킹제임스성경 유일주의자들의 엉터리 가르침1
Summary
TLDRThe speaker critically examines the King James Version of the Bible, specifically pointing out discrepancies in Acts 8:37. They argue that this verse is absent in many ancient manuscripts and was possibly added by the scribe's oversight. The speaker also discusses how this verse's inclusion was justified by Erasmus, despite its absence in significant texts. They conclude by questioning the credibility of those who claim the Bible is corrupted by Satan, suggesting that people are being misled.
Takeaways
- 📖 The speaker is discussing a specific verse in the Bible, particularly focusing on 37th verse of a chapter.
- 👤 There is a claim that the King James Version of the Bible has been tampered with by Satan.
- 🔍 The speaker refers to Kim Ju's paper, which analyzes the authenticity of certain verses in the New Testament.
- 📝 The paper identifies 13 verses that are not present in the original manuscripts and were added later.
- 🗣️ The speaker emphasizes that these verses are not found in significant ancient manuscripts.
- 🎭 The speaker points out that the style of writing in the disputed verses does not match the style of the apostles, like Peter or Paul.
- ✍️ The speaker suggests that the disputed verse in Acts 8:37 is not in the original text but was likely added by a scribe.
- 📜 The speaker mentions that the verse is not found in important manuscripts like MS 2 and MS 4, which were used by Erasmus to compile the New Testament.
- 🚫 The speaker concludes that the verse is not present in any significant manuscripts and was likely added by Erasmus arbitrarily.
- ❗ The speaker warns against blindly following teachings that claim the King James Version is corrupted without verifying the source.
Q & A
What is the main concern raised in the transcript about the King James Version of the Bible?
-The transcript suggests that the King James Version of the Bible has been corrupted by Satan and contains verses that are not part of the original text.
What specific verse is mentioned as an example of a verse that might not be original?
-Acts 8:37 is mentioned as an example of a verse that is not found in some ancient manuscripts and is suspected to be a later addition.
Who is Kim Ju-kwan and what is his stance on the King James Version?
-Kim Ju-kwan is a professor whose research is mentioned in the transcript. He argues that certain verses in the King James Version, including Acts 8:37, are not found in the original texts and are likely additions.
What is the significance of the term 'MS 2' mentioned in the transcript?
-MS 2 refers to a medieval manuscript that Erasmus used to create the New Testament. The absence of a certain verse in this manuscript suggests that it might not be original.
Why is Acts 8:37 considered to be a spurious verse by some scholars?
-Some scholars consider Acts 8:37 to be a spurious verse because it does not appear in the majority of manuscripts and was possibly added by a scribe's oversight.
What is the role of Erasmus in the creation of the King James Version of the Bible?
-Erasmus played a significant role in the creation of the New Testament part of the King James Version. His decisions, including the addition of certain verses, are discussed in the transcript.
What is the 'margin' mentioned in the transcript in relation to the Bible manuscripts?
-The 'margin' refers to the space around the main text in a manuscript where additional notes or comments could be written. The transcript suggests that a verse was added in the margin and later mistakenly included in the main text.
What does the transcript imply about the reliability of the King James Version?
-The transcript implies that the King James Version may not be entirely reliable due to the inclusion of verses that are not found in the original manuscripts.
What is the 'Latin Vulgate' mentioned in the transcript?
-The Latin Vulgate is an ancient Latin translation of the Bible. The transcript mentions that the verse in question is not found in the Latin Vulgate, suggesting it might be a later addition.
What does the transcript suggest people should do in response to these concerns about the King James Version?
-The transcript suggests that people should be cautious and not be misled by the King James Version's inaccuracies, implying that they should seek out more reliable translations or original texts.
What is the tone of the speaker in the transcript regarding the King James Version?
-The speaker in the transcript appears to be critical and concerned about the integrity of the King James Version, warning against its potential inaccuracies.
Outlines
📖 Bible Text Authenticity Concerns
The speaker addresses concerns about the authenticity of certain Bible verses, particularly focusing on James 2:26 in the King James Version. They argue that this verse is not found in ancient manuscripts and suggest that it was added by the reformers. The speaker also mentions that modern translations do not include this verse, implying that it might have been influenced by Satan, according to some interpretations. The discussion highlights the differences in style and tone between various parts of the New Testament and questions the legitimacy of certain textual additions.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡King James Version
💡Reformation
💡Satan
💡Manuscript
💡Professor Kim
💡Erasmus
💡Papyrus
💡Codex
💡Scribe
💡Interpolation
💡Latin Vulgate
Highlights
The speaker emphasizes the importance of examining the 37th verse of a specific chapter in the Bible.
It is claimed that King James Version of the Bible is corrupted by Satan.
The speaker mentions that the King James Version is not the original text.
The speaker points out that the 37th verse of a chapter in the New Testament does not appear in ancient manuscripts.
Kim Ju's paper is referenced, which argues that 13 verses in the New Testament are not found in the original texts.
The speaker argues that these verses were added to the text by scribes.
The speaker discusses the different styles of writing in the New Testament, suggesting that the disputed verses do not match the style of the authors.
The speaker mentions that the verse in question does not appear in a significant medieval manuscript used by Erasmus.
The speaker suggests that the verse was inserted into the text due to a scribe's oversight.
The speaker argues that the verse was not part of the original text but was written in the margin and later inserted.
The speaker points out that the verse is missing in a majority of manuscripts and the Latin Vulgate.
The speaker criticizes King James Version scholars for not recognizing the absence of the verse.
The speaker warns that many people are being deceived by the corrupted text.
The speaker questions who to believe regarding the authenticity of the Bible.
The speaker highlights the importance of examining the original manuscripts to determine the authenticity of the text.
The speaker discusses the implications of the corrupted text on the faith of believers.
The speaker calls for a return to the original, uncorrupted text of the Bible.
Transcripts
그다음에 우리가 꼭 한 가지 여기서
짓고 넘어가야 될 것은 여러분 성경
보시면 37절 한번 보세요 뭐가 돼
있어요 없음 돼
있잖아요이 킹제임스 유일 주의자들은이
없음
이래서 개혁 성경은 사탄이 변개한
성경이다 마귀가 변개한 성경이다
이렇게
말해요
없음은 이게 이게 서방의 는 뭐가 되
있냐 내가 예수 그리스도께서 하나님의
아들인 줄 믿노라 이렇게 이렇게
신앙고백을 했다 이렇게 말하는
거예
그렇지만이 내용을 실제를 잘 보면
김주 교수의 논문 개혁 계정에 신약
성경에 등장하는 13구절 그까 13서
없음 구절에 대한 소고 여기에 보면
적거이 절을 세양 본문의 추가
본문이다 이렇게 단정을 했어요 주요
본문들과 고대 역본들에 없다 이거요
없어요 실제로
없어요 제가 나중에 여기 몇 가지
말씀드리고 결론을 말하겠지만 어떤
사본에도 없기 때문에
없어요 특히 여기 사도행전 여기
우리가 지금 보고 있는 8장 37절이
더
그래요 적는이 서양 사본의 톤 예순
그리스톤이라는 표현도 누가적 표현이
아니다 그러니까
누가가이 쓰는이 헬라를 쓰는 그
뉘앙스가 있잖아요 베드로가 쓰는
뉘앙스 있고 사도 바울이 쓰는 그런
글 글맛이 있거든요 그 이건 누가의
글 방식이 아니라 이거 컴포트는
사도행전 8장 36절에 나오는 시의
질문에 답이 없는 상
필사자의 강격 후의 전형이라고
지적하면서 지적하면서 원문이 아니다
이렇게 평가했어요 또 무엇보다도 몇
적은 말하기를이 문장이 에라스무스가
신약 성경을 제작하기 위해 중요하게
사용했던 중세 후기 사본 MS 2인데
거기에 나타나지 않았을지라도이 문장이
다른 사본 MS 4에
여백에 등장하기 때문에이 읽기가
필사자의 부주의함으로 생략된 것으로
생각해서이 문장을 자신의 비평에
삽입했다 이렇게 말했어요 이게 무슨
말이냐 면은 본문의 맥락에 있는 쓴
사본이 아니고
여백에다가 그냥 적어 놓은 거 그거를
이렇게 갖다 넣었다이
말이에요 사도행 8장 17절은
한마디로 말하면 다수 사본 소수 사본
라틴 벌게이트에도 없어요 아디에
어디에도 없기 때문에 어디에도 없기
때문에 없음이라고 표기한 거야 그냥
임의로 에라스무스가 뭐예요 임의로
추가해서 저 여백에 갈겨 놓은 걸
뭐예요 자기가 그걸 추가한 거예요
그런데도 킹제임스
주의자들은 뭐라 그래요 가 보고
있는이 성경을 없음이라고 했다고
뭐예요 어 이거 여러 이유가 있지만이
이유도 하나가 들어가서 뭐라 그래요
사탄이 변개한 성경이다 이렇게
가르치는
거예 누구 말을 믿어야
되겠어요 그런데도 수많은 사람들이
미혹 당하고 넘어가고 있는 거야
تصفح المزيد من مقاطع الفيديو ذات الصلة
How the Trinity verse got added to the Bible
The DISASTEROUS Imperfect Preservation Of The Quran [Debate] | Sam Shamoun
ORIGENS DA BÍBLIA: Descubra quem inventou os livros bíblicos.
A história do cristianismo só faz sentido se for verdadeira
The STRANGEST proof that the Quran is from Allah | Arabic 101
The Story of Jacob in the Bible | Bible Explorers | Animated Bible Story for Kids [Episode 3]
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)