حسن خريشة: لا يمكن تبرير خطوة عباس وهي شكل من أشكال الرضوخ لضغوط الاحتلال وعدم الالتزام برغبة الشعب

Summary

Dr. Hassan Khreisheh, Deputy Speaker of the Palestinian Legislative Council, criticizes the recent decision to withhold financial support from the families of martyrs and prisoners, calling it part of a broader trend of diminishing the rights of Palestinian prisoners. He argues that this decision is a result of yielding to external pressures, particularly from the US and Israel, and undermines Palestinian dignity. Dr. Khreisheh emphasizes that prisoners and martyrs should be honored, not equated with those in need. He calls for a reversal of the decision, stressing that the issue touches on Palestinian identity and sovereignty.

Takeaways

• 😀 Dr. Hassan Khreisheh, Vice President of the Palestinian Legislative Council, criticizes the recent decree to cut financial allocations for martyrs' families and prisoners, which he views as harmful to the Palestinian cause.
• 😀 The decree is seen as part of a larger trend of diminishing the role of Palestinian prisoners, starting with the reduction of the Ministry of Prisoners' Affairs to a mere department under the Ministry of Social Affairs.
• 😀 Dr. Khreisheh believes that the decree is a dangerous precedent for Palestinian national unity, as the issue of prisoners is one of the few points that unites Palestinians.
• 😀 He stresses that the Palestinian people have always honored their martyrs and prisoners, seeing them as heroes, and that the decision undermines this long-standing tradition.
• 😀 The timing of the decree is also criticized, as it aligns with external pressures from the U.S. and Israel, who label Palestinian prisoners as terrorists, in contrast to the way Palestinians view them as freedom fighters.
• 😀 Dr. Khreisheh argues that the legal framework for this decision is flawed, as it bypasses Palestinian legislative institutions like the Palestinian Legislative Council, and is instead issued unilaterally by President Mahmoud Abbas.
• 😀 The decree represents, according to Dr. Khreisheh, a submission to foreign influence, especially the U.S. and Israeli governments, and is seen as a surrender of Palestinian sovereignty.
• 😀 The policy change involves reclassifying Palestinian prisoners and martyrs' families as social cases, which is offensive to their status as fighters and heroes, not individuals in need of charity.
• 😀 Dr. Khreisheh rejects the justification that this decision is required for foreign aid or to comply with the conditions of international agreements, deeming it a weak excuse.
• 😀 Finally, Dr. Khreisheh calls on President Mahmoud Abbas to reverse the decree, emphasizing that it harms Palestinian dignity and goes against the promises made by the Palestinian leadership to support martyrs, prisoners, and the wounded.

Q & A

What is Dr. Hassan Khreisheh's main concern about the decree regarding financial allocations for families of martyrs and prisoners?

Dr. Hassan Khreisheh's main concern is that the decree diminishes the role and sacrifices of Palestinian prisoners and martyrs, transforming them into social cases, rather than honoring them as heroes who have sacrificed for the Palestinian cause.

How does Dr. Khreisheh view the historical treatment of Palestinian prisoners and martyrs?

Dr. Khreisheh sees Palestinian prisoners and martyrs as heroes who have been consistently honored by the Palestinian people. He emphasizes that their sacrifices have played a key role in the national struggle, and they have always been celebrated as symbols of resistance.

What historical changes have occurred regarding the status and treatment of Palestinian prisoners and martyrs?

Initially, there was a Ministry for Prisoners Affairs, but it was reduced to a department and later shifted to the Ministry of Social Affairs. The current decree has further marginalized the issue, now placing prisoners and martyrs under a national empowerment institution, which is seen as downgrading their status.

What role does Dr. Khreisheh believe the international community, particularly the U.S. and Israel, played in this decree?

Dr. Khreisheh believes that the decree is a result of external pressures from the U.S. and Israel, who label Palestinian prisoners as terrorists. He argues that these pressures have influenced the Palestinian leadership to undermine the status of prisoners and martyrs.

Why does Dr. Khreisheh reject the justification of the decree by the Palestinian leadership?

Dr. Khreisheh rejects the decree because he believes it is unjustifiable, even with claims of needing external aid or supporting foreign financial aid programs. He insists that such measures undermine Palestinian dignity and disregard the heroic status of prisoners and martyrs.

How does Dr. Khreisheh view the legal and constitutional legitimacy of the decree?

Dr. Khreisheh argues that the decree lacks legal and constitutional legitimacy because it was not passed through the proper legislative channels. He stresses that such decisions should be made by the Palestinian Legislative Council, but instead, the decree was issued unilaterally by President Mahmoud Abbas.

What is the significance of the Palestinian Legislative Council in the decision-making process?

The Palestinian Legislative Council is a crucial institution for legitimate decision-making. Dr. Khreisheh emphasizes that any important legislation or decree should go through the council to ensure it reflects the will of the people and adheres to legal procedures.

How does Dr. Khreisheh feel about President Mahmoud Abbas's approach to issuing decrees?

Dr. Khreisheh is highly critical of President Mahmoud Abbas’s approach, especially regarding unilateral decrees. He argues that issuing decisions without proper consultation or legislative review undermines Palestinian sovereignty and violates the principles of democratic governance.

What impact does Dr. Khreisheh believe the decree will have on Palestinian unity?

Dr. Khreisheh believes that the decree will negatively affect Palestinian unity, as it disregards the common consensus that prisoners and martyrs are central to the Palestinian cause. The decree could create divisions and diminish the sense of collective purpose.

What does Dr. Khreisheh propose as a solution to the issues raised by the decree?

Dr. Khreisheh advocates for the reversal of the decree, stressing that it should be reconsidered in line with the dignity of Palestinian prisoners and martyrs. He calls for a legal review and urges that decisions of such importance be made through proper democratic processes, not through unilateral executive action.