Part 2: Digital technologies and social inclusion (Research Frontiers)
Summary
TLDRThe script discusses the gendered history of the computing industry and its impact on inequality. It highlights the economic benefits of technological jobs, especially for marginalized groups, and the potential of crowd work for women's economic emancipation. However, it also points out the exploitation and discrimination in gig and crowd work. The script emphasizes the societal consequences of gender inequality in knowledge production, such as biased algorithms affecting health outcomes, and the importance of diversity in teams for innovation and better outcomes in software development. It concludes by stressing that technology is not neutral and that technologists have a responsibility to design inclusive digital systems.
Takeaways
- 💼 The computing industry has historically been gendered, shifting from a female-dominated field to a male-dominated one as it became more prestigious and lucrative.
- 🌐 The script emphasizes the importance of striving for gender equality in technology not just for ethical reasons, but also for its economic and societal benefits.
- 💡 Technological jobs and technology-mediated jobs can provide opportunities for marginalized groups, including women, to enter the workforce through flexible work arrangements like crowd work.
- 🔄 However, crowd work can also lead to exploitation and discrimination against gig and crowd workers, particularly on the basis of gender or age.
- 📊 A Eurostat survey highlighted a shortage in recruitment for ICT professionals, indicating that gender balance in the IT sector could help fill more jobs and contribute to economic growth.
- 🧐 Gender inequality in technology leads to unequal knowledge production, which can reinforce biases and exacerbate the digital divide.
- 🤖 Biases in data collection and algorithm design can have serious consequences, such as misdiagnosing health conditions based on gender, as illustrated by the Babylon app example.
- 🔍 The script calls for a more inclusive approach to technology design that considers a variety of users and their needs to avoid perpetuating stereotypes and biases.
- 👥 Diversity in teams leads to better and more innovative outcomes, improving software quality and development productivity.
- 🌟 Inclusion not only enhances team flexibility and adaptability but also increases organizational economic returns by avoiding groupthink and defensive behaviors.
- 🌱 The script concludes by highlighting that technology is not neutral and that the way technologists design and participate in the digital economy has far-reaching consequences at individual, organizational, and societal levels.
Q & A
How has the computing industry changed in terms of gender representation historically?
-Historically, the computing industry was a low-paying sector that employed women, but it has structurally changed to become a high-value sector dominated by men.
Why is striving for gender equality in technology important beyond just a moral imperative?
-Gender equality in technology is important for its economic prospects, societal effects, and the potential to reduce biases in knowledge production and digital technologies.
What is crowd work and how does it offer flexibility to marginalized individuals?
-Crowd work refers to work done through a crowdsourcing platform that matches workers with tasks required by organizations. It offers flexibility in terms of when and how to work, which is crucial for women and marginalized individuals to enter the labor market.
How can crowd work potentially help women become economically emancipated?
-Crowd work can help women get better jobs and become economically emancipated by providing flexible work opportunities that allow them to participate in the labor market from home.
What are some of the issues faced by gig and crowd workers that may hinder their economic emancipation?
-Gig and crowd workers may face exploitation or discrimination based on gender or age, which can hinder their economic emancipation despite the flexibility offered by such work.
Why is gender inequality in the IT sector problematic for economies?
-Gender inequality in the IT sector is problematic because it leads to a shortage in recruitment, with many firms facing difficulties in filling ICT professional positions, resulting in unfilled jobs and economic inefficiency.
How does inequality in knowledge production reinforce biases and affect society?
-Inequality in knowledge production can reinforce biases, leading to unequal outcomes and a digital divide. It affects who produces knowledge and what kind of worldviews are encapsulated by that knowledge, potentially leading to biased and harmful digital technologies.
Can you provide an example of how biased data can have real-world consequences in health information systems?
-An example is the UK National Health Services Babylon app, which used AI to advise patients but was found to give incorrect recommendations to women due to biased data, leading to misdiagnoses and potentially life-threatening consequences.
What is the importance of diversity in teams for innovation and productivity in software development?
-Diversity in teams leads to better and more innovative outcomes, as diverse perspectives can improve software quality and development productivity, making teams more flexible and open to change.
How can digital systems amplify and reproduce gender inequality and stereotypes?
-Digital systems can amplify and reproduce gender inequality and stereotypes by using biased algorithms and data, which can lead to unequal consequences for different genders, particularly affecting the well-being and health of people.
What is an intersectional approach and why is it important in addressing digital health issues?
-An intersectional approach considers multiple aspects of identity, such as gender, race, and class, to understand and address issues comprehensively. It is important in digital health to ensure that technologies are inclusive and do not perpetuate biases or discrimination.
Outlines
💻 Economic and Social Impacts of Technological Inequality
This paragraph discusses the importance of striving for gender equality in the computing industry, not just as a moral imperative, but for its economic and societal benefits. It highlights how technological jobs can provide opportunities for marginalized individuals, particularly through flexible crowd work, which can empower women economically. However, it also points out the exploitation and discrimination that can occur in gig and crowd work environments. The paragraph emphasizes the negative economic consequences of gender inequality, such as a shortage in recruitment of ICT professionals, and the broader implications of unequal knowledge production, which can reinforce biases and exacerbate the digital divide. It provides an example of how biased data in health information systems can lead to incorrect medical advice, affecting women and minorities disproportionately, and calls for a more inclusive approach in technology design to avoid these issues.
🌟 The Power of Diversity and Inclusion in Innovation
The second paragraph explores the advantages of diversity in teams, suggesting that it leads to better and more innovative outcomes for both teams and organizations. It argues that inclusive environments can improve software quality and development productivity by fostering flexibility and openness to change. The paragraph also touches on the broader impact of digital systems, which can amplify and perpetuate stereotypes, affecting the well-being and health of individuals. It concludes by emphasizing that technology is not neutral and that the design and participation of technologists in the digital economy have significant individual, organizational, and societal consequences. The paragraph sets the stage for the next part, which will introduce ideas to counteract exclusion and promote equality in the tech industry.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Gendered
💡Equality
💡Economic Prospects
💡Crowd Work
💡Digital Divide
💡Biases
💡Inclusive Knowledge Production
💡Predictive Policing
💡Diversity in Teams
💡Digital Health
💡Algorithms
Highlights
The computing industry has historically been gendered, shifting from a female-dominated sector to one dominated by men as it became more prestigious.
Equality in technology is important not just as a moral imperative, but also for its economic and societal benefits.
Technological jobs and technology-mediated jobs can provide opportunities for marginalized individuals, particularly women, to enter the workforce.
Crowd work offers flexibility, which is a significant factor for women's participation in the labor market.
Despite the potential of crowd work, studies show that gig and crowd workers face exploitation and discrimination based on gender or age.
Gender inequality in the IT sector leads to a shortage in recruitment and a loss of potential talent.
Inequality in knowledge production can reinforce biases and contribute to the digital divide.
Unequal data collection can lead to biased health information systems with potentially devastating consequences for certain demographics.
An example of biased data is the UK National Health Service's Babylon app, which misdiagnosed a female smoker's heart attack symptoms as a panic attack.
Data collection often overlooks the diversity of users, leading to incomplete and biased algorithms.
Inclusive design in technology can lead to more person-centered approaches and better adaptation to diverse user needs.
Biases in algorithms can result in discriminatory practices, such as predictive policing and risk assessment scores.
A feminist approach to women's health, as suggested by a 2023 Lancet report, could save 800,000 lives by addressing biases in healthcare.
Digital systems can amplify and scale gender inequality, cementing and reproducing stereotypes with wide-ranging impacts.
Diversity in teams has been shown to lead to better and more innovative outcomes in software development and organizational performance.
Inclusion increases organizational economic returns by reducing defensive avoidance behavior and promoting adaptability to change.
Technologists have a responsibility to consider the consequences of their designs and participation in the digital economy at individual, organizational, and societal levels.
The history of computing has been gendered from the beginning, with exclusion and inequality having negative consequences that need to be addressed.
Transcripts
the previous part we have looked at how
the Computing industry has been gendered
structurally changing from a low
rewarding sector that employed women to
one dominated by men when it became seen
as providing for valuable careers in
this part we will look at the reason why
you should care about equality as a
technologist obviously equality is
something that we should strive for in
and for itself but it remains important
to understand the consequences of having
such
inequality the first reason is economic
prospects there are clear individual ual
but also societal effects from
technological jobs or jobs mediated by
technology technology mediated jobs can
help to get more people to work
particularly those suffering from
marginalization there were a lot of
hopes placed on digital Technologies and
in particular on crowd work which refers
to work done in a crowdsourcing way In
Crowd workor a platform matches a worker
with tasks that are required by an
organization that kind of work is
flexible allowing women who have
historically been deprived red of
entering the labor market to join it
from home so crowd work gives you a lot
of flexibility when and how to work and
this is identified by economists as one
of the most important factors for women
to enter the labor market as Churchill
and Lynn argue crowd workk can help
women get better jobs and become
economically
emancipated the key word here of course
is can because there are very good
studies that show that gig and crowd
workers are exploited or discriminated
against in different ways for example on
gender or age basis we've looked at how
it mediator jobs can improve
individual's lives but it is also
important for societies gender
inequality is really problematic for
economies since there is a shortage in
recruitment a survey by eurostat
indicated that 41% of firms had
difficulties recruiting ICT
professionals balancing the it sector
would mean more jobs being filled and IT
jobs in general tend to be good and well
paid exclusion and inequality cause an
issue we need to avoid inequality
generates unequal knowledge production
which has negative
consequences inequality reinforces
biases which strengthen the digital
divide inequality is not only about
access it's not only a matter of jobs
you hold it's also an issue about who
produces knowledge and what kind of
worldviews are encapsulated by that
knowledge what kind of knowledge and
values are being produced and designed
into our digital
Technologies information systems that
are built with unequal data can affect
people with devastating consequences
let's take this example from a paper
that suggests an intersectional approach
to digital Health it reads for example
the UK National Health Services Babylon
app released in 2017 used artificial
intelligence to advise patients on the
probability of a diagnosis based on
their selfreported symptoms the app also
advise a course of action contact a
doctor visit the emergency room or no
action a female smoker aged 59 years
with symptoms of a heart attack I.E
chest pain shortness of breath and
anxiety
received a diagnosis of depression or
panic attack whereas a male user with
the same background and symptoms was
informed of a possibility of a heart
attack the health information system had
biased data but gave incorrect
recommendations to women how does this
happen we often collect data without
really thinking about who we collect
data from goes a bit like this
schematically we collect data making
assumptions about the general user but
we think is universal we do not see the
issues or the conditions that different
users may suffer from and fail to treat
those conditions in time because we have
not seen them we have not identified
them they're not part of our data or
even knowledge so they cannot become
part of our
practice when we do have treatment it's
not adapted to the variety of users and
their varieties of bodies gender
differences here matter if we were to
include more people and have a more
person centered approach to the design
of Technologies we would necessarily
become more inclusive there are other
examples like predictive policing which
tend to discriminate against black
people or risk scores for receiving
benefit payments that negatively make
assumptions against women or single
parents so this is a wide issue and this
happens because biases can be designed
into the algorithms used for decision-
making the data on which algorithms take
decisions are themselves biased and this
affects women and particularly women
from Minority backgrounds this can have
large scale consequences a report in the
health journal lanet in 2023 suggested
that taking a feminist approach to
Women's Health could save 800,000 lives
it's not just data but the way that we
think about medicine or how our digital
systems come to cause unequal
consequences to people that we should
have been more attentive to as un
Secretary General Antonio gutes said
rather than presenting facts and
addressing bias Technology based on
incomplete data and badly designed
algorithms is digitizing and amplifying
sexism with deadly consequences of
course medicine did not wait for digital
technology to be gendered but now gender
inequality is reproduced at scale
digital systems amplify and scale
inequality they can cement and reproduce
stereotypes which affect the well-being
and health of people the third reason is
that there are many studies that suggest
that diversity in teams lead to better
and more Innovative outcomes for teams
and
organizations inclusion also increases
organizational economic returns by
helping teams refrain from defense
avoidance behavior patterns and
outwardly suspicious group think teams
are more accepting of unexpected
challenges and worldviews diverse teams
can just be more flexible and more
readily accept change this matters for
software development it has been
suggested that diverse teams can improve
the software quality they produce and
improve development productivity so to
conclude we have seen that technology is
not neutral it creates inclusion we've
seen in the introduction how it has
allowed social movements to make an
impact on the political agendas in many
countries but we we have also seen how
Computing can exclude or create
inequality the history of computing has
been gendered from the beginning we have
seen an intersectional view of exclusion
when we talked about gender imbalance we
saw how that imbalance was connected
with issues of class we have also seen
that digital inequality and exclusion
have very negative consequences as
technologists the way that you design or
participate in the digital economy has
consequences at the individual
organizational and societal levels in
next part we will introduce a few ideas
to counter mitigate or address exclusion
Browse More Related Video
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EDCpiLiSViM/hq720.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEmCIAKENAF8quKqQMa8AEB-AH-CYAC0AWKAgwIABABGGUgZShlMA8=&rs=AOn4CLByyhdDrQCQMwWaPsXJhUiYrsegiQ)
Part 3: Digital technologies and social inclusion (Research Frontiers)
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9Z1rMgu2LV0/hq720.jpg)
The Secret List of (soon to be) Extinct Jobs ———sincerely, AI
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3WpaLt_Blr4/hq720.jpg)
The Anthropocene and the Near Future: Crash Course Big History #9
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kZDkhftLMco/hq720.jpg)
Red card for macho Spain | ARTE.tv Documentary
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uBWA4sMx7vE/hq720.jpg)
Come TROVARE lavoro nel DIGITAL? Vi spiego come funziona start2impact
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DlkWsc6yCMI/hq720.jpg)
Direitos Étnico-raciais: o que são e como surgiram? | Projeto Equidade
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)