BOMBSHELL: Trump hit with NEW INDICTMENT

Summary

In the latest 'Legal Breakdown', it's revealed that Donald Trump faces a superseding indictment in his DC case, maintaining the original four felony charges despite the Supreme Court's presidential immunity ruling. Prosecutor Jack Smith has meticulously revised the indictment to exclude any evidence that might contravene the new immunity standards, presenting a stronger case that could lead to a trial. The development is seen as a significant step towards holding Trump accountable for his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results.

Takeaways

• 📜 Donald Trump has been hit with a superseding indictment in his DC case, which includes the same four criminal charges from the initial indictment.
• 🚨 The charges stem from Trump's alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.
• 🛡 In response to the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity, the new indictment has been carefully curated to exclude any evidence that could be seen as violating the ruling.
• 🔍 Prosecutor Jack Smith and his team have conducted a line-by-line comparison of the original 45-page indictment to ensure compliance with the Supreme Court's decision.
• 🗂️ The new indictment is 36 pages long, with some evidence removed to respect the Supreme Court's ruling on immunity.
• 📉 Removed evidence includes discussions Trump had with Department of Justice officials and a tweet from the Oval Office, which were considered as potentially within presidential duties.
• 📈 Despite the removal of certain evidence, the four felony charges against Trump have been maintained as sound and prosecutable.
• 🏛 The case will now proceed to be litigated before Judge Chuin, who will determine if the new indictment meets the Supreme Court's standards.
• 🔄 The process may eventually go back to the DC federal circuit court of appeals and possibly to the Supreme Court again.
• 🎯 The use of a new grand jury for the superseding indictment is a strategic move to ensure the case is not tainted by previous evidence that could be seen as inadmissible.
• 📆 The timeline for the case may be extended slightly due to the new indictment, but the overall scheduling track is expected to remain the same.

Q & A

What is the significance of the superseding indictment against Donald Trump?

The superseding indictment is significant because it maintains the same four felony charges against Donald Trump, despite the recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity. It shows that the prosecution believes they have enough evidence to proceed with the trial.

How did the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity affect the indictment?

The Supreme Court's ruling led the prosecution to review the original indictment and remove any evidence or information that could be seen as violating the court's decision on presidential immunity. This resulted in a pared-down indictment of 36 pages, compared to the original 45.

What was the original length of the indictment against Donald Trump, and how did it change after the Supreme Court's ruling?

The original indictment was 45 pages long. After the Supreme Court's ruling, the prosecution revised it to 36 pages, removing evidence that could be considered as violating presidential immunity.

What was an example of evidence removed from the indictment due to the Supreme Court's ruling?

An example of evidence removed includes conversations Donald Trump had with Department of Justice officials, attempting to influence them to support his claims of election fraud, as the Supreme Court ruled that a president's core constitutional functions involve communication with the attorney general and Department of Justice officials.

Why was a new grand jury involved in the superseding indictment?

A new grand jury was involved to ensure that the indictment was untainted by any evidence that the Supreme Court had deemed inadmissible. This prevents any potential legal challenges based on the grand jury having been exposed to inadmissible evidence.

What is the role of Judge Chuin in the ongoing case against Donald Trump?

Judge Chuin is the presiding judge in the DC case against Donald Trump. She will review the new indictment and decide whether the charges and evidence presented by the prosecution meet the Supreme Court's standards on presidential immunity.

What is the current status of the case after the superseding indictment?

The case is expected to proceed with the current schedule, with the next step being a hearing where Judge Chuin will decide on the admissibility of the charges and evidence. The prosecution has already suggested that Donald Trump does not need to be physically present for his arraignment on the new indictment.

How does the press release from Jack Smith's spokesperson reflect the approach taken by the prosecution?

The press release is brief and to the point, indicating that the new indictment respects and implements the Supreme Court's holdings and remand instructions. It shows the prosecution's commitment to proceeding with the case in a manner that is legally sound and ethical.

What is the potential impact of the superseding indictment on the timeline of the case?

The superseding indictment may cause a slight delay as the new information needs to be processed, and Donald Trump will have to be arraigned on the new charges. However, the prosecution does not expect a significant extension of the timeline, and the case is likely to remain on a similar scheduling track.

What are the implications of the prosecution's decision not to insist on Donald Trump's physical presence for arraignment?

The decision not to insist on Donald Trump's physical presence for arraignment shows the prosecution's confidence in the strength of the charges and their willingness to proceed without additional procedural complications, which could further streamline the legal process.