ChatGPT o1 vs ChatGPT4 | Is it even better? | OpenAI launches new model GPT-o1

Summary

In this video, the host enthusiastically introduces OpenAI's new models, O1 and O1 mini, and compares them to the current GPT-4 model. Through simple prompts, the host tests the models' reasoning abilities and speed, noting that while O1 models are slower due to their enhanced thinking process, they provide better answers for users without prompting skills. The video showcases the models' performance in creating an engaging LinkedIn post, coding an HTML game, and discussing complex topics like unemployment. The host concludes that O1 mini stands out for its speed and quality, particularly in simple prompts, while O1 preview excels in complex reasoning, though it takes more time.

Takeaways

• 😀 The presenter is excited to introduce OpenAI's new models, O1 and O1 mini, and plans to test them against the current model, GPT-4.
• 🔍 The test will focus on how well the new models perform in reasoning-based tasks and their speed compared to GPT-4.
• ⏱️ It's acknowledged that the new models are slower due to additional 'thinking' processes they incorporate.
• 📝 The prompts used in the test are designed to be simple, aiming to show that even without advanced prompting skills, users can get better answers from the new models.
• 💡 The new models feature a 'thinking process' display, showing their step-by-step reasoning, which is a unique selling point.
• 📈 The test results show that O1 mini and O1 preview outperform GPT-4 in generating an engaging LinkedIn post, with O1 preview being particularly impressive.
• 💻 In a programming test creating an HTML game, O1 mini is the fastest and provides a superior user interface (UI) in the output.
• 📊 When tackling complex topics like unemployment, O1 mini again stands out for the quality of its writing and the depth of its responses.
• 🌟 The presenter expresses a personal preference for O1 mini over O1 preview, based on the simplicity and effectiveness of its outputs.
• ❓ The script ends with a playful test question about 'hours in a strawberry,' which all models answer incorrectly, showing they can still be tripped up by nonsensical queries.

Q & A

What are the new models released by OpenAI mentioned in the script?

The new models released by OpenAI are called O1, which includes two options: O1 preview and O1 mini.

How do the O1 models differ from the current model, GPT-4?

The O1 models are designed to perform better in reasoning-based processes and include a thinking process feature that shows the model's thought steps. However, they are comparatively slower than GPT-4.

What is the purpose of the prompts used in the script?

The prompts are designed to be simple and usable by normal users without learning any prompting skills, aiming to get better answers due to the improved capabilities of the O1 models.

How does the script describe the performance of O1 models in creating a LinkedIn post?

The script indicates that the O1 models, particularly O1 preview, produced high-quality LinkedIn post content that was engaging and could be directly used with minor adjustments.

What was the test case for evaluating the programming capabilities of the O1 models?

The test case involved creating an HTML game, which showcased the models' ability to generate code, with O1 mini performing particularly well in terms of speed and quality.

How does the script compare the response times of O1 mini, O1 preview, and GPT-4.0?

The script demonstrates that O1 mini is the fastest among the three, followed by GPT-4.0, with O1 preview taking the longest time to generate responses.

What complex topic was used to test the O1 models' capabilities in the script?

The complex topic used was addressing unemployment in India, where the models were tasked with suggesting government actions.

How does the script evaluate the O1 models' ability to handle real-life use cases?

The script evaluates the O1 models' ability to handle real-life use cases by testing them on questions related to reducing poverty and redefining poverty lines, noting that the models provided similar but well-thought-out answers.

What was the fun question asked to the models at the end of the script?

The fun question asked was, 'How many hours are there in a strawberry?', which was used to test the models' ability to handle nonsensical questions.

What is the overall conclusion about the O1 models based on the script?

The overall conclusion is that the O1 models, especially O1 mini, perform well in terms of simplicity, speed, and quality of responses, making them potentially more usable for general users.