The Hunt for Red October (2/9) Movie CLIP - Ryan's Plan (1990) HD

Summary

In this tense conversation, a politician and an analyst discuss a critical situation involving a high-stakes defection of a Russian naval commander named Ramius. The politician recognizes the analyst's earlier boldness and proposes a strategy to inspect the Russian vessel discreetly, without alarming Soviet authorities. Despite the analyst's reluctance, citing his inexperience in the field, he is tasked with making direct contact with Ramius. The conversation highlights the political maneuvering, risks, and urgency of the situation, where failure could lead to dire consequences.

Takeaways

• 🚪 The protagonist was perceived as harsh when interacting with the general.
• 😐 The protagonist insists that being harsh wasn't their intention, though it's suggested otherwise.
• 😏 The general was patronizing, which led the protagonist to react strongly, believing the general deserved it.
• 👔 The politician openly admits to being a liar and a cheat, showing self-awareness of his nature.
• 🇷🇺 The discussion shifts to the possibility of a Russian defection, which is treated as a serious and risky situation.
• 🛳️ The protagonist suggests that they must capture the Russian vessel to handle the situation properly.
• 💰 There's recognition that the Russians will demand their property back, as the vessel is valuable Soviet state property.
• 🔍 A strategic plan is proposed to conduct a covert inspection of the Russian vessel, framing it as a routine safety check.
• 📞 Direct communication with Atlantic commanders is essential to avoid detection by the Russians.
• 🧳 The protagonist, despite being an analyst and not field personnel, is seen as the ideal candidate to make contact with Ramius and confirm his intentions.

Q & A

Why did Jack slam the door on the general?

Jack felt patronized by the general and responded assertively, though he claims it wasn't his intention. However, another character notes that Jack did it on purpose because the general deserved it.

Why does the politician describe himself as a 'cheat and a liar'?

The politician is making a cynical remark about his profession, implying that politicians often deceive people or make compromises to achieve their goals. He says this to highlight the need to keep his options open and navigate political complexities.

What is the significance of the Russian defection in the conversation?

The Russian defection is central to the plot. The characters are discussing the possibility of a Russian officer, Ramius, defecting with a valuable Soviet submarine, which would be a significant geopolitical event.

Why does Jack suggest 'grabbing the boat'?

Jack believes that the best course of action is to seize the submarine to prevent the Soviets from recovering it, especially if Ramius intends to defect.

Why is the comparison between 'a stray pilot with a Mig' and the submarine important?

The comparison highlights the difference in stakes. While a stray pilot defecting with a fighter jet is a serious matter, a submarine, which is worth several billion dollars and part of Soviet state property, is a much bigger deal. The Soviets would want it back at any cost.

What is the purpose of suggesting a 'coast guard safety inspection'?

The suggestion to perform a 'coast guard safety inspection' is a cover to board the submarine without provoking an international incident or alerting the Soviets to their real intentions.

Why must the commanders in the Atlantic be contacted directly?

The characters need to avoid using regular communication channels to prevent the Soviets from intercepting the message, which could expose their plan.

What does Jack mean by saying he is 'only an analyst'?

Jack is expressing self-doubt, indicating that he is not field personnel and lacks experience in operations. He feels that he is better suited for analysis than action.

Why is Jack considered 'expendable'?

The politician sees Jack as expendable because he is not a high-ranking or well-known figure, making him a safer choice to send on a risky mission that others would not undertake.

What is the time limit given to Jack to prove his theory?

Jack is given three days to prove that Ramius intends to defect. After that, the authorities will be forced to hunt down and destroy the submarine if no clear decision is made.