Disaster Preparedness Part 1
Summary
TLDR千葉大学グローバル・トランスディシプリナリー学研究科のアル・パヴィッチ准教授が講義するこのビデオでは、災害予防と準備に関する日本政府内閣府の調査結果を紹介し、災害意識と準備活動の実態を探ります。また、デザイン思考の基本概念と手法を活用して、災害準備に対する意識向上の可能性を探究します。さらに、調査結果に基づいて、人々の災害予防に対する態度や行動を理解し、具体的な問題を特定するプロセスを説明し、デザイン思考がどのように災害準備に役立つかを紹介します。
Takeaways
- 🌍 日本政府の内閣府が行った調査によると、46.3%の人が自宅での災害対策を強化したいと回答したが、災害防止組織に参加する意欲を示したのはわずか4.5%だった。
- 💡 60%以上の回答者が大規模災害の発生可能性を認識している一方で、実際に災害対策を進めているのは40%未満だった。
- ⏳ 多くの回答者が、災害対策を行っていない理由として、時間の不足や費用、情報不足、機会の欠如を挙げている。
- 👥 災害対策活動で協力できるグループとして、家族以外では近所の人や職場の人、ボランティア防災組織、趣味のグループなどが挙げられた。
- 🏠 52.4%の回答者が、自宅での水や食料の備蓄、家具の転倒防止などの準備をしたいと考えている。
- 📚 約37%の回答者は、防災に関するセミナーやワークショップへの参加に関心を持っていると答えた。
- ⏰ 災害対策を行う際の最大の障害として、42.6%の人が「時間の不足」を挙げた。
- 🎓 デザイン思考を防災対策に適用することで、災害への意識を高め、対策の実行を促す効果が期待できる。
- 💭 デザイン思考の5つのステージ(共感、問題定義、発想、プロトタイプ、テスト)は、災害対策の問題解決に役立つ。
- 🚨 デザイン思考を用いて、防災に関する啓発活動をより効果的で、ユーザーフレンドリーかつ継続的に改善できる。
Q & A
災害に対する公共の意識に関する調査はどのような目的で行われましたか?
-日本政府の内閣府が行った調査は、災害防止と準備に関する公共の理解と行動を明らかにすることを目的として実施されました。
調査結果によると、どのくらいの人々が自宅での災害準備を強化する意向を示しましたか?
-調査結果では、46.3%の回答者が自宅での準備を強化する意向を示しました。
ボランティアの災害防止組織に参加したいと考えている人の割合はどれくらいですか?
-ボランティアの災害防止組織に参加したいと考えている人はわずか4.5%でした。
災害発生の可能性を高いと認識している人はどれくらいいますか?
-60%以上の回答者が災害が発生する可能性が高い、または確実に発生すると認識しています。
実際の災害準備に取り組んでいると回答した人の割合はどれくらいですか?
-実際に災害準備に取り組んでいると回答した人は40%未満でした。
災害準備に対する障害として挙げられている主な要因は何ですか?
-主な障害として挙げられているのは、時間の不足、コスト制約、機会の不足、情報の欠如です。
災害準備に関する情報の提供について、どのような改善が提案されていますか?
-情報提供の改善として、情報をよりアクセスしやすく、理解しやすくすることが提案されています。
調査によれば、将来的にどのようなグループで災害防止活動を行いたいと考える人が多いですか?
-調査では、家庭外で日常的に災害防止活動を行う際に、隣人や職場の人々、地域のボランティア組織などのグループで活動したいと考える人が多いことがわかりました。
デザイン思考のプロセスは災害準備にどのように役立つとされていますか?
-デザイン思考のプロセスは、ユーザー中心の問題解決アプローチを通じて、災害準備に対する意識を高め、実際の行動に結びつけるために役立つとされています。
デザイン思考の5つの主要なステージは何ですか?
-デザイン思考の5つの主要なステージは、共感、定義、発想、プロトタイプ、テストです。
Outlines
📚 自己紹介と講義の概要
Al Pavich氏が千葉大学のグローバル・トランスディシプリナリー研究科の准教授として自己紹介し、災害準備に関する講義の第一部を紹介します。日本政府の内閣府が行った調査結果を通じて、災害予防と備えに対する市民の認識と行動を説明。また、デザイン思考の概念とその手法についても説明し、災害準備の意識を高めるための応用可能性を探ります。2016年5月に実施された調査では、46.3%の回答者が日常の準備を強化する意向を示し、4.5%が消防団などの自主防災組織への参加に興味を持っていることが分かりました。
🧐 災害意識と行動の現状分析
調査によると、60%以上の回答者が大規模災害の発生可能性を認識している一方で、40%未満が十分な備えをしていると回答しています。特に災害の可能性を低く見積もる人々は、防災に消極的である傾向が見られます。また、防災の重要性を認識しながらも準備が不十分な理由として、時間不足、費用制約、機会不足、情報不足などが挙げられています。これらの障害を克服するための対策として、情報の提供方法の改善や、簡易な学習機会の提供が推奨されています。
👥 災害準備におけるグループ活動とその課題
災害準備活動にどのようなグループが関与できるかについての調査結果では、隣人や職場、ボランティア組織、趣味のグループが挙げられました。52.4%が家庭内での日常準備、37%が災害に関する情報収集、35%が災害時のコミュニケーションネットワークの構築に興味を持っていることが分かりました。しかし、42.6%が時間不足を、他にも学習グループや指導者の不足を障害として挙げています。これらの問題を解決するためには、学習の機会や環境の整備が重要です。
💡 デザイン思考を用いた災害意識向上へのアプローチ
災害の可能性が高いと認識しているグループとそうでないグループで、備えのレベルに違いが見られます。防災へのモチベーションを高めるためには、災害が起こり得ることを意識させることが重要です。ここで、デザイン思考の人間中心のアプローチが有効であると提案されます。デザイン思考の5つのステージ(共感、定義、アイデア創出、プロトタイピング、テスト)を通じて、防災意識を高める方法が紹介されます。共感のステージでは、ユーザーのニーズを理解することが重視され、これがデザインの基盤となります。
🎨 デザイン思考プロセスの各ステージ
デザイン思考は、問題解決に向けた人間中心のアプローチで、共感、定義、アイデア創出、プロトタイピング、テストの5つのステージを通じて行われます。共感のステージではユーザーのニーズを理解し、定義のステージでは問題を明確化します。アイデア創出では多様な解決策を生み出し、プロトタイピングでは迅速な試作品を作成してテストします。テストではユーザーのフィードバックを反映させて、解決策の改善を図ります。このプロセスは反復的であり、常に改善が行われます。
🚀 デザイン思考の適用による災害準備の強化
デザイン思考を災害準備に応用することで、より効果的な意識向上キャンペーンを開発・実施することが可能です。共感ステージでは、ユーザー調査を通じて防災に関する態度や行動を深く理解し、ストーリーテリングを活用して共感を呼び起こします。定義ステージでは問題を明確化し、アイデア創出ステージではブレインストーミングや共同設計を行います。プロトタイピングステージでは、啓発資料やシミュレーションを開発し、テストステージで対象者のフィードバックを反映させて改善します。
📈 結果の評価と継続的改善の重要性
防災意識向上の取り組みを評価するために、意識レベルの変化や備えの行動の採用、地域の関与度合いを継続的に追跡し、取り組みの効果を測定することが重要です。フィードバックを活用し、啓発活動を改良し、地域社会のニーズに応じた効果的な防災キャンペーンを展開します。デザイン思考の原則に従い、継続的な改善を行うことで、対象者の意識と行動の変化に対応することが可能です。次回の講義では、実際に設計された製品やサービスについて説明します。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡防災意識調査
💡デザイン思考
💡共感
💡家庭での備え
💡情報の欠如
💡ボランティア防災組織
💡マンパワーの不足
💡災害の可能性
💡学習環境の整備
💡ユーザー中心設計
Highlights
Introduction to disaster preparedness lecture, focusing on survey outcomes and design thinking methodologies.
The Japanese government survey revealed that 46.3% of respondents want to enhance daily disaster preparations at home, but only 4.5% are interested in joining voluntary disaster organizations.
More than 60% of respondents acknowledge the likelihood of a major disaster occurring, but fewer than 40% feel adequately prepared.
Key reasons for not preparing include lack of time, cost, limited opportunities, and lack of information.
The cabinet office suggests simplifying disaster information and making it more accessible, especially for those with low engagement.
52.4% of people expressed interest in making daily disaster preparations like stockpiling water and food, and preventing furniture from falling.
A significant obstacle to disaster preparedness is a lack of time, with 42.6% of respondents citing it as a barrier.
The survey found that many individuals are motivated by information about disaster risks but need more accessible educational resources.
Design thinking is introduced as a key approach to tackling disaster preparedness, focusing on user-centered methods.
The five-stage design thinking process includes empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test, all critical to generating innovative solutions.
Empathy is highlighted as a core component, essential for understanding user needs and challenges in disaster preparedness.
In the prototyping phase, simple, low-cost solutions like brochures, websites, and simulations can be used to raise disaster awareness.
Co-design workshops involving community members can help brainstorm disaster preparedness strategies and ensure active participation.
The test phase involves gathering feedback from target audiences to refine preparedness materials and ensure cultural relevance.
Design thinking allows for continuous iteration, ensuring that disaster preparedness campaigns evolve to meet community needs.
Transcripts
my name is Al pavich I'm an associate
professor from The Graduate School of
global and transdisciplinary studies at
Chiba
University hello everyone this is part
one of disaster preparedness lecture
during this lecture we will take a brief
look at the outcomes of a survey
conducted by the Japanese government's
cabinet office this survey sheds light
on the Public's understanding and
actions related to disaster prevention
and preparedness additionally we will
delve into the principles of design
thinking we will explore the underlying
concept and methodology of design
thinking and the potential applications
of this approach in promoting awareness
of disaster
preparedness the cabinet office
published the results of the survey on
awareness and activities related to
disaster prevention in daily life in May
2016 in the survey participants were
asked if you were to increase your
involvement in disaster prevention in
the future beyond your current efforts
what specific actions would you prefer
to take the results revealed that
46.3% of respondents expressed their
intention to enhance daily preparations
at home however a comparatively small
percentage only 4.5% of their
respondents indicated an interest in
joining a voluntary disaster prevention
organization such as a fire brigade
the disaster prevention awareness survey
inquires about individual's perception
of the likelihood of disasters and their
recognition of the significance of
disaster
preparedness over 60% of the respondents
acknowledge the potential occurrence of
a major disaster which includes those
who indicated I am sure it will occur
and I think the possibility is high
however when asked about their actual
Readiness for disasters fewer than 40%
of the participants responded that they
are adequately working on preparedness
or working on it to the extent possible
in daily
life if we categorize individuals based
on their responses to the question of
disaster preparedness importance with
one group answering possibility is high
and the other possibility is low those
who perceive the possibility as low are
generally less engaged in disaster
prevention to assess the significance of
educational initiatives on disaster
preparedness the cabinet office
conducted surveys to investigate why
some individuals were not taking steps
to prepare for disasters despite
recognizing their importance respondents
who acknowledged the importance of
disaster preparedness but indicated that
they were not adequately prepared or
hardly prepared in their daily lives
were asked to explain their reasons the
results revealed that the most commonly
mentioned factors were lack of time cost
constraints limited opportunities and
lack of
information according to the report from
the cabinet office there are specific
recommendations for different groups for
those who indicated a lack of
information the report proposes making
information more accessible and easier
to understand to address individuals who
expressed a lack of opportunity the
suggestion is to distribute simplified
informational materials online and for
those who do not feel a personal
connection to the concept of disasters
the report advises emphasizing the
potential dangers associated with
disasters which might be an effective
approach additionally more than 20% of
respondents responded with no particular
reason the report says that motivating
such individuals could be achieved by
raising awareness of the risks
associated with disasters potentially
advancing disaster preparedness
efforts before explaining the chart
shown in this slide I want to mention
that there was a questionnaire about
possible groups that people can help
each other regarding disaster
preparedness the respondents were asked
what kind of groups do you think can be
involved in disaster preparedness
activities on a daily basis with people
outside the family each respondent chose
different groups such as neighbors
people at work or part-time job people
in voluntary disaster prevention
organizations neighborhood associations
Etc and people in Hobby groups or Club
activities in this slide I will talk
about disaster prevention activities
that people choose with their chosen
group and what the obstacles may be when
asked about the types of activities they
would engage in for daily disaster
prevention activities within their
groups in the future the most common
response at
52.4% was Tod do daily preparedness that
can be made at home like stockpiling
water and food and preventing furniture
from falling over about 37% of those
surveyed showed interest in getting
information or knowledge about disasters
by participating in workshops or
seminars additionally about 35% of
respondents expressed their interest in
creating communication system in case of
disaster such as a communication Network
or mailing list regarding potential
obstacles when working on disaster
prevention activities with their group
members in the future 42.6% of
respondents cited lack of available time
as the most common obstacle this was
followed by about 24% who pointed out
absence of nearby study groups or
seminars or a lack of information about
them about 23% who mentioned inadequate
guidance or a lack of clarity on whom to
consult and about 23% who highlighted
heavy individual burden due to a
shortage of
Manpower we looked through the survey
results and found hints on bringing
people's awareness towards disaster
preparedness we also identified some
encouraging developments for example
46.3% of the respondents mentioned daily
preparations that they can make at home
and other places
as well as taking an interest in
gathering information about disasters
regularly as things they would like to
do to prevent disasters indicating that
there is a latent awareness of the need
to prepare for disasters but still there
are a lot of obstacles that hinder
appropriate disaster preparedness many
respondents cited reasons such as lack
of time lack of opportunity to think
lack of information and not being
familiar with the problem as factors
that hinder disaster prevention so it is
crucial to eliminate these factors and
change behavior in addition many
respondents cited a need for study
groups or seminars being held nearby and
the lack of someone to advise them as
obstacles to disaster prevention efforts
in communities and groups it was
predicted that providing a place for
learning as well as an environment and
resources for learning would be vital to
increasing the disaster prevention
capabilities of regions and communities
furthermore the level of preparedness
for disaster prevention differs between
the group that answered that the
possibility of a disaster is high and
the group that did
not many think that the probability of
disasters is low for motivating disaster
prevention it is also considered
adequate to make people aware of the
possibility of disasters occurring now
that we have a glimpse of people's
awareness and activities toward disaster
prevention let's consider what we can do
about it how do we make people's
motivation higher what kind of approach
is needed the analysis of survey results
gave an empathetic understanding of many
people's attitudes and actions
concerning disaster preparedness empathy
plays a pivotal role in a human-
centered design approach like design
thinking it enables you to put aside
your preconceived notions about the
world and gain a genuine understanding
of users and their
requirements I suggest that the design
thinking process is one of the effective
approach Roes to disaster preparedness
problems and it could help increase
people's awareness of
disasters let's look at how we can apply
design thinking but before that I would
like first to explain what design
thinking
is the hasso platner Institute of Design
at Stanford commonly known as the D
School proposed the five-stage design
thinking model I will talk about this
design thinking process in more detail
design thinking is a problemsolving
approach that places a strong emphasis
on understanding the needs and
perspectives of the end users or
customers it's a human- centered
iterative process used to generate
Innovative and practical solutions to
complex problems design thinking
typically consists of the key stages
empathize Define ideate prototype and
test the first stage is empathize in
this stage designers seek to understand
the people they are designing for this
involves empathy which means observing
and engaging with users to gain insights
into their needs challenges and
aspirations it often involves conducting
interviews surveys and observations the
second stage is Define based on the
empathy phase the next step is to define
the problem this involves synthesizing
the collected information to identify
the core issues and challenges that need
to be addressed
it's about framing the problem in a
human Centric way the third stage is id8
this stage encourages creative thinking
and brainstorming designers and team
members generate a wide range of
potential Solutions without judgment the
goal is to produce a diverse set of
ideas the fourth stage is prototype once
a promising idea or concept emerges it's
time to create a prototype this could be
a rough sketch a physical model or even
a digital representation of the proposed
solution the Prototype is meant to be a
quick and lowcost representation of the
idea to be
tested the fifth stage is test testing
involves putting the prototype in front
of users or stakeholders to gather
feedback and evaluate its Effectiveness
this process is essential for refining
and improving the solution if the
solution doesn't meet the needs of users
it's back to the ideation phase I
explained five stages but design
thinking is iterative process the
process often Cycles back to earlier
stages as new insights are gained
iteration allows for continual
refinement and Improvement of the
solution design thinking is often
associated with creative and
multi-disciplinary teams working
collaboratively to tackle complex
problems it encourages a mindset that
values experimentation learning from
failures and focusing on the user's
perspective while it is most common used
in the context of product and service
design it can also be applied to various
other fields including business strategy
education and social
Innovation design thinking has gained
popularity for its ability to Foster
Innovative user centered solutions to a
wide range of
challenges let's employ various
techniques within the framework of the
design thinking process to enhance
disaster preparedness for the empathized
stage we will conduct in-depth user
research to understand the perspectives
attitudes and behaviors of the target
audience regarding disaster preparedness
this may involve surveys interviews and
focus groups with different population
segments in addition we add a
storytelling approach to gather and
share stories of individuals who have
experienced disasters or successfully
prepared for them these narratives can
create empathy and convey the importance
of preparedness
for the defined stage we need to think
about problem Framing and use the
insights from user research to define
the specific challenges and barriers to
disaster preparedness within the
community formulate the problem
statement in a way that resonates with
the target audience later we create user
personas to represent different
population segments considering their
unique needs concerns and motivations
related to preparedness for the idea
stage let's do a brainstorming and
generate a wide range of creative ideas
for promoting disaster preparedness
encourage team members to think outside
the box and come up with innovative
solutions also we can do co-design
workshops to collaborate with the target
audience in co-design workshops to
brainstorm and prioritize ideas this
involves active participation from the
community in the ideation
process for the Prototype typ stage we
will develop awareness materials such as
brochures videos websites and mobile
apps that convey key preparedness
messages in a clear and engaging Manner
and we design Hands-On simulations or
exercises that allow individuals to
experience the impact of disasters in a
safe and controlled environment this can
create a sense of urgency and the need
for
preparedness in the test stage we test
the awareness materials and activities
with representatives from the target
audience gather feedback on the
effectiveness relevance and appeal of
the materials we should establish
feedback mechanisms that allow the
community to provide ongoing input and
suggestions for improvement design
thinking is an iterative process
therefore we use the feedback obtained
during testing to make necessary
improvements to the awareness materials
and activities ensure that the messages
and engagement methods are culturally
sensitive and resonate with the
community always engage community
members in planning and executing
disaster preparedness initiatives
encourage their active participation in
designing and delivering awareness
programs think about the local
Partnerships and collaborate with local
organizations businesses and schools to
create a network of support for disaster
preparedness Leverage The expertise and
resources of these Partners to evaluate
and measure impact we should set clear
metrics to measure the impact of the
awareness initiatives track changes in
Awareness levels the adoption of
preparedness behaviors and Community
engagement over time and continually
assess the effectiveness of the
awareness efforts and make necessary
adjustments based on the results by
applying design thinking we can develop
and Implement disaster preparedness
awareness campaigns that are more
engaging userfriendly and effective in
motivating individuals and communities
to take action design thinking
principles emphasize continuous
Improvement ensuring that awareness
initiatives evolve to meet the changing
needs and perceptions of the target
audience this concludes the first part
of this lecture in part two we will
examine the products services and
systems that were created to address the
issues raised in this lecture
these selected examples will demonstrate
how design has been utilized for
disaster preparedness thank you for
[Music]
watching
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)