Suffragettes vs Suffragists: Did violent protest get women the vote?

Channel 4 News
8 Feb 201806:33

Summary

TLDRDuring 1912-1913, women's suffrage activists escalated to serious violence, including bombings and arson, causing public alarm. Despite political resistance, by 1910, most MPs supported women's voting rights. The outbreak of WWI provided an opportunity for Emmeline Pankhurst to halt the increasingly violent campaign. Post-war, the government recognized the need for women's enfranchisement, leading to the 1918 Representation of the People Act, which granted voting rights to women over 30 who met certain property qualifications.

Takeaways

  • 💥 Women engaged in serious violence during 1912-1913, including bombing campaigns and attacks on homes.
  • 🏛️ The political inaction of the time, particularly by the liberal and conservative parties, led to frustration and escalated actions within the suffrage movement.
  • 🗳️ By 1910, most MPs were open to the idea of women's parliamentary franchise, but were hesitant due to concerns about their own political survival.
  • 🔪 Members of the Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) attacked political figures, including an incident where they threw a hatchet at John Redmond.
  • 🌎 The outbreak of World War I in 1914 provided an opportunity for Emmeline Pankhurst to halt the increasingly violent campaign, as it was reaching a dead end.
  • 👥 The suffrage movement was diverse, with a range of activists and tactics, some of which were extreme and uncomfortable.
  • 🎖️ The return of young men from the horrors of World War I, who had made the ultimate sacrifice, highlighted the injustice of their lack of voting rights.
  • 🏡 Up to 40% of men did not have the right to vote in 1914 due to property qualifications, which was a point of contention.
  • 👩‍💼 Women activists were effective in lobbying for the right to vote, ensuring their cause was discussed at Westminster.
  • 👭 The suffrage movement was not a single story; it involved a rich diversity of activists, and there was fluidity between suffragettes and suffragists.
  • 🌟 The right to vote was seen as a means to address everyday difficulties such as poor working conditions, low pay, and lack of healthcare.

Q & A

  • What was the nature of the violence engaged in by women during 1912-1913?

    -Women engaged in serious violence such as bombing campaigns, blowing up timber yards, and attacking private homes, which caused significant alarm and concern at the time.

  • Was there a debate among historians about how to classify the violence of the women's suffrage movement?

    -Yes, there is some disagreement among historians about whether the actions should be referred to as terrorist violence or terrorist activity.

  • What was the political climate regarding women's suffrage by 1910?

    -By 1910, most MPs in the House of Commons had come around to the idea of women having the parliamentary franchise, but they were hesitant to implement it due to concerns about self-preservation and how women might vote.

  • Why were politicians hesitant to extend the vote to women?

    -Politicians were worried that if they extended the vote to women, women might vote for the opposing party, thus threatening their own constituencies and power.

  • What was a notable violent act carried out by members of the Women's Social and Political Union?

    -Three members of the Women's Social and Political Union threw a hatchet into a carriage, narrowly missing Irish nationalist leader John Redmond but injuring his ear, and later attempted to burn down a theater where he was attending an event.

  • How did the outbreak of World War I impact the women's suffrage movement?

    -The outbreak of World War I provided an opportunity for Emmeline Pankhurst to halt the campaign, which was escalating into extreme violence, and to refocus efforts.

  • What was the significance of the First World War for the suffrage movement?

    -The war highlighted the sacrifices made by young men and the injustice of their lack of voting rights, which helped to further the argument for women's suffrage.

  • What percentage of men did not have the right to vote in 1914?

    -Up to 40% of men did not have the right to vote in 1914 because they did not own property and did not meet the property qualification.

  • How did the suffrage movement ensure that women's right to vote was discussed at Westminster?

    -The suffrage movement was very effective in lobbying and ensuring that the discussions at Westminster included the right of women to vote.

  • What did the women's suffrage movement believe would improve if women had the right to vote?

    -The movement believed that having the right to vote would alleviate everyday difficulties such as poor working conditions, low pay, and lack of healthcare, as these issues would be more likely to be addressed with women's representation in parliament.

  • How did the suffragettes and suffragists relate to each other during the movement?

    -The suffragettes and suffragists knew each other, worked together, and there was fluid movement between the two groups. One could support both at different times, and there was no strict division between them.

Outlines

00:00

💥 Women's Suffrage and Violence

The paragraph discusses the escalation of violence by women during the suffrage movement between 1912-1913. It mentions serious acts of violence such as bombing campaigns, attacks on timber yards, and even targeting private homes and public spaces like post offices. The paragraph highlights the debate among historians about whether to classify these actions as terrorist violence. It also discusses the political climate of the time, where political parties were reluctant to extend voting rights to women due to fear of losing their constituencies. The violence was a response to this inaction. The narrative also includes specific instances of violence, such as an attack on John Redmond, and the eventual impact of World War I on the movement, which led to a cessation of violent tactics. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the extreme tactics used during the movement and the complex nature of social protest.

05:02

🌟 Diversity in the Suffrage Movement

This paragraph focuses on the diversity of activists within the suffrage movement and the factors that united them. It discusses the belief that gaining the right to vote would improve the everyday lives of women, addressing issues such as poor working conditions, low pay, and lack of healthcare. The paragraph also emphasizes the fluidity between different factions within the movement, such as suffragists and suffragettes, and the collaborative nature of their work. It concludes by reminding us to be mindful of the diverse stories within the movement and not to oversimplify it into polarized groups.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Suffrage Movement

The suffrage movement refers to a social and political campaign advocating for women's right to vote. In the video, it is highlighted as the central theme, with the narrative focusing on the escalating tactics used by women in the early 20th century to gain the right to vote. The movement is portrayed as diverse, involving various forms of protest, including peaceful and violent means.

💡Violence

Violence, in the context of the video, refers to the physical force used by some women in the suffrage movement to further their cause. It is mentioned that women engaged in serious acts such as bombing campaigns and attacks on homes, which were a significant escalation in their protest methods and caused public alarm.

💡Terrorism

Terrorism is a term that describes acts of violence intended to create fear; it's used in the video to discuss the debate among historians about whether certain violent acts by suffragists should be classified as terrorist activities. The script mentions bombings and attacks, which were intended to instill fear and force political change.

💡Political Parties

Political parties are organized groups that seek to influence government policy. The video discusses the failure of political parties, particularly the liberal and conservative parties, to extend voting rights to women, leading to increased frustration among suffragists and contributing to the rise in violent protests.

💡Franchise

The franchise, in this context, refers to the right to vote in political elections. The video script discusses the growing support among MPs for extending the franchise to women by the 1910s, yet the reluctance due to concerns over how women might vote and the potential impact on their political power.

💡Self-Preservation

Self-preservation in the video refers to the MPs' desire to maintain their political power and constituencies. They were hesitant to extend the vote to women for fear that women might vote for opposing parties, thus threatening their political survival.

💡World War I

World War I is mentioned as a turning point for the suffrage movement. The outbreak of war provided an opportunity for Emmeline Pankhurst to halt the campaign, which was becoming increasingly violent. The war also shifted public and political focus, creating a context where the rights of returning soldiers were contrasted with the lack of voting rights for women.

💡Emmeline Pankhurst

Emmeline Pankhurst is a key figure in the suffrage movement, mentioned in the video as someone who led the campaign for women's rights. Her decision to stop the campaign during World War I is highlighted as a strategic move, reflecting the complexities and evolving tactics within the movement.

💡Representation

Representation in the video refers to the belief that having women in political office would lead to changes in policies affecting women's lives. Suffragists argued that access to political citizenship, including the right to vote, would alleviate issues like poor working conditions, low pay, and lack of healthcare.

💡Suffragettes vs Suffragists

The video script explains the distinction between suffragettes, who often employed militant tactics, and suffragists, who advocated for more peaceful means. However, it also notes the fluidity between the two groups, indicating that individuals could support both approaches at different times, reflecting the diversity within the movement.

💡Property Qualification

Property qualification was a requirement for men to be able to vote, as mentioned in the video. It is used to illustrate the existing inequalities in voting rights, where even some men were denied the vote based on their economic status, highlighting the broader context of the suffrage movement's fight for equal rights.

Highlights

Women engaged in serious violence such as bombing campaigns during 1912-1913.

Timber yards were blown up and homes were attacked.

Disagreement among historians if these actions should be called terrorist violence.

Political parties failed to extend the franchise to women, leading to frustration.

By 1910, most MPs were open to the idea of women's parliamentary franchise.

MPs were worried about women voting for the opposing party.

Three members of the Women's Social and Political Union attacked John Redmond.

The First World War provided an opportunity for Emmeline Pankhurst to halt the campaign.

The suffrage movement used extreme tactics that may be uncomfortable to acknowledge.

Young men returning from WWI should have the right to vote, as they sacrificed for their country.

40% of men did not have the right to vote in 1914 due to property qualifications.

Women's suffrage activists were effective in ensuring the right to vote was discussed in Westminster.

The suffrage movement was not a single story but involved a diversity of activists.

Women saw voting rights as a way to alleviate everyday difficulties like poor working conditions and low pay.

Suffragettes and suffragists knew each other, worked together, and there was fluidity between the two groups.

Remembering the history of the movement requires careful acknowledgment of the diverse groups involved.

Transcripts

play00:07

vorrei 1912-1913 you had women engaging

play00:11

in really quite serious violence so

play00:13

violence such as bombing campaigns

play00:15

timber yards were blown up and when

play00:18

piece homes were attacked farmers were

play00:20

left on trains and in post offices so

play00:22

it's really going up another level which

play00:24

there's some disagreement amongst

play00:26

historians of whether these dis should

play00:27

be referred to as terrorist violence or

play00:29

terrorist activity but at the time it

play00:31

certainly caused huge alarm and concern

play00:38

[Music]

play00:46

[Music]

play01:10

as a result of the failure of the

play01:12

political parties of our time and

play01:14

particularly the liberal or the

play01:15

conservative party to act on these

play01:17

demands to extend the franchise to women

play01:20

you have increasing frustration

play01:21

developing among certain quarters of the

play01:24

wider suffrage movement

play01:31

[Music]

play01:49

by 1910 most MPs in the House of Commons

play01:52

have come around the idea of women

play01:55

having the parliamentary franchise they

play01:57

already could vote local elections so it

play01:59

was just extending that right to them

play02:00

for national politics but they couldn't

play02:03

quite figure out how to do it and they

play02:04

were all worried about if they did

play02:06

extend the vote to women with the women

play02:08

vote for the other party so it was about

play02:09

self-preservation they wanted to stay in

play02:11

power they wanted to keep their

play02:12

constituencies and they felt threatened

play02:14

by this unknown other of how women might

play02:17

vote

play02:21

[Music]

play02:27

[Music]

play02:41

three members of the women's social and

play02:43

political union threw a hatchet into the

play02:45

carriage that he was travelling along

play02:47

the street in Dublin it missed him but

play02:48

nipped the ear of John Redmond the Irish

play02:50

nationalist leader and then later that

play02:52

night they didn't give up they weren't

play02:53

deterred they were quite determined they

play02:55

that evening they tried to burn down the

play02:57

theatre that asketh was attending an

play02:59

event out and all three receive quite

play03:01

long prison sentences as a result of

play03:03

their action war First World War breaks

play03:17

out in 1914 and in in some strange way

play03:19

it's actually an opportunity for

play03:21

Emmeline Pankhurst to stop the campaign

play03:24

because it really was kind of working

play03:26

itself into a dead end of violence so I

play03:29

think it's important when we're looking

play03:31

back and remembering the history of the

play03:32

suffrage movement that we acknowledge

play03:33

that when social movements are using

play03:36

different forms of protest some of those

play03:38

really can be quite extreme and we can't

play03:40

really hide away from perhaps being a

play03:41

bit uncomfortable with some of the

play03:43

tactics that were used during our time

play03:53

[Music]

play04:03

they couldn't have young man returning

play04:05

for the horrors of the First World War

play04:07

who had served their countries the

play04:09

ultimate act of self-sacrifice and the

play04:11

not be could have the right to vote up

play04:13

to 40% of men didn't have the right to

play04:15

vote in 1914 because they didn't own

play04:17

properties and they didn't meet the

play04:19

property qualification

play04:23

[Music]

play04:35

[Music]

play04:36

and they were very effective in ensuring

play04:40

that in those discussions at Westminster

play04:42

that women would receive the right to

play04:45

vote

play04:48

[Music]

play04:57

except that there wasn't thing one

play04:59

single story which reflects the suffrage

play05:02

movement like all protest movements it

play05:04

involves a really rich diversity of

play05:07

activists and it's very interesting for

play05:09

us to find out what draw drew all of

play05:11

these different women together and

play05:13

having won gold is very effective when

play05:15

you're campaigning so of course it's not

play05:17

surprising that the vote presented that

play05:19

go to so many women

play05:23

[Music]

play05:34

they saw having access to political

play05:36

citizenship so having the right to vote

play05:38

would alleviate some of the everyday

play05:41

difficulties they experienced in their

play05:43

lives so poor working conditions low pay

play05:46

lack of health care all of these issues

play05:49

could be changed and were more likely to

play05:51

be changed they strongly believed if you

play05:53

had representation in the houses of

play05:55

parliament

play05:57

[Music]

play06:02

once again remember remembering the

play06:04

history of this movement it will have to

play06:06

be careful of not suggesting that these

play06:08

were too polarized groups they all knew

play06:11

each other they work together there was

play06:12

a lot of fluid movement between both

play06:14

suffragettes and suffragists you could

play06:16

be both there was nothing saying that

play06:17

you couldn't at one point support

play06:19

suffragists activity and another point

play06:21

be a suffragette

play06:26

[Music]

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

الوسوم ذات الصلة
Suffrage MovementWomen's RightsPolitical HistoryTactical ProtestViolence DebateGender EqualityBritish Politics1910s EraEmmeline PankhurstFirst World War
هل تحتاج إلى تلخيص باللغة الإنجليزية؟