킹제임스성경 유일주의자들의 엉터리 가르침1

Taehong Jeong

29 Sept 202403:51

Summary

TLDRThe speaker critically examines the King James Version of the Bible, specifically pointing out discrepancies in Acts 8:37. They argue that this verse is absent in many ancient manuscripts and was possibly added by the scribe's oversight. The speaker also discusses how this verse's inclusion was justified by Erasmus, despite its absence in significant texts. They conclude by questioning the credibility of those who claim the Bible is corrupted by Satan, suggesting that people are being misled.

Takeaways

📖 The speaker is discussing a specific verse in the Bible, particularly focusing on 37th verse of a chapter.
👤 There is a claim that the King James Version of the Bible has been tampered with by Satan.
🔍 The speaker refers to Kim Ju's paper, which analyzes the authenticity of certain verses in the New Testament.
📝 The paper identifies 13 verses that are not present in the original manuscripts and were added later.
🗣️ The speaker emphasizes that these verses are not found in significant ancient manuscripts.
🎭 The speaker points out that the style of writing in the disputed verses does not match the style of the apostles, like Peter or Paul.
✍️ The speaker suggests that the disputed verse in Acts 8:37 is not in the original text but was likely added by a scribe.
📜 The speaker mentions that the verse is not found in important manuscripts like MS 2 and MS 4, which were used by Erasmus to compile the New Testament.
🚫 The speaker concludes that the verse is not present in any significant manuscripts and was likely added by Erasmus arbitrarily.
❗ The speaker warns against blindly following teachings that claim the King James Version is corrupted without verifying the source.

Q & A

What is the main concern raised in the transcript about the King James Version of the Bible?
-The transcript suggests that the King James Version of the Bible has been corrupted by Satan and contains verses that are not part of the original text.
What specific verse is mentioned as an example of a verse that might not be original?
-Acts 8:37 is mentioned as an example of a verse that is not found in some ancient manuscripts and is suspected to be a later addition.
Who is Kim Ju-kwan and what is his stance on the King James Version?
-Kim Ju-kwan is a professor whose research is mentioned in the transcript. He argues that certain verses in the King James Version, including Acts 8:37, are not found in the original texts and are likely additions.
What is the significance of the term 'MS 2' mentioned in the transcript?
-MS 2 refers to a medieval manuscript that Erasmus used to create the New Testament. The absence of a certain verse in this manuscript suggests that it might not be original.
Why is Acts 8:37 considered to be a spurious verse by some scholars?
-Some scholars consider Acts 8:37 to be a spurious verse because it does not appear in the majority of manuscripts and was possibly added by a scribe's oversight.
What is the role of Erasmus in the creation of the King James Version of the Bible?
-Erasmus played a significant role in the creation of the New Testament part of the King James Version. His decisions, including the addition of certain verses, are discussed in the transcript.
What is the 'margin' mentioned in the transcript in relation to the Bible manuscripts?
-The 'margin' refers to the space around the main text in a manuscript where additional notes or comments could be written. The transcript suggests that a verse was added in the margin and later mistakenly included in the main text.
What does the transcript imply about the reliability of the King James Version?
-The transcript implies that the King James Version may not be entirely reliable due to the inclusion of verses that are not found in the original manuscripts.
What is the 'Latin Vulgate' mentioned in the transcript?
-The Latin Vulgate is an ancient Latin translation of the Bible. The transcript mentions that the verse in question is not found in the Latin Vulgate, suggesting it might be a later addition.
What does the transcript suggest people should do in response to these concerns about the King James Version?
-The transcript suggests that people should be cautious and not be misled by the King James Version's inaccuracies, implying that they should seek out more reliable translations or original texts.
What is the tone of the speaker in the transcript regarding the King James Version?
-The speaker in the transcript appears to be critical and concerned about the integrity of the King James Version, warning against its potential inaccuracies.

Outlines

00:00

📖 Bible Text Authenticity Concerns

The speaker addresses concerns about the authenticity of certain Bible verses, particularly focusing on James 2:26 in the King James Version. They argue that this verse is not found in ancient manuscripts and suggest that it was added by the reformers. The speaker also mentions that modern translations do not include this verse, implying that it might have been influenced by Satan, according to some interpretations. The discussion highlights the differences in style and tone between various parts of the New Testament and questions the legitimacy of certain textual additions.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡King James Version

The King James Version (KJV) is an English translation of the Christian Bible that was commissioned in 1604 and completed in 1611. It is a significant version of the Bible that has been widely used and is known for its prose and poetic qualities. In the video, the KJV is mentioned in the context of being altered or corrupted, suggesting a debate over its authenticity and accuracy.

💡Reformation

The Reformation refers to a major schism that began in the 16th century within Western Christianity, leading to the creation of Protestant denominations. The term is used in the video to discuss the changes made to the Bible, implying that the King James Version might have been influenced by the Reformation's ideologies.

💡Satan

Satan is a figure in the Abrahamic religions, often depicted as a tempter and a figure of evil. In the transcript, Satan is mentioned as an entity that has supposedly tampered with the Bible, indicating a belief in the video that the text has been corrupted by malevolent forces.

💡Manuscript

A manuscript refers to a handwritten or typewritten document, often used in the context of historical texts and religious scriptures. In the video, manuscripts are discussed as sources that the King James Version might have been based on, with the implication that some verses might have been added or omitted.

💡Professor Kim

Professor Kim is likely a reference to a scholar or expert mentioned in the video who has written a paper or conducted research on the authenticity of certain biblical verses. The video suggests that Professor Kim's work is being used to argue that certain verses in the King James Version are not original.

💡Erasmus

Desiderius Erasmus was a Dutch Renaissance humanist who is best known for preparing important scholarly editions of the Bible, including the Greek New Testament. In the video, Erasmus is mentioned as someone who played a significant role in the creation of the New Testament, with the implication that he may have added verses that were not in the original manuscripts.

💡Papyrus

Papyrus is a material made from the pith of the papyrus plant, used in ancient times for writing. It is relevant to the video as it refers to the physical medium on which early biblical texts were written. The discussion around papyrus might be related to the authenticity and preservation of the original texts.

💡Codex

A codex is a book composed of a collection of bound pages, as opposed to a scroll. In the context of the video, codex refers to ancient books containing biblical texts. The mention of codex is important because it relates to the physical form in which the Bible was preserved and transmitted, which could impact the accuracy of the text.

💡Scribe

A scribe is a person who writes copies of documents, especially religious or historical texts. In the video, the term is used to discuss the possibility of errors or intentional changes made by scribes when copying biblical texts, which could lead to discrepancies in different versions of the Bible.

💡Interpolation

Interpolation refers to the insertion of additional material into a text, often without proper authority. In the video, interpolation is discussed as a method by which certain verses might have been added to the King James Version, suggesting that these verses are not part of the original biblical text.

💡Latin Vulgate

The Latin Vulgate is a late 4th-century Latin translation of the Bible that became the standard Bible for the Roman Catholic Church. The video mentions the Latin Vulgate as one of the sources that might have been used in the creation of the King James Version, and it is also used to argue that certain verses are not found in other versions of the Bible.

Highlights

The speaker emphasizes the importance of examining the 37th verse of a specific chapter in the Bible.

It is claimed that King James Version of the Bible is corrupted by Satan.

The speaker mentions that the King James Version is not the original text.

The speaker points out that the 37th verse of a chapter in the New Testament does not appear in ancient manuscripts.

Kim Ju's paper is referenced, which argues that 13 verses in the New Testament are not found in the original texts.

The speaker argues that these verses were added to the text by scribes.

The speaker discusses the different styles of writing in the New Testament, suggesting that the disputed verses do not match the style of the authors.

The speaker mentions that the verse in question does not appear in a significant medieval manuscript used by Erasmus.

The speaker suggests that the verse was inserted into the text due to a scribe's oversight.

The speaker argues that the verse was not part of the original text but was written in the margin and later inserted.

The speaker points out that the verse is missing in a majority of manuscripts and the Latin Vulgate.

The speaker criticizes King James Version scholars for not recognizing the absence of the verse.

The speaker warns that many people are being deceived by the corrupted text.

The speaker questions who to believe regarding the authenticity of the Bible.

The speaker highlights the importance of examining the original manuscripts to determine the authenticity of the text.

The speaker discusses the implications of the corrupted text on the faith of believers.

The speaker calls for a return to the original, uncorrupted text of the Bible.