Atlético atropela um Fluminense covarde

Rica Perrone

25 Sept 202408:40

Summary

TLDRThe video analyzes Atlético Mineiro's dominant 2-0 victory over Fluminense, highlighting the exceptional performance of Atlético Mineiro, which played its best match of the year. The speaker praises coach Eduardo Coudet's tactics and the impact of player Deyverson, whose energy and personality brought life to the team. In contrast, Fluminense's performance is criticized as cowardly and disappointing, lacking offensive intent and spirit. The analysis emphasizes the potential turning point this game could represent for Atlético, with newfound confidence and connection with their fans. It ends by anticipating a renewed challenge from Atlético in future matches.

Takeaways

⚽ The speaker praises Atlético Mineiro's performance, calling it the best game of their year.
🧠 The Atlético coach, Milito, is praised for his almost perfect tactics in the match.
🔥 Atlético Mineiro completely dominated the game and could have won by a much larger score, possibly 6-0.
😒 The speaker criticizes Fluminense for being too defensive and not playing real football.
😔 Fluminense’s approach was described as cowardly, focusing only on avoiding goals instead of trying to win.
🤔 The comparison is made to a previous game between São Paulo and Botafogo, criticizing similar tactics.
👏 Daverson is praised for his determination, personality, and ability to entertain and perform under pressure.
😡 The speaker expresses frustration over Fluminense's lack of offensive attempts and failure to honor their fans.
💪 Atlético Mineiro's victory was compared to a fight where they completely dominated Fluminense, leaving them helpless.
🎉 The victory is celebrated as a turning point for Atlético Mineiro, boosting their confidence and connection with fans.

Q & A

What was the final score of the match between Atlético Mineiro and Fluminense?
-The final score was Atlético Mineiro 2, Fluminense 0.
How does the speaker describe Atlético Mineiro's performance in the match?
-The speaker describes Atlético Mineiro's performance as 'absurd,' highlighting it as their best game of the year, with an almost perfect strategy.
What could have been the final score based on Atlético Mineiro's dominance?
-According to the speaker, the final score could easily have been 5 or 6 to 0 in favor of Atlético Mineiro.
How does the speaker criticize Fluminense's approach to the game?
-The speaker criticizes Fluminense for being extremely 'cowardly' and not playing football, suggesting they should have at least honored their jersey by playing more offensively.
What comparison does the speaker make to illustrate Fluminense's poor performance?
-The speaker compares Fluminense's performance to São Paulo's recent poor showing against Botafogo, where both teams avoided playing offensive football and focused solely on defense.
What does the speaker say about the last-minute goal by Daverson?
-The speaker calls Daverson's last-minute goal one of the most deserved moments they've ever seen in football, emphasizing that Atlético Mineiro should not have been eliminated given their dominant performance.
How does the speaker view Daverson as a player?
-The speaker admires Daverson, highlighting his personality and entertainment value. Despite acknowledging his technical limitations, the speaker believes Daverson has qualities like decision-making and charisma that make him an asset to the sport.
How does the speaker feel about the idea of 'heroic' victories in football?
-The speaker believes that not all victories are heroic, particularly in cases like this where a team (Fluminense) played poorly and could have been 'lucky' rather than earning a heroic win.
What analogy does the speaker use to describe the match between Atlético Mineiro and Fluminense?
-The speaker compares the match to a fight between Mike Tyson and Maguila, suggesting it was an unbalanced battle where Fluminense did nothing and Atlético Mineiro dominated.
What does the speaker say about Atlético Mineiro's future after this game?
-The speaker believes that Atlético Mineiro's victory could be the start of a new phase, with stronger connection between the team and the fans, and confidence in their ability to win future games.

Outlines

00:00

😤 Dominant Performance by Atlético Mineiro

The script describes a football match where Atlético Mineiro delivered an outstanding performance against Fluminense, winning 2-0. The commentator praises Atlético Mineiro's game as nearly perfect, with everything they attempted working out well. They criticize Fluminense's approach, calling it cowardly and suggesting that they should have played with more honor. The commentator also discusses the importance of Atlético Mineiro's victory and how it connects with their fans, comparing the team's current form to past performances and highlighting the contributions of key players like Daverson, who scored a late goal that was well-deserved.

05:01

😅 Fluminense's Lackluster Display

The second paragraph continues the analysis of the match, focusing on Fluminense's poor performance. The commentator expresses disbelief at Fluminense's strategy, which involved playing defensively and not attempting to create offensive opportunities. They argue that even if Fluminense had won, it would not have been a heroic victory but rather a result of luck. The script also touches on the broader implications of the match for Fluminense's reputation and the potential for new stars to emerge from Atlético Mineiro's victory. The commentator reflects on the importance of personality and decisiveness in football, using Daverson as an example of a player who embodies these qualities.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Atlético Mineiro

Atlético Mineiro is a Brazilian football club based in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais. In the context of the video, the club is praised for its exceptional performance in a particular match, described as 'absurdo' (absurd) and 'disparado' (outstanding). The speaker emphasizes the team's near-perfect execution and their dominance over their opponents, Fluminense, which is a significant part of the video's narrative.

💡Fluminense

Fluminense is another Brazilian football club based in Rio de Janeiro. The keyword is used in the script to contrast with Atlético Mineiro's performance. Fluminense is criticized for their 'covardia' (cowardice) and lack of offensive play, which is a central point of criticism in the video. The team's defensive stance and failure to engage in proactive play are highlighted as negative aspects of their game strategy.

💡Galo

Galo is the nickname for Atlético Mineiro, which translates to 'Roosters' in English. It is used in the script to evoke a sense of pride and identity associated with the club's fans. The speaker mentions a 'novo galo' (new rooster), possibly referring to a player or a new star emerging from the team's victory, which is a symbol of the team's spirit and the fans' connection to the game.

💡Daverson

Daverson is a player for Atlético Mineiro who scored a goal in the match discussed. He is described as a player with great characteristics and personality, embodying the entertainment aspect of football that the speaker values. Daverson's goal is mentioned as 'merecidas' (deserved), and his personality and impact on the game are highlighted as exemplary and inspiring for the sport.

💡Libertadores

Copa Libertadores is a prestigious South American football club competition. The keyword is used to emphasize the importance of the match and the context in which Atlético Mineiro and Fluminense were playing. The speaker contrasts Fluminense's performance in the Libertadores with their performance in the discussed match, indicating a significant drop in quality.

💡Milito

Milito refers to the coach of Atlético Mineiro, who is praised in the script for his strategic decisions and the team's improved performance under his guidance. The speaker mentions 'o milito que eu critico' (the Milito I criticize), suggesting that despite previous criticisms, the coach's tactics in this match were successful and noteworthy.

💡Paulinho Hul

Paulinho Hul is a player for Atlético Mineiro who is mentioned in the context of a tactical change made by the coach Milito. The speaker discusses how Milito's decision to bring in Paulinho Hul 'mais aberto' (more open) contributed to the team's offensive success, illustrating the importance of strategic substitutions in football.

💡Arana

Arana is a player for Atlético Mineiro whose positioning is discussed in the script. The speaker mentions how the coach's decision to move Arana 'mais perto do escarpa' (closer to the touchline) opened up the field for the team, allowing for more offensive opportunities. This highlights the tactical nuances of football and the impact of player positioning.

💡Futebol

Futebol, or football, is the central theme of the video. The speaker uses the term to discuss the quality of play, the entertainment value, and the spirit of the game. The keyword is used to criticize Fluminense's approach as not being true 'futebol' due to their defensive and unambitious play, which detracts from the game's essence.

💡Imponderável

Imponderável refers to the unpredictable or unforeseeable aspects of football. The speaker discusses how the imponderable nature of the game can sometimes lead to surprising outcomes, but also notes that in this particular match, the predictable dominance of Atlético Mineiro made the imponderable less fascinating. This term is used to reflect on the game's inherent unpredictability and its impact on the viewer's experience.

Highlights

Atlético Mineiro played an outstanding match, arguably their best of the year, with a performance that was almost perfect.

The game could have ended 6-0 or 5-0 in favor of Atlético Mineiro if not for their missed opportunities.

Last week, São Paulo played a similar match against Botafogo, where Botafogo had significantly less game volume and scoring chances.

Fluminense's performance was extremely cowardly; they should apologize to their fans for not honoring their jersey.

Fluminense's approach to the game was to avoid playing football, focusing solely on not losing rather than trying to win.

The final goal by Daverson was one of the most deserved goals the commentator had ever seen in football.

Fluminense's strategy was to finish the game with four defenders, showing no intent to play offensive football.

The commentator refused to write about Fluminense's performance because it was not a source of pride.

The commentator criticized Fluminense for not being the team that competed in the Libertadores last year.

Daverson was praised for his characteristics and contribution to the game, embodying the entertainment aspect of football.

Daverson's personality and decision-making were highlighted as crucial to the team's success.

The commentator expressed a desire for more players like Daverson to inspire new talent in football.

The victory of Atlético Mineiro was described as one that the commentator enjoyed writing and talking about.

The connection between the fans and the team was emphasized as a significant outcome of the match.

The match was likened to a fight between Mike Tyson and an older, less capable opponent.

The commentator criticized Mano Menezes' tactics and strategy during the match.

The performance of the coach Militão was praised, especially for opening up the game and creating space for Atlético Mineiro.

The commentator congratulated Atlético Mineiro on their well-deserved victory and the spectacle they provided at the Arena.

The atmosphere at the Arena was mentioned, despite some acoustic issues that the commentator had not personally verified.