17 - Critiquing Public Speakers
Summary
TLDRThis video script explores the intricacies of handling criticism, particularly in the context of public speaking. It emphasizes the importance of both giving and receiving constructive feedback, focusing on aspects like speech content, delivery, and organization. The discussion also touches on the impact of personal biases and the significance of evaluating speeches based on their merits rather than the speaker's characteristics. The script includes insights from Judy Pearson from Virginia Tech University and encourages viewers to embrace criticism as a tool for growth and improvement in communication skills.
Takeaways
- 🤔 Criticism can be challenging to accept, but it's essential for personal growth and learning.
- 👀 The focus of criticism is often on negatives, but it can also highlight positive aspects and provide constructive feedback.
- 🎤 When evaluating public speeches, consider aspects like organization, delivery, content, and ethical standards rather than personal characteristics.
- 📊 Studies show that gender can influence how speeches are evaluated, with females sometimes receiving higher scores and more lenient feedback.
- 👥 Personal biases can affect the way we critique speeches, so it's important to be aware of and try to set these aside for fair evaluation.
- 📝 Using an evaluation form can help structure critical analysis and keep the focus on relevant attributes of a speech.
- 👂 Listening and responding with understanding is crucial in communication, and constructive criticism can enhance this skill.
- 💡 Content is as important as delivery in a speech; a polished presenter can deliver lackluster content, and vice versa.
- 👨🏫 Students should not be intimidated to critique public speakers, even those with high profiles, using critical listening and thinking skills.
- 🔍 It's beneficial to look for balance in criticism, acknowledging both strengths and areas for improvement to foster continuous improvement.
Q & A
What is the main theme discussed in the script?
-The main theme discussed in the script is the importance of criticism, both positive and negative, in the context of public speaking and personal growth.
Who is Judy Pearson and what is her role in the discussion?
-Judy Pearson is from Virginia Tech University and she joins the discussion to talk about criticism in public speeches, including how to evaluate speeches and how to give and take constructive criticism.
What are some ways to evaluate a speech as mentioned in the script?
-The script suggests evaluating speeches by considering organization, delivery, content, and ethical standards. It also recommends using an evaluation form to keep focused on these attributes.
How does the script address the issue of personal biases affecting speech evaluation?
-The script highlights that personal biases, such as age, race, sex, or stature, can affect speech evaluation and emphasizes the importance of focusing on the speech's attributes rather than the speaker's personal characteristics.
What is the significance of the story about the daughter and the 11-year-old from Trenton?
-The story illustrates the value of learning from different experiences and people, suggesting that education and wisdom can come from unexpected sources, and it challenges the notion that formal education is the only path to learning.
Why is it important to separate the speaker from the speech when critiquing?
-Separating the speaker from the speech is important to ensure fair and objective evaluation. It allows critics to focus on the content, delivery, and structure of the speech rather than being influenced by personal characteristics of the speaker.
What does the script suggest about the impact of genetics on discrimination?
-The script discusses studies that show genetic discrimination is more common than people might think, with individuals being denied health insurance not because they are sick but due to their genetic predispositions or relationships to those who are sick.
How does the script recommend giving negative criticism?
-The script suggests giving negative criticism in a constructive and considerate manner, using a written critique form to express negative comments, being specific about the issues without attacking the person, and balancing negative comments with positive feedback.
What is the role of the audience in giving feedback as per the script?
-The audience plays a crucial role in providing feedback on speeches. Their critiques, whether positive or negative, help speakers improve and adapt their presentations, making them more effective communicators.
How does the script encourage speakers to handle criticism?
-The script encourages speakers to view criticism as a tool for improvement, to listen with an open mind, and to consider suggestions for improvement seriously. It also advises speakers to focus on behaviors that can be changed or improved rather than taking criticism personally.
Outlines
🗣️ Criticism in Public Speech
The paragraph discusses the challenges of accepting criticism, especially in public speaking. It highlights the speaker's personal experience with criticism from their critical mother and how it affected them. The focus then shifts to the importance of understanding that criticism can be both positive and negative. The paragraph introduces Judy Pearson from Virginia Tech University, who joins the conversation about evaluating speeches. It emphasizes the need to look beyond personal biases and to focus on the speech's content, delivery, and impact. The speaker also shares a personal anecdote about their daughter's learning experience, which serves as a metaphor for the value of criticism in personal growth.
📊 Gender Bias in Speech Evaluation
This paragraph delves into the issue of gender bias in speech evaluations. It presents findings from a study that showed females received higher scores for their speeches compared to males. However, the study also revealed a disparity in the type of criticism given; females were often told they were fine without needing improvement, while males were pushed to work harder. The paragraph underscores the importance of focusing on the quality of the speech rather than the speaker's personal characteristics. It also discusses the use of evaluation forms to ensure a fair and structured critique, emphasizing the need to consider various aspects such as organization, delivery, content, and ethical standards.
🎤 Overlooking Delivery Flaws in Famous Speakers
The speaker reflects on the experience of listening to famous individuals like Henry Kissinger, noting that even renowned figures can have delivery flaws that make their speeches less engaging. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of focusing on the content of a speech rather than just the speaker's delivery. It also touches on the idea that as listeners and critics, we should not be intimidated by a speaker's fame or position but should critically evaluate the speech on its merits. The speaker encourages students to question and critique even their own teachers, highlighting the importance of critical thinking in public speaking evaluation.
🔍 Embracing Criticism for Improvement
This paragraph discusses the value of embracing criticism to improve public speaking skills. It highlights the speaker's personal journey from being nervous about receiving criticism to valuing it as a tool for growth. The speaker shares how they became more comfortable with giving and receiving critique and the importance of focusing on the speech rather than the person when critiquing. The paragraph also touches on the idea that criticism should be given in a constructive manner, with suggestions for improvement, and how to handle both positive and negative feedback effectively.
📝 The Power of Written Criticism
The paragraph emphasizes the effectiveness of written criticism in helping speakers improve. It contrasts oral and written feedback, suggesting that written comments can be more thoughtful and less intimidating for the recipient. The speaker shares personal experiences where written critiques helped them become aware of unconscious behaviors during speeches and how they worked on improving those aspects. The paragraph also discusses the importance of being open to suggestions for improvement and using criticism as a means to enhance future speeches.
🌟 The Role of Criticism in Public Discourse
In this paragraph, the speaker discusses the broader implications of speech criticism in society. It argues that the ability to give and receive constructive criticism is crucial for a free and democratic society. The speaker encourages students to view criticism as a challenge to be met and mastered, rather than something to be feared. The paragraph concludes with a metaphor about Singapore being an 'island paradise' and the importance of evaluating such claims critically, highlighting the role of critical thinking in public discourse.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Criticism
💡Constructive Comments
💡Evaluation
💡Delivery
💡Content
💡Bias
💡Genetic Discrimination
💡Public Speaking
💡Prejudices
💡Ethical Standards
💡Adaptation
Highlights
Criticism can be both positive and negative, focusing not only on mistakes but also on good aspects.
The importance of evaluating public speeches and giving constructive comments.
Learning how to take criticism graciously is crucial for personal and professional growth.
Personal anecdotes can be powerful in speeches, as illustrated by the Princeton and Trenton story.
Criticism should be based on the speech's content and delivery, not the speaker's personal characteristics.
Gender differences in speech evaluation, with females receiving higher scores in a study.
The impact of genetic discrimination and its prevalence, as reported by Stanford and Harvard medical schools.
The necessity for adults to learn effective communication with younger generations.
The value of using an evaluation form to keep focused on the qualities of an effective speech.
The significance of speech content even when delivery is excellent, using a Rotary Club speech as an example.
How political speeches can have great content but suffer from poor delivery.
The challenge of critiquing famous or professional speakers and the importance of focusing on the speech, not the person.
The discomfort of giving and receiving criticism and strategies to manage it, such as focusing on the speech, not the person.
The benefits of written critiques for providing negative feedback in a less public and less humiliating manner.
The importance of being specific and constructive when giving criticism, avoiding personal evaluations.
How to respond to both positive and negative criticism, with a focus on improvement and self-awareness.
The role of practice and self-critique in addressing issues identified through criticism.
The significance of context in evaluating critiques and considering the majority opinion when multiple suggestions are made.
The final thoughts on speech criticism as a challenge to be met and mastered, contributing to a free society.
Transcripts
I think criticism is a very difficult
thing to take I have a difficult time
sometimes taking criticism
my mother was pretty critical when I was
a kid she was critical and she was
critical of my weaith and she was saying
I joked around too much I remembered
that I was always getting home too late
breathing I know that bothered I when we
think about criticism we usually focus
on the negative what we did wrong how
people will correct us but criticism can
be positive as well not only for what we
learn but for all the good things that
can be said today we're going to talk
about criticism of the public speech
we'll look at ways to evaluate a speech
show how to give constructive comments
and learn how to take criticism
graciously now joining me is Judy
Pearson from Virginia Tech University
we all make judgments about the speeches
we give and the speeches we hear we
might think we did terribly or feel we
were right on the mark we may like a
particular speaker's informal style of
delivery or be put off by the language
used or a choice of topic sometimes our
evaluations of others are based
proportionately more on the speaker then
on the speech itself watch and listen to
the following speeches and then rank
them in order of your preference my
daughter is a freshman at Princeton this
year and since I'm paying about $20,000
a year in portion and they only go to
school 21 weeks a year I think it's
about a thousand dollars a week she
could go to a spa but that's not very
interested in what she's getting out of
it but but I had a very very interesting
discussion with her she came home at
Christmas I said to her what is the most
important thing you learned at Princeton
Lionel
getting for my money and she said why I
didn't learn her Princeton
she said the most important thing I've
learned I learned in Trenton Trenton is
just a few miles down the road she said
I go to Trenton every afternoon and I
cancelled this a little 11-year old one
and she said mother I am terrible about
what this means
so Trenton is he's taught me 25 words
for getting beat up now this is a child
where if I walked in her room and say
Jaime clean your room she files a
complaint for childhood I mean the idea
of being physically beat up she can't
believe and then she went on and on and
on she said I've learned so much more
from him than he's ever going to learn
from me I can't believe it and I can get
on the bus and escape said he one's
gonna be so bad he shows up every day I
don't dare missin but I'm so troubled
that our country doesn't see it how we
gonna have Princeton and Trenton sitting
20 months apart in fact according to
last Friday's edition of the USA Today
genetic discrimination is more common
than you may think that article cited
the results of recent studies conducted
at the medical schools of both Stanford
and Harvard which documented hundreds of
such cases of discrimination in only
four categories of illness these people
were denied or lost their health
insurance coverage not because they were
sick but because they were related to
someone who was sick or because they
were asymptomatic gene carriers this
type of discrimination should not escape
our attention and scrutiny primarily
because Michael kabak a professor at the
University of California at San Diego
tells us everyone carries at least five
to ten genes that could possibly make us
sick under certain conditions and given
the fact that we have no control over
our genetic makeup we have the potential
even if we're healthy and insured right
now to fall victim to genetic
discrimination at any time in the future
we as adults have to learn how to talk
to you and listen and respond with
understanding
a lot of us adults have forgotten how to
do that we talk at you and not to you
you have a lot of things on your mind
that you want to share but sometime we
don't grant you the courtesy to listen
you're very intelligent these days and
haze believe me you can articulate
things very well you understand
hypocracy
when I tell you to say no to drugs and
I'm standing in front of you with a high
ball in one hand and a cigarette that
long in the other saying to you just say
no you're smart you understand you
emulate what you see be it at home or on
the streets and I commend you for that
so why did you rank them as you did what
did you like or dislike about them did
you focus more on the speeches or on the
speaker's try to avoid judging a speaker
on personal characteristics like age
race sex or stature it can be extremely
difficult to put our prejudices and
preferences aside but fair evaluators
must do just that you know how I didn't
study a few years ago looking at gender
differences in evaluation procedures and
evaluation behavior and I learned in
that study that females actually receive
higher scores and their speeches than
males that a woman is more likely to get
an A than a man is in a college
classroom yeah and that's kind of
strange why is that or what was the what
was the upside of that study well you
know at first it appeared to me that
this was a good thing that maybe women
were more competent I don't know what
the reason is but it does appear that
women get a better shake what was more
disturbing though is after I went
through and analyzed the data I looked
at a situation where the grades between
the woman and the man were held constant
for example both the male and female
speaker got a C grade to look at the
criticism or the content of the
criticism that the evaluators provided
and what I learned was that in the
female instance the female was told oh
don't worry about it
great but it's just fine you don't have
to worry about this at all there's
nothing you need to do to really improve
but we weren't expected to do better
that's exactly right they were told
essentially that they were fine and they
didn't have to improve at all but the
man who got a similar speech as C grade
on his speech was told that he had to
improve that he had to work harder that
this was something that was going to be
important for his career in his
livelihood and so he had to improve so
we had a very disparate situation then
between the male and the female in the
college classroom and it really is
something everybody needs to take into
consideration because you could probably
ask those people and they'd probably say
you know I don't distinguish between the
two genders exactly and yet we probably
all are guilty at the same behavior
instead of judging speakers on personal
characteristics evaluators should focus
on those attributes that contribute to a
good presentation like organization
delivery content and ethical standards
the Iowa Legislature has theirs for 150
years their interaction with Native
Americans has been minut and so we run
into a situation at the Iowa Legislature
of the legislature saying well this is
always the way this is the way it's
always been and we have the tribes in a
situation of saying we've got to empower
ourselves and key and the whole process
is this question of image one good way
to keep focused on these attributes is
to use an evaluation form in your
critical analysis there's an example of
one in the study guide an evaluation
form can keep you on track by reminding
you of the qualities of an effective
speech this not only makes criticism of
other speeches easier but the form can
help you better prepare your own
presentations most evaluation forms
include criteria like topic choice
purpose arguments organization vocal and
bodily aspects of delivery audience
analysis and adaptation although it's
very easy to focus on delivery and
evaluations because that's often the
most visual part of the presentation the
content of a speech is also extremely
important a speaker may be a Polish
presenter
but lack substance for example have I
heard a speech last week by a very
experienced consultant at a Rotary Club
she was there to speak on nonverbal
communication when I looked at the
delivery of her speech I couldn't fault
her on anything at all but when I
thought about the content there was a
great deal lacking the topic had the
possibility of being very interesting
for the audience but what happened was
that the material she delivered was all
old information that everybody knew as a
matter of fact I heard some of the
audience members as they were leaving
the speech saying things like well
nothing new there there's nothing
nothing that we learned today it's old
that the content was flawed even though
the delivery was excellent so a nice
speech but people were just switching
off because they really did yes and
conversely a speech may be beautifully
developed and structured but the
delivery is weak and I've seen some
examples of this Judy namely political
speeches when a lot of times there's a
lot of really good content a lot of
interesting issues that are being taken
very very seriously by people but the
delivery of the speaker is such that you
know maybe they're not an experienced
speaker whatever somebody who's going to
be a first-time person in politics and
and and they people tend to switch off
that way and some really good content
goes right by them every University
Community College has speaker series
they have people coming on campus to
give talks and if you went to every talk
that was given on a campus you would
find that a good many of them are
delivered by professional speakers or
very well-known or famous people who are
not particularly good speakers I
remember hearing Henry Kissinger give a
very long speech that seemed even longer
because the man has a decided accent
when he speaks he also never changes his
tone of voice and he's fine to listen to
on a news program where you're hearing
30 seconds of Henry Kissinger but
believe me an hour of Henry Kissinger is
somewhat torturous same thing can be
said for lots of others so as a good
listener or someone who's trying to be a
good citizen about public speaking you
sometimes have to overlook people's
delivery flaws or some of the other
things that they might do because all
these all these speakers are human
beings and they all have certain
frailties as far as being a public
speaker and so either even the famous or
what's more important what you say or
how you say it he was arrested for
planning demonstrations against American
involvement in Vietnam under the dreaded
I sa some 19 years into his detention
following intense international pressure
for his release the government tried to
justify his continued detention by
belatedly labeling him a communist you
can and should be critical of any speech
you hear don't be intimidated by the
position or fame of a speaker use your
critical listening and thinking skills
judge if the speech meets your
expectations one of the things that I've
discovered is when it comes to
critiquing public speakers students feel
inadequate they feel like they don't
have the expertise in order to do that
and as a result they will tend to accept
things as truth and as valid and as good
simply because of the credibility of the
person who did it I encourage my
students even with myself okay even with
me when you're examining me are you
listening to what I say you need to
constantly be asking yourself the tough
questions about what I'm saying don't
accept anything at face value always
look deeper okay because no one has all
the right answers no one knows
everything try not to let your own
biases enter into the evaluation these
biases result when you compare your own
skills and attributes with those of the
speaker and Judy any kind of bias of
course has the same result that is you
don't learn as much as you should yes
and the biases can be positive or
negative and still act the same way for
example if somebody has more education
more experience or a higher position
than you have you might assume that what
they're saying is accurate and give them
a positive kind of evaluation that's not
fair on the other hand if somebody
belongs to a different political party
than you do or they have less of some of
these qualities you might assume that
they are are less than they actually are
and in either case you're doing the
person a disservice yes you are
now evaluated student speeches may make
you very uncomfortable you might think
that you're unqualified to give an
opinion after all you're in training -
of course you're not an expert but you
can describe what you saw heard and felt
that's valuable feedback for a speaker
[Music]
i've value criticism I value that
because I know that I can improve you
can always improve every stage of your
life you are always improving so yes I
want that criticism I want to to come
across as a credible person and if I
don't have their criticism coming back
to me I won't ever know if it was good
or not at first you know I didn't think
I really wanted to offer criticism to
other students because I thought well
Who am I to be criticizing other
students you know when I'm here trying
to learn how to public speak and but I
but I've been again I wanted others to
give me criticism because I wanted to
know was I doing okay is there some
things I could change so you just kind
of have to put yourself you know out
there and have people give you criticism
and accept that and understand that
they're just trying to help you give a
better speech I love to hear critical
feedback from my audience I love to be
critiqued it does not embarrass me it
helps to improve my future speeches I
really that is a key essential and my
first night of class I told everyone I
was kind of blent about it I said please
tell me what I'm doing wrong I want to
know what I'm doing wrong so I can
improve and I can go on and give better
speeches
actually the bad comments probably I
value the most because it gives me areas
that I know that I need to work on and
improve that's something that someone in
the audience can pick out and says you
know I really had a problem with this
well if I can make the next time I give
a speech if I can make that person more
comfortable with that
I'm at least getting my point across to
that person there's one particular
gentleman in the class that every time
he got up in front of the class it was
like he had a terribly dry mouth and he
licked his lips and constantly smacked
his lips together and it absolutely
drove me crazy and I know that I should
have said something but I didn't and as
a listener and a critique I should have
said something so he would be aware of
this and it would help him out in the
future I think after a certain point I
felt better about getting criticism from
others actually it was easier I think
I'm my part to receive criticism than it
was to give criticism to others I
probably everyone thinks that way but it
but after a while it became easier I
encourage my students that when they are
critiquing each other they're not
critiquing the person they're critiquing
the speech that's very different
now you can critique delivery you can
critique the speech itself okay their
words the organization etc that's not
saying that something is wrong with that
person as we said before criticism can
be both negative and positive many of us
have been socialized to be modest and
have never learned how to take
compliments with ease and grace for
example hub I've heard from a lot of our
viewers of this particular series that
they really find you an attractive host
for this program they complement
everything from your light green eyes
and are curious about whether you've
contacts or not to talking about your
vocal characteristics and your you know
your general journalistic kind of
broadcast your voice all those kinds of
things now imagine if you will that one
of those viewers is sitting here right
now with you today and they make some of
those comments how would you respond to
that it was easy to get a little bashful
and stuff like that about something like
that but you just have to say thank you
and move on
you know you've got a you got a job to
do you gotta keep going yes and they
aren't contacts that's they are
non-contact that's right when someone
compliments you on your speech a simple
thank you is an appropriate reply then
filed a comment away with others to call
upon the next time you're asked to make
a presentation you'll want to do the
same good thing again
you know flattered you can be
embarrassing suggestions for improvement
are even more difficult to swallow it's
easy to get on the defensive especially
if you've worked hard in a speech or if
the subject is an intensely personal one
that's why I ask my students not to put
their negative comments that they have
about another speaker in an oral format
but rather to write it down to use a
written critique form to express those
negative kinds of comments that way it's
not so public and not so humiliating for
the speaker who may have made several
errors and doesn't necessarily want to
be told about it in that situation I
think it's real important to be positive
in a classroom situation that I have
it's a project that a person is working
on it's not a speech so they're not like
right out in the front but we do have a
session where we do some oral comments
and we try to accentuate the positive
things what's good about this what can
we talk about this really good and if
there are some things that that are
maybe not completely 100% positive you
know we talk about those in very open
very broad terms not very personal not
very pointed and and maybe some of the
other comments are made a little bit
later in a written form yes and because
it's a project rather than a speech that
probably is appropriate in that
situation if you're the giver of
negative criticism always word your
remarks in the kindest possible way
don't apologize for your opinions but be
considerate of the feelings of others
you don't necessarily have to tread on
eggshells but on the other hand you do
need to recognize that what you say is
going to have a powerful impact on who
they are the language that is used in
critiques is very important because if
you say well that was a stupid way of
doing it then you are evaluating that
person not the speech now if you want to
say that there was a problem with the
way someone did something be very
specific say when you were tapping your
fingers on the podium that became a
distraction to
your speech so I missed some of what you
were saying that doesn't mean that it
was stupid it just you know it's it lays
out the behavior and the results of it
rather than adding that evaluative
dimension which says you know it was
stupid it was bad it was wrong
feedback always helps you know when they
when they tell you the positive things
that you do I mean I think there needs
to be a balance between negative and
positive things that you do here's a bad
thing but this is something you did
really good and that way you know it
doesn't feel like you've just been torn
apart by by your class my first class
that I provided criticism it was orally
where I was asked to provide first a
positive comment and then some
suggestions for improvement to the
student and the fact that I started out
with a positive comment really helped
because then I could see the person
beaming and sometimes I think then they
didn't it didn't hurt as much that I was
saying and your foot tapped a bit turned
this beach or whatever the the problem
was so I became more comfortable with
that but the the way that I'm probably
most comfortable with giving criticism
would be in a written form and later on
in my speech communication classes that
is the form that we took so that the
individual giving the speech would walk
away maybe with five forms with maybe
you know 10 or 15 sentences in total
that they could look at and really learn
from and if it hurts too much to look at
right away I know they went back to them
and looked at them later because I did
when people provided the written
comments as a speaker you have to
understand that when you're getting
constructive criticism it's just that
it's designed to help you if you look at
it at that as that then you can take
from that okay what can I do what
behavior can I engage in to alleviate
this criticism the next time for me I
often find my students tell me I talk
very fast okay I know that I talk very
fast so as a speaker I have to say okay
I need to be aware of the rate that I'm
speaking so I need to begin to slow down
maybe that means that I need to take
particular care and our ticket
relating my words and in doing that that
will automatically slow down my speech
okay so as a speaker take your criticism
and if people are focusing on behaviors
figure out what you can do with that
behavior or how you can stop that
behavior in order to improve your
speaking the first night of class I was
very nervous and I was very fidgety when
I got up in front of the audience and
through practice and throughout the
course of the semester and so forth I
was able to see what I was doing wrong
and I was critiqued by my audiences and
especially the teacher and so I was
aware of what I was doing because at the
beginning I was not aware I didn't know
that I was rocking back and forth and
swaying from side to side and after
listening to my fellow students and my
teacher I became aware of this and
through my practice I was able to see
that I was doing it even at home when I
was practicing I would catch myself and
so I would start over again and I would
in the back of my mind that was always
there to make sure I knew how I was
standing and that I wasn't moving around
and with the use of my note cards that
helped me a little I think the best way
to receive criticism from others was not
in a threatening way but in a way that
they suggested Roger this is what you
were doing maybe next time you could try
this and that always felt good because
it didn't only come with with criticism
but it came with an idea that I could
use on my next speech something that a
way to improve then not just you know
you really need to stop standing there
and moving around like you are and so
that helped a lot one of the things that
the instructor called to my attention
and I wasn't aware of it at all is that
when I was standing and we weren't using
a podium at this particular time but it
was a table and I had my notes lying on
the table in front of me since I where
trifocals once you get something into
focus you don't want to move
and so he said that you know maybe if
you looked a little more relaxed and
moved around he said you're standing
pressed right up against the table and
it it looks awkward or uncomfortable and
I said well the reason for it was and he
said well now that I know there's a
reason but maybe you might still want to
you know work on a different technique
that doesn't look quite so stifling or
something that a student who anytime he
spoke he would be so nervous that he
would scratch I mean he would just get
itchy all over
he was just scratch and scratch and
scratch rather than simply telling him
you need to stop scratching I would say
why don't you try just holding your
hands down in front of you by holding
your hands you're preventing them from
scratching he did not have gestures but
he was not scratching and I mean to the
point where it made other people
uncomfortable even if I talked about it
you know I get itchy but you know by
doing that by holding his hands he was
able to stop engaging in a very
distracting behavior in his delivery
so take the criticism look at the
behavior that is being criticized figure
out what you can do in order to
alleviate that criticism or stop that
behavior or remedy that behavior or if
it's not engaging in gesture to figure
out how you can begin to feel more
comfortable using gestures you know so
the key is focusing on okay
this has been identified as a problem
what can I do to fix it when people tell
me what is wrong in a speech that I give
and how to fix it I appreciate that
because I feel that there's little point
and just continuing to give speeches if
you're never going to improve that you
should constantly improve so I do
appreciate and value that criticism but
I really value most of all suggestions
for improvement because oftentimes if I
made the mistake I may not realize that
there's a problem with it and therefore
if I don't know it's a problem I won't
know how to correct it generally so
their point of view really brings more
life to to the way that I change my
speeches in the future than if i just
depended on my own criticism of my work
when your speech received suggests
for improvement take them in the helpful
spirit in which they're intended and you
may not agree but you should always
listen with an open mind after all this
is your audience speaking to you if they
miss read your intent or didn't follow
your arguments or thought you were
serious when you were joking you'll need
to make some changes in order to
communicate more effectively next time
all critiques should be judged in
context if only one audience member
suggests a modification in your delivery
you might overlook it if it's echoed by
several others you should seriously
consider making a change for example
imagine that one person evaluating your
speech talked about the
inappropriateness of your language they
suggested it was too complicated too
complex they didn't understand it it
went over their head but maybe several
others in the audience took your
language as something to be especially
complimentary of they talked about how
it was appropriate it was expressive and
they understood exactly what your
content was just because of the language
choices you made in that instance what I
would do is disregard the comments have
one person in order to look at the
majority of comments that really
suggested the language was exactly
appropriate for that particular topic
your ability to give constructive
criticism and take it will greatly
enhance your contributions to this
public speaking course in the world
outside of the classroom critical
evaluations of the speeches of others
are integral to a free society your
usefulness in that society will be
measured by your ability to think for
yourself and to express your opinions in
a constructive way now speech criticism
is not something to be feared it really
is a challenge to be met and mastered we
are oftentimes regaled with the official
vernacular that Singapore is an island
paradise there is an old adage which
says the proof of the pudding lies in
the eating the number of emigrations by
native bon Singaporeans fleeing Li Kuan
Yew's island paradise is quite
phenomenal given the size of the
population as we all know emigration is
a major
matic experience in anyone's life
تصفح المزيد من مقاطع الفيديو ذات الصلة
What are Communication Skills? | Importance, Types and Ways to Improve it
Motivation Monday - How do you handle negative reviews?
5 LIFE CHANGING short films 🥲 YOU WILL NEVER FORGET ❤️
Berbicara Lancar dan Public Speaking
Create a Culture of Feedback
"Words don't come to mind while speaking English, I go blank" - my tips to solve this problem
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)