Death Sentence vs Life In Prison - How Do They Actually Compare?
Summary
TLDRThis script explores the history and evolution of capital punishment in the US, contrasting it with life imprisonment. It delves into early public executions, the shift to private penitentiaries, and the quest for more humane execution methods, from hangings to lethal injection. It discusses the moral and practical reasons behind the preference for life imprisonment, including the potential for exoneration and the high costs associated with death penalty trials and death row maintenance.
Takeaways
- π‘ The death penalty in America dates back to the 17th century with hangings as the primary method of execution.
- π₯ Public executions were intended to serve justice and act as a deterrent to crime.
- π Despite the belief that harsh punishments deter crime, data shows that crime rates increased during times of public executions.
- π Early Americans emphasized limiting the death penalty, showing clemency in certain cases.
- π The death penalty was mostly reserved for murder in the US, with a growing movement for its complete abolishment.
- π The number of crimes punishable by death increased in the South, particularly for crimes committed by slaves.
- π The creation of penitentiaries shifted focus towards reforming criminals rather than deterring crime through punishment.
- π¬ The 20th century saw the US becoming more selective with the death penalty, often opting for life imprisonment.
- π Execution methods evolved from hangings to electric chair, gas chamber, and finally lethal injection, each with their own controversies.
- π Lethal injection, despite being considered the most humane method, has faced criticism for being potentially painful and distressing.
- π Life imprisonment is seen as a more moral option and allows for the possibility of exoneration with new evidence.
Q & A
What was the primary purpose of public executions during the 17th century?
-Public executions were meant to serve justice and act as a deterrent to crime.
How did the early Americans differ from their English counterparts in their approach to the death penalty?
-Early Americans placed great emphasis on limiting the use of the death penalty, often showing clemency in cases of good personal character, youth, or extenuating circumstances.
What was the significance of the creation of state prisons in the context of the death penalty?
-The creation of state prisons led to an increased investment in reforming criminals rather than simply deterring crime through punishment, and it allowed authorities to end public spectacles of executions.
How did the 20th century see a change in the use of the death penalty in the United States?
-The United States became more progressive in the use of the death penalty, reserving it for only the most heinous crimes, and often opting for life imprisonment over execution.
What were some of the issues with the method of hanging as a form of execution?
-Hanging could go wrong if the rope's length was not properly calculated, resulting in a slow and painful death or decapitation if the condemned's weight was not correctly measured.
What was the electric chair introduced as a replacement for, and what were its problems?
-The electric chair was introduced as a replacement for hangings, promising a quick and efficient death. However, it had problems such as the condemned catching on fire or still being alive after the application of voltage.
Why is lethal injection currently the preferred method for executing the death penalty?
-Lethal injection is seen as a more humane and efficient way to execute the death penalty, despite having its own set of problems.
What are some of the issues with the administration of lethal injections?
-Lethal injections are often administered by prison guards with minimal training, which can lead to mistakes in finding veins, inserting IV lines, and administering drugs in the correct doses and order.
Why is life imprisonment considered a more moral option than the death penalty?
-Life imprisonment is seen as the more moral option because it avoids the moral pitfall of the state killing someone, no matter the crime.
How does life imprisonment provide a practical advantage in terms of legal redress?
-Life imprisonment allows for the possibility of new evidence or forensic techniques to be discovered, which can lead to the freeing of an innocent person or a reduction in sentence.
Why is the death penalty more expensive than life imprisonment without parole?
-The death penalty is more expensive due to the costs of lengthy trials, multiple appeals, and the additional expenses of running a death row, including staff, observation, maintenance, and healthcare costs.
Outlines
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video
S6 E10: Lethal Injections, William Barr & Australian Elections: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver
Are you in favor of death penalty
Top 5 Facts About Capital Punishment
Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty
Killing people is always wrong | Richard Bourke | TEDxSydney
26λ μ§Έ μ€λ¨λ μ¬ν μ§ν, μ¬κ°νλ©΄ λ²μ΄μ§ μΌμ / μ°ν©λ΄μ€ (Yonhapnews)
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)