Goethe-Zertifikat B2 – Deutschprüfung Modul Sprechen | German B2 Oral Exam

Summary

In this B2-level German language exam, two candidates, Samira and Stasa, present on various topics. Samira discusses workplace nutrition, emphasizing the benefits of preparing meals at home versus eating out. Stasa presents on financing studies, exploring options like student loans, working while studying, and scholarships. They engage in a discussion about whether students should evaluate their professors. Both share personal experiences and perspectives, with Samira supporting the idea of evaluations to improve teaching quality, while Stasa acknowledges the potential downsides. The conversation highlights cultural differences and the importance of student feedback in education.

Takeaways

• 😀 A student from Azerbaijan, Samira, discusses the importance of eating healthy at work, advocating for preparing meals at home rather than eating on the go or ordering at work.
• 🍏 Samira emphasizes that bringing food from home is cheaper and healthier, as supermarket prices are lower than restaurant meals, and home-cooked meals can be more nutritious.
• 🏥 Samira, as a doctor, highlights the importance of healthy eating, but acknowledges that in hospitals, canteens provide healthy options, including fruits and vegetables.
• 🍔 The discussion includes the observation that many people in Germany eat on the go, which might not always be healthy, but can be time-saving.
• 💼 Another candidate, Stasa, from Slovenia, discusses options for financing university studies, including student loans, parental support, and scholarships.
• 💰 Stasa points out that in Slovenia, university education is free, so students don’t have to worry about tuition fees, but they still need to manage living costs like housing and food.
• 📚 Stasa suggests that students can finance their education by working part-time jobs, especially in cafés and restaurants, where students are often employed.
• 🧑‍🏫 Stasa mentions that working while studying is common in Slovenia, as students are paid without being taxed, which makes it easier to balance work and study.
• 💡 Stasa believes that the best way to finance education is by working part-time, gaining experience, and using scholarships when available.
• 📝 The second part of the exam involved a discussion about whether students should evaluate their professors, with both candidates agreeing that professor evaluations motivate teachers to improve and enhance the learning environment.

Q & A

What topic did Samira Safarova present on?

Samira Safarova presented on the topic of 'Nutrition at the Workplace,' discussing the different ways people can manage their meals during work hours, such as eating on the go, preparing meals at home, or ordering food at work.

Why does Samira suggest preparing meals at home and bringing them to work?

Samira believes that preparing meals at home and bringing them to work is healthier and more cost-effective. She explains that buying ingredients at the supermarket and preparing meals oneself is cheaper and offers more control over nutritional quality.

What is Samira’s profession, and how does it influence her perspective on healthy eating?

Samira is a doctor, and her profession makes her strongly value healthy eating. She emphasizes that healthy food is crucial for maintaining good health, which influences her preference for preparing meals at home over eating out.

What does Samira think about eating on the go?

Samira is not against eating on the go, acknowledging that it can save time, but she believes it is often less healthy compared to preparing food at home. She highlights that convenience can sometimes come at the expense of nutritional quality.

What were the follow-up questions asked after Samira’s presentation?

The follow-up questions were: 1) Would Samira bring her own food to work if she worked in a hospital cafeteria? 2) Does Samira think most people eat healthily at work?

What did Stasa Schwi present about?

Stasa Schwi presented on the topic of 'Financing Studies.' She discussed various ways to fund university education, including taking student loans, receiving financial support from parents, or applying for scholarships.

How does Stasa view the student loan option in Germany?

Stasa sees student loans as a good option for students who cannot afford tuition fees. She notes that these loans typically have lower interest rates compared to regular loans and can be repaid after graduation.

What is Stasa’s opinion on working part-time while studying?

Stasa supports the idea of students working part-time while studying, especially if they are studying abroad. She believes that it is a practical solution to finance their studies, although it can be challenging to balance work and studies.

How do Slovenian students finance their living expenses despite free education?

Stasa explains that in Slovenia, where education is free, students typically finance their living expenses by working part-time in cafes and restaurants. These jobs pay wages that are tax-free for students.

What argument does Stasa make about the disadvantages of financing studies solely through work?

Stasa acknowledges that relying solely on working while studying can be difficult, as students have less time for their studies and personal life. However, she believes it is necessary for students to manage their finances, especially when living costs are high.

What was the topic of the discussion in Part 2 of the exam?

In Part 2 of the exam, the candidates discussed whether students should officially evaluate their professors. Both candidates supported the idea, arguing that it could improve the quality of teaching and create a better learning environment.

What was Samira’s personal experience with professor evaluations?

Samira shared that in Azerbaijan, professors were not evaluated, and this led to a lack of motivation among professors. When the evaluation system was introduced, professors were more motivated to improve their teaching, which ultimately benefited the students.

What is Stasa’s opinion on the potential disadvantages of professor evaluations?

Stasa believes that while professor evaluations are beneficial, they can sometimes be affected by students' personal biases. If a student has a negative experience with a professor, it might lead to an unfair evaluation.

How do the candidates feel about the anonymity of professor evaluations?

Both Samira and Stasa agree that professor evaluations should be anonymous to prevent biased or unfair assessments. They believe that anonymity ensures more honest and objective feedback.

Did the candidates agree on the topic of professor evaluations?

Yes, both Samira and Stasa agreed that students should evaluate their professors. They believe it helps improve teaching standards and motivates professors to continuously improve their teaching methods.