world government that can enforce rules or laws. The video emphasizes that in the international system, no overarching power exists to govern states or provide security. This lack of authority is fundamental to the theory of political realism, as it shapes the behavior of states by making them prioritize their own security.

💡Political Realism

Political realism is a theory in international relations that views the international system as anarchic, meaning that it is driven by self-interest, power dynamics, and survival. Realists argue that states operate in a self-help system where they cannot rely on others for security. The video uses realism to explain why states act the way they do, especially in response to the anarchic nature of global politics.

💡International System

The international system refers to the network of relationships among states, characterized by the lack of a central authority. In the video, the presenter describes it as anarchic, with no world government or police force to impose order. This system leads to insecurity among states, influencing their behavior, such as forming alliances or increasing military power.

💡Self-Help System

In the context of political realism, a self-help system means that states must rely on their own resources and capabilities to ensure their survival. The video explains that due to the anarchic nature of the international system, states cannot depend on others for protection, and must either strengthen their military power or form alliances to safeguard their security.

💡Security Dilemma

The security dilemma is a situation in which the efforts of one state to increase its security lead to increased insecurity for others. In the video, this concept is illustrated through an arms race: when one state builds up its military, others feel threatened and respond by doing the same, creating a cycle of distrust and insecurity that can escalate into conflict.

💡Arms Race

An arms race occurs when two or more states continuously build up their military capabilities in response to each other. The video uses the arms race as an example of the security dilemma, where states, trying to secure themselves in an anarchic system, inadvertently make the international environment more hostile and dangerous.

💡Survival

Survival is the primary concern of states in an anarchic international system, according to political realism. In the video, the presenter explains that because there is no central authority to protect them, states prioritize their own survival above all else, often focusing on increasing military power and forming alliances to secure their position.

💡Trust

Trust is described as difficult to establish in an anarchic system because states are primarily concerned with their own security and interests. In the video, the lack of trust between states leads to difficulties in promoting long-term cooperation, as each state fears the others may have hidden agendas or aggressive intentions.

💡Central Authority

A central authority refers to an overarching power or governing body that can create laws and enforce them. The video explains that such an authority does not exist in the international system, which is why it is considered anarchic. This absence of a central authority forces states to rely on themselves for protection and fosters insecurity.

💡Cooperation

Cooperation in international relations involves states working together for mutual benefit. However, the video explains that in an anarchic system, cooperation is challenging due to the lack of trust and the self-help nature of states. Realists argue that the anarchic structure of the international system makes sustained cooperation difficult, as states are more concerned with their own survival.

Highlights

Anarchy is a core concept in the theory of political realism, influencing global politics.

Realists argue that global politics is shaped by the lack of a central authority, leading to an anarchic system.

The absence of a world government means no established rules, laws, or protections exist in the international system.

Realists emphasize that there is no global police force to enforce rules or laws in the international system.

An anarchic system creates insecurity among states, making survival their ultimate priority.

States in an anarchic environment must rely on themselves for security, leading to the concept of a 'self-help system.'

States have two main options for security: increasing their military power or forming alliances.

Trust is difficult in an anarchic system, making cooperation between states extremely challenging.

The security dilemma illustrates how states build up military power out of fear, leading to arms races.

In a security dilemma, states’ efforts to defend themselves can result in increased insecurity and potential conflict.

The arms race between states A and B demonstrates how mistrust and fear can escalate tensions in an anarchic system.

The security dilemma can extend throughout the international system, involving multiple states in an arms race.

Anarchy leads to a hostile and suspicious environment among states, which can potentially lead to war.

Realists believe that the anarchic structure of the international system dictates the behavior of states.

Not all theories agree with realism; other perspectives challenge the idea of an anarchic international system.

Transcripts

play00:10

hi I'm Alan sense and I'm sitting

play00:13

outside the International House at the

play00:15

University of British Columbia welcome

play00:18

to the global politics instructional

play00:20

video series in this series we're

play00:23

looking at a number of key concepts in

play00:25

the study of international relations and

play00:27

global politics today we're looking at

play00:30

anarchy

play00:32

now anarchy is important because anarchy

play00:36

is one of the core concepts in the

play00:38

theory of political realism realists

play00:42

argue that the way global politics are

play00:45

and the way global politics happens is

play00:48

all because it's an international

play00:51

anarchy that is to say the international

play00:54

system is anarchic and realists argue

play00:58

that this fundamentally determines the

play01:00

character of global politics

play01:02

historically today and in the future so

play01:07

let's see what they mean anarchy

play01:12

now when we think of anarchy often comes

play01:16

up first is the idea of anarchism and

play01:20

anarchists of course are irrelevant in

play01:23

some contexts but we're not really

play01:25

interested in them right now we're

play01:26

actually focused on global politics so

play01:29

I'm going to draw an international

play01:32

system and I'm going to populate it with

play01:35

some states and I'll draw some very

play01:37

powerful states and some less powerful

play01:42

states and some even less powerful

play01:46

states now realists argue that this

play01:52

system is anarchic that is to say it is

play01:56

characterized by anarchy and they make

play01:58

that claim for two reasons first there

play02:02

is no central authority in this system

play02:10

and what that really means is there's no

play02:13

world government there's no world

play02:15

government to establish rules establish

play02:18

laws or provide protection for anyone in

play02:21

the system

play02:23

the second reason this system is

play02:27

anarchic is that there is no world

play02:31

police force and as a result there's no

play02:38

force to actually enforce rules or laws

play02:42

in the system

play02:44

now realists argue there's another of

play02:47

consequences to this the first

play02:49

consequence is that states are very

play02:51

insecure in an anarchic environment and

play02:55

as a result they are very concerned

play03:00

observe ival and that is their first and

play03:03

ultimate priority second realists argue

play03:09

that in this anarchic system states can

play03:14

really only rely on themselves for their

play03:17

own security and realists call this a

play03:19

self-help system and there's really only

play03:22

two ways States can't

play03:25

help themselves to secure themselves

play03:27

against any threats and that's to

play03:29

increase their own military power or to

play03:32

form alliances third realists argue that

play03:39

in an anarchic system is extremely

play03:42

difficult to trust anyone so Trust is

play03:47

difficult and as a result it's very

play03:52

difficult to promote cooperation

play03:54

everyone in the system is worried about

play03:57

their own self-interests there's a lot

play03:59

of conflict in the system because it's

play04:01

so difficult to establish long-term

play04:03

patterns of cooperation with others in

play04:06

an anarchic environment so realists

play04:09

argue that this anarchic structure makes

play04:12

States act the way they do this system

play04:16

this anarchic system determines the

play04:19

behavior of states and one of the

play04:22

examples that realists use to illustrate

play04:24

this and we'll talk about here because

play04:28

it's a very good example is something

play04:31

called the security dilemma and the

play04:36

whole idea here is when states look out

play04:40

into the international system and I'll

play04:41

just label these three or powerful

play04:44

states in the system a B and C when

play04:47

states look out into the system they

play04:48

feel insecure so let's take state a

play04:50

looks into this system and feels it's

play04:53

insecure there's no central authority

play04:55

there's no police force it needs to

play04:57

depend on itself for its own security

play04:59

Trust is difficult it wants to survive

play05:02

and so as a result it will build up its

play05:05

military power and I'll just draw a

play05:08

little symbol there to to express that

play05:11

and what state a is really doing is it's

play05:14

looking out of the system is saying you

play05:16

know we don't have any aggressive intent

play05:18

we don't want to attack anybody but we

play05:21

can't trust anyone either and we need to

play05:23

ensure our own security so we're going

play05:24

to build up our military to defend

play05:26

ourselves

play05:28

now state B looks at that and asked the

play05:32

question why did state a do that why did

play05:34

they increase their military

play05:36

and certainly they realized it we have

play05:38

no aggressive intent towards them so

play05:41

perhaps they're building up their

play05:43

military in order to attack us we can't

play05:47

take that chance it's a self-help system

play05:49

so we better build up our own military

play05:51

in response state a then looks to that

play05:57

effort by state B to build up its

play06:00

military and ask the question now why

play06:03

did they do that surely they knew we

play06:06

have no aggressive intent towards them

play06:08

we were building up our military to

play06:10

defend ourselves but then they go up and

play06:12

build their military up why did they do

play06:15

that maybe they're planning to attack us

play06:18

it's a self-help system so we better

play06:21

build up or military a little bit more

play06:23

in order to defend ourselves against

play06:26

state b state b then looks at that and

play06:29

goes hah why did they do that we

play06:32

increased our military just to defend

play06:34

ourselves and now they've gone and

play06:36

increase their military some more we

play06:38

better do the same and then state a

play06:43

responds state B responds and before you

play06:48

know it you've got an arms race between

play06:51

state a and state B now meanwhile state

play06:55

C is looking at this and going what's

play06:56

going on these two countries are vastly

play06:59

increasing the military power we better

play07:01

do the same in case they're planning to

play07:04

attack us and before you know it you've

play07:07

got an arms race that's extended

play07:08

throughout the system an arms race is a

play07:12

particularly extreme form or virulent

play07:14

example of the security dilemma and of

play07:18

course the dilemma here is that in their

play07:22

efforts to ensure their own security

play07:24

these states have now created an

play07:26

environment which is much more insecure

play07:29

than it was before I mean there's

play07:31

certainly no more secure than they were

play07:32

before and arguably they're even less

play07:34

secure because this system is now much

play07:37

more hostile much more filled with

play07:39

suspicion and distrust and could even

play07:41

lead to war so realists make the

play07:45

argument through the security dilemma as

play07:48

one example

play07:50

of how Anarchy affects global politics

play07:53

the nature of the system the character

play07:55

of the system actually affects the

play07:57

behavior of states it does so in a way

play08:00

that realists argue has examples

play08:03

throughout history so that was the

play08:11

concept of anarchy now not everyone

play08:13

believes that realists are right when

play08:15

they describe the world as anarchic most

play08:18

other theories have very different takes

play08:20

on how you would describe the

play08:22

international system and its fundamental

play08:24

characteristics but clearly if we do

play08:27

want to try to understand global

play08:28

politics realists do have a lot to tell

play08:31

us and anarchy is one of the main

play08:33

contributions they make to this

play08:35

discussion I hope you enjoyed this video

play08:38

join me next time

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

الوسوم ذات الصلة
Global PoliticsInternational RelationsPolitical RealismAnarchySecurity DilemmaRealist TheoryState BehaviorArms RaceSelf-help SystemInternational System
هل تحتاج إلى تلخيص باللغة الإنجليزية؟