The MOST powerful smartphone! A17 Pro vs 8 Gen 3 vs Dimensity 9300 vs Exynos 2400 vs Tensor!
Summary
TLDRThis video offers a comprehensive chipset comparison featuring the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Apple's A17 Pro, Samsung's Exynos 2400, and Google's Tensor 3. It tests their performance in tasks like Adobe Lightroom photo editing, video rendering in Adobe Rush, and gaming, with a focus on speed, temperature, and battery usage. The A17 Pro excels in rendering, while the Dimensity 9300 shows strength in video editing and Geekbench scores. The video also includes a Geekbench ML and GFX Bench assessment, revealing the A17 Pro's machine learning prowess and varying graphic performance across chipsets.
Takeaways
- 😀 The video compares the performance of the Snapdragon 8 gen 3, MediaTek Dimensity 9300, Apple's A17 Pro, Samsung's Exynos 2400, and Google's Tensor 3 chipsets.
- 🔋 All devices tested were charged to 100% and set to the same brightness level for a fair comparison.
- 🏁 The Snapdragon 8 gen 3 was the fastest in applying presets to 100 photos in Adobe Lightroom, followed closely by Exynos and Dimensity.
- 🌡️ The A17 Pro completed the render task in Adobe Lightroom the quickest, with 3 minutes and 45 seconds, while Tensor 3 took the longest at over 10 minutes.
- 📹 In Adobe Rush, Exynos experienced app crashes, and A17 Pro finished the video editing task first, with Dimensity in second place.
- 🎮 During gaming tests with Bloons TD6, the A17 Pro showed the least frame rate drop, while Snapdragon 8 gen 3 had the most significant drop.
- 📊 Geekbench tests revealed that A17 Pro had the highest single-core score, and in multi-core tests, A17 Pro led closely followed by Dimensity.
- 🤖 Geekbench ML, which measures machine learning performance, saw A17 Pro achieve the highest score, with Dimensity in second place.
- 📊 3D Mark's stress test showed Snapdragon with the best and worst loop scores, indicating consistent performance.
- 🏆 In GFX Bench tests, Dimensity won the first test, while Tensor 3 surprisingly won the second and third tests, with A17 Pro winning the last round.
- 🔋 A17 Pro had the best battery performance, ending with 78% battery left, whereas the Galaxy S24 Plus had the least remaining battery at 66%.
Q & A
Which chipset won the competition in applying presets to 50 JPEG and 50 raw files in Adobe Lightroom?
-The Snapdragon 8 gen 3 won with 20 seconds, followed closely by the Samsung Exynos with just 1 second more.
What was the performance of Apple's A17 Pro in the Lightroom rendering task?
-The A17 Pro completed the task first in just 3 minutes and 45 seconds.
How did the Google Tensor 3 perform in the Adobe Rush video editing test?
-The Google Tensor 3 took over an hour to render the video, which was unusually long and possibly due to the latest update from Google.
What issue did the Samsung Exynos chipset encounter during the test with Adobe Rush?
-The Samsung Exynos chipset experienced an app crash, leaving the test unfinished.
In the Kind Master video editing test, which chipset rendered the video the fastest?
-The MediaTek Dimensity rendered the video in just 15 seconds, making it the fastest in this test.
What was the outcome of the Microsoft Excel test with 60,000 lines?
-All the phones managed to complete the task quickly, with the A17 Pro being the fastest at 6 seconds, followed by Snapdragon and MediaTek at 10 seconds, Exynos at 11 seconds, and Tensor at 13 seconds.
In the Bloons TD6 game test, how did the frame rates drop on the smartphones when thousands of units were sent at once?
-The A17 Pro dropped to under 37 frames per second, Dimensity to under 19, Exynos also to under 18, and the Snapdragon 8 gen 3 to under 11.
What is the purpose of the Geekbench test mentioned in the script?
-Geekbench tests the functionality of devices along with benchmarking the CPU by modeling real-world usage, providing single core and multi-core scores separately.
How did the chipsets perform in the Geekbench ML test, which measures machine learning performance?
-The A17 Pro achieved the highest score, almost 6,000 points, with the Dimensity taking the second place and Tensor getting the bronze medal.
In the GFX Bench test, which chipset won the Aztec Ruins test and why is it significant?
-The MediaTek Dimensity won the Aztec Ruins test, indicating its strong performance in handling next-gen graphic features.
Which chipset had the best battery performance after all the tests, and which one drained the most?
-The A17 Pro had the best battery performance with 78% left, while the Galaxy S24 Plus drained the most with only 66% left.
Outlines
此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。
立即升级Mindmap
此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。
立即升级Keywords
此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。
立即升级Highlights
此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。
立即升级Transcripts
此内容仅限付费用户访问。 请升级后访问。
立即升级浏览更多相关视频
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ Review : The King Of Benchmarks
SMARTPHONE CHIPSETS NA DAPAT IWASAN SA 2024 AT 2025!
Best Phones to Buy in January 2024 | ഉടൻ വരുന്ന ഫോണുകൾ (Malayalam)
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra - Speed Test (WOW)
Speed & Performance Test: Samsung A05 vs. A15 vs. A25 Comparison!
Xiaomi 14T Pro full review
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)