Why The Bible Has NO Contradictions!

Alvin2254
15 Aug 202415:29

Summary

TLDRIn this video, Alvin 2254 addresses the misconception of biblical contradictions, explaining that what many perceive as conflicts are actually misunderstandings due to lack of context or perspective. He clarifies the definition of a logical contradiction and uses examples to illustrate how different biblical narratives, genres, and interpretations can be reconciled without contradiction. Alvin emphasizes the importance of reading the Bible in its full context to grasp its true meaning, countering common arguments that suggest otherwise.

Takeaways

  • 📖 The video discusses perceived contradictions in the Bible and aims to explain why they are not actual contradictions.
  • 🔍 It emphasizes the importance of understanding context and not taking verses out of context when interpreting the Bible.
  • 👤 The video highlights that the Bible is written from multiple perspectives, which can lead to perceived inconsistencies if not properly understood.
  • 💭 It addresses the issue of people misinterpreting the Bible due to different literary genres and tones present in its texts.
  • 🧐 The speaker refutes the idea that God's desire for everyone to be saved contradicts with verses where certain people are condemned, explaining it as respecting human free will.
  • 📜 The video clarifies a supposed contradiction regarding King Isaiah's age, showing that modern translations do not support this claim.
  • 🐏 It explains Jesus's statements about being 'good' and 'God' in relation to his dual nature as both human and divine.
  • 🤔 The speaker challenges the argument that Jesus's use of 'your God and my God' implies he is not God, arguing that Jesus's humanity and divinity are not contradictory.
  • 🛐 The video concludes by reinforcing that the Bible does not contain contradictions and that perceived issues stem from a lack of context and understanding.
  • 🙏 It encourages viewers to engage with the Bible's text critically and to seek understanding rather than dismiss it based on superficial readings.

Q & A

  • What is the primary purpose of the speaker in the video?

    -The speaker aims to address and clarify what some people perceive as contradictions in the Bible, explaining why they are not actually contradictions.

  • What is the law of non-contradiction as mentioned in the script?

    -The law of non-contradiction is a logical principle stating that a statement and its denial cannot both be true at the same time and in the same manner.

  • Why do some people believe there are contradictions in the Bible?

    -People believe there are contradictions in the Bible due to multiple reasons such as multiple perspectives, inconsistent genre and tone, and a lack of context understanding when interpreting verses.

  • How does the speaker explain the concept of multiple perspectives in the Bible?

    -The speaker uses the example of observing an event from different angles without conflicting each other to illustrate that multiple perspectives do not necessarily indicate contradictions.

  • What is the issue with interpreting the Bible's different genres and tones as inconsistencies?

    -The issue is that the context of the Bible is often misunderstood, leading people to falsely interpret the different genres and tones as inconsistencies, rather than understanding them as part of the diverse literary styles of the Bible.

  • What is the speaker's stance on the argument that God's desire for no one to perish conflicts with verses where God is seen condemning people?

    -The speaker argues that this perceived conflict ignores the context and the fact that it is people's own decisions and free will that lead to their eternal separation from God, not God's will.

  • How does the speaker refute the argument about the age discrepancy between Isaiah in 2 Kings and 2 Chronicles?

    -The speaker points out that modern translations of the Bible clearly state that Isaiah was 26 years old, thus resolving the supposed discrepancy and showing that the older translations were misinterpreted.

  • What is the speaker's explanation for Jesus' statement 'Why do you call me good? There is none good but God.'?

    -The speaker explains that Jesus was distinguishing himself from false shepherds and emphasizing his role as the Good Shepherd, which does not contradict his divine nature as it is a reflection of his human nature and free will.

  • How does the speaker address the argument that Jesus calling God 'my God' implies he is not God?

    -The speaker clarifies that Jesus being both fully human and fully divine allows him to refer to God as 'my God' from his human perspective, which does not negate his divine nature.

  • What is the speaker's conclusion about the perceived contradictions in the Bible?

    -The speaker concludes that the Bible does not have contradictions and that the perceived contradictions are often due to verses being taken out of context or misunderstood.

  • What does the speaker suggest for those who have more questions or disagree with the points made in the video?

    -The speaker encourages viewers to leave their questions, comments, concerns, disagreements, or corrections in the comments section for further discussion.

Outlines

00:00

😀 Biblical Contradictions Clarification

Alvin 2254 introduces a video addressing the misconception of biblical contradictions, emphasizing the importance of context and understanding in interpreting scripture. He explains that what some perceive as contradictions are often due to a lack of comprehensive reading or misinterpretation of the Bible's various perspectives and genres. Alvin plans to tackle key points that commonly cause confusion and invites viewers to share more examples for a potential follow-up video.

05:00

🔍 Analyzing Misunderstandings of Biblical Texts

This paragraph delves into why people believe there are contradictions in the Bible, highlighting three main reasons: multiple perspectives in biblical narratives, inconsistent genre and tone, and the tendency to take verses out of context. Alvin uses an example of observing a school incident from different angles to illustrate that different perspectives do not necessarily indicate contradictions. He emphasizes the need for a thorough analysis of context, translation, and perspective to avoid false claims of biblical inconsistencies.

10:02

📖 Debunking Common 'Contradictions' in the Bible

Alvin discusses specific examples of perceived contradictions, such as God's desire for all to be saved versus verses that seem to suggest divine condemnation. He clarifies that these are misunderstandings of God's judgment and human free will. Alvin also addresses the misinterpretation of Jesus' age in biblical texts and explains that modern translations correct the confusion. He stresses the importance of considering the full context to avoid erroneous conclusions about the Bible's teachings.

15:03

🙏 Understanding Jesus' Dual Nature and Free Will

In this paragraph, Alvin explores the complex nature of Jesus as both divine and human, and how this dual nature does not create a contradiction but rather reflects the mystery of the incarnation. He refutes arguments that Jesus denied being God by pointing out that Jesus affirmed His unity with God in the context of their shared work. Alvin also discusses the concept of free will, countering the notion that dedicating time to activities other than worship negates the existence of free will. He concludes by reinforcing the idea that the Bible does not contain contradictions and encourages viewers to consider context and meaning when interpreting scripture.

👋 Closing Remarks and Invitation for Further Discussion

Alvin concludes the video by summarizing the main points made about the non-existence of contradictions in the Bible and the importance of context in understanding scripture. He invites viewers to share any questions, comments, or disagreements in the comments section and expresses his hope that the video was enlightening. Alvin ends with a blessing and a promise of future content.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Eternal Life

Eternal life refers to the concept of living forever, often associated with spiritual or divine life beyond physical death. In the video's context, it is the gift offered by God through faith in Christ, which some people fail to understand or accept, leading to confusion and perceived contradictions within the Christian community.

💡Contradictions

A contradiction is a statement or set of statements that are logically opposed, where both cannot be true simultaneously. The video discusses how people misinterpret verses from the Bible, claiming they are contradictory without proper context, which is a central theme of the video addressing misconceptions.

💡Context

Context is the background or setting in which something exists or occurs, which can affect its interpretation. The video emphasizes the importance of understanding the context of biblical verses to avoid misinterpretation and the perception of contradictions.

💡Free Will

Free will is the power of making choices that are neither determined by natural causality nor predestined by fate or divine will. The video explains how God's offering of eternal life respects human free will, which is integral to understanding why some people choose not to accept it.

💡Multiple Perspectives

Multiple perspectives refer to different viewpoints or interpretations of the same event or situation. The video argues that the Bible, written from various perspectives, does not contradict itself but rather provides a fuller picture of events, contrary to some people's assumptions.

💡Inconsistent Genre and Tone

The Bible contains various literary genres such as history, poetry, and wisdom literature, each with its own tone and style. The video points out that perceived contradictions due to inconsistent genre and tone are often a result of misinterpretation, rather than actual inconsistencies.

💡Law of Non-Contradiction

The law of non-contradiction is a principle stating that contradictory propositions cannot both be true. The video uses this law to illustrate what constitutes a logical contradiction and to argue that the so-called biblical contradictions do not adhere to this principle.

💡Scriptural Interpretation

Scriptural interpretation is the process of understanding the meaning of texts within the Bible. The video script discusses how incorrect or incomplete interpretation can lead to the perception of contradictions that do not actually exist.

💡Divine Will

Divine will refers to the will or intentions of God. The video clarifies that God's will is for everyone to have eternal life, but people's rejection of this gift, through their free will, is what leads to eternal separation from God, not a divine decree.

💡Jesus as the Good Shepherd

The term 'Good Shepherd' is a metaphor used in the Bible to describe Jesus' role as the protector and guide of his followers. The video uses this metaphor to argue against the idea that Jesus denying being 'good' in one context contradicts his divine nature.

💡Sabbath

The Sabbath is a day of rest and religious observance in Judaism, traditionally observed from Friday at sunset to Saturday at sunset. The video discusses how Jesus' actions on the Sabbath and his statements about it are misunderstood by some as contradicting his divine nature, but are actually affirmations of his equality with God.

Highlights

Introduction to the concept of biblical contradictions and their perceived presence in the Christian community.

Definition of a logical contradiction and its application to biblical interpretation.

Explanation of why multiple perspectives in the Bible do not necessarily lead to contradictions.

Example of observing a school fight from different angles to illustrate multiple perspectives.

Discussion on how inconsistent genre and tone in the Bible can lead to perceived contradictions.

The importance of context in understanding biblical passages and avoiding misinterpretation.

Analysis of the supposed contradiction between God's desire for all to be saved and verses suggesting divine condemnation.

Clarification that individuals' free will choices lead to their eternal fate, not God's will.

Refutation of the claim that Jesus denied being God by citing specific biblical verses.

Explanation of Jesus' dual nature as both human and divine and its implications for understanding biblical texts.

Discussion of the argument that Jesus' use of 'your God and my God' denies his divinity.

Analysis of Jesus' statement about the Sabbath and his equality with God the Father.

Addressing the misconception that free will negates the idea of devoting time to God.

Conclusion that the Bible does not contain contradictions when considered in proper context.

Encouragement for viewers to engage in discussion and provide feedback in the comments.

Transcripts

play00:00

what's up guys Alvin 2254 here now I

play00:03

know you all didn't expect this type of

play00:05

content but here I am today thanks to

play00:07

the Holy Spirit anyways we unfortunately

play00:11

live in a society where although the

play00:13

Lord offers us eternal life by putting

play00:15

our trust in Christ people are so

play00:17

delusional that they see two quote

play00:20

unquote conflicting verses and proceed

play00:23

to completely take it out of context

play00:26

without truly understanding the meaning

play00:28

of it this caused is a lot of confusion

play00:31

within the Christian Community but fear

play00:33

not because this is why I am here to go

play00:36

over these quote unquote contradictions

play00:38

and explain why they are actually not

play00:41

contradictions now quick disclaimer

play00:43

before we begin there are so many of

play00:46

these arguments to the point where it is

play00:48

way too much to it in one video

play00:50

therefore I will be going over a few key

play00:53

points people actually get tripped up on

play00:55

and thus become controversial if there's

play00:58

any more that you have in your mind that

play01:00

are big feel free to let me know in the

play01:02

comments and I'll probably do a part two

play01:04

on this if need now then without further

play01:07

Ado let's begin first off before we dive

play01:10

into examples of quote unquote biblical

play01:13

contradictions we must first Define a

play01:16

contradiction and explain in a logical

play01:18

way why people think this is present in

play01:21

the Bible a logical contradiction is a

play01:24

statement or set of statements that

play01:26

involve a combination of a statement s

play01:28

and it's denial not s where both cannot

play01:31

be true at the same time and in the same

play01:34

manner this is known as the law of

play01:37

non-contradiction for example consider

play01:39

the two statements the apple is red and

play01:43

the apple is not red these are two

play01:46

opposing statements where one affirms

play01:48

that apple is red and the other denies

play01:51

it but obviously it is logically

play01:53

impossible for both of these to be true

play01:56

at the same time thus entailing a

play01:58

contradiction as they are opposing

play02:01

statements that deny each other now

play02:04

here's where people get tripped up as

play02:06

the reason why people say the Bible has

play02:08

contradictions is due to the multiple

play02:10

reasons but let's go over three key ones

play02:13

for the sake of this video as we do have

play02:15

other points and examples to get to

play02:18

reason one is due to multiple

play02:20

perspectives the Bible was written with

play02:23

multiple perspectives of a particular

play02:25

event hence people get the idea that

play02:27

it's inconsistent and contradictory but

play02:30

you see this in itself isn't sufficient

play02:32

enough to actually conclude

play02:34

contradictions are present as you're

play02:36

essentially presupposing that premise

play02:38

number one the Bible was written with

play02:40

multiple different perspectives

play02:42

therefore conclusion the Bible is

play02:44

contradictory which doesn't logically

play02:46

follow and is thus a non sequer you

play02:50

would have to give analytical evidence

play02:52

as to the perspectives in question

play02:54

conflicting each other in order to

play02:55

actually conclude a contradiction is

play02:57

present here's an example you and I are

play03:01

observing a school area and we see three

play03:04

different things happening in this order

play03:07

number one the boys walk out of the

play03:09

school clearly having beef with each

play03:11

other two a teacher screams in panic

play03:15

while witnessing the event and three the

play03:18

boys begin to fight each other until the

play03:20

police come to diffuse the fight the

play03:23

police then ask us what's happened as we

play03:26

were obviously observers of the

play03:28

situation awakens perspective the boys

play03:31

were walking out of the school and they

play03:32

started fighting as they obviously had

play03:34

beef your perspective the boys were

play03:36

walking out of the school and a teacher

play03:38

was screaming in panic while they were

play03:40

[Music]

play03:42

fighting get awaken those are still

play03:45

contradictions you these are two

play03:47

conflicting perspectives you go these

play03:49

are contradictions the Bible is false

play03:52

not really you see although we're

play03:54

describing the situation in two

play03:56

different ways we're not conflicting

play03:58

each other or anything rather we are

play04:00

literally describing the exact same

play04:02

event that's how the Bible is written

play04:05

although things are explained in a

play04:06

different manner by all these different

play04:08

perspectives they still explain the

play04:11

exact same

play04:13

situation no contradiction present

play04:16

moving on reason number two as to why

play04:18

people believe the Bible has

play04:19

contradictions is because of quote

play04:22

unquote inconsistent genre and tone the

play04:25

point is that the Bible contains various

play04:27

generas such as history poetry and

play04:31

wisdom literature each with its own tone

play04:34

and style this can create apparent

play04:36

contradictions to when different genres

play04:38

or tones are applied to similar themes

play04:41

or events the issue with this reasoning

play04:44

is that the Contex of the Bible is

play04:46

actually straw man to the point where

play04:48

such genre and tone is falsely

play04:50

interpreted as inconsistent which you'll

play04:53

see a bit more later in the video this

play04:56

leads to key reason number three

play04:58

tracking issue

play05:00

the reason is literally as it says

play05:02

people don't actually track what the

play05:04

Bible says which follows up to what I

play05:06

said earlier about people being so

play05:08

delusional that they see two quote

play05:10

unquote conflicting verses and proceed

play05:14

to completely take it out of context

play05:16

without actually taking the time to read

play05:19

and comprehend the four verses of such

play05:23

and this ladies and gentlemen is why

play05:26

reading is

play05:28

fundamental you still contr the Bible

play05:31

like you say you would all right then

play05:34

we'll go over some right now the first

play05:36

quote unquote contradiction we'll be

play05:39

going over is that although it's

play05:40

affirmed in verses such as 2 Peter 3:9

play05:44

that God doesn't want anyone to perish

play05:46

and instead wants everyone to come to

play05:48

repentance in other verses such as

play05:50

Romans 9:18 to dsin chap 2: 11- 12 Etc

play05:57

the Lord is supposedly condemning

play05:58

certain people Harden in their hearts

play06:00

and having other actions that least the

play06:02

perishing and eternal separation from

play06:04

them thus entailing a contradiction the

play06:07

problem with this argument is that it

play06:09

completely ignores the context of who

play06:12

specifically is being condemned and

play06:14

whose decision to perish it actually is

play06:16

making it clear that people who make

play06:19

this argument don't really understand

play06:21

how God's judgment works the father

play06:23

offers the avoidance of Eternal

play06:25

separation from him along with eternal

play06:27

life through his son Jesus Christ to

play06:29

those who put their trust and faith in

play06:31

him do the will of the father Etc the

play06:33

only reason why people go to hell in the

play06:35

first place is not because of God's will

play06:38

but actually because of the person's

play06:41

will as the person chose to reject

play06:45

Christ have an unrepentant heart Etc

play06:48

through their own free will that God

play06:51

provided them therefore God valuing

play06:54

everyone fulfills their decision be are

play06:57

harder than their hearts and however

play06:59

hell

play07:00

they choose to live their lives away

play07:02

from Christ it doesn't necessarily

play07:04

entail a contradiction but rather it's

play07:07

just God respecting their decision even

play07:09

though that's not what he wants from us

play07:11

in the first place but remember he

play07:14

created all of us with free will meaning

play07:17

free choices can be made that are

play07:19

neither determined by natural causality

play07:22

nor predestined by fith or Divine will

play07:25

but rather through the will of the

play07:28

person itself

play07:30

contradiction number two quote unquote

play07:32

contradiction number two I should say is

play07:34

actually something I discussed with my

play07:36

student Mixie pretty recently shout out

play07:39

to him by the way as he got confused by

play07:41

it and sorry if I pronounced your name

play07:42

wrong anyway the argument is that in

play07:45

translations like James translation

play07:48

Isaiah was stated to be the age of 22

play07:50

when he reigned in gasum for a year in 2

play07:53

Kings

play07:54

8:26 yet 2 Corinthians 22:2 allegedly

play07:59

States was 22 but here's what people who

play08:02

make this ridiculous argument don't show

play08:04

you and this is the easiest way to

play08:06

respond to this argument by the way

play08:08

let's take a look at a modern day

play08:10

translation of these two verses such as

play08:11

the English Standard Version even if you

play08:14

want to say the previous versions were

play08:16

Mickey Mouse incorrect

play08:18

translations look at that both texts

play08:21

both affirm the same thing without any

play08:25

deny or oppostion has no contradiction

play08:27

found let's read it together

play08:29

Isaiah at that time was 26 years old

play08:33

ringing over Jerusalem for over a year

play08:36

and he had a mother named aalia who was

play08:39

a granddaughter of alory king in Israel

play08:43

you see how easy it is to refute these

play08:46

satanic interpretations once you

play08:48

understand the full context it's really

play08:51

that simple the key is to analyze the

play08:54

perspectives translations and any of the

play08:56

other context given now then

play09:00

next point now this point is something

play09:03

my friend exil pointed out to me earlier

play09:06

so I'll shout him out here because I

play09:08

have to give credits when it's do

play09:11

basically we have people using Jesus

play09:14

saying why do you call me good if only

play09:16

God is good in order to assert that

play09:19

Jesus is affirming he's God is

play09:21

contradicted by him saying this thus

play09:24

saying Jesus affirmed he isn't God but

play09:27

how do we respond to this it's simple

play09:30

Jesus called himself the Good Shepherd

play09:33

distinguishing him from false Shepherds

play09:36

who prioritize their own interest over

play09:38

the welfare of the flock and the bigger

play09:41

part is he's not just a Good Shepherd

play09:46

his singular role as the Messiah and

play09:48

savior is clearly empathized in

play09:51

scripture because of course he is the

play09:54

Good Shepherd ask yourself how is Jesus

play09:58

good in any way if only God can be good

play10:01

under any

play10:03

perspective exactly you see Jesus isn't

play10:07

obligated to reveal his deity to the

play10:09

rich man so if the rich man doesn't

play10:11

address Jesus as God by calling him good

play10:14

it doesn't mean Jesus is just going to

play10:16

get but hurt by

play10:17

it the Pharisees and the seduces also

play10:20

didn't recognize Jesus as God not even

play10:23

the Messiah yet Jesus was unfaced not

play10:26

only that but even his followers

play10:29

themselves

play10:30

most of them were attracted to Jesus and

play10:32

some of them were genuine as well yet

play10:35

they didn't know nor suppose that Jesus

play10:37

was God In the Flesh Jesus didn't cry

play10:40

about it and say why are you guys not

play10:42

calling me God my feelings are hurt no

play10:44

no no no he didn't do that he was

play10:46

clearly

play10:47

unfaced somewhat similarly people also

play10:50

use Jesus saying to your God and my God

play10:53

to say Jesus is not God but this is also

play10:55

wrong although it's true Jesus Is God

play10:58

and show multiple times it's likewise

play11:00

also true that Jesus is human and though

play11:02

that is not contradictory and let me

play11:04

explain why the person of Christ is

play11:07

flesh in his flesh but he is divine in

play11:09

his divine nature thus Christ is true

play11:12

man and true God in short Jesus is

play11:16

essentially God in human form and that

play11:18

is really not a

play11:20

contradiction God the father is God of

play11:22

All Flesh so if Jesus was truly man then

play11:25

he was truly flesh and if God the father

play11:28

is the god of all true flesh then he's

play11:31

Jesus's God according to human nature

play11:33

not his divine nature there's a

play11:36

difference between that human nature is

play11:39

our nature our fleshly nature God's

play11:43

divine nature is something way beyond

play11:45

our nature obviously remember that now

play11:49

for those of you disagreeing let's look

play11:51

at some consistency ask yourself this

play11:54

what is Jesus denying to be God in John

play11:58

5: 13 to 18 let's look now the man who

play12:04

has been healed did not know this for

play12:06

Jesus has disappeared in the crowd that

play12:08

was there later Jesus found himself in

play12:11

the temple and said to him see you all

play12:13

have been made well do not sin anymore

play12:16

so that nothing worse happens to you the

play12:18

man went away and told the Jews that it

play12:21

was Jesus who had made him well

play12:23

therefore the Jews started persecuting

play12:25

Jesus because he said he was doing such

play12:28

things on the Sabbath but Jesus answered

play12:31

them my father is still working and I am

play12:34

also working for this reason the Jews

play12:37

were seeking all the more to kill him

play12:39

because he was not only breaking the

play12:41

sabath but was also calling God his own

play12:44

father thereby making himself equal to

play12:47

God did y'all hear that last part let's

play12:50

read it again my father is still working

play12:53

and I am also working for this reason

play12:57

the Jews were seeking all the more to

play12:59

kill because he was not only breaking

play13:03

the Sabbath but he was also calling God

play13:05

his own father thereby making himself

play13:09

equal to God I think the answer here is

play13:12

obvious Jesus did not deny being God but

play13:16

rather he affirmed himself equal to the

play13:18

father as they are both working as one

play13:22

along with of course the Holy Spirit the

play13:25

Jews had no doubt about Jesus claiming

play13:27

to be God because because God is the

play13:29

only one who rules the Sabbath no man

play13:33

nor Prophet can change that whatsoever

play13:36

yet Jesus's power over the sabath is

play13:39

clearly established simple right at

play13:43

least I hope you guys have been keeping

play13:44

up so far but it's all right got one

play13:46

more to go now I did speak about Free

play13:50

Will quite a bit earlier but as a bonus

play13:53

I want to be talking about something

play13:55

I've seen in this Discord server called

play13:58

versus Battle the

play13:59

recently basically the argument is this

play14:02

if we have free will then we wouldn't

play14:04

devote all of our time to God and

play14:06

probably not all the time yet we're

play14:08

called Antichrist when we don't give

play14:10

attention to God this time let's use the

play14:13

counter example method to show the flaws

play14:15

of this argument with this exact same

play14:17

logic people who devote themselves to

play14:20

Hobbies such as Sports don't have free

play14:22

will which doesn't make logical sense

play14:26

they clearly have free will to do what

play14:28

they want out side of playing sports

play14:30

professionally in a huge league as long

play14:32

as they're professional players well

play14:34

especially I should say as long as it

play14:36

doesn't violate the terms set by the le

play14:40

as you clearly see it clearly doesn't

play14:43

contradict the fact that we have free

play14:44

will to do us we please and again you

play14:47

can reference what was already

play14:48

established earlier all right let's wrap

play14:51

up so in conclusion we established that

play14:55

the Bible actually does not have

play14:58

contradiction and that all of these

play15:00

quote unquote contradictions in the

play15:03

Bible are severely taken out of context

play15:06

and completely ignores the whole meaning

play15:08

of the verse all right that's all for

play15:11

today I hope you enjoy the video and if

play15:13

you have any questions comments concerns

play15:15

disagreements or mistakes I make be sure

play15:17

to let me know in the comments God bless

play15:20

you all and see you in the next

play15:27

one what

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

相关标签
Biblical ContradictionsScriptural AnalysisChristianityReligious DebateTheological InsightScripture ClarityBible StudyFaith ExplorationSpiritual UnderstandingContextual Interpretation
您是否需要英文摘要?