ISTQB FOUNDATION 4.0 | Tutorial 55 | Defect Management | Defect Report Template | CTFL Tutorials

TM SQUARE
5 Apr 202410:17

Summary

TLDRThis tutorial delves into the ISTQB Foundation Level certification, focusing on Chapter 5.5: Defect Management. It explains the necessity of writing defect reports, detailing their objectives such as providing resolution information, tracking work product quality, and suggesting improvements in development and testing processes. The video outlines essential fields for a defect report, including a unique identifier, title, date observed, issuing organization, author's role, test object and environment, test context, description, expected versus actual results, severity, priority, status, and references. The script emphasizes the importance of defect management for overall process improvement.

Takeaways

  • πŸ“š The tutorial is focused on chapter 5.5 of ISTQB Foundation level certification, specifically on defect management.
  • πŸ” Defect management is crucial for understanding the process of handling defects within the software testing life cycle (STLC).
  • πŸ€” Three key questions about defects are addressed: what is a defect, why write a defect report, and what should be included in a defect report.
  • πŸ“ A defect report is essential for providing sufficient information to those responsible for resolving the issue, beyond just the tester's knowledge.
  • πŸ”‘ The objectives of writing a defect report include providing detailed information for resolution, tracking the quality of the work product, and offering ideas for improving the development and testing process.
  • πŸ“ˆ Defect reports help in evaluating the quality of both the test cases and the work products being tested, such as code or design.
  • πŸ’‘ By analyzing defect reports, insights can be gained on which areas of the development or testing lifecycle need improvement.
  • πŸ“‹ The minimum fields to include in a defect report are outlined by standards like ISO/IEC 29148, but organizations can add more based on their needs.
  • πŸ”‘ Key fields in a defect report include a unique identifier, title, date of observation, issuing organization, author and role, test object and environment, and a detailed description of the defect.
  • πŸ”„ The status of a defect throughout its lifecycle, known as the bug or defect life cycle, can vary by organization but commonly includes statuses like new, open, resolved, reopened, and closed.
  • πŸ“˜ Defect reports are not only for resolving issues but also serve as a tool for generating reports, tracking progress, and learning lessons to improve the overall test process.

Q & A

  • What is the main purpose of writing a defect report?

    -The main purpose of writing a defect report is to provide those responsible for handling and resolving reported defects with sufficient information to resolve the issue, and to document the defect for other stakeholders to understand what went wrong.

  • Why are verbal communications not recommended for defect reporting?

    -Verbal communications are not recommended because they are not documented and thus cannot be easily shared with all stakeholders who might be interested in the defect. It's important for the information to be accessible and understandable to everyone involved.

  • What are the three objectives typically associated with writing a defect report?

    -The three objectives are: 1) Provide sufficient information for resolving the defect, 2) Provide a means of tracking the quality of the work product, and 3) Provide ideas for improvement of the development and test process.

  • How does a defect report help in evaluating the quality of work products?

    -A defect report helps in evaluating the quality of work products by identifying which test cases are effective in finding defects and which areas of the product have the most defects, indicating potential areas for improvement in development or testing processes.

  • What is the significance of including the role of the author in a defect report?

    -Including the role of the author in a defect report is important because it clarifies who identified the defect, which can be a tester, developer, or designer. This helps in understanding the context of the defect and the perspective from which it was found.

  • What is meant by the 'test object and environment' in a defect report?

    -The 'test object and environment' refers to the specific item being tested and the conditions or settings in which the defect was identified. This provides context to understand where and under what circumstances the defect occurred.

  • Why is it important to include the expected and actual results in a defect report?

    -Including the expected and actual results in a defect report is important because it clearly outlines the discrepancy that constitutes the defect, helping those resolving the issue to understand the nature of the problem and what needs to be corrected.

  • What is the 'severity' of a defect, and why is it important to include in a defect report?

    -The 'severity' of a defect refers to the impact of the defect on the system or the end user. It is important to include because it helps prioritize which defects need to be fixed first, based on their urgency and impact.

  • What is a 'defect life cycle', and how does it relate to the status of a defect in a report?

    -A 'defect life cycle' is the journey a defect goes through from identification to resolution, including stages like 'new', 'open', 'resolved', 'reopen', and 'closed'. The status of a defect in a report helps track its progress through this life cycle.

  • Can additional fields beyond the standard ones be included in a defect report?

    -Yes, while there are standard fields recommended by guidelines like ISO/IEC 829, additional fields can be included in a defect report as per the product, project characteristics, or domain-specific requirements to provide more detailed information.

  • How does a defect report contribute to the overall improvement of the test process?

    -A defect report contributes to the overall improvement of the test process by providing insights into common issues, areas of weakness, and opportunities for improvement within the development and testing life cycle, allowing for more informed decision-making and process refinement.

Outlines

00:00

πŸ“š Understanding Defect Management and Reporting

This paragraph introduces the topic of defect management within the context of the ISTQB Foundation Level certification, specifically focusing on Chapter 5.5. It discusses the importance of writing a defect report, the process of managing defects in the software testing life cycle (STLC), and the key questions related to defects that should be answered. The paragraph emphasizes that a defect is a deviation from expectations or requirements, often referred to as an anomaly. It also outlines the objectives of a defect report, which include providing sufficient information for resolving issues, tracking the quality of work products, and offering ideas for improving development and testing processes.

05:00

πŸ“ Key Components of a Defect Report

This section delves into the specifics of what should be included in a defect report. It clarifies that while there are standards such as ISO/IEC 29148 that suggest minimum fields, organizations can tailor their defect reports to their needs. The paragraph lists typical fields found in a defect report, such as a unique identifier, title, date of observation, issuing organization, author details, test object and environment, test context, detailed description, expected versus actual results, severity, priority, status, and references. It also touches on the bug life cycle and the organization's freedom to define its own status conventions, highlighting the importance of these reports in defect management and process improvement.

10:01

πŸŽ“ Conclusion and Invitation for Further Learning

The final paragraph serves as a conclusion to the tutorial, summarizing the importance of understanding and effectively managing defects through detailed reporting. It invites viewers to look forward to sample questions in the next tutorial and to continue their learning journey with Chapter 6. The speaker expresses their availability for addressing queries and encourages continuous learning and exploration in the field of software testing.

Mindmap

Keywords

πŸ’‘ISTQB Foundation Level Certification

The ISTQB Foundation Level Certification is an internationally recognized qualification for software testers. It signifies that the individual has a foundational understanding of software testing principles and practices. In the video, this certification is the context in which the tutorial is being presented, and the focus is on a specific chapter related to managing test activities.

πŸ’‘Defect Management

Defect management refers to the process of identifying, documenting, tracking, and resolving defects or issues in software development. It is a critical component of the software testing life cycle. The video script discusses the importance of understanding this process and its role in ensuring software quality.

πŸ’‘Defect Report

A defect report is a document that provides a detailed account of a software defect, including its nature, impact, and steps to reproduce it. The script emphasizes the importance of writing a defect report to communicate issues effectively to stakeholders and to facilitate the resolution process.

πŸ’‘Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC)

The Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC) is a series of phases or stages that define the testing process within the software development life cycle. The video mentions STLC in the context of understanding the process of managing defects and the activities and artifacts involved in it.

πŸ’‘Deviation

In the context of software testing, a deviation refers to a discrepancy between the expected and actual results of a software application. The script uses the term to describe what a defect is, highlighting the importance of identifying such deviations during the validation process.

πŸ’‘Validation Process

The validation process in software testing is the act of evaluating the software to determine whether it complies with the specified requirements. The script mentions this process as the context in which deviations, or defects, are experienced and identified.

πŸ’‘Test Case

A test case is a set of defined conditions or variables under which a software application is tested to determine whether it behaves as expected. The script discusses how test cases can result in the identification of defects and how they can be evaluated for quality through defect reports.

πŸ’‘Quality of Work Product

The quality of a work product refers to the level of excellence or fitness for use of the output from a development or testing process. The video script explains how defect reports can provide insights into the quality of both the items being tested and the testing artifacts themselves.

πŸ’‘Bug Life Cycle

The bug life cycle, or defect life cycle, is the series of stages a defect goes through from its discovery to its resolution. The script briefly touches on this concept, explaining that the status of a defect at any point in time can be tracked, which is crucial for effective defect management.

πŸ’‘Unique Identifier

A unique identifier is a specific value that is used to distinguish a particular defect from others. The script mentions this as one of the essential fields in a defect report, which helps in tracking and referencing the defect throughout its life cycle.

πŸ’‘Priority

In the context of defect management, priority refers to the level of urgency associated with resolving a defect. The script explains that including the priority in a defect report helps in determining which defects need to be addressed first, based on their impact and urgency.

Highlights

Introduction to Chapter 5.5 on defect management in ISTQB Foundation level certification.

Explanation of the importance of understanding the process of managing defects within the life cycle.

Three key questions related to Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC): what is a defect, why write a defect report, and what to include in it.

Definition of a defect as a deviation experienced during the validation process of testing.

Objectives of writing a defect report: providing sufficient information for resolving issues, tracking quality of work products, and suggesting improvements.

The necessity of documenting defects for stakeholders beyond the tester.

Use of defect reports for evaluating the quality of test cases and work products under test.

How defect reports can provide insights into areas of the development and testing process that need improvement.

The role of defect reports in identifying the most problematic areas within a project.

Overview of the fields typically included in a defect report according to ISO/IEC 82900.

Customization of defect report fields based on product, project characteristics, and domain specifics.

List of minimum fields to be included in a defect report: unique identifier, title, date, issuing organization, author, test object, environment, and context.

Importance of including detailed description, expected vs. actual results, and severity in defect reports.

Discussion on the priority and status of defects, and the flexibility for organizations to define their own statuses.

The concept of a defect life cycle and its significance in tracking and managing defects.

Inclusion of references in defect reports for additional context and information.

Emphasis on the value of defects in improving the overall test process and the importance of learning from them.

Conclusion of Chapter 5 and a look forward to sample questions and Chapter 6 in the next tutorial.

Transcripts

play00:00

Hello friends and greetings for the day

play00:02

welcome back to another tutorial on

play00:03

istqb Foundation level certification we

play00:06

are in chapter 5 talking about managing

play00:08

test activities and continuing ahead

play00:10

with our next segment which is 5.5

play00:13

defect management and here we'll be

play00:16

talking about what is the reason we

play00:17

should write a defect report and what

play00:19

can be include in a defect

play00:28

report

play00:31

when it comes to defect management

play00:32

someone should really understand what

play00:34

exactly is the process of managing

play00:36

defects within the life cycle and what

play00:38

are those activities and artifacts

play00:40

involved in managing defects Al together

play00:42

when it comes to a stlc which is

play00:44

software testing life cycle in fact at

play00:47

some point of time anyone should be able

play00:49

to answer three different questions

play00:51

related to this that is what is a defect

play00:53

why should we write a defect report and

play00:55

what should we include in a defect

play00:57

report in this particular section we'll

play00:59

be talking about answering the two

play01:00

questions because the first question has

play01:02

been already answered in the chapter one

play01:04

that is what is defect a defect is

play01:06

certainly a deviation experiened as a

play01:08

part of the validation process which is

play01:11

testing and it is even referred to as

play01:13

the deviation from the expectation or

play01:16

deviation from the requirements or even

play01:18

sometime we do use the words like

play01:19

anomalies which are identified between

play01:22

the expected and the actual result so

play01:24

this has been discussed as a part of

play01:26

chapter one in this particular tutorial

play01:27

we'll be talking about why should I

play01:29

write a defect report and what should be

play01:31

include in a defect reports so let's

play01:34

quickly look into it and understand more

play01:36

about the reason the objective involved

play01:38

in writing a defect report so when it

play01:40

comes to the objectives the typical

play01:42

defect reports objectives include

play01:45

provide those responsible for handling

play01:47

and resolving reported defects with

play01:49

sufficient information to resolve the

play01:51

issue it's a very straightforward thing

play01:53

when the testing is being conducted and

play01:55

a test case fails it's only a tester in

play01:58

very much isolation who knows what went

play02:00

wrong what was the problem what was the

play02:03

defect all about but until unless this

play02:06

person writes a report nobody else can

play02:08

really understand what went wrong and

play02:10

verbal Communications are not

play02:12

recommended at this point of time that

play02:13

means a tester cannot go to everybody's

play02:15

desk because it's just not the developer

play02:18

who is going to reol resolve the issue

play02:20

but there are many other stakeholders

play02:21

who might be interested in the defect

play02:23

information to take a call to make a

play02:25

decision or sometime to defer it or

play02:27

probably take resolution actions and not

play02:30

just summary is enough there are many

play02:31

other things which we do include in the

play02:33

defect report thus documenting it is

play02:36

very important for others stakeholders

play02:38

to understand that what is the defect

play02:41

all about so that's the very first

play02:43

objective whereas the second objective

play02:44

says provide a means of tracking the

play02:47

quality of the work product when we talk

play02:49

about the quality of the work product

play02:51

here we certainly understand that the

play02:53

work products what we are using or what

play02:56

we are testing both the things can be

play02:57

evaluated right from the defect report

play03:00

for example if the if you talk about our

play03:02

own what defects like test cases then

play03:04

what test cases are resulting into good

play03:06

identification of defects and what test

play03:09

cases are not really helping us to find

play03:11

some good defects I can make judgment on

play03:13

the selection of regression test Suite

play03:15

or those test cases to be put into

play03:17

regression test Suite also I can select

play03:20

good candidates learn lessons from the

play03:22

test cases which can be very helpful on

play03:24

a long run for me to even write similar

play03:27

type of test cases for upcoming projects

play03:28

as well on on the other hand the test

play03:31

artifacts which we are testing like code

play03:33

design if I'm finding a lot of defects

play03:35

related to code then I know my unit

play03:37

testing was poor or if I find a lot of

play03:40

defs related to code I can even say the

play03:42

development has to improve right so it

play03:45

helps me understand the quality of the

play03:47

work product on either side of it

play03:49

whereas the third objective involved in

play03:51

defect management or for writing defect

play03:53

report includes provide ideas for

play03:56

improvement of the development and T

play03:58

Test process so so certainly by having

play04:01

defect report being created or written I

play04:03

can capture those information which will

play04:05

also tell me which face identified the

play04:08

issue or the defect and which work

play04:10

product had most number of defects

play04:12

related to it which could further help

play04:14

me to understand that which area of the

play04:17

life cycle needs a little bit of more

play04:19

Improvement in a simple example assume

play04:21

that I got 100 defects in a project out

play04:24

of which 70 were related to

play04:26

misunderstanding of requirement however

play04:29

we say that we conducted static testing

play04:31

at the time when the requirements were

play04:33

being written that means we reviewed the

play04:34

requirement and we found some good

play04:36

defects there as well but point being

play04:38

made is if in Dynamic testing out of 100

play04:40

70 defects were related to

play04:43

misunderstanding of requirement then I

play04:45

think my static testing needs to be

play04:47

improved so it's just not the other

play04:48

activities of the development life cycle

play04:50

but within testing also the previous or

play04:52

early testings could also be improved by

play04:55

just having defect management done

play04:57

properly thus these three object

play05:00

contribute to the overall defect

play05:01

management by being conducted in a very

play05:04

very professional way so given that we

play05:07

know the objectives it's time for us to

play05:09

understand what exactly should be

play05:11

include in a defect report in nutshell

play05:14

so when it comes to writing a defect

play05:15

report it's not really a standard list

play05:18

of items what I can include or standard

play05:20

list of fields Legends what should I

play05:22

include in the defect report however

play05:25

there are certain standards like ISO i e

play05:27

829 which do declare that these SE are

play05:29

some of the minimum Fields what you

play05:31

should always include but however you

play05:34

can include anything beyond that as per

play05:36

your product and project characteristics

play05:39

or even related to your domain specific

play05:42

so it's not necessary that these are the

play05:43

only Fields what you're going to see in

play05:45

a moment are the only fields to be

play05:47

included in defect report you can

play05:49

certainly have more and more details

play05:51

further Beyond this in order to make

play05:53

sure that you have a wonderful defect

play05:55

management as per your expectation does

play05:57

istqb does not claim that this is the

play06:00

very very standard list of defect report

play06:03

Fields what you should have and there's

play06:05

nothing else required so let's quickly

play06:08

have a look on what are those fields we

play06:09

are talking about so defect report

play06:11

logged during Dynamic testing typically

play06:14

include now when we say typically of

play06:16

course we are trying to talk about those

play06:18

simple things what which should be their

play06:20

bare minimum so the items include unique

play06:23

identifier which is identification ID of

play06:27

a defect title with a short summary of

play06:29

the anomaly being reported a short

play06:31

oneliner which will tell the people that

play06:33

what is the defect all about then date

play06:36

when the anomaly was observed issuing

play06:38

organization and author including their

play06:40

role so date is of course to track the

play06:42

progress issuing organization means who

play06:45

identified it and the author the person

play06:47

who did that and of course their role

play06:50

because it's not necessary that only

play06:51

testers can find a defect when it comes

play06:53

to review even developers designers can

play06:55

also find defects so in that context it

play06:58

becomes pretty important to include the

play07:00

name of the person as well and their

play07:03

role also identification of the test

play07:05

object and environment the test object

play07:07

means here the item being tested and the

play07:09

environment certainly means where did

play07:11

you identify as we do understand there

play07:13

are a lot of stage lot of different

play07:14

environments so we do make sure that

play07:16

which environment did we identify it in

play07:19

also to add context of the defect which

play07:21

basically talks about the test case

play07:22

being run the activity being performed

play07:25

which face other relevant information

play07:27

such as technique which helped you find

play07:29

it so include any any of those

play07:31

information which helps someone

play07:33

understand more about how this defect

play07:35

can be understood or how this effect can

play07:38

be identified further or even reproduced

play07:41

when required further to add description

play07:44

so summary is just a oneline title but

play07:46

description of the failure would further

play07:48

give all the details of the description

play07:51

of a defect which helps detailed

play07:54

understanding of the issue and that can

play07:55

include any relevant test logs uh

play07:58

database dumps screenshots or any kind

play08:00

of video recording as well also expected

play08:03

results and actual results should be

play08:04

captured along with the defect report

play08:06

sity which certainly means the impact of

play08:09

the defect on the system or the end user

play08:12

priority to fix which in simple word

play08:14

means the urgency to resolve the issue

play08:17

like what should be fixed first compared

play08:18

to other defects and status of defect at

play08:21

any point of time however on this point

play08:23

I would like to share that there is a

play08:25

complete defect tracking life cycle

play08:27

which do make a lot of sense sense to

play08:29

any organization the Journey of a defect

play08:32

is called as bug life cycle or defect

play08:34

life cycle but the status are completely

play08:37

left to organization that what kind of

play08:40

status do you like to make use of you

play08:42

have the complete freedom on that

play08:44

however there are some common and

play08:45

standard uh naming conventions for some

play08:47

of the status like new open resolved

play08:50

reopen and closed but on top of it if

play08:53

you wish you can always have your own

play08:55

custom status to determine what is the

play08:58

life cycle for a defect in your

play08:59

organization or your project further to

play09:02

add of course you can include any kind

play09:05

of references which you think could be a

play09:07

good source of information for someone

play09:09

to understand that what was the defect

play09:11

all about so put together these are all

play09:14

those common fields what why must look

play09:16

forward to include when it comes to

play09:18

defect management or writing a defect

play09:20

report which in turn would help you to

play09:24

understand the defect at any point of

play09:25

time generate reports or even spend your

play09:28

time learning lessons from your defects

play09:30

to improve your test process altoe

play09:33

however we'll talk about the test

play09:34

process improvements in the next level

play09:36

that is test manager but at this point

play09:38

just want to let you know that defects

play09:40

are very helpful in determining the

play09:42

overall test process Improvement as well

play09:44

well that's all from this particular

play09:46

tutorial team and with that we also

play09:47

complete the chapter five we'll look at

play09:49

some sample questions in our next

play09:50

tutorial and get started with chapter

play09:52

six so that's all from this particular

play09:54

tutorial team should you have anything

play09:55

else feel free to comment below I'm

play09:57

always there to address your queries and

play09:58

answer them well till then keep learning

play10:00

keep exploring keep understanding the

play10:02

context thanks for watching the video

play10:03

team and happy

play10:09

[Music]

play10:15

learning

Rate This
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…
β˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
ISTQBDefect ManagementSoftware TestingTest ActivitiesQuality AssuranceBug TrackingTest CasesRequirementsDevelopment CycleTest ProcessReport Writing