Perplexity Pro vs ChatGPT4 Review: Which is Your BEST Upgrade Choice?

Grace Leung
5 Jul 202416:24

Summary

TLDRこのビデオでは、パープレキシティAIとChat GPT Plusの比較を深掘りし、各々のコア機能、価格、使用制限、高度なLLMモデル、ファイルフォーマットのサポート、ウェブブラウジング、カスタマイズ機能、データ分析、テキスト生成、画像生成、記事の要約などについて詳述します。パープレキシティAIは最新情報を得るための優れた選択肢で、Chat GPT Plusはクリエイティブなテキスト生成とデータ分析において優れています。最終的には、ユーザーのニーズにより適したプラットフォームを選ぶことが推奨されます。

Takeaways

  • 💰 Perplexity AIの月額料金は20ドル、年額料金は200ドルで、年間契約で割引が適用されます。Chat GPT Plusも月額20ドルですが、年額割引はありませんが、チームやエンタープライズプランも用意されています。
  • 🔢 Perplexity AIの日あたりの使用制限は600回、Chat GPT PlusはGPT-40モデルで640回と、使用制限がわずかにChat GPT Plusが有利です。
  • 🚀 Perplexity Proでは独自の高度なモデルSonaを使用可能ですが、Chat GPT PlusではGPT-3.5、GPT-4、GPT-40など全てのモデルファミリーにアクセスできます。
  • 📄 Perplexity AIはテキストファイルやPDF、画像ファイルのサポートがありますが、Chat GPT PlusはWord、Excel、PowerPointなどさらに多くのファイル形式をサポートしています。
  • 🌐 Perplexity Proは独自のオンラインLLMを持ち、インターネットにアクセスして最新情報を取得できますが、Chat GPT Plusも同様のウェブブラウジング機能を持ち、デフォルトで有効です。
  • 🛠️ PerplexityではAIプロンプトのカスタマイズが可能ですが、Chat GPT Plusはカスタムプロンプトとプラグインを提供し、より多くのカスタマイズオプションを持ちます。
  • 📊 Perplexityはデータ分析とビジュアライゼーションにおいては弱く、Chat GPT Plusはデータ分析において優れており、Excelデータの扱いが得意です。
  • ✍️ 文章生成においては、Perplexity ProはChat GPT-4を使用して生成した文章が自然で流暢ですが、Chat GPT Plusはより自然で創造的なレスポンスを生成することが可能です。
  • 🎨 Perplexity Proは画像生成においては検索を完了させる必要があり、時間がかかるという欠点がありますが、Chat GPT PlusはカスタムGPTをすぐに使用して画像生成が効率的です。
  • 📑 Perplexity Proは記事やPDFの要約においては正確なデータの把握はできるものの、Chat GPT Plusはより組織的な要約を生成し、より具体的で明確なキーポイントを提供します。

Q & A

  • 質問1: Perplexity AIとChatGPT Plusの価格設定の違いは何ですか?

    -Perplexity AIは月額20ドル、年額200ドルで、年額プランを選ぶと割引があります。一方、ChatGPT Plusは月額20ドルで、年間プランは提供されていません。

  • 質問2: Perplexity AIとChatGPT Plusの使用制限の違いは何ですか?

    -Perplexity AIは1日あたり600回の検索制限があり、各検索でクレジットを消費します。ChatGPT Plusは1日あたり640回のメッセージ制限があり、若干多く使用できます。

  • 質問3: 高度なAIモデルへのアクセスについて、Perplexity AIとChatGPT Plusの違いは?

    -Perplexity AIはSonaやClaudeのモデルにアクセス可能で、タスクに応じて切り替えが可能です。ChatGPT PlusはGPT 3.5、GPT-4などのモデルにアクセスでき、モデルの選択肢が豊富です。

  • 質問4: Perplexity AIとChatGPT Plusでサポートされるファイル形式はどう違いますか?

    -Perplexity AIはテキストファイル、CSV、PDF、画像ファイルなどをサポートしていますが、ChatGPT PlusはWordやExcel、PDFなど、より多くのファイル形式をサポートしています。

  • 質問5: インターネット接続機能における違いは何ですか?

    -Perplexity AIはデフォルトでインターネット検索機能がオンで、RedditやYouTube、研究データベースを検索することができます。ChatGPT PlusはBingを使ったブラウジング機能が搭載されていますが、Perplexityの方が特定のサイト検索に強みがあります。

  • 質問6: カスタムAIプロンプトとプラグインの違いは何ですか?

    -Perplexity AIはコレクション内でカスタムプロンプトを設定できますが、プラグインは提供していません。ChatGPT PlusはカスタムGPTを定義でき、プロンプトのパーソナライズ機能もあり、拡張性が高いです。

  • 質問7: 正確な情報を提供する点でどちらが優れていますか?

    -Perplexity AIは最新の情報を常に提供し、ソースの引用もしてくれるため、正確性で優れています。ChatGPT Plusも正確な情報を提供しますが、Perplexityに比べて情報の更新頻度が低いことがあります。

  • 質問8: データ分析と視覚化における違いは何ですか?

    -ChatGPT Plusはデータの分析と視覚化に強く、指示に基づいてグラフを作成できますが、Perplexity AIはこの点で劣り、複雑な指示に対応できないことがあります。

  • 質問9: 文章生成においてどちらが優れていますか?

    -文章生成では、ChatGPT Plusの方がより自然で人間らしい文章を作成しますが、Perplexity AIは他のモデル(例:Claude)に切り替えることでより良い結果を得ることができます。

  • 質問10: AIの生成する幻覚(ハルシネーション)の扱いにおける違いは?

    -Perplexity AIは存在しない情報について正しく認識し、エラーを報告しますが、ChatGPT Plusは存在しない情報をあたかも真実のように生成してしまうことがあります。

Outlines

00:00

💬 AIサービス比較:Perplexity AI vs Chat GPT Plus

ビデオでは、Perplexity AIとChat GPT Plusの比較を行っています。Perplexity AIは月額20ドル、年額200ドルのオプションがあり、Chat GPT Plusも同じ月額ですが、年間の割引はありません。両者ともエンタープライズプランが用意されています。使用制限においては、Perplexity AIが1日あたり600の検索に制限されており、Chat GPT PlusはGPT 40モデルで640メッセージまでとわずかに優れています。高度なモデルに関しては、Perplexity Proが独自の高度なモデルにアクセスできるのに対し、Chat GPT PlusはGPT 3.5、GPT 4、GPT 40のモデル家族にアクセス可能です。ファイルフォーマットのサポートでは、Perplexity AIがテキストファイルやPDF、JPEG、PNG画像ファイルをサポートし、Chat GPT Plusはさらに多くのフォーマットをサポートしています。ウェブブラウジング機能では、Perplexity Proが独自のオンラインLLMを持ち、Chat GPT PlusはBangでウェブブラウジングが可能であるとされています。

05:01

📊 データ分析とビジュアライゼーションの比較

ビデオでは、Perplexity ProとChat GPT PlusがCSVファイルのデータ分析とビジュアライゼーションのタスクをどのように処理するかを比較しています。Perplexity Proはデータの正確な数とヘッダーを返すことができましたが、ビジュアライゼーションの生成には対応していませんでした。一方、Chat GPT Plusはデータの分析だけでなく、ビジュアライゼーションの要求にも応え、より良いパフォーマンスを見せています。また、大きなデータセットの処理においては、Chat GPT Plusが優れているとされていますが、数千行のデータセットでは両者ともに限界があると指摘されています。

10:02

🖼️ テキスト生成と画像生成の比較

テキスト生成においては、Perplexity ProとChat GPT Plusが同じモデルを使用しているにもかかわらず、Chat GPT Plusの生成テキストがより自然でカジュアルであると評価されています。画像生成では、Perplexity Proが検索を完了させる必要があり、効率的ではありませんが、生成された画像の品質は高く評価されています。Chat GPT Plusは画像生成機能を直接使用できるため、より効率的で、生成された画像の品質も同様に高く評価されています。

15:05

📚 文章要約と画像要約の比較

文章要約においては、Perplexity ProとChat GPT Plusが同じモデルを使用したにもかかわらず、Chat GPT Plusの要約がより組織的で詳細に特定の詳細を含んでいるとされています。画像要約では、Perplexity Proがデータの正確な分析を提供しましたが、Chat GPT Plusの要約がより優れており、特定の詳細と数字を含んだコメントが含まれているとされています。また、Chat GPT Plusは主題とセクションを正確に識別し、要約がより明確で要点に沿ったと評価されています。

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Perplexity AI

Perplexity AIは、ビデオで比較されるAIサービスの一つです。月額20ドルの料金で提供されており、年間契約を申し込むことで割引を受けることができます。このAIは、高度なモデルや画像生成機能など、多岐にわたる機能を提供しています。ビデオでは、Perplexity AIの機能と他のサービスと比較し、ユーザーが最適な選択を下せるようにしています。

💡Chat GPT Plus

Chat GPT Plusは、ビデオでPerplexity AIと比較される別のAIサービスです。月額料金も20ドルですが、年間契約は提供されておらず、チームやエンタープライズプランも用意されています。ビデオでは、Chat GPT Plusのメッセージの日次制限やサポートするファイルフォーマット、ウェブブラウジング機能などの機能が評価されています。

💡高度なLLMモデル

高度なLLM(Large Language Model)モデルとは、ビデオの中でPerplexity Proが提供する独自の高度なAIモデルを指します。これにより、ユーザーはタスクに応じて異なる高度なAIモデルに切り替えることができます。ビデオでは、Perplexity Proが提供するこれらのモデルの利点を強調しています。

💡ファイルフォーマットのサポート

ファイルフォーマットのサポートとは、AIサービスが処理できるファイルタイプの範囲を指します。ビデオでは、Perplexity AIがテキストファイルやPDF、画像ファイルなどを含む幅広いファイルフォーマットをサポートしていることが説明されていますが、Chat GPT Plusはさらに多くのフォーマットをサポートしていると比較されています。

💡ウェブブラウジング

ウェブブラウジングとは、AIがインターネット上の情報を検索し、ユーザーの質問に答えることができる機能を指します。ビデオでは、Perplexity ProとChat GPT Plusがウェブブラウジング機能を持ち、最新情報を提供できる点で評価されています。

💡カスタムAIプロンプト

カスタムAIプロンプトとは、ユーザーが特定のタスクや目的に合わせてAIの動作をカスタマイズできる機能です。ビデオでは、Perplexity Proがコレクション内でAIプロンプトをカスタマイズできると説明されていますが、Chat GPT Plusはカスタムプロンプトを定義する機能とプラグインを提供していると比較されています。

💡データ分析と可視化

データ分析と可視化とは、AIが提供されたデータから洞察を引き出し、グラフィックやチャート形式で表現する機能です。ビデオでは、Perplexity AIとChat GPT PlusがCSVファイルの分析やチャートの作成をどのように扱うかが比較されています。

💡テキスト生成

テキスト生成とは、AIがユーザーの指示に従って文章を生成する機能です。ビデオでは、Perplexity ProとChat GPT Plusが特定のトピックに関する記事ドラフトを生成する能力が比較されており、その生成されたテキストの質と自然さについて議論されています。

💡画像生成

画像生成とは、AIがユーザーの要求に応じて画像を生成する機能です。ビデオでは、Perplexity AIとChat GPT Plusが画像を生成するプロセスと生成された画像の品質が比較されています。特に、Chat GPT Plusが画像生成機能をより効率的に扱うことが強調されています。

💡記事の要約

記事の要約とは、AIが長い文章やデータから主要なポイントやトレンドを抜き出して簡潔にまとめる機能です。ビデオでは、Perplexity ProとChat GPT Plusが画像やPDFファイルの内容を理解し、要約する能力が比較されています。

Highlights

Perplexity AI与Chat GPT Plus的深入比较视频介绍。

Perplexity AI的基本功能和定价,每月20美元,年费200美元。

Chat GPT Plus同样定价每月20美元,提供团队和企业计划。

Perplexity AI的每日使用限制为600次搜索,Chat GPT Plus为640条消息。

Perplexity Pro提供高级AI模型访问,包括Sona和GPT-4。

Chat GPT Plus可访问所有模型家族,包括GPT-3.5和GPT-4。

Perplexity AI支持多种文件格式,包括文本、CSV、PDF和图像文件。

Chat GPT Plus支持更多文件格式,如Word、Excel和PPT。

Perplexity Pro具备在线LLM功能,可访问互联网进行搜索。

Chat GPT Plus具有网页浏览能力,由Bang提供支持。

Perplexity允许在集合中自定义AI PRS,但不提供插件或扩展。

Chat GPT Plus提供自定义PRS和记忆功能,适用于Pro用户。

Perplexity Pro和Chat GPT Plus在事实准确性方面表现相当。

Perplexity Pro在提供最新信息方面具有优势。

Chat GPT Plus在数据可视化方面表现更佳。

Perplexity Pro在内容生成方面,使用Claude模型时表现更好。

Chat GPT Plus在生成创造性内容时更自然和人性化。

Perplexity Pro在图像生成方面效率较低,需要先完成搜索。

Chat GPT Plus在图像生成方面更高效,无需先搜索。

Perplexity Pro在文章和图像摘要方面表现一般,不如Chat GPT Plus。

Chat GPT Plus在摘要长PDF时更清晰、有组织。

根据需求选择Perplexity Pro或Chat GPT Plus,两者各有优势。

Transcripts

play00:00

few weeks ago I posted a video about

play00:01

perplexity Ai and I received lots of

play00:04

question from you regarding how it

play00:05

Compares with chat GPT plus and parly

play00:08

perplexity Pro so in this video I'm

play00:10

going to do a more Deep dive between the

play00:12

two and help you to pick the one that is

play00:15

best f for you now let's begin with the

play00:17

core features and pricing for perplexity

play00:19

AI is $20 per month $200 per year so you

play00:22

get a little discount if you subscribe

play00:24

yearly it also has an Enterprise plan as

play00:26

for chat gbd4 is also $20 per month but

play00:30

no any subscription and it also has team

play00:32

and Enterprise plans to choose from so

play00:34

the starting investment is lower in

play00:36

perplexity but I would say it may not be

play00:38

a huge consideration Factor if you just

play00:40

rather subscribe on a monthly basis like

play00:42

me now for the usage limits perplexity

play00:45

prayer is limited to 600 per searches

play00:47

per day regardless of what AI model you

play00:49

use so each search or message deducts a

play00:52

credit from the daily limit and credits

play00:54

are restored 24 hours after their use as

play00:57

for chat GPD plus the limit is around

play01:00

640 messages per day for GPT 40 model so

play01:04

it's slightly higher than perplexity so

play01:06

in this case I'll would say chat GPT has

play01:08

an advantage now here comes to the

play01:10

advanced llm models for perplexity a pro

play01:13

you can access its own Advanced model

play01:15

Sona gbd 40 clock a models oppers but

play01:18

not that for clock it has the daily

play01:20

usage limits as for image generation you

play01:23

can also choose between different models

play01:25

including the latest Da Model from open

play01:27

AI as for chbd plus you can access to

play01:30

all the model family like gbd 3.5 gbd4

play01:34

and the latest Advanced model gbd 40 so

play01:36

I would say perplexity definitely has a

play01:38

huge advantage in this where you can

play01:40

access and switch between different

play01:42

Advanced AI model based on your task

play01:44

needs now here comes to support file

play01:47

formats and limits for perplexity AI it

play01:49

can support textual files like playing

play01:51

text file CSV file PDF as well as image

play01:54

files like jpack PNG it also support

play01:57

unlimited file uploads daily and for

play02:00

users you can also leverage Advanced

play02:02

model like Co 3 and gbd4 to handle

play02:05

longer files and for CH gbd plus it can

play02:07

support much more F format than perlex

play02:10

per which I think it is a huge Plus for

play02:12

example like work doll popcorn format

play02:15

Excel and even SI file and a lot more so

play02:18

I would say definitely chbt plus does a

play02:21

better job in terms of supporting

play02:23

different file formats now for web

play02:25

browsing prolexic pro has it own online

play02:28

llm that can access to the internet and

play02:30

these features is turn on by default in

play02:33

particular you can outet to focus on

play02:34

searching Reddit YouTube or Warf flame

play02:36

research database for the latest

play02:38

information which is a huge plus as for

play02:40

charity plus it also has web browsing

play02:43

ability which is powered by bang it is

play02:45

turn on by default and we will also test

play02:48

the ability in a minute so I would say

play02:49

perplexity has more advantage in this

play02:52

now here comes to the custom air Proms

play02:53

and plugins perplexity off customization

play02:56

of AI PRS within collections which means

play02:59

you need to set up the Collections and

play03:00

build your custom proms however it

play03:02

doesn't offer any plugins or extensions

play03:05

like chat gbt so in this case chat gbt

play03:07

plus does a bad job because you can

play03:09

Define your custom PR only once and it

play03:12

will apply to all your conversations and

play03:15

also a big bonus is that chib has a

play03:17

memory features under the

play03:19

personalization that it remembers some

play03:21

of your input detail which is only

play03:24

available to Pro users as for custom

play03:26

gbts you can access to thousands of gbts

play03:29

to SASE your needes so chat gbt wins in

play03:32

terms of customization now here comes

play03:35

the most exciting part in order to have

play03:36

the most accurate Apple's Apple

play03:38

comparison I'm going to change my

play03:40

perplexity setting to use the chat gbd4

play03:43

and Del by default so to make sure they

play03:45

use the same model to generate the

play03:47

response with the same PRS but for some

play03:50

areas I may also switch to other models

play03:52

based on the tses one of the popular

play03:54

comparison areas is the factual accuracy

play03:57

so let's try a few PRS first let's ask

play03:59

it to give me the main provisions of the

play04:01

gdpr in the European Union comparing

play04:04

both responses I would say the response

play04:06

from perlex Pro is more accurate there

play04:09

are total eight data subject rights but

play04:11

chbt is missing one of them but still it

play04:14

get most of them accurate and also the

play04:16

seven core gdpr principles so let's try

play04:19

another PR let's Al to give me the main

play04:22

difference between a symphony and

play04:24

concerto I would say both of the

play04:26

responses are accurate and correct with

play04:29

Det details in the structure purposes

play04:31

for each and of course it also depends

play04:33

on the subject areas that you're asking

play04:35

and it's difficult to cover all the

play04:37

areas in this evaluation but I would say

play04:39

for most of the popular topics including

play04:42

academic ones both of them can give

play04:44

highly accurate response and I encourage

play04:46

you to also try them out in your domain

play04:48

areas though what I like more is how

play04:51

perplexity always includes sources for

play04:53

me to do fast checking in case I'm not

play04:55

the subject matter expert so I would say

play04:58

both of them can generate responses but

play05:00

perplexity has the better Advantage

play05:03

because it's always a citations for fast

play05:05

checking another com ask a question

play05:07

between two is how updated the

play05:09

information that they give so my first

play05:11

PR here is to AIT to check for the

play05:13

latest information let AIT to give me

play05:16

details about the tailor with a tour

play05:18

details and days and it sounds like an

play05:20

easy one now you can see that the

play05:22

answers from perplex Pro and more detail

play05:25

giving more information about the tour

play05:27

even revenue and in fact more accurate

play05:30

as well because the first tour day

play05:32

actually starts in March so for this

play05:35

prom chat GPT is missing a few c tour

play05:38

days and now let's try another prom now

play05:40

I asked there to give me the top 10

play05:42

women who rank on the American richest

play05:44

selfmade women list by fors and here is

play05:47

the Original Stories so it's just been

play05:49

updated recently so you can see that for

play05:52

perplexity Pro it gets all the names

play05:54

correct and it's amazing to see how

play05:57

updated info it can give as for ch gbt

play06:00

unfortunately the ranking is not correct

play06:02

and obviously I can tell the source is

play06:04

used may have been outdated let's try

play06:07

one more prom now I also to give me the

play06:09

key takeaways of water feder's latest

play06:11

at dcus College earlier in June

play06:14

and personally I have watched the F

play06:16

speech so I can tell if their response

play06:19

is accurate and up to date or not so you

play06:21

can see this time both of them are

play06:22

giving me similar information but still

play06:25

there's some Nuance even though they use

play06:27

the same model I would say for the Char

play06:29

Pro response is accurate and gets the

play06:32

context better although the response

play06:34

from perplexity is not wrong I like the

play06:37

answer from chat gbt better I've also

play06:39

tried to ask perplexity for when it data

play06:41

is updated for the response and every

play06:44

time is more reason than chat gd4 and

play06:47

now it's very clear that perplexity does

play06:49

a better job for getting upto-date

play06:50

information particularly if you need to

play06:52

pull information that is happening right

play06:54

now or very reason for CH 4 it content

play06:58

is also accurate but it's not as fresh

play07:00

as perplexity and now let's move on to

play07:03

data analysis and visualization so I

play07:05

have this CSV file containing 1,000 data

play07:09

roles and let's ask both of them to

play07:11

analyze the data and plot some charts

play07:13

for me the first PR is to make sure it

play07:15

can return the accurate number of data

play07:17

rols and header for me so both of them

play07:19

are able to return correctly for me

play07:21

which is great and now let's ask them to

play07:24

find how many rows that have mentioned

play07:26

the word excel in one of the columns and

play07:28

present it in the chart format by the

play07:30

way the correct number should be 654 so

play07:32

you can see both of them can get it

play07:34

correct but you can see that for

play07:35

perplexity is not able to generate the

play07:37

chart as I instructed even if I use to

play07:40

generate image function it is completely

play07:42

off while for chat gbt it has no

play07:45

problems in parting the chart now let's

play07:47

make it more complicated and as it to

play07:49

break down the number of job listing by

play07:51

these five industry that I mentioned so

play07:53

this time you can see that perplexity

play07:55

completely fails for this PR is not even

play07:57

returning the numbers for me and no

play07:59

chart is generated as for chart gbt it

play08:02

delivers the prom well and follows my

play08:04

instruction which can save you lots of

play08:06

time in working with Excel data so you

play08:08

can see it's pretty clear that trbt is

play08:10

definitely better than perplexity in

play08:12

terms of data analysis and visualization

play08:15

though caution sometimes I found for

play08:17

really large data sets contain a few

play08:19

thousand roles even for chat GPT plus it

play08:22

cannot handle well so keep that in mind

play08:25

now let's move on to tax generation I

play08:27

know this is by far the most used

play08:29

features now let's try to outa to give

play08:32

me an article draft about gym

play08:34

intimidation and how to overcome it so I

play08:36

will include some key points for that to

play08:38

follow so since they both use the same

play08:41

model you can see the response is very

play08:43

similar how they structure the draft the

play08:45

headings and even the article title and

play08:48

some of the sentences are even the same

play08:50

but if I take a closer look the

play08:52

generated Tex from chat is slightly

play08:54

better the paragraph matches the heading

play08:56

better while for perlex pro some

play08:59

sentence I would say it's not quite on

play09:01

point for example this one under the

play09:03

focusing on oneself which I think is not

play09:06

quite relevant and accurate and also

play09:08

what I like more about chat gbd response

play09:11

is it RS more natural and casual and you

play09:14

can also see that from the conclusion

play09:16

paragraph the one from perplexity sounds

play09:18

more formal and cold compared with ch

play09:21

GPT and now let's ask perplexity to

play09:24

rewrite it with the clock three oppus

play09:26

and see if the response will sound

play09:27

better and so now you can see the draft

play09:29

sounds so much better it reads more

play09:32

fluent natural and some good use of

play09:35

sentence structure and it also gets the

play09:37

contact much better and it is more

play09:40

cohesive more engaging which I really

play09:42

like so overall I would say if we just

play09:44

purely compare when perplexity is using

play09:47

chatu B4 model the generat writing is

play09:49

not as good as the native chat B4 but

play09:52

the thing is in perplexity Pro you can

play09:55

switch to claw which is good at content

play09:57

writing that in this case perplexity

play09:59

does a about job and this is

play10:00

particularly useful if you need to

play10:02

include lots of factual data or

play10:04

statistic in your article that need to

play10:06

reference lots of different web sources

play10:08

then perplexity is your choice another

play10:10

common issues we all see am AI chat BS

play10:13

is hallucinations so let's see how they

play10:15

both compare in generated hallucinated

play10:18

response so now I will a to give me

play10:20

information based on nonexist people and

play10:23

subjects so let's ask it to give me the

play10:26

main themes in the book The quantum

play10:28

Paradox by Dr Emily white is all fake so

play10:31

you can see for perlex pro because it's

play10:34

always based on some sources so it gives

play10:37

me the most relevant information but

play10:39

saying there is no results found about

play10:42

the book by such person and as for

play10:44

charity plus you can see it completely

play10:47

hallucinates the response with much

play10:50

confidence and make up all the

play10:51

information which I think is completely

play10:54

false let's try another PR which is a

play10:56

bit ambigous and see how they responds

play10:59

and unless O say to give me an answer

play11:01

what did the cow do after it jump over

play11:03

the moon is actually based on the

play11:05

popular English nural Rhythm so you can

play11:07

see for perplex prayer it searches for

play11:09

the information and refers me to the

play11:11

song and saying that the action of the

play11:14

cows are not explained that in details

play11:17

which is right it doesn't hallucinate as

play11:19

for Chach is so funny and creative

play11:21

actually saying that the crow should

play11:23

celebrate the lip which is hilarious and

play11:26

I can see the browsing features is not

play11:28

trigger for this prom so that's may also

play11:32

why CH will hallucinate in this response

play11:34

and now let's move on to image

play11:36

generation because this is definitely

play11:38

another mostly used features for perlex

play11:41

per I found is quite annoying that

play11:43

whenever you need to generate an image

play11:45

it needs to complete your search first

play11:47

and then you can click generate image So

play11:50

currently there's no way to all it to

play11:52

directly generate an image from your PR

play11:55

which is not time efficient to be honest

play11:57

as for chb plus you can can use the

play11:59

daily custom gbt from the custom gbt

play12:02

store and immediately start the chart

play12:04

which I found is a huge plus if you just

play12:07

actively using the image generation

play12:09

features and now the first problem is to

play12:11

all it to generate a hyper realistic

play12:13

photo to be used in retail as a project

play12:16

sales materials and you can see for

play12:18

perplexity Pro it needs to do the search

play12:20

first which is a bit annoying and then

play12:22

let's select photograph as a style and

play12:25

the image is quite good very realistic

play12:27

as for charity plus the quality is also

play12:30

good which I think both delivered the

play12:31

prom quite well but since generating

play12:34

images is so much more efficient in chat

play12:36

gbt than in perplexity I would say chity

play12:40

still does a better job in this area and

play12:42

now let's compare how they summarize

play12:44

articles and images so I have this image

play12:46

about the comparative analysis between

play12:48

Walmart and Best Buy that I generate

play12:51

from Sam rush and so I can make sure

play12:53

both of them do not easily find similar

play12:55

sources online and now let's ask it to

play12:58

see if understand what image is about

play13:01

and give me the summary takeaway with

play13:03

commentary so you can see that for

play13:05

perplexity it can grab the data

play13:07

accurately including the traffic share

play13:09

organic traffic backlinks all matches

play13:12

the data content which is brilliant but

play13:14

you can see that the response from CH

play13:16

gbt is so much better not just it

play13:19

mentioned the data correctly like

play13:21

perplexity but the commentary is also

play13:24

well written with specific details and

play13:27

numbers which I like and you can tell

play13:29

how it can describe the trend versus

play13:32

perplexity which is more generic and I

play13:34

love how it breakdowns the commentary

play13:37

for each metric with a final paragraph

play13:39

As the conclusion and now let's try to

play13:41

out it to summarize a long PDF again I

play13:44

try not to give any context to it and

play13:46

see if can understand the topic and give

play13:48

me key takeaways and indicate the pages

play13:51

for perlex pro you can see the summary

play13:52

is very clutter and does not following

play13:55

the flow of the report sometimes it

play13:57

mentions the Pand the content and then

play14:00

it jump back to the section although

play14:02

overall it still summarized the report

play14:04

with the correct context is not too

play14:06

organized and had to follow so I would

play14:08

say the response from chb is better

play14:11

although it's generated using the same

play14:13

model the response is more organized and

play14:15

with more specific details and I think

play14:17

chity is smarter in this case where it

play14:20

can identify the main body and a penic

play14:22

sections correctly and you can see for

play14:24

the appendix it intentionally be more

play14:26

brief in the key points without much

play14:28

specific but this makes the overall

play14:30

summary more clear and to the point so

play14:33

here's the wrap obviously both

play14:35

perplexity Pro and chat GPT Plus have

play14:37

their own strength so there is no

play14:39

obviously the best if you need to

play14:41

actively do content research and need

play14:43

upto-date information or even real time

play14:46

quick factual information into

play14:48

specific sources for extensive searching

play14:51

I need to have the flexibility to switch

play14:53

to other Advanced AI model like clock 3

play14:56

models for Better Tax generations with

play14:59

statistic to back up then perley Pro is

play15:02

for you it is slightly cheaper as well

play15:04

with this annual plan but keep in mind

play15:07

is not good at creative tales and data

play15:09

analysis and also for now it has

play15:12

limitation in a file form support and

play15:14

Integrations with other tools which

play15:16

limits its use cases however if you

play15:19

treasure creativity needs idea

play15:21

brainstorming and a daily productivity

play15:23

boost like quicker data analysis than

play15:26

chat gbt is for you it has good context

play15:28

to understanding that is able to

play15:30

generate relatively more humanik and

play15:33

creative responses compared with

play15:35

perplexity it also has lots of custom

play15:37

gpts to explore which makes a wide range

play15:40

of use cases possible and I'm sure you

play15:43

will find one that STS you but it may

play15:45

take you some time but the thing is it

play15:47

tend to hallucinate even though it

play15:49

doesn't have the information about the

play15:51

subject and the browse with bank

play15:53

features is also not used it in every

play15:55

problem so it's not good for some highly

play15:57

fractual curies and even so the sources

play16:00

are not as updated and as much as

play16:03

perplexity so now tell me would you

play16:05

prefer perplexity Pro or chat GD plus

play16:08

let me know in the comments and if you

play16:10

enjoy this video please give me a thumbs

play16:12

up and subscribe to my channel for more

play16:14

content like this and lastly watch my

play16:16

tutorial on using perplexity AI for

play16:18

Content research if you haven't done yet

play16:20

see you soon

play16:22

[Music]

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

相关标签
AI比較PerplexityChat GPTコンテンツ研究価格設定機能比較データ分析画像生成カスタムAI言語モデルSEOツール
您是否需要英文摘要?