Oliver Stone on RFK Jr., Nordstream, Sy Hersh, Nuclear Power and Climate Change

Summary

In this interview, Oliver Stone reflects on the significance of JFK's 1963 peace speech at American University, emphasizing the need for mutual respect and cooperation among nations. Stone discusses the current geopolitical landscape, advocating for a reevaluation of American foreign policy and the importance of understanding other nations' perspectives. He also touches on his documentary 'Nuclear Now', highlighting the necessity of nuclear energy for a sustainable future and criticizes the media's role in shaping public opinion on critical issues like the Ukraine conflict.

Takeaways

• 😀 The interview begins with an expression of gratitude to the interviewee for participating and acknowledges the significance of discussing alternative perspectives for younger generations.
• 📜 The conversation centers around JFK's peace speech at American University, highlighting its importance and the need for younger generations to understand its message of reconciliation and mutual respect.
• 🎬 The interviewee, Oliver Stone, discusses his film 'Nuclear Now', advocating for nuclear energy as a solution to pollution and the energy crisis, emphasizing its safety and efficiency compared to fossil fuels.
• 🔍 Stone criticizes the lack of nuclear energy discussion in global forums, suggesting that renewables alone cannot meet the energy demands and that nuclear energy is a necessary component of the future energy mix.
• 🌍 He touches on the historical context of JFK's peace speech, including the Cuban Missile Crisis and the Cold War, and how it was an attempt to redefine relations with the Soviet Union and move away from a Cold War mentality.
• 📽️ Stone reflects on his experiences in Vietnam and his father's service in World War II, emphasizing the disconnect between those who experience war firsthand and those who make decisions to go to war without such experience.
• 🇺🇦 The discussion includes commentary on the current conflict in Ukraine, with Stone suggesting that the situation is complex and that historical context is crucial for understanding the dynamics between Russia and Ukraine.
• 🗣️ Stone calls for a reevaluation of American values and foreign policy, advocating for a more empathetic and cooperative approach to international relations, as exemplified by JFK's peace speech.
• 📖 He mentions his book 'Chasing the Light', sharing insights into his journey as a filmmaker and the importance of perseverance and resilience in the face of adversity.
• 💡 The interview concludes with Stone's endorsement of JFK's peace speech, encouraging viewers to watch it and reflecting on the speech's relevance to current global challenges.

Q & A

What is the significance of Kennedy's speech at American University in 1963 according to the interview?

The interviewee characterizes Kennedy's speech as extremely important and layered, emphasizing reconciliation with the Soviet Union, acknowledging the Soviet Union's contribution in World War II, and promoting mutual respect and understanding between nations.

How does the interviewee relate Kennedy's peace speech to current global affairs?

The interviewee suggests that Kennedy's vision of peace and cooperation is still relevant today, criticizing the current hostile stance of the United States towards countries like China and Russia, and advocating for a re-examination of American values and respect for the national interests of other sovereign nations.

What is the interviewee's view on the role of nuclear energy in the future?

The interviewee strongly supports nuclear energy as a solution to pollution and CO2 issues, arguing that it is a clean and efficient source of energy that has been unfairly sensationalized and misunderstood.

Why does the interviewee believe that the United States should not be involved in the Ukraine conflict?

The interviewee argues that the Ukraine conflict is far from American interests, and that the history between Ukraine and Russia is complex. He suggests that the U.S. should be focusing on partnering with countries like Russia on issues such as nuclear energy and combating pollution, rather than engaging in conflicts that could lead to a larger war.

What does the interviewee think about the current state of American politics and media?

The interviewee expresses concern over the partisanship and gridlock in American politics, and criticizes the media for what he perceives as a lack of truthful reporting, particularly regarding international affairs and the Ukraine conflict.

How does the interviewee describe his experience making 'Platoon' and what it aimed to portray?

The interviewee shares that 'Platoon' was intended to show the harsh and terrifying reality of war, contrasting with the public's perception at the time. He believes that his and his father's combat experiences provide a unique perspective that is often missing in discussions about war.

What is the interviewee's opinion on the current situation with Germany and its energy policies?

The interviewee criticizes Germany's decision to align with the U.S. on energy policies, particularly the abandonment of the Nord Stream pipeline and the reliance on more expensive alternatives like liquid natural gas from the U.S., which he sees as detrimental to Germany's economy and energy independence.

What does the interviewee suggest about the Kennedy assassination and the involvement of U.S. intelligence agencies?

The interviewee implies a deep suspicion of the official narrative of the Kennedy assassination, suggesting that figures within the CIA and potentially other U.S. intelligence agencies may have been involved, and that the truth has been covered up.

How does the interviewee view the role of Seymour Hersh in journalism?

While the interviewee respects Hersh's work in some areas, he expresses skepticism about Hersh's reporting on the Kennedy family, suggesting that Hersh's sources may be biased and that his portrayal of the Kennedys has been influenced by those with an agenda against them.

What advice does the interviewee give to young people trying to make a difference in the world?

The interviewee encourages young people to be persistent, to understand that rejection and failure are part of the process, and to continue striving for their goals despite the challenges. He shares his own experiences of struggling to find success and emphasizes the importance of resilience and perseverance.

Outlines

00:00

🌟 Introduction and Reflection on JFK's Peace Speech

The paragraph begins with an expression of gratitude for the interviewee's participation. It delves into the significance of JFK's peace speech at American University, highlighting its message of reconciliation with the Soviet Union post-Cuban Missile Crisis. The interviewee emphasizes the speech's call for mutual respect and understanding, contrasting it with the contemporary approach to international relations. The discussion also touches on JFK's acknowledgment of Soviet sacrifices during WWII and the speech's influence on future generations, including the interviewee's own work and perspectives on peace.

05:02

📽️ Filmmaking and the Pursuit of Truth in Nuclear Energy

This segment discusses the interviewee's venture into filmmaking to convey the importance of nuclear energy as a clean and efficient power source. The conversation critiques the sensationalism surrounding nuclear energy and compares it with the often overlooked dangers of fossil fuels. The interviewee's film, 'Nuclear Now', is mentioned as a medium to educate the public about the benefits and safety of nuclear power, challenging the prevalent narratives that overshadow its potential in combating climate change and pollution.

10:03

🔥 The Complexity of War and the Ukraine Conflict

The paragraph explores the interviewee's personal experiences with war, drawing from his service in Vietnam and his father's experiences in World War II. It contrasts these firsthand accounts with the often misinformed public discourse on war and conflict, particularly the Ukraine crisis. The interviewee criticizes the lack of understanding and the ideological motivations behind current geopolitical tensions, advocating for a more nuanced and empathetic approach to international relations.

15:04

🌿 Environmental Concerns and the Future of Energy

In this part, the discussion shifts towards environmental issues, with a focus on pollution and climate change. The interviewee expresses his concerns about the melting Arctic ice and the escalating global tensions that could result from environmental degradation. He also touches on his views about the importance of clean energy and the role of nuclear energy in mitigating the effects of climate change, emphasizing the need for a global shift towards sustainable energy solutions.

20:06

🚀 Historical Perspectives on Nuclear Power and International Relations

The paragraph reflects on the historical context of nuclear energy, highlighting the support it once had from prominent figures like JFK and Eisenhower. It contrasts the current political climate, where nuclear energy is often overshadowed by vocal minorities and misinformation. The interviewee laments the lack of progress in adopting nuclear energy, especially in the United States, and suggests that a more open-minded approach to nuclear power could lead to significant environmental and economic benefits.

25:08

🌐 Geopolitical Tensions and the Quest for Peace

This segment delves into the geopolitical landscape, focusing on the tensions between the United States and Russia. The interviewee discusses the historical context of these tensions and the role of the media in shaping public perception. He criticizes the lack of empathy and understanding in foreign policy, particularly towards Russia, and argues for a more balanced and cooperative approach to international relations, echoing the sentiments expressed in JFK's peace speech.

30:10

🗣️ The Power of Truth and Speaking Out

The final paragraph emphasizes the importance of speaking the truth, especially in the face of misinformation and propaganda. The interviewee discusses his experiences confronting mainstream media and the challenges of advocating for unpopular truths. He expresses his admiration for other journalists and public figures who dare to speak out, regardless of the consequences, and encourages the younger generation to continue seeking and sharing the truth in their own endeavors.

Keywords

💡Alternative Vision

An alternative vision refers to a different perspective or plan for the future that contrasts with the current or traditional ones. In the video, the discussion encourages young people to consider an alternative vision for society, particularly in terms of rebellion against oppressive systems and envisioning a new path forward. It is used to inspire a new generation to think critically about the status quo and to imagine a different future.

💡Kennedy Speech

The 'Kennedy Speech' refers to a famous address given by President John F. Kennedy at American University in 1963, advocating for peace and an end to the Cold War. The speech is highlighted in the video as a model of eloquent and visionary leadership, emphasizing the need for reconciliation and mutual respect between nations. It is used as a touchstone for discussing the importance of peace and understanding in international relations.

💡Cuban Missile Crisis

The Cuban Missile Crisis was a 13-day confrontation in 1962 between the United States and the Soviet Union initiated by the Soviet deployment of nuclear missiles in Cuba. In the script, this crisis is mentioned to illustrate the high stakes of the Cold War and how Kennedy's leadership helped to defuse a potential nuclear war, emphasizing the importance of diplomatic solutions to global conflicts.

💡Sovereignty

Sovereignty in the context of the video refers to the self-governance and autonomy of a nation. The discussion points out the importance of respecting the sovereignty of all countries, including Russia, and how interference in other nations' affairs can lead to conflict and a loss of respect for international boundaries.

💡Nuclear Energy

Nuclear energy is a key topic in the video, presented as a necessary and undervalued source of power for the future. The discussion argues for the safety and reliability of nuclear power, contrasting it with the dangers of fossil fuels and the limitations of renewable energy sources. The video script uses nuclear energy as an example of a technology that is often misunderstood and misrepresented in the media.

💡Fusion Energy

Fusion energy represents the potential for a nearly limitless and clean power source if nuclear fusion can be achieved. In the video, fusion is mentioned as a future hope for energy needs but is also acknowledged as a technology that is not yet commercially viable. It is used to discuss the promise and challenges of advanced energy technologies.

💡CO2 and Pollution

CO2 (carbon dioxide) and pollution are discussed in the context of environmental concerns and the need for clean energy solutions. The video emphasizes the urgency of addressing climate change and pollution through the adoption of nuclear energy as a means to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and avoid catastrophic environmental impacts.

💡Ukraine Crisis

The Ukraine crisis is a geopolitical conflict that has its roots in complex historical and political issues between Ukraine and Russia. In the video, the crisis is used to critique the simplistic narratives often presented in the media and to call for a more nuanced understanding of international politics that respects the sovereignty and historical context of all parties involved.

💡Espionage

Espionage is referenced in the context of hidden operations and intelligence gathering, particularly in relation to the Kennedy assassination and potential covert actions by state agencies. The term is used to highlight the potential for secret influences and manipulations behind significant historical events, suggesting that what is publicly known may only be part of a larger, more complex story.

💡Regime Change

Regime change refers to the replacement of a government with another, often through external intervention. In the video, the term is used critically to discuss the potential consequences and ethical implications of efforts by one country to overthrow the government of another, particularly in the context of discussions about Russia and the Ukraine crisis.

💡Underdog

The term 'underdog' is used colloquially in the video to refer to a person or team that is expected to lose but has the potential to surprise everyone. It is used in a discussion about sports but can also symbolize the value of rooting for the less powerful or expected party in any situation, reflecting a broader theme of supporting the overlooked or underestimated.

Highlights

Interviewee expresses gratitude for the opportunity to discuss important topics.

Discussion on engaging young adults to consider alternatives to the status quo.

Emphasis on the significance of JFK's American University speech and its 60th anniversary.

Analysis of JFK's peace speech, highlighting reconciliation with the Soviet Union.

Mention of JFK's civil rights speech and its influence on Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream'.

Reflection on the Cuban Missile Crisis and its impact on the Cold War.

Acknowledgment of Soviet Union's contribution and sacrifices during World War II.

Critique of the military-industrial complex and its influence on politics.

Discussion on JFK's vision for peace and mutual respect between nations.

Insight into JFK's assassination and its impact on his peace initiatives.

Commentary on the Vietnam War and its effect on American society and morale.

Interviewee's personal experience as a soldier in Vietnam and its influence on his views.

Call to action for the younger generation to be inspired by JFK's vision for the future.

Interviewee's perspective on the importance of nuclear energy and the need for a sustainable future.

Critique of the media's portrayal of nuclear energy and the push for renewable energy sources.

Discussion on the potential of fusion energy as a future solution for clean energy.

Reflection on the current state of American politics and society compared to the past.

Interviewee's thoughts on the Kennedy family's stance on JFK's assassination.

Opinion on the potential contents of the classified JFK assassination files.

Final thoughts on the importance of speaking the truth and the influence of the media.

Transcripts

first I want to thank you again for

giving us the time and day for you to be

interviewed by us it's an honor and we

appreciate it I think to just kind of

start us off I think what kind of and I

are trying to succeed in our mission is

we're trying to get people our age 18 to

30. to try and think about what it means

to actually have an alternative because

it's one thing I think to be rebellious

against the oppressive system that we're

all in but what do you replace it with

and one of the things that we've really

been promoting is this Kennedy speech

that he gave at American University

and uh I yeah I believe you're familiar

with it is that correct sure yeah and

these speeches of the century

and so it's the 60th anniversary of that

speech uh I think in three days or so

and

what is it exactly your what is your

characterization of that speech it's

importance and how do I get people my

age to actually go to that as their

vision for the future

uh

the speech uh kind of went under the

radar at the time as I remember it

wasn't particularly noted until

afterward uh Kennedy had a very busy the

last six eight months of his life this

was extremely many things were happening

it's interesting that he gave that

speech very almost a couple of days

apart from when he gave his civil rights

speech about uh

about uh the situation in Alabama

he gave a beautiful speech you should

familiarize yourself with that speech

too because it was one of the

really first eloquent statements about

civil rights and it pressured it

prefaced a lot of what Martin Luther

King was going to say and his I Have a

Dream speech in fact

well I'm sorry I did come after his well

no the I Have a Dream speech came in

August correct August 63. no no it was

right before it was actually a few

months before you should you should read

that speech because it's called

grandiloquence to it and he quotes

Lincoln and it's a beautiful speech but

uh his peace speech is extremely uh to

me layered it's a layered speech he

mentions many themes among them

reconciliation with the Soviet Union and

that was so important and it was as you

know it

came after his near confrontation with

the end of the world in 1962 the Cuban

Missile Crisis this speech

said that we're on the path to get it

together with the the Cold War was a

myth he was he he knew this but I mean

it's very hard to move a country away

from a cold war situation when you're

spending billions of dollars on on the

defense as Eisenhower himself said it's

just it's funny that Eisenhower spent

the most amount of money at the same

time left behind a situation

which he said was tragic and he he said

this is a all the the functions of state

are going to be poisoned and

contaminated by this uh relationship

with business and uh the uh defense

industry and he meant it and he was

right God damn it so and Kennedy carried

that on and he saw the same problem

although he didn't agree with Eisenhower

on many things and I think one of the

most beautiful things in the speech was

he recognizes the contribution of the

Soviet Union in World War II how many

people were killed in the Soviet Union

fighting the Nazis fascism he at the

time he said something like uh

26 million or something but the truth is

now we know the numbers are going up and

the latest actual research numbers are

some closer to 39 million and something

like 20 some million Were Soldiers so

it's quite quite a huge sacrifice they

made and that is what has

uh played a huge role in the Russian

attitude towards

the west and people I guess in the west

don't really I recognize that they don't

realize the four or five every German

four or five of every German Soldier

killed in World War II was killed on the

Eastern Front not on the Western Front

now that's not to say the West did not

contribute they did Len Lees was very

big to Russia when we were shipping them

petroleum all kinds of products which

were crucial to their effort and kept

them going at a time when they were very

very deprived of everything

but the you have to say the Russians did

pull themselves up by the bootstrap and

Kennedy

he acknowledged the Damage Done to their

country he said one-third of that

country basically the Ukraine area the

whole

the whole Western section of the country

had been decimated by the Nazis uh it

was uh

someone he said from here to Chicago

would be the equivalent meaning in the

Soviet Union from New York from

Washington to Chicago is what he was

read he was relating to in that speech

he also

brief and he said it's time to realize

this and it's time for our countries to

basically

get it together and respect each other

and he emphasized not a Pax Americana

that was what people were thinking at

the time that it was an American piece

governed by American weapons of war

which is what we have to some degree now

in the world in other words he was

counseling a real piece of understanding

of of compassion of mutual respect and

we never achieved that believe it or not

we never achieved that briefly uh I

believe you know he was killed in 16

soon thereafter and his peace initiative

with the Soviet Union went down that

went down in the toilet uh as Lyndon

Johnson was a pedestrian politician and

a stupid man because he got himself

involved in a ridiculous War nine six

thousand miles away

he knew I mean he must have known better

than to do that and he kept fighting it

he never gave up because the America

cannot lose that was a it's a point of

Honor that is Nixon kept emphasizing we

cannot have we have to have a peace with

honor that peace with honor cost of

Vietnamese millions of people and it

cost American lives quite a bit and it

destroyed a lot of the country in the

sense of up here on morale we came back

from that war and I did I was a soldier

there you know much more callous tell us

about the world tell us about we didn't

consider at that time Asian people to be

human beings in the same level that we

were I mean that it was a it was a form

of racism

but that existed and it still exists uh

now of course we've come to respect the

Asian race because they made a lot of

money and they're very good at business

and organization and Society in these

people but at that time it was a whole

other ball game and that war was one of

the insanities of life that you have to

live through everyone's going to live

through some kind of insanity I'm sure

you will too or you probably have

already but uh anyway Kennedy's dream

was shattered but it still exists it

exists in the hearts of men and women

and the Young Generation who we inspired

uh

ronkovic whose book I made born the

Fourth of July into a movie was one of

those people was very inspired by Jack

Kennedy and many people were and he's

coming around now in history again to be

recognized he was dismissed marginalized

by the shortness of his office by the

historians you know saying that well he

was a good speech guy but he didn't

really accomplish anything which is

really unfair if you really look at what

he did and we don't have time to go into

that now we're not talking about John

Kennedy but

people like Noam Chomsky have dis have

have uh just not up to date on the

research and all the things that Kennedy

did and tried to do and speaking to all

the African countries to Nasser and the

Middle East to Indonesia sukarno he was

really reaching out to the third world

you can say he was a third world

conscious person and he knew that there

was a history of Oppression against the

third world and he knew that the

Russians were getting the better

advantage of it because they were

frankly they hadn't been in Africa

oppressing or colonizing the place so

Russia was much more appreciated by

neutral countries in those days but you

couldn't be neutral because the United

States kind of had came down on you John

Foster tell us his policy was that

neutrality his appeasement

am I going on too much I think we should

maybe I should get a little faster

the point was about the speech it was uh

this is all good no no we're not gonna

say one thing about your your question

is

no no I'm sorry uh this the famous

speech Yes Parks Americana yeah

the kind of peace that makes life on

Earth worth living that is what is so

important worth living I made a film now

it's just called nuclear now it's just

coming out it's on Amazon as of today

and uh you uh iTunes and uh Google Play

you can watch it and

it's about

I'm sorry it's about

energy and what are we going to do for

the future how do we keep the quality of

life that we want on this Earth we're

not getting that we're getting this

pollution New York today's bearing in

pollution the the point is that clean

energy is the solution and people don't

have the facts on clean energy and

that's one of the reasons that motivated

me to do the film because I worked with

scientists and I wanted to get

everything correct because I feel that

nuclear energy was never given that

given the respect it deserved you get

these agendas from Davos from all these

World organizations they talk about the

future and blah blah blah I never see

nuclear energy as they always talk about

Renewables solar uh hydropower uh and uh

wind but they're not just they're

they're good and we like them but

they're not the solution they're not

going to make up the volume that we need

which is continent size the world we're

thinking not just about the United

States we're thinking about the homework

you can see the movie it makes a very

important point we need nuclear energy

we need it now we need it big and a lot

of it we need to build and we can it's

all been in our we did it for 50 years

we've been doing it it works there was

one accident that was Lethal that was uh

churnable and it's all explainable and

it's ridiculous any in any industry has

to go through a period of growth and

it's important that it has be tested and

that's what's been happening they've

been building plants 400 and some all

over the world and they working and here

we are like questioning the nuclear

energy it's a ridiculous argument

because if you compare the deaths of

nuclear energy to the deaths of coal and

oil is not even close it's

magnitude of uh magnitudes different uh

the charts are in the film so here we

are obsessing about

melodramatic things like a a plane crash

becomes more important than the numerous

car crashes that are going on in other

words we sensationalize this thing

everything that goes wrong in nuclear is

sensationalized into this catastrophe

that's the end of the world which is

nonsense

it's nonsense we have too many examples

of success and we we can deal with with

we can deal with accidents we have to

without accidents you don't grow

we were at the premiere of nuclear now

in New York or the screening of it I'm

sorry I probably was going on no no no

no no Mr Stone please this this is all

good uh kind and I want to ask if you

wanted to follow up on the question yeah

I um I actually want to know you

mentioned your um War experience in

Vietnam and of course you've talked

about your interviews that your father

also served in World War II and

you were living in reality you were you

need this in in your movie Platoon you

show it's a very tough and terrifying

reality but it wasn't what people

thought was going on right and I want to

know how unique is that experience of

war and how does it separate the people

who fight Wars from the rest of us that

don't and I think that's crucial for our

time right now where we have the Ukraine

war and a lot of things are being said

about it but we really don't understand

what's going on so

uh so your question really is about

Ukraine or about about my War experience

about your War experience yeah yeah

because I think you know you and your

father have combat experience and when

the Layman who talks about war whether

it's supporting Ukraine or not or

whatever you know you actually have been

in it what is something in in general

that the Layman should know about combat

although

in my history anyway all the people who

talk about going to war fighting Wars

have never been in a war it's ironic

that they're the leaders Lyndon Johnson

was a big coward it seems you know he

George Bush was a coward he couldn't he

couldn't even serve in the National

Guard without without problems he was

scared of his horses and he although he

wanted the reputation of a macho Cowboy

actually he hated riding horses I mean

there's always this kind of tension uh

Lindsey Graham who's one of our worst

Senators ever you know talks about war

like he he does no experience of it he

was in the intelligence services

uh Nikki Haley oh my God she wants to be

president and here she is calling

yesterday for world war three if we

don't win Ukraine if we don't win

Ukraine how crazy has this thing gone

that we're fighting we want to fight

world war three which is a catastrophe

over Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine is six

thousand miles away and his history with

Russia is extremely complicated I've

done two films about it you've got to

understand it to even get into it

because America is fighting because of a

ideology about Russia and it's an

ideology that's dangerous Wicked and

exactly what John Kennedy was talking

about in his peace speech it's crazy to

go against Russia because

potentially we could be the best

Partners in the world not only on

nuclear energy which is crucial because

Russia is way out ahead of us as is

China we need allies to combat the world

situation because I think the most

threatening thing in the world is

pollution and CO2 I really feel that the

Arctic Ice is melting everything is

going to get worse and worse and Tighter

and more Wars more tension it's going to

be of Hell to live there I'm not going

to be there but after 2050 you might

well take all these consider into

consideration maybe you'll my Phil will

become a classic then maybe it'll be in

the Library of Congress or something I

don't have much they don't give me much

critique time but frankly uh I've been

warning about this since I read the book

bright future by Josh Josh Goldstein and

his nuclear engineer partner Stefan's

fist you saw the film it's the the book

is based on a book it's based on facts

it's all facts it's not one fact that

can be contested in that movie not one

and I'm very proud of that because I'm

always questioned them you know stone is

fictionalizing this and that Well

everybody's got an opinion on nuclear

but they don't know anything the same is

true frankly about Jack Kennedy's death

everybody's got an opinion everybody's

got an opinion oh I think he was shocked

by this I don't know I blah blah blah I

think it was obviously the one man did

it but you know they don't really people

don't spend time investigating it that's

what I do with my films and in my

documentaries

um

well no listen well for one I mean I

visited uh Princeton plasma physics lab

where they were doing groundbreaking

research on Fusion one of the things

your film ends on is is Fusion Energy

actually that it could be the hope for

the future and I know that um we have

now crossed a barrier where we for the

first time in history have produced more

energy with Fusion then we are using to

actually make it so you know there's

there is there is a real absolutely hope

but there's not really reasonable hope

within according to everyone I've talked

to and I was just up at MIT at with

Dennis uh White who's a genius uh he was

working on fusion plasma Fusion uh he he

took me through the steps but you know

given the amount of money you have to

spend to get that energy it's it's a

it's a no-go right now because you have

to have a scalable I'm sorry you have to

have a scalable uh

realistic cost to this uh until all

nuclear and fishing can do it fishing

can't do it although the United States

spends too much money China Korea Japan

have done it in a cheaper way and in

Russia too so it can be done

yeah well you know but of course we have

so many environmentalists blocking the

procedure with all these legal

restrictions that in America it's almost

impossible to build anything much less

not just in nuclear but in any industry

you know it's hard to lay Concrete in

this country to to get things done to

build info we can't replace our bridges

it's amazing that we're

you know we spend a fortune and yet it

dissipates we we don't build bullet

trains we hardly build anymore and that

is a concern uh

so

you know I'm looking to Eurasia I'm

looking to Asia I'm looking I think even

Latin America I think there's

a

Renee sauce it's possible and I I don't

discount the United States the United

States is great for innovation

there's 50 companies exploring smis of

nuclear efficient and they're doing you

know with government help

50 of them you know we hope but Fusion

itself is more a prospect for the latter

part of the century second half of the

century if we make it

to the

you know it's very interesting that you

talk about this because um you have a

very unique perspective with comparing

the United States in the era of the 50s

and 60s and to other countries like

France like I know you spent summers in

France

yeah and your mother was yeah right you

talk about this a little bit in your

biography can you actually speak on the

America that you experienced growing up

from your teens and 20s to what you see

today

yeah

yeah it's very sad to me but you know I

I suppose young people I mean older

people

I don't want to be the guy who says

always better than you know it was a lot

of problems back then to me it was a lot

more racism there was a lot more

um

unthought about military militarism and

I think where people are questioning

Wars they're questioning everything now

and sometimes it helps to do that but

there's a there's a partisanship the

gridlock that nothing gets done and that

is a problem such as nuclear energy that

was the easiest one to solve that was

not an issue but it became an issue

because there's a vocal minority

so I mean that's the kind of stuff that

blocks up the whole country because the

country could now be only nuclearized

let's say let's say 80 80 of our energy

like in France in France it's 70 could

come from electricity that would be

amazing and we'd also we would be

developing hydrogen where it can go

hydrogen can take us to liquid fuels for

airplanes for the future and it can take

us to to making industry viable without

burning up the whole atmosphere in other

words we could be producing cement we

could be producing steel we could be

producing agriculture fertilizer

all with that heat that comes from

nuclear energy going through hydrogen

hydrogen as a carrier with uh and even

carbon could make for a world that is

clean energy so out with the oil out

with the gas and gas is just as bad as

oil because gas is methane as we tried

to show in the film which is invisible

nobody sees it but it is

as Josh says in the film 80 times worse

than oil in the in the in the near term

it's really ugly nothing and we have a

lot more of it

so we're still up to 84 something like

that of our of our energy as fossil fuel

in the world fossil fuel at this point

all that talk about Renewables all that

we haven't changed anything we're still

pissing out the fossil fuel this is a

this is not the Kennedy approach Kennedy

was talking about nuclear energy way

back when so was Eisenhower they both

agreed on that and most of most people

were intelligent agree on it it's just

why can't we get things done

and we're wasting our time in Ukraine

we're fighting a war that we're going to

lose we're going to get it's humiliating

that we're lying about it from the

beginning there hasn't been any truth

told in any American newspaper that I've

seen it's unbelievable that people are

brainwashed in this country and they

believe what they read in the Washington

Post as they see on the

television networks it's just so

isn't it I mean do you ever hear of one

do you ever hear the Russian side of the

story I know I haven't heard it maybe

maybe some brave soul has done it but if

you're so much as trying to give the

Russians out of The Story You're

considered an apologist for for who you

saw my Putin interviews back in 2000 or

17 or 18. you know I was called all

kinds of things again but all it was is

a set of questions for him and you know

there's the film doesn't take an

editorial position it just lets him

speak in his own voice if you look at

all the American shows about Boone by

the way people don't realize this but

they're seeing a dubbed version of his

voice they don't even see the real voice

that Putin does so you're getting this

Bluff angry uh bluffing kind of Russian

caricature of a Russian man it's not the

way he is at all he's very soft-spoken

he's a Statesman he has the same

qualities as Kennedy he sees the long

picture and he's very patient if he

hadn't been so patient we would probably

be a war now in Russia

considering the things we have done in

Ukraine and a lot of dirty has gone

down believe me that war started by the

way in 2014 there's no question that war

started and you were right about that

Jose to call out uh what's her name they

uh and Alexandra ocos Rios or whatever

you know Casio Cortez yeah because you

know Cortez yeah she I mean she's not

she's smart I think she could learn but

they don't want to learn you know they

don't they're like Nikki Haley there's a

kind of a I can't go there because I

know it's not politically it's a it's a

negative politically for me to in any

way uh empathize with Russia which is

ridiculous considering that these are

the two most strongest nuclear powers in

the world and we're at the edge at the

very edge

of pulling that trigger uh which of

course would be a disaster for America

and we would lose much much more than

Russia is losing uh our industry or our

economy would go to anyway it

doesn't matter the moment a bomb is

blown it's going to demoralize the

entire world now but what you just said

though about like how AOC and Company

don't want to empathize with Putin is

exactly the point of the speech it's you

know you know JFK is saying put yourself

in the shoes of the Soviets we don't

have to like communism to

um admire their great history and

culture but the point is it isn't

communism it's a new form of capitalism

it's an authoritarian State okay they

have a form of democracy in other words

Americans won't admit this but the truth

is if you travel through Russia you'll

see that there's if Putin were not

popular enough he would be out that's

the way the Russian system works it's

it's a rough system tough neighborhood

but if you're not doing what the popular

will is you will be sussed out and

removed as Khrushchev was

Chef was considered too much of an

adventurer for what he did in the Cuban

Missile Crisis and they got rid of him

and he was totally in charge we thought

but they got rid of him and that happens

quietly on the Soviet side and then it

happened when we went to uh their post

uh communist world with the outset

Yeltsin was a democratically elected but

he you know he had tremendous flaws too

Boone took over and stabilized the

country and so from 2000 to 2023 you

will see that Russia really got stronger

and it's and it was constantly and I I

traced all this in the interviews it was

constantly attacked there was not one

moment when they let up on Putin it got

worse after 2007 when he made his speech

at Munich he did that speech and you see

John McCain the senator who loves war

with Russia he's sneering at him all the

Americans have never respected the

Russian point of view which is why he's

so patient because it's unbelievable how

many red line warnings were given to

America before the Ukraine the 22

situation happened in Ukraine they were

maybe that you can even say the fault of

Putin and he can be faulted for this is

he should have realized this in 2014

when the United States

uh pulled off this coup that Victoria

Newland is responsible for largely

responsible for with Jeffrey Pyatt the

ambassador to Ukraine when that happened

that was as you remember the the Eastern

provinces Donetsk and

and lugans were up in arms they were

already and Crimea was up in arms those

people are Russian ethnics they're not

going to go along with a new government

that's anti-russian and that was the

whole issue so Putin maybe should have

acted then and

he didn't want to because he wanted to

be well he was it was a very tenuous

position with the United States too he

still believed I believe in a

partnership in our documentary he kept

saying our partners our partners I got

upset with him I said why are you always

referring to the United States that your

partners are not your partners that was

the essence of our disagreement so I was

wondering but he still believed in the

possibility of negotiation I believe

that's what he thought would happen he

made warnings he made warnings about

this we're not going to have NATO on our

Southern uh in the Ukraine and we can't

where if I put weapons on the border of

Canada or Mexico you'd go nuts in the

United States you'd be at War but you

have no respect for us as a sovereign

country we're Sovereign sovereignty

means we do it our way we're our country

you're not going to tell us how to run

our country

which is exactly what John Kennedy is

saying we have to respect the

sovereignty of these other countries

which we didn't do after World War II we

ran over the sovereignty of Europe

England is is basically a slave uh is a

is a intelligence agency working for us

and uh France I mean de Gaulle tried and

he did separate and I think France has

really shown some courage in in the

nuclear Department certainly but uh the

sovereignty of these countries has been

compromised with military bases all over

their countries and Okinawa Japan

Korea uh Italy turkey now turkey thank

God is coming back there have some

Sovereign taken down we know with

erdogan but sovereignty is a key issue

that he keeps mentioning in his

speeches and no one in the United States

seems to pick up on it they don't even

they don't repeat his speeches properly

uh they they uh distort his species into

our our line of propaganda

Mr stone I have two more questions but

before I go uh kainen are you there yeah

I'm here still I want to give you an

opportunity to ask any follow-up you

want and then we'll stop with two more

questions sure

um Mr Stone I wanted to get your um

thoughts on a recent admission that

oracay Jr made on the Sean Hannity Show

when he was asked about

um the death of his brother uh his

father excuse me

um and he had said I'll just quote it

that the day that my uncle was killed I

was picked up at Sidwell Friends School

and brought home the first phone call

that my father made after J Edgar Hoover

told him that his brother had been shot

was the seat to the CIA desk officer in

Langley it was only a mile from our

house and then my father said to him did

your people do this and then he goes on

to describe his father asking the same

question to Henry Lewis who was one of

the Cuban Bay of Pigs leaders and John

McComb the head of the CIA then um so I

want your thoughts on his recent

admission and the importance of a member

of the Kennedy family saying something

like this it is important but I you know

I'm again I'm surprised because I knew

this and we've heard it before Kennedy

Robert Kennedy was clearly moving in

direct and several people have come out

and said that uh he was definitely going

to reopen the case now that has been

questioned but it seems to hold up that

he the people who knew his intention was

he was going to reopen the case and that

scared a lot of people because they knew

they were guilty so there was that adds

to the motivation to kill him

and as we know that is one of the most

screwed up assassinations of all time is

really dumb I mean to have all you have

all the shots from the front and it

seems like he was shot from the rear

definitely with that second gun from the

the the the security guard called Cesar

Thane I think it was called uh Robert

Kennedy's been correct about this and he

knows it and it's shocking to see his

family which should be more in the

Kennedy Spirit not open up to this and

condemn him like this I think Robert's

very very

guts he's got the guts of his father and

the guts of his uncle and that

unfortunately we don't see it in the

rest of them uh

there's you know this uh

I mean where else do you see such a

ridiculous cover story as Oswald shoots

him from this impossible position and

then he gets killed by a thug who's got

underground connections uh with with a

mob and that Thug in turn is dies of

cancer very suddenly a couple of years

later before he goes to trial so Oswald

is prevented from Talking going to trial

because Oswald knows a lot because he's

a plant he's a uh agile

agile used agile provocative the French

would say he's an agent used by the

intelligence agencies he goes to Russia

he goes blah blah blah he does all the

moves they use him like they use pawns

on a piece but he's not an important

Pawn he said only becomes important in

hindsight and then they got to kill him

fast

uh this is a ridiculous Story I mean

people who see movies would know right

away that something's fishy but uh the

country fell asleep again this is why

you know it's the people don't react I

mean the Warren report was made people

angry the majority of people got angry

but again nothing changed in that

government our government is somewhat of

a dictatorship in that way because it

just locks in now we have a one-party

State basically Republican Democrat

doesn't matter the defense budget goes

up to a trillion dollars it doesn't

matter these people keep voting and

voting because the money gets back

Channel back in contributions to

themselves so it's money has got to come

out of politics clearly but beyond that

the whole concept of a country worth

defending that we believe in is is very

very remote now

Mr Stone uh this will be kind of like

the last question issue that I'm just

going to ask one more thing of you

Donald Trump when he was asked why

didn't you release the Kennedy files he

said if you saw what was in them he

wouldn't want to release them too now

if there well this is kind of like a

two-part question I guess like one do

you think he's being honest about that

or is he lying and secondly if he's

being honest is this the is would it

expose the same kind of apparatus that

is involved in the cover-up of the

Nordstrom well

I understand and what'd you say the Gulf

Stream of the Nord stream blowing up the

Nordstrom pipeline story too uh but

definitely it falls in the same area of

espionage

now you don't if you have evidence of

Espionage like you you don't keep it on

paper you know it has to it has to

disappear you have to shred it you can't

have uh incriminating information like

that running around so I I highly doubt

that there would be an incriminating

piece of paper all we were doing is

trying to say let's pry this like Jim

Garrison was doing in his trial I was

trying to get a little more information

oh pry it open there are CIA agents

whose files we know exist but they we

can't get them those people people like

Phillips people like the guy in Florida

I forgot his name uh uh you know there's

a lot of these Morales uh I'm off the

top of my head I can't remember all the

names but there are people who worked on

this case and they knew Oswald they knew

all the players the Cubans they knew the

the the the mod element was working with

the CIA too

but there has to be a center and there

has to be an authority at the beginning

at the top that's the only thing that

makes sense The Authority that controls

this thing is the CIA

and to some degree the FBI but they

don't work in Con in tandem they they

were competitive

but so sometimes some of the best

information comes from the FBI because

they don't know what's really going on

but uh Angleton James Angleton and

counterintelligence plays a key role

here as does Richard Helms Helms was the

chief of the CIA eventually and uh a key

player I believe he knows a lot he knew

a lot more he lied his way through

Congress uh there was a joke when he

appeared in front of the uh the

committee uh that uh Frank church the

church committee that was a that was

horrible what he did Angleton too they

all lie and uh but I don't know what

Trump knows he tends to be a

melodramatic character but he was the

only one who actually next to way back

years ago Garrison he did try to do

something and then he backed off because

those files were supposed to be released

there was a date 2016 I believe it was

and somebody got to him at the very last

second and put pressure and said you

can't do this so what he's saying if

they knew what they knew it doesn't make

sense it's they wouldn't have that they

would not have that on paper in my

opinion but there would be good

information about the CIA agents and

their meetings and so forth but I don't

think that's going to come out either

by the way he's a minor player but he

does he did say a lot of things before

he died Howard Hunt is not to be ignored

these files are important

she's just the the very last question

and then um we'll be wrapped up um

do you bringing it to now and the

importance of speaking up the truth you

know I know you really liked what I did

against the New York Times and the

executive editors of Reuters and

Washington posts and stuff and um we're

going to continue to keep doing these

things Titan and I are involved in

training other people to do it because

they recognize us now

um no yeah we were we were barred from

going into a congressional Town Hall in

New York

they they told us you're not allowed in

so are they allowed to do that well I

don't got the money for a lawyer I'm

sure not but

um

one of the things we do though no matter

like whenever we train people is we tell

them to speak the truth unapologetically

and I think you're an expert in that and

another expert in that is Seymour Hirsch

Seymour Hersh is just saying what he

knows talking and Reporting what he

knows and I think he's what almost 80

years old or over 80 years old now so

he's doing his thing he's just saying

you know what I'm just gonna publish it

and he said that he took the Nordstrom

story to sub stack and he said the last

place he was going to take it to was the

New York Times what is your reflection

and observation on that story and on

Seymour Hersh in general

well on nordstream I do believe that the

United States had to know I mean when

Joe Biden said that so clearly in a

speech before it blew up that

it will not it's not going to go through

he almost said it Point Blank and he was

determined to stop it so Biden was very

much aware of the situation what exactly

happened I don't know maybe they used

ukrainians I'm sure they did but it's

you know the motive is so clear that you

know it's it's ridiculous to the United

States first first cover story was it

was the Russians who did it which I find

to be ridiculous uh the Nordstrom was

very important to Joe Joe Biden and it

does it did sever the relationship

between Russia and Europe and that has

hurt Europe more than it hurt Russia

that's what this unbelievable thing is

Germany really went along with it

Germany that was Germany property as

well as Russian property they blew it up

Germany did nothing because of this

I'm saying this new Chancellor he's not

really a very strong man he seems to be

cowed in fact he was booed the other day

by the German his own party in Germany I

I read that Schultz was booed because of

that so unhappy with he's put right he's

put he's destroyed the German economy

essentially they've allowed the

Americans to take over and tell and

dictate to them that they ain't going to

do liquid natural gas is going to come

from the U.S plus other countries and

that Germany is going to is gonna

abide by these higher prices as a result

Germany which already destroyed its

nuclear plants is now really in a home

uh France is doing better with energy

than Germany

and much less the coal plants that

Germany oh it's a nightmare Germany has

lost its standing

when you remember when we went to the

Iraq War Germany and France did not go

with us

the Prime Minister said no they they had

some sovereignty that's pretty pretty

interesting that the at least said no to

the United States on a major war that we

went into

but uh where was I I'm sorry the

pipeline right oh yeah on Hirsch

I know her and you know we've had uh you

know I think he's done some very good

work on mili he did some very good work

I don't know if his Nordstrom story

holds I mean I've heard

Pro and Khan I haven't really

investigated it but Hirsch on the other

hand

has done a lot of damage and you have

perhaps not known this but you should

look at his book he wrote on Camelot

it was a

very poor reporting job and it's been

outed and and he tried basically to go

after the Kennedy myth and uh he used

you see when Kennedy was killed that's

when the forces that were against

Kennedy all started to come out of the

woodwork the CIA among them all these

people that worked with them

gave information that was damaged near

the Kennedy such as they were behind the

attempts assassination attempts on

Castro not so there's no evidence of it

at all and Jim's Jim D Eugenio has been

on this case for a long time he reads

everything he was my main researcher on

my JFK Revisited absolutely not true

Kennedy was not into assassination did

not think it would work he knew it would

backfire but her hints at all this stuff

and he the sleeves with the gangsters

and the uh the the women and so Hersh is

very much a pure and his mentality

Puritan and he has his I call a

vulnerable side where

he sees he sees sex as some kind of

some kind of uh

mortal wound or something that he's a

strange guy or should I don't uh I would

counsel you to be cautious in what he

writes he's good but

he's getting his information from CIA

people and he's admitted as such and

that's CI person who he particularly got

information on on Camelot was the

assistant to Richard Helms during all

this process I forgot his name but he

gave a lot of information on the

Kennedys against the Kennedys to her so

that the source has to be questioned

there

okay perfect I I'm I'm out of questions

I think that's it kind of if there's

anything else Now's the Time

no I think this is good

yeah Mr Stone I I again want to thank

you for uh giving us the time to do this

and just if you could just give me like

a 10 second like I endorse the Kennedy

speech because we really want people to

watch it this weekend and it's going to

make one comment to you in your note to

me yes I gotta pee one sec oh okay

who who are you picking tonight

basketball wise

the nuggets

no I want to I want Miami to win I like

underdogs

what was for the underdog no no nuggets

nuggets are The Underdogs because

they've never made it are you kidding me

they're bigger don't you see the

difference I mean come on

the uh you got to give it to Miami

they're Scrappy they really hung in

there and they don't give up we'll see I

was with the Celtics the win but you

gotta root for the underdog it's like

yeah

okay I hear you anyway I'm sorry you

said you're gonna give me a comment on a

note in your note just for your own

dialogue and when you speak

you say here uh

okay Newland Lincoln and others was to

provoke an invasion by Russia

and to completely destroy them as a

Sovereign Nation now that's a big

statement to completely destroy them as

a Sovereign Nation I would say tone that

down a little bit and to bring regime

change to Russia in which they would

divide up Russia break it into economic

Parts more like a Yeltsin kind of

scenario than to it's such a huge

country I mean it doesn't it would it

wouldn't it's so insane completely

destroyed Russian I would avoid words

like that

no you're right they're trying to well

balkanize it I think is more that's real

quick it's not like Napoleon going to

Moscow and you know trying to conquer

Russia in 18 and whatever 15. uh the

other thing uh you wanted for me is an

endorsement of the speaker the six yeah

so I believe that John Kennedy's peace

speech at American University in June of

1963 it's an commencement speech he gave

was one of the classic speeches of

American History up there with FDR's uh

depression speech and Lincoln's

Gettysburg address and it's one of the

great eloquent speeches written by Ted

Sorensen and him

uh it gets to the essence of American

generosity and cooperation because

cooperation is the is the without

cooperation this world will perish we

need to cooperate and anyone who's

following the world situation can see

that America has gone wrong and is

hostile and very nervous about its

position in the world that's questioning

its right to be at the center and going

after any country that challenges it

whether it's China whether it's Iraq

whether it's Russia these countries have

not challenged us they're just trying to

get their space and their air and what

comes to them their national interests

are what matters to them and we're not

taking that into account we say that

their national interests are against our

values well

but that's not so that's not so you have

to re-examine what American values are

and what the Sovereign interests of

other nations are when you realize that

you'll realize that there are no enemies

really there are no there are no enemies

unless you pick a fight

it's like a school yard you know you got

to go pick a fight

and you got to call the other guy names

and he and all that kind of stuff and

that's what we've been doing

look at the other side and look what

they're saying and try to listen always

to what the other side says know you're

supposed enemy because maybe he's not

your enemy maybe he's your friend or

your partner

okay

well thank you very much Mr Stone thank

you so much recording stopped we can end

up there uh Jose keep me apprised at

what you're up to and your next uh all

your your actions I'd love to know

what's going on with uh your

interventions so to speak yes uh you

know

annual month friends of mine named due

dissonance they have filmed a

documentary about the interventions and

me and it'll be premiering next month or

so I'm sure we can send you a link for

you to watch it I'd like to see it yeah

what's it called I I don't know what the

documentary is going to be called but

they are called due dissidents that's

the name of their production company if

you want to I don't know what to say it

again do like d-u-e dissidents

d-i-s-s-i-d-e-n-c-e and that's the name

of their production company but uh other

than that Mr Stone again thank you

kindly I'll keep you updated on any any

exciting things give me a plug for my

book what's it called just say in your

book uh something the one I wrote the uh

yeah you didn't mention oh you're

chasing chasing the light that one right

just for a moment please

hey so tell me a little bit about your

book Chasing the lights

oh you read it

did I read it yeah yeah I read it I

especially I really like the

introduction because you were going

after something in that I think I and

kind of as young men who are broke okay

who come from the circumstances we come

from I'm from the South Bronx Eastern

Queens you're trying to achieve a goal

by no matter what it takes you have to

do it and right now kind of and I's goal

is to try and save the world I we really

don't want the world to be blown up in a

nuclear explosion and when you're

recounting your filming Salvador and how

you guys were going near bankrupt just

to finish your first film was awfully

inspiring good good I wanted it to reach

out to a younger generation because I

think it's an eternal struggle a young

person trying to make it in this world

trying to find this a spot

a sovereign spot a place where he can

feel that comfortable with the world at

home and that took a long time and it

wasn't easy

I I was uh after Vietnam and it took

many years it took seven eight years for

me to really break through and and get

heard and get a place and I talk about

the projections more than the successes

and I want people to realize that

rejection is a part of it too because

then makes you stronger and you have to

be humble in the sense of that's what's

going to happen you're going to get your

ass kicked and by the way I'm still

getting my ass kicked it hasn't changed

I've had successes it's true but it's

also more failure than successes

just think it's I want to help another

generation because frankly our hope is

in another generation it's the world is

going to be yours I hope you take good

care of it good luck all right Jose well

thank you kindly Mr Stone thank you take

care and your name is illwin oh my uh

kainen k-y-n-a-n kainan

k y

Canaan is the rapper from Sudan

I've never heard of him before he's

great I tried to cast him as Bob Marley

in a movie

he was a great great rapper beautiful

music

yeah kind of you can call me Kai for

short that's easier for some are you

Hawaiian or something no um it's

actually a Welsh name oh I see well good

luck to you okay guys bye-bye thank you