王志安留給台灣觀眾的謎團:開玩笑到底有沒有邊界?
Summary
TLDRLeLe Farley在此视频中讨论了王志安在台湾深夜秀中模仿身体有障碍的律师陈的行为,以及其引发的争议。作为一名喜剧演员,Farley强调喜剧无禁区,意图比内容更重要。他通过比较美国喜剧演员的成功与失败的模仿案例,探讨了模仿艺术的界限。Farley认为,即使非专业喜剧人士也有权进行模仿和讽刺,关键在于模仿的质量和对被模仿对象的尊重。他最后呼吁中文世界不要对幽默设限,认为喜剧和模仿是对喜剧演员技能和社会意识的重大考验。
Takeaways
- 😊 王志安的笑话虽然低级,但并不代表残疾人就不能开玩笑
- 😞 王志安的模仿太过懒惰,没有展现真正的喜剧艺术
- 🤔 喜剧没有禁区,只有恶意和艺术的区别
- 😄 美国喜剧界已经很成熟,容忍度很高
- 🧐 演员是否有资格开这种玩笑,还是问题所在
- 😎 喜剧的目的是消除隔阂,突破框架
- 🙂 台湾的喜剧环境还不够成熟
- ☹️ 王志安的身份令人对他的期望更高
- 🔥 喜剧需要不断尝试,而观众也要有包容心
- 😌 评判一则笑话好坏,最重要的是质量
Q & A
LeLe Farley对王志安在台湾深夜秀上模仿身体有障碍的律师陈的看法是什么?
-LeLe Farley认为,尽管王志安的模仿可能是出于好意,旨在融入现场气氛并取悦年轻观众,但他的表现并不尊重,因为模仿没有做到位,缺乏对陈个人背景和说话方式的理解。LeLe Farley强调,即便是模仿身体有障碍的人,也应该基于尊重和艺术性,而不是简单地为了笑料。
LeLe Farley如何看待王志安作为记者参与喜剧表演?
-LeLe Farley指出,虽然王志安本身是记者而非专业喜剧演员,但这并不意味着他不能在喜剧舞台上做出表演。问题在于,作为记者,公众对他有着更高的期望,认为他应该保持客观、严肃和事实基础,而他的喜剧表演并未能满足这些期望。
LeLe Farley对喜剧中的“踢上踹下”原则持何看法?
-LeLe Farley不赞成“踢上踹下”的原则,他认为喜剧应该打破阶级和差异,关注人性共同点,而不是界定谁高谁低。他认为,这种界定本身就是对弱势群体的一种歧视。
为什么LeLe Farley认为没有哪个群体是不能被拿来开玩笑的?
-LeLe Farley认为,只要出于平等和非歧视的意图,就没有任何群体是不能被拿来开玩笑的。他认为,避免特定群体或觉得他们需要特别关照,实际上是一种间接的歧视。
LeLe Farley是如何评价Shane Gillis的表演的?
-LeLe Farley高度评价Shane Gillis模仿患有唐氏综合征的叔叔的表演,认为这种模仿出于尊重,从不同角度让人们理解这个群体,而非寻求同情。他认为,Shane Gillis通过精确和技巧性的模仿,将喜剧艺术提升到了一个新的层次。
LeLe Farley为什么认为王志安的模仿是懒惰的?
-LeLe Farley认为王志安的模仿懒惰,因为他没有花时间去了解陈的个人经历和背景,仅仅看到了陈的身体残疾,而没有深入理解其个性,因此他的模仿显得肤浅且攻击性。
LeLe Farley如何看待喜剧中的模仿艺术?
-LeLe Farley认为,喜剧中的模仿艺术是一种技巧性工作,能否掌握正确的度和角度入手,是对喜剧演员技能的重大考验。良好的模仿可以拉近喜剧演员与观众的距离,而粗糙的模仿则可能带来恶意。
LeLe Farley对年轻人在民主社会中的态度是什么?
-LeLe Farley认为,年轻人在民主社会中批判权力是一件好事,他们对执政党的批评态度是可以理解的,这反映了社会的健康和活力。
LeLe Farley提到的Brendan Schaub的例子说明了什么问题?
-通过Brendan Schaub的例子,LeLe Farley说明了即使是专业人士也可能因为不了解被模仿对象的真实情况而做出不恰当的模仿,这种基于刻板印象的模仿不仅不好笑,而且可能具有歧视性。
LeLe Farley认为喜剧界和观众对于模仿的接受度有何变化?
-LeLe Farley认为,随着时间的推移,美国的喜剧界和观众都变得更加成熟和宽容。喜剧演员通过精心准备和对文化的深刻理解来创作作品,而观众也学会了欣赏这种努力和技巧,同时对粗糙的模仿表现出抵制态度。
Outlines
😊乐乐谈王志安模仿残疾律师陈永顺的段子
乐乐首先表达了对王志安在台湾夜间秀上模仿残疾律师陈永顺的段子被撤销广告的理解。然后表示要全面分析自己对这则段子的看法,因为作为喜剧演员,讲段子是她的工作。她提到过去讨论过的几则相关话题,指出观众必须支持喜剧演员尝试的权利。她认为问题不在于王志安取笑残疾人,而是他的模仿做得不好。
😁美国热门喜剧演员模仿智障叔叔的段子案例
乐乐举出美国热门喜剧演员Shane Gillis模仿自己患有唐氏综合症叔叔的段子。这个段子将悲伤滤镜移除,让人从不同角度去理解这一群体。它需要非常高的技巧。乐乐指出问题在于王志安的模仿太懒,没有理解陈永顺的背景。段子带有攻击性。
😃乐乐总结不应该禁止对某些群体的模仿
乐乐认为不应该有一刀切的规则禁止对某些群体的模仿。她希望中文世界在幽默方面不要划那么多红线。段子和模仿是测试喜剧演员技巧和社会意识的大挑战。最后,她建议新订阅的粉丝查看她和Jerry的过去视频。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡站立喜剧
💡模仿
💡轻视
💡禁忌
💡无意歧视
💡暴力
💡催泪
💡低级趣味
💡技巧
💡成熟
Highlights
王志安的模仿太过懒散,没有花时间了解陈为廷的背景和言谈举止
王志安的笑话给人一种攻击的感觉,年轻观众却很喜欢
要正确模仿残障人士需要非常高的技巧,否则很容易产生恶意
美国喜剧界现在已经很成熟,容忍度很高,但也有像Brendan Schaub这样的失败例子
安德鲁·桑蒂诺就是一个积极的例子,他花足够的时间去理解和体会印度文化
Transcripts
(I'll fix the English tomorrow after sleep!) Hello everyone I'm LeLe Farley
The last time I talked about
my thoughts on Wang Chi-An's appearance on Taiwan's Nightly Show
parodying a physically challenged lawyer Chen
but that airing
was surprisingly demonetized again
which is fine
you know I'm not mad
I'm not mad at all
so I thought I would just put out a video
to give a full explanation of
what I thought of Wang Chi-An's joke
As a stand-up comedian
telling jokes is my hobby and my job
So Wang Chi-An's appearance on Taiwan's Late Night
and his blunder
naturally interests me
We've talked about a lot of topics related to
stand-up comedy before
from Will Smith's beating up of the hosts
to Chizi, criticizing the Party
and running to Canada,
also about the roasting of Wang Shi-Jian's
I still firmly believe that
as an audience member
you must support stand-up comedian's
right to attempt
Whether a joke is funny or not,
they all come from the same place
stand-up comedy is not like any other art form-
you can't practise alone in front of the mirror
you have to have an audience
and you have to keep on figuring out and honing your bits based on the feedback you get from the audience
in order to be able to grasp the right balance
with a joke
So an audience's reaction and tolerance
for the art of stand-up comedy
as well as a comedian's methods for breaking through
are both crucial
In turn,
the potential of these comedians to influence
and break through the collective consciousness of a society
comes from this understanding and tolerance given by the audience,
the community,
especially in the early stages (like Taiwan's scene)
But the case of Wang Zhian
is not quite the same as the cases
we've discussed before
Wang Zhian himself is not a comedian
but a reporter
and he himself emphasizes this
on various social media platforms
He constantly reiterates his position as a journalist
And as a journalist
the general public's expectation of you
is that you are objective
serious and factual
Even if you are on the late-night stage
this standard and expectation
will not be lowered by much
Because this identity as a journalist
is a very important part of the viewers'
perception of Wang Zhian
So even if Wang
did make such a joke on a comedy stage, the public still could react poorly
If Wang does make such a joke
the public's acceptance of his jokes
is generally not too high
and as a non-professional of comedy
he doesn't know how many times a stand-up comedian
needs to repeat joke attempts in order to write
and grasp the right degree
In my opinion
he was
completely intoxicated by the
atmosphere of the live show
and eagerly wanted to please the young audience
He wanted to
fit into the environment and thus swung for the fences
But that doesn't mean that
as a journalist
he's disqualified from making jokes.
It doesn't mean that
we can't make jokes about people with disabilities in any way,
or can't impersonate people with disabilities in any way.
I've always believed that there are no taboos.
There's only a difference in intent
It doesn't matter if you're a boy or a girl.
Gay, lesbian, bisexual.
Black, white, Jewish, Chinese, etc.
You're allowed to joke about it. The goal,
In my opinion,
is the embodiment of equality and non-discrimination
If you deliberately avoid a certain group
or even feel that they need your special care
In my personal opinion
it's kind of like indirect discrimination
Then maybe here
there may be people who want to pretend to be an expert, claiming
Wang Chi-Ann didn't follow the "unwritten rules" of stand-up:
that jokes can only punch up but not punch down
I really hate this line
comedy is about breaking down class and difference
and focusing on the theme that
we are all human beings,
instead of defining who is up and who is down
Plus,
who has the right to define who is above whom,
to say that it is punching down,
feels discriminating against the underprivileged
So in that case
what is offensive about the joke made by Wang Chian,
in fact this
was pointed out in the very first sentence of Mr. Chen's own interview
"I don't think he did a good job mimicing me, like I can't move my hands..."
That's right, that's exactly my opinion
so much so, that I wonder if Mr. Chen
had gone to see some stand-up comedy performances when he was a student in
in Boston.
Afterall, Boston
is the place where stand-up comedy stars are produced
That being said
In my opinion
the problem is not that
Wang made fun of the physically challenged
but that his impersonation was not at all decent
Comedians
They often do all sorts of impersonations on stage
A good impersonation
can instantly bring a stand-up comedian and an audience together
and also bring them together
in laughter
And to elicit such a reaction is a test of the comedian's ability
It's a test of a comedian's ability to do a good impersonation
or to back up his argument
In terms of a parody of people who are physically challenged,
I'd like to show you the hottest comedian in the United States today
Shane Gillis
He did a parody of his uncle who has Down Syndrome in one of his specials
It's now on the internet in the U.S.
and a huge hit
You'd look across the table
and you'd see him sneaking grilled cheese
"Uncle, where did you get that cheese? "
Make your own comparisons
When parodying people with disabilities
as viewers we can feel
Shane Gillis' parody of his uncle who has Down Syndrome
is done from a place of respect
It's not even a call for sympathy and attention
Instead, it removes the filter of sadness
It allows us
to look at
and understand these groups of people from a completely different angle
It's very, very hard to make a good joke about such a sensitive topic
When Shane Gillis is telling a joke like this
he first lays out the argument
and then he starts a series of act outs,
making a joke about his uncle sneaking
grilled cheese sandwiches
His mimicry
is the punchline to the whole joke
and the most important cornerstone
Through his mimicry
you get the sense that
he's someone who really cares
and understands the group
In this scenario,
the more specific and skilled the mimicry, the close it is to art
Whereas the more flippant,
the closer you come to maliciousness
and Wang Chi-on's offense is that his impersonation
was just flat-out lazy
Secondly, he only saw Chen's physical disability
without understanding his personal background
and his way of speaking,
concluding that Chen was just a tool to stir up emotion
and set a mood
Thus his jokes
gave off a feeling of attack...
Yet the audience seemed to like it
I tried to understand their mindset as well...
Most of them are young people,
and in a democratic society
young people look at the party in power
like teenagers in the rebellious stage
look at their parents
They're going to be critical of the party in power
suspicious and even dismissive...
and you know that's a good thing
that's understandable
So
once someone,
an foreigner,
criticizes the ruling party
the youth will naturally find it very enjoyable
And this is not limited to Taiwan
The same phenomenon is also found in the United States
Look at those political satirical news programs
most of those hosts are from abroad
their voices are very valuable.
I still think that Wang
has the right to make jokes and impersonate anyone
and also has the right to ridicule the DPP
In any democratic country
the ruling party
is the target of the fiercest attacks and criticism.
But
I also think that Wang's joke
was low hanging fruit
It was lazy
So do you think that
as long as Wang's impersonation is very good
it's OK to joke about physically challenged people
In the arena of comedy
the better your impersonation,
the closer you come to art;
the more frivolous your impersonation
the closer you come to maliciousness
Comedy in the United States has evolved over the years
The audience is now very mature
The comedy environment is also very mature and tolerant
But there are comedians
who have been mocked for their poor mimicry
One such man is Brendan Shcaub
I used to think
Giraffe is pronounced Diraffe
I thought it was the D's
He used to be a professional fighter, now a "comedian"
Brendan tells a joke in one of his specials
about a certain fight
where he got hit in the head and started bleeding.
There was a doctor who came up to check out his injuries
Brendan's imitation here
of a Chinese accent
feels more based off a stereotype
It doesn't feel funny,
it feels more like discrimination
And what really makes Brendan's a textbook case
of crappy comedy
is his distortion and deliberate fabrication of reality
The Chinese-American doctor Brendan mentions
is Dr. Greg Hsu
He's the UFC's dedicated doctor
Let's hear what his English is really like...
Wait a minute
His English is native
He's a colonel in the U.S. Air Force
Brendon's parody is just as factually incorrect as Wang's
as he didn't take the time to understand
the person they were joking about
Wang didn't take the time to get to know
Mr. Chen and his experience
just as Brendan Schaub
didn't take the time to get to know
the Chinese doctor mentioned
they are both just trying to make a cheap joke
in exchange for a more
cheap laugh
So let's look at a positive example
I've mentioned
Canadian Comedian Russel Peters before,
so this time
I'm going to introduce you to an American stand-up comedian of Irish descent
Andrew Santino
Hear that?
He's a professional
No surprise he grew up with Indian neighbours
Behind such performances
is the dedication of enough time and effort
to understand and feel that culture
This produces a superior and more hilarious piece of work
In conclusion, I would like to say that
there's not a one-size-fits-all rule
that says we can't make jokes about certain groups
or mimic them
That's a very lazy mode of thinking
I would also like to see the Chinese-speaking world
not draw so many lines with humor,
you can't make one forbidden zone after another
Those are cages that prohibit thinking and development
Jokes and parodies are skilled work
Whether it's mastering the right degeree or the angle of entry,
it's all a great test of a comedian's skills
It's also a great challenge to a society's consciousness
And before this video ends
I'd like to suggest that those who have only subbed recently
to take a look at this video
It's all about my past with Jerry
In the future I'm gonna make another video to talk about
his current situation
I'm Lele Farley
PEACE!
Browse More Related Video
Ancient Foundations for Mimetic Studies: Nidesh Lawtoo III. Mimesis as a Way of Life
Nepo Babies #podcast #nepotism #interview #model #famous #acting #shorts #reels #parents
눈물의 여왕 김수현🧡김지원 궁합을 여쭤봤더니..연인으로 발전 가능성 있다는데.. 사주 속 궁합은 어떨까? | 배우 김수현 김지원 #궁합 #사주
Why Rotor Riot Rampage is so "Overpriced" (ft. Botgrinder & Grim Ripper)
Ilya Sutskever | This will all happen next year | I totally believe | AI is come
I Bought a Bootleg S-WORKS Saddle from Ali Express
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)