Why US elections only give you two choices
Summary
TLDRThe video script discusses the limitations of the two-party system in the US and the winner-takes-all election system, which often results in unrepresentative outcomes. It highlights the lack of diversity in Congress due to this system and contrasts it with proportional representation systems used in other democracies, such as Germany. The script explores different types of proportional representation, including closed and open list systems, mixed-member proportional, and ranked choice voting, which could potentially lead to a more representative and less polarized Congress. It suggests that changing the electoral system to multi-winner elections could open up more coalition possibilities and improve democracy in the US.
Takeaways
- 🏆 The US electoral system often results in a winner-takes-all outcome, which can lead to unrepresentative outcomes.
- 🤔 Many Americans are dissatisfied with the two-party system and desire more political options.
- 🚫 Voting for third-party candidates in the current system can inadvertently support the party you least agree with, as it's often seen as a protest vote.
- 🔍 The New England region, despite having a significant Republican vote, does not have any Republican Representatives in Congress due to the winner-takes-all system.
- 📊 Proportional representation systems, used in many democracies, allocate seats in parliaments based on the percentage of votes a party receives.
- 📝 There are various types of proportional representation, including closed list, open list, mixed-member proportional, and ranked choice voting.
- 🌐 Germany's Free Democratic Party, despite not winning any single constituencies, secured a significant number of seats due to proportional representation.
- 📈 Ranked choice voting encourages support for smaller parties by using secondary preferences if the first choice is not viable.
- 🔄 Changing to multi-winner elections could make Congress more representative and potentially reduce polarization.
- 📚 Federal law currently limits each Congressional district to electing only one Representative, which would need to change for a more proportional system.
- 🌟 Experimenting with different forms of proportional representation at state and local levels could lead to a stronger democracy in the United States.
Q & A
What is the main issue with the current two-party system in the US?
-The main issue is that despite a significant portion of the population not wanting the two-party system, the 'winner takes all' election system often leads to a lack of representation for third parties, resulting in a less diverse and polarized political landscape.
How does the 'winner takes all' system affect third-party representation in Congress?
-In the 'winner takes all' system, even if a third party receives a significant percentage of the vote, it may still not win any seats in Congress, as the candidate with the most votes in each district wins, which typically favors the two major parties.
What is an example of how the current system fails to represent the political views of a region?
-In New England, despite 36% of voters supporting Republicans in the 2022 Congressional elections, none of the region's 21 Representatives are Republicans, indicating that the perspectives of New England Republicans are not reflected in Congress.
How does the German electoral system differ from the US system?
-Germany uses a form of proportional representation, where the share of votes a party receives translates into a similar share of seats in parliament, allowing for better representation of smaller parties and a more diverse political landscape.
What are the four common types of proportional representation mentioned in the script?
-The four common types are closed list, open list, mixed-member proportional, and ranked choice voting. Each system has a different method for translating votes into seats, with varying levels of direct candidate selection by the voter.
How does ranked choice voting encourage voting for smaller parties?
-Ranked choice voting allows voters to rank multiple candidates, which means that if their first choice is not winning, their vote can still count towards their second or third choice, potentially benefiting smaller parties and less established candidates.
What is the key to making the US Congress more representative and less polarized?
-The key is to transition from single-winner elections to multi-winner elections, either by creating larger districts that elect multiple representatives or by expanding the size of Congress to allow more representatives per district.
What is the current federal law regarding the number of Representatives a district can elect?
-Federal law states that no Congressional district can elect more than one Representative, which would need to be changed to implement multi-winner elections.
States and cities have the autonomy to choose how their legislatures and city councils are elected. They can experiment with different forms of proportional representation, which may have lower hurdles to implementation compared to changing federal laws.
-null
What is the significance of updating the US electoral system?
-Updating the electoral system could lead to a more representative democracy, allowing for a wider range of political views to be heard and potentially opening up more coalitional possibilities for lawmaking.
Outlines
🗳️ The Flawed Two-Party System
This paragraph discusses the limitations of the two-party system in the United States, highlighting the lack of representation for third parties and the consequences of 'winner-take-all' elections. It points out that a significant portion of the population is dissatisfied with the two major parties and desires more options. The script uses the example of New England's lack of Republican representation in Congress despite a significant number of Republican votes to illustrate the issue. It also compares the US system with Germany's proportional representation, where a party like the Free Democratic Party can win seats in parliament without winning any constituencies, showcasing a more inclusive political landscape.
📊 Proportional Representation Systems
The paragraph explores various proportional representation systems used around the world, such as closed list, open list, mixed-member proportional, and ranked choice voting. It explains how these systems work and their benefits in ensuring that the distribution of power in a legislature is proportional to the votes cast. The script emphasizes that while these systems can encourage voting for smaller parties, they still face challenges in single-winner elections. It suggests that making Congress more representative could change the partisan dynamic and open up more coalition possibilities for lawmaking. The paragraph concludes by discussing potential ways to implement these systems in the US, such as through multi-winner elections or expanding the size of Congress, and the need for federal law changes to allow for these reforms.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Two-party system
💡Winner-takes-all
💡Proportional representation
💡Closed list
💡Open list
💡Mixed-member proportional
💡Ranked choice voting
💡Multi-winner elections
💡Gerrymandering
💡Legislative representation
💡Democratic dynamics
Highlights
The US election system often results in a two-party choice, despite the public's desire for more options.
Voting for a third party in the US is often seen as a protest vote, as it helps the party you least agree with.
In New England, despite 36% of voters supporting Republicans, none of the 21 Representatives are Republican due to the 'winner takes all' system.
Oklahoma votes one-third Democratic but has no Democratic Representatives, illustrating the flaws in the current election system.
In a hypothetical scenario with a popular third party, that party would still earn zero seats in Congress under the current system.
Proportional representation systems, like those in Germany, allow for a more equitable distribution of seats based on vote shares.
There are four common types of proportional representation: closed list, open list, mixed-member proportional, and ranked choice voting.
In a closed list system, voters choose a party, not a candidate, and party lists determine the representatives.
Open list systems allow voters to choose candidates, with seats going to the most voted individuals within each party.
Mixed-member proportional systems, like Germany's, involve casting two votes: one for a candidate and one for a party.
Ranked choice voting encourages voting for smaller parties by using multiple candidate rankings and a threshold for victory.
Proportional representation systems distribute power more fairly than 'winner takes all' systems.
To make Congress more representative, single-winner elections could be replaced with multi-winner elections.
Changing federal law would allow for the expansion of proportional representation in US elections.
State and local elections offer opportunities for experimenting with different proportional representation systems.
Updating the US election system could lead to more effective and community-focused representation in Congress.
The simplicity of the current rule hides many problems in the US democratic system.
Viewer contributions are crucial for the production of educational content, such as a tutorial on Vox's document animation technique.
Transcripts
The person who gets the most votes wins.
Let's talk about this.
In the US,
we basically have two choices in elections.
And... listen.
It's not going amazing.
“Government shutdown”
“Split Congress”
“Great divide”
“Cannot agree”
“Too polarized”
“Big majorities don't want either one of them running.”
Big majorities of us actually don't want the two-party system at all.
We want more options.
But a lot of the time,
we actually do have more options.
It's just that, when it comes time to vote for them,
we mostly don't.
We kind of can't.
In our system, voting for a third party
helps the party you least agree with.
It's just a protest vote.
But there's a way
we could make it more than that.
We just need to take a closer look at this.
New England.
The northeastern region of the US.
About 15 million people live here.
These six states send 21 Representatives to Congress.
And in the 2022 Congressional elections,
36% of voters here voted for Republicans.
But none of this region's 21 Representatives are Republicans.
It means that the perspective of the New England Republicans,
who have historically been fiscally conservative
and more socially progressive, is not reflected in Congress.
This is because of the way we elect Representatives to Congress,
where every Representative comes from a different district,
each district holds its own election,
and in each election,
the person who gets the most votes wins.
These are “winner take all” elections.
And they produce this result all over the country.
Take the state of Oklahoma.
Oklahoma has five Congressional districts.
It votes one third Democratic.
It has no Democratic Representatives.
And before we start blaming gerrymandering for this,
in other words, the shape of these districts,
in Massachusetts, which I admit does look kind of gerrymandered,
a group of independent mapmakers looked at this situation.
And they tried to draw new district maps
that would give Republicans some representation here.
But they found that, “though there are more ways of building
a districting plan than particles in the galaxy,
every single one would produce a 9-0 Democratic delegation.”
And now imagine if,
in every single House race, there was also a really popular
third party, getting 25% of the vote,
in every district in the country.
That party would earn...
zero seats in Congress.
If you ask yourself, why haven't you voted for a third party,
most of the time it’s, well, they don't really have a chance.
Our system, by its very nature, precludes political competition.
But most democracies
don't actually work this way.
In 2021,
a German center-right party called the Free Democratic Party
won about 90 seats in Germany's parliament.
German federal elections have about 300 constituencies
that work sort of like America's districts,
with each one electing a single representative.
And out of every one of those races,
the Free Democratic Party
did not win a single one.
But Germany uses a form of what is called
“proportional representation.”
Proportional representation means that a share of votes
gets you a share of seats.
These are four common types of proportional representation,
and one way to understand each of them is,
are you voting for a person, or are you voting for a party?
So at one end of that spectrum,
in a “closed list” system, like they use in Spain, for example,
you might not even vote for a candidate.
You’d just vote for a party.
Each party wins some percentage of the vote,
and those percentages each translate into a certain number of seats.
The people who fill those seats come off of each party's “list.”
So voters don't get to choose those candidates.
That's the “closed” part.
But there are also “open list” systems
which are maybe the most common, used in places like Finland,
Belgium, Denmark.
A standard version of this is, you vote for a person,
and your vote counts towards a larger party total
sort of like we saw before,
determining how many seats each party gets.
But in open list, you do choose the candidates.
The seats go to the people in each party who got the most votes.
Germany uses a system called “mixed-member proportional.”
Mixed, because in their system you cast two votes:
for a person, and for a party.
Each district elects one person,
and those people fill some of the seats in Parliament.
But the rest of the seats are filled by looking at the party vote,
and then doling the remaining seats out to the parties,
until the end product is proportional to the party vote.
And the last one we'll look at
is the one that Ireland uses to elect its legislature.
And this is actually a version of something
we're already starting to do
in some congressional and local races in the US.
“Ranked choice”
“ranked choice”
“ranked choice voting.”
In ranked choice voting, instead of just voting for one person,
you rank multiple candidates.
It's a system that encourages you to vote for smaller parties
and less established candidates,
because if your first choice is unpopular,
they use your second choice vote.
And that process repeats itself, until a certain threshold is reached.
On its own, though,
ranked choice voting doesn't necessarily
make these smaller candidates that much more likely to actually win.
They will be at a disadvantage in any election that only one person can win.
But: if you lower the threshold of victory in a ranked choice race,
that produces multiple winners,
more proportional to the vote.
All of these systems have different formulas
for turning votes into representation.
What they have in common is, they all distribute power proportionally,
instead of just relying on this.
Now, you'll notice we’ve spent the last few minutes
talking about Congress, and parliaments: legislatures.
Presidential elections
can definitely be made more fair, that is another video.
But they will always, by definition, be single-winner elections,
most likely to be won by the more established parties.
But if Congress is more representative and less polarized,
it could change the whole partisan dynamic around the presidency.
Right now, if the president wants to pass a law,
he or she, with rare exceptions, needs
both Democrats and Republican Party support.
But if there were three, or four, or five parties in Congress,
that would open up far more coalitional possibilities
and combinations to pass laws.
The key to making this happen will be taking these
single-winner elections that we use to elect Congress,
and replacing them with multi-winner elections that pick, say,
3 to 5 people to represent a district.
For example, Oklahoma, now five congressional districts,
could act as a single district,
holding an election that five people can win.
It would still mostly be represented by Republicans,
just not exclusively.
Another option is that we could keep many of our current districts,
and just make Congress bigger:
so, use each district to elect more Representatives.
But okay.
How do we actually do any of this?
Federal law currently says that no Congressional district
can elect more than one Representative.
So to make Congress more representative,
that is what will need to change.
But that change needs to be made by... Congress.
When the country is struggling to even agree on small things,
it can feel really unthinkable.
But then there are plenty of indicators that being a member of Congress
is pretty miserable these days.
Changing the system would let members
focus on the reasons they ran for Congress in the first place:
serving their community, making sure they get things done.
But there are other ways to change things too.
The states each choose how their own state legislatures get elected.
Cities choose how their city councils get elected.
And the hurdles to changing those are much, much lower.
The more experiments we can try,
the more different forms of proportional representation
we can implement in the United States,
I think the better, ultimately, our democracy will be.
This rule feels really simple.
But that simplicity,
it hides a lot of problems.
We are one of the oldest, if not the oldest, democracy in the world, right?
All these different other democracies, most of the world's democracies,
are using a system that's better.
We just need to update our system.
Thanks for watching.
One really important way that we're able to continue making videos
is viewer contributions:
support from people who like what we do
and want to help us keep doing it.
This month we've put together a video
that will actually only be available to contributors.
It's a tutorial video about how to do something very specific:
the way that we animate highlights on documents in our videos.
There are actually a couple of videos out there already
that attempt to explain how Vox animates highlights on documents,
but they don't always get it quite right,
so our art director just went ahead and made the definitive guide.
If you have always wondered about that,
or if you just want to support us,
you can go to vox.com/give-now,
and we will share that video with you later this month.
Thank you again, for watching, and to so many of you for supporting us.
استعرض المزيد من الفيديوهات ذات الصلة
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/f6bD6hhkyhA/hq720.jpg)
iOS vs Android... cual es mas seguro?
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/UmaWDpg4fMU/hq720.jpg)
What is Ripple? (XRP, IOUs, Gateway and Validators Explained)
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MUW76q_IOU8/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCJADEOABSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLC3ha8dIBc9WsYfq4dXFwo3VV86-A)
Electoral Reforms in Pakistan | Updates | Pakistani Politics
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/a-K2C3sf1_Q/hq720.jpg)
The Problem With UUIDs
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PQhLfBLp19M/hq720.jpg)
이재명 대표 겨냥, 이낙연 최악 망언 터졌다, 박살낸 손고모 대반격 "일찍부터 안에서 암약했던 적군" (뉴탐사 총선 시뮬레이션떴다, MBC 여론조사 적용, 민주당 191~205석)
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/0DdJVUI5U5A/hq720.jpg)
A revolução de independência dos EUA | Nerdologia
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)