VOCÊ REALMENTE ENTENDEU o QUE É AMOR? - CLÓVIS DE BARROS e ILAN BRENMAN

Summary

The speaker delves into the multifaceted nature of love, emphasizing the desire for presence (Eros), the joy of presence, and the zeal in absence. They argue that love is not just longing but also the celebration of togetherness and the insubstitutability of the loved one. The script highlights the importance of recognizing the cause of joy in love, as stated by Spinoza, and discusses the societal challenges in expressing happiness and the uniqueness of love that cannot be replaced or substituted, making life more vibrant and meaningful.

Takeaways

• 💔 The concept of love involves a dimension of lack, which is the desiring part of love, or Eros, that is missing.
• 🏫 The speaker feels a strong sense of absence when not teaching, indicating a deep connection to their profession.
• 🎉 Love is not just about the feeling of absence; it also brings joy in presence, as explained by Spinoza.
• 🔥 The 'happy hour' mentioned is a metaphor for the intense relief and joy when work ends, contrasting with the love of teaching.
• ❤️ The speaker believes love is the joy in presence, accompanied by the awareness of its cause, which is the loved one.
• 👫 Love in a relationship requires the presence of desire, joy, and zeal, which are essential for a fulfilling marriage.
• 🤔 The speaker suggests that if love were only about absence, there would be no happiness in marriage, but there is.
• 👨‍👧‍👦 Zeal is described as the protective and caring feeling one has for someone they love, like a parent for their child.
• 🧩 Love is composed of three elements: desire in absence, joy in presence, and zeal, forming a triptych of love.
• 🎭 The speaker wants to add a fourth element to love: insubstitutability, meaning the unique and irreplaceable nature of the loved one.
• 🚫 In love, the loved one is not interchangeable; if a bond changes, the love for that person remains unique and insubstitutable.
• 🌈 The speaker concludes that the elements of desire, joy, zeal, and insubstitutability make love a colorful and enriching part of life.

Q & A

What does the speaker believe is the missing dimension of love?

The speaker believes that the missing dimension of love is the part that desires, which is Eros, the lack of which is felt as an absence.

How does the speaker describe the 'happy hour' after work?

The speaker describes 'happy hour' as a time of absurd violence and truculence because the best part of life, according to them, is being in the classroom, and the absence of it during holidays is felt deeply.

What does the speaker say about the presence of love in terms of joy?

The speaker says that love is also joy in the presence, as stated by Spinoza, which is joy accompanied by the idea of its cause, meaning one is happy and knows the cause of happiness.

What is the difference between love and joy according to the speaker?

The difference between love and joy is the consciousness of the cause, according to the speaker. Love involves being affected by the cause of joy and having awareness of it.

Why does the speaker believe that love is also Zelo?

The speaker believes that love is also Zelo, which is the desire for presence in absence, joy in presence, and a protective concern for the loved one, whether they are near or far.

What does the speaker suggest as the fourth element to add to the definition of love?

The speaker suggests adding 'insubstitutability' as the fourth element to the definition of love, emphasizing that the loved one is not replaceable or interchangeable.

What does the speaker mean by 'competent desire'?

By 'competent desire,' the speaker means the ability to pursue what one wants with skill and effectiveness, which can make life more colorful.

How does the speaker view the importance of joy in life?

The speaker views joy as an essential part of life that is often overlooked. They suggest that being able to find joy in what one has achieved is more difficult than the desire for it.

What does the speaker say about the societal view of joy?

The speaker criticizes the societal view of joy as being undervalued and suggests that society is more geared towards desire and competition rather than happiness.

What is the speaker's opinion on the difficulty of loving in presence?

The speaker believes that loving in presence, or during conviviality, is difficult and requires a level of maturity that is often not achieved.

How does the speaker describe the concept of 'insubstitutability' in love?

The speaker describes 'insubstitutability' in love as the understanding that the love for a person is unique and cannot be replaced or substituted by another, even if one forms new relationships.